BRENT SCOWCROFT FROM WALTER J. STOESSEL, JR., NORMAN TERRELL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-258-1-76-1
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
February 16, 2011
Sequence Number: 
76
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 18, 1974
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-258-1-76-1.pdf163.07 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2011/02/16: LOC-HAK-258-1-76-1 S E ;C R E T *******S copy 9402, 169.1934 74 ZY. i FM MDSCrrI Ti. THE w!HI'TE HOUSE S E C R 'E T 141940Z JUN 7 25X1 FM' WALIFR J. 5T0E5SELr , JR?., 'NORMAN TERRELL: MOSCOW 037 Tr: , BRENT SCDWCRQFT,- WHITF HOUSE SIT gf0t4': PLEASE PAS'S ASAP TO JAN LORAL AHn HELMUT SOHNENr FL.DT WE.WDliLb LIKE TIT MAKE SOME MUTUALLY SHARED OBSERVATIONS ON WHtERE, WE NOW. STAND AND WHERE WE NEED GO IN THE NEXT WEEK ANo A H&F. nA''T'A E X'C$ANGE . MOR KHOY=, I.S QBVI^0I1SLY, WAITING FOR INSTRUCTIONS TO tAK SfME 'P;nS1TIVF' REAtTIaN,TG. oUR DATA ExC+4ANGE PROPOSAL. IT I.S,CLEAR THAT . THIS WILL' INVOLVE' All -EST A LIMITED AMOUNT OF CONCRETE DATA,:. I T IS. MUCH MORE LIKELY, ' HOWEVER p TO OPEN THE WAY' FOR AH AGP F-E D FRAMEWORK of DATA REQUI,REMt NTS TO SERVE AS THE BASIS FOR AN I NFOR- MAT-1ON, XC?HANGE A,FTE-R? THE SU.MMIT. WE THINK, IT WILL'-PROVE UNPRO(YUCTIVE, THEREFORE, TO 'CONTINUE HAMNE$t I'N ' AWAY . AT THE SOV I I=TS FhR CONCRETE DATA AFTER MDRO94t)v HAS HIS INSTRUCTI INS.. :' WMAYr WOULD BE MORE USEFUL WOULD BE Tn HAVE A -U..S? PROPOSAL ON ,FUTURE: INFORMATION EXCHANGE READY TO TABLE WITH A SUGGEST'IIIN THAT A SUB-690UP OF EXPERTS, USING OURI PAPER AS A STARTING. POINT,. IMMEDIATELY BEGIN WrIRKI.NG OUT,,A, JOINT. REPORT. IT MAY RE Pr1SS.IOLE, IF WE PROCEED ON THIS BASIS, TO HAVE SOME U$DERSTANnnING RY THE S M I:T WHAT OBLIGATIONS UN .DATA EXCHANGE THE TWO S l r~F5 WOULD UNDERTAKE. (WE WILL TRY TO GET A OELFGATION CABLE OUT ON THIS TOlmO*ROW. IN THE MEANTIME, YOU MIGHT pE THINKING OF H(?,.W TO HANDLE IT.). ONr- LAST POINT ON; A DATA FRAMEWORK'. WF SHOULD 'LEAVE Tr-;E DOOR OPEN TO DECIDE THAT MOREs .LESS OR DIFFERENT DATA IS NEEDED. S THE P t5T,rSUMMIT TL?CHNICAL `CALK PROCEED. IT SHOULD ALSO BE MA17r= CLEAR pt,B.LiCLY THAT' ANY DEAL,WE WORK OUT AT THE SUMMIT QN NUMBERS, YIELD VALUE AND SO: ON IS CCONTINGT ON' A MUTUALLY SATISFACTORY DATA EXCHANGE. (THIS WOULD ALSO JUSTIFY 'T~iE JANUARY 1, 1976, EFFECTIVE DATF',) 2. oUOTA. IT IS EVIDENT THAT THE, QUOTA COULD BE A STICKING POINT AT THE-SUMMIT. WE ARE IMPRESSED WITH THE'INSISTENCE WITH WHICH TM HAVE PRESSED THE QUOTA,'(SEF TODAY'S" ST?ESSEI../MOROKHOV PR-I- VaTE CONVERSATION). WE STILL THINK THE SOVIET QUOTA IDEA * * * *' ' * * * * .* PSN:0224.05 S n v I'm *' * * WHS R COMMENT * ` * * * DOS, OSD, DOE, JCS reviews completed PAGE 01 1OR:169/19:422 OTG;1818477 JUN 74 S E C R E T *******S coo y No Objection to Declassification in Part 2011/02/16: LOC-HAK-258-1-76-1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2011/02/16: LOC-HAK-258-1-76-1 **** S EC R E T**5 CCT'nw HAS REAL.,PRO's LEMS. HOWEVE?', WE SHOULD EVALUATE WHETHER T I MERBAEV' S FACTOR-OF-TWO IDEA (IF SAFRONOV' c LOWER.-THRESHOI vi ACC( ENT? ALLOWANCE OFFER Af.!Y POSSIBILITIES. IN ANY CASE w~ SHOUtO RE PREPARED FOR &?N ADAMANT SOVIET STAND ON QUOTA AT THE SUMMIT. PNEIS. MO tOKHf V I S PNE PRL1POS AL OF TODAY OFFERS A GOOD BASIS ,TO PROCEED. WE THINK..A MORATORIUM ON,PNE-'S WHILE THE US- SOVIET PILATFRALS WORK OUT AN AGREED PNE SCUEME COULD FIX IT.-w, THIS MIGHT BE AGREED r)RIVATELY. IN ANY EVENT, WE SHOmD MAKE ,IT CLEAR TO THE SOVIETS THAT THERE IS t$O WAY WE WILL AORFE In PNE'S ABOVE AN UPPER THRF.SHOLD* 4. r,ELEGATION POLITICS, THE NEW,~SENIOR REPS F'OM JCS., OSO AND AEC ARE CONCERNI:;, THAT OUR INSTRUCTIONS SEEM TO LIMIT THEIR F1 EXIBILITY TO D1c;?- CUSS,,IMPORTANT POLICY ISSUES. (WALSH HAS ALREADY CfMMUNICAiED PrIVATEt.Y TO WADE IN THIS SENSE,) FIRSTS?T~4EY WANT AUTHORITY TO on MORE DEEPLY INTO THE VALUE nF THE UPPER YIELD THRESHni0 WITH THE SOVIETS, BOTH SMKI,NG OJT SOVIET VIEWS AND ACTIVELY PRESENTING OUR OWN IDEAS, SECOND, THEY WANT 1..1S THRESHOLD P.1L I CY CHANGED TO EMBRACE A..QUOTA ABOVE THE THRESHOLD. THI c, LATTER IDEA, WHICH WE UNDERSTAND ALSO HAS SOME CURRENCY IN WASHINGTON, IS,FOR THE PURPOSE nF KEEPING OUR SILO-RUSTING OPTIONS OPEN. WE, WILL STALL ?AND ARGUE HERE, ,RUT EVENTUALLY WE MAY HAVE TO SEND A OELErAT LON CABLE RACK ON THESE POINTS , IE SO IT WILL REFLECT SPLIT VIEWS WITHIN THE DELEGATION, WITH THE CHAIRMAN RECOMMENDING NEGATIVELY. WARM REGARDS. P'~N:0224O5 PAGE 02 Or- 02 TOR=I69/19:42Z DTG:IA1847Z JUN 74 *** S E C R E T *******S CD?'v No Objection to Declassification in Part 2011/02/16: LOC-HAK-258-1-76-1