YOUR VISIT TO PEKING

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
15
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
December 8, 2010
Sequence Number: 
18
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 11, 1973
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3.pdf1.17 MB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 SANITIZED COPY FOLLOWS ON-FILE NSC RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS APPLY DOS Review Completed. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 25X1 ?- 4":11 'e` ? No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 . IOW ******* S E C R E T *4* ** S copy . , .AnUTINF ? CRZI48 DE RUEHCR #0510 1900940 0409302 JUL 73 Fs USLO PEKING ? TP SeCSTATE SHOC 389 ?INFO AmEmBASSY BANGKOK 024 AmeMBASSY LONDON 004 ? AmemBASSY MOSCOW 002 AmEMBASSY PARIS 011 AmemBASSY PHNOM PENH 002 AHEMBASSY TAIPEI 020. ? AmeNBASSY TOKYO 036 ' ' MEMBASSY SAIGON 011. , A.MCONSOL 'HONG KONG 201 S.E R eit PEKING OB10 E.O. 11652: GDS IneLAs 12/31/79 TAGS: PfOR, CHCG SUBJC CHOU ON CAMBODIA ' REF: HONG KONG 6045, OSLO PEKING A-8 . t, USLO AGREES WITH CONGEN HONG KONG ON RFSTRAING EXERciso ey CHOU EN-LAI IN ,HIS BANQUET SPEECH WELCOMING SIHANNKIS RETuRN TO PEKING (HONG KONG 1520). THIS RESTRAINT IS ALL THE MORE NOTICEABLE IN THE CONTEXT OF SIHANOWS OWN REMARKS, WHICH R,.E ?A1.M0ST OBSESSIVE IN EXPRESSING HATRED OF THF "LON NOL CLIQU(0 AND THE "U.S. ImPERIA1JSTS". GIVEN THE FACT THAT IN HIS mEETIN,' WITH U.S. CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION JUST PRIOR TO THIS, RAN0uri CHOU MENTIONED THAT'SIMANouK WOuLn BE "FIRING SOME CANNONS .7TRAT EVENING, WE BELIEVE THAT CHOU MUST HAVE REEN INFORMED IN, ADVANCE ABOUT WHAT SIHANOUK WAS GOING To SAY AND TEMPERED HIS REMAR,(S ' ACORDINpLY So AS TO MAINTAIN PRC FLEXIBILITY WITH RESPECT To CAMBODIAN SITUATION, .20, DESPITE THE BOMBAST OF SIHANQUKIS WORDS, WE CONSIDER T,40 '1.14ERE,,Is A MA0e0 ELEMENT OF APPEAL CONTAINED WITHIN THEM, IF SIHANOUK, DOWNOT. FEEL THAT HIS OwN POSITION ANO THAT OF FORM HE CLAIMS TO, LEAD ARE ALL THAT COMFORTABLE4 1:0R EXAmPLE, I$. PASSAGE OF SPEECH TEXT wE OBTAINED . FROK GERMAN DIPLOMAT AND PRINTED IN "PEOPLels DAILym, BUT , * * * * * * * * * ?* *wHsR ComMENT * * * * * * * * * * * IKENWEDY,I00,,STEARMANPSOLomON RECALLED $4012 PAGE 01. DR$10/14:46Z DIG:09093 2 JUL 73 , No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 * * * SECRET ** ****S CIIPV .hi/NOT NeNA ENGLISH, HE. SAYS THAT U.S. WILL ONLY UNDERSTA,.0 THE LANGUAGE OF FORCE,: AND THAT Is wHY HE ASKS ALL HFRIENOly ,C4IMNOIES, ALL FRATERNAL COUNTRIES, AND ANTI-IMPERIALIST OMRADES.-INA-ARmS OF THE KHMER PEOPLE TO GIVE, SEND AND ORIN4.-: OVER AS Snow AS POSSIBLE ARMS AND PARTICULARLY AMMUNITION, Ac,AiN AMMUNITION AND ALWAYS AMMUNITION,' TO HELP HIS :F(IRCES ?PREvET THE EXTERMINATION OF THE KHMER COUNTRY AND PEOPLE AND HELP THEM :AF.,6:AIN NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE". THIS RECALLS WHAT STHANOUk TOLD CORRESPONDENT STANLEY KARNoW JUST PRIOR TO HIS DEpART110 ,Fog HIS TRIP. ABROAD: ABOTH TN CHINESE AND THE NORTH VIETNAMESE VAT) STOPPED SENDING MILITARY EQUIPMENT AFTEp 'JANUARY 27, THUSOBLIGING HIS FORCES TO RELY ON CAPTURED WEAPONS FROM ON Not. (oSinis A-8). ^ AT ANOTHER POINT,: HE DEtLARFS THAT HIS FORCES WILL FIGH'r I:0,INQP:!'EVEN IF THERE: ARE LEFT FOR THEM ONLY THE ARCHAIC APONS OP THEIR ANCESTORS IB0w$ AND ARROwS, CUTTERS, HAMmERS, AxEs, SHOVELS, PICKS AND CUDGELS) TO 00 SP.? WE ACCORDINGLY JUDGE THAT IF THE CHINESE, AT LEAST, HAv 'TURNED OFF THE ARMS PIPE-LINE To SIHANOUK, THEY HAVE ,NEVERTHELESS LET HIM *NON THAT THEY HAVE THEIR HANDS ON THr- 0/AVE. WE, ro,cOURSE, HAVE NO wAY OF KNOWING WHAT' HANOI'S poSITIOW,Nlowt HE, BUT CERTAINLN ROTH HANOI AND PEKING WOlit'q RE INCLUDED IN MANI:MIS APPEAL TO "FRATERNAL COUNTRIES" 'FfIft /WO ASMONtTfON4 BRUCE ) ST'' TOR *1901 14146t C B E IA*114* *S No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 IAA'4" No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 TOP SECRET/ T VE EXCLUSIVELY EESY PEKING 016 (Section 1 of 2) July 11 1973 TO: HENRY KISSINGER FROM: DAVID BRUCE SUBJECT: Your Visit to Ping . Much appreclate opportunity to comment on subjects which You might cover during Your August visit to Peking. Following are my thoughts, which are subject to further refinement in the period prior to your arrival as international developments or other tactical considerations may dictate. 2. U.S. -PRC Bilateral Relations These have been progressing very wellIvery well indeed slnce signing of Paris Agreement despite the existence of Cambodia and Taiwan as important issues still standing between us in the immediate sense. The Chinese people are now becoming used to an official American presence in Peking and to an increasing number of U.S. delegations In China; the PRC is sending it own people to the U.S. in growing numbers; the PRC authorities have been very responsive to our needs in opening our Liaison Office; American businessmen are engaging in a substantial level of trade with the PRC; and all-in-all the Chinese leaders are making it plain that they are Prepared to push ahead to the normalization of relations providing we ourselves respond in kind "in 'the spirit of the Shanghai Joint Communique. In following this course the PRC leaders are unabashed by the contradictions it creates between their ideological predeleotions on the one hand and the realities of world Power balances on the other; e.g. the same issue of the People's Daily which carried Sihanouk's banquet speech strongly attacking the U.S. also printed an article and photo covering Chou En -lai's reception of the Magnuson group. The Chinese people Must accordingly now be realizing that rhetoric is indeed just the firing of empty cannons and that what counts is what the PRC does rather than what it says. You might wish to open by commenting in positive terms on the favorable trend in U.S.-FRC relations and reaffirm that we definitely intend to follow through on our side toward the goals which have been jointly set. 3. Cambodia -- This of course i the Most pressing problem betweenth?US.and Peking give China's identificationwith While there is some reason to believe the Chinese TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 Wtik Da TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE EXC.LU:SIYELY::tYtgOL may be attempting behind the $ nes to bring iflu?e to bear on Sihanouk (Peking .105101 they are acutely embarrassed by any allegations that they are engaged with other great powers in an exercise to settle Cambodia behind Sihanouk's back. We will need to do what we can to hold down U.S. press speculation to this effect, otherwise Chinese efforts to be helpful may be compromised. In your. private Peking conversations on Cambodia, I believe that the line you have taken publicly is absolutely correct; that all major countries which have a stake in peace in Indo-China should use their influence in the direction of restraint. The position which you have already handed the Chinese on Cambodia should also serve as a basis for further discussion, and you will want to know the reaction of Sihanouk, if any. In addition, I would suggest these points: Anti-Vietnam forces in the U.S are trying to seize upon Cambodia to achieve what they were unable to get in VIetnam; a serious defeat for administration policy. If this effort is allowed to succeed, a new American isolationism may develop which would disrupt existing power alignments no only in the Far East but in Europe as well. Such a situ would suit neither U.S. nor PRC interests. -- As Prime Minister Chou En -lai undoubtedly discovered in his conversations with Senator Magnuson, the Senator does not have the world view shared by the administration and the PRC. Regrettably there are many others like him in the U.S. Senate, and these people exercise a great amount of influence. Although their position on Cambodia may be similar to that of the PRC? their ultimate objectives run counter to those of the administration and also that what we believe are the PRC's objectives. In all this, the Chinese may be more disposed to listen than to indicate any particular line of action on their part. They will of course express support for Sihanouk. 4. Nixon -Brezhpev Summit Talks and Joint Agreement -- In my opinion your main purpose here will be to reiterate in person to Chou En -lai the assurances we have already provided elsewhere as to the U.S. philosophy regarding the USSR and the Joint Agreement and as to the lack of U.S.-Soviet "collusion." In this case, the Chinese will undoubtedly want to expand further TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 'LLA003.1"4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY on their area of greatest concern -- their fear that the agreement with the USSR, which they say the Soviets will in any case not honor, will lull people into a false sense o security. (In this connection a reiteration of Sec Def Schlesinger's line on the maintenance of U.S. forces in Europe may be helpful,) It is noteworthy, though, that the Chinese have not commented publicly to this effect other than through Senator Magnuson's unfortunate leak of his conversation with Chou, and you may wish to express appreciation for the absence of overt Chinese criticism, This has been very helpful in gaining international acceptance of the Joint Agreement. 5. The Soviet Role World wide I think it likely that in connection with pare 4 above, the Chinese will expatiate on the topic of how the Soviets are stretching out their hands in areas of strategic interests to China such as the Indian Ocean) Southeast Asia, and Japan' You might deal with this by repeating what the President said to Huang Chen about cur wanting a strong and secure China, and by pointing out that our efforts to retain adequate deterrent forces in various parts of the world are both contributory to this end and a reflection of our own awareness of basic Soviet pollcy. You might also note that we will do what we can to oppose Soviet moves toward an Asian Security Pact, (which incidenta do not appear to be gaining much acceptance perhaps the Chinese may wish to give their own appraisal). End Section 1 of 2. TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYE ONLY No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 1A.,LA.00 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 ARA Date TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY PEKING 016 (Final Section of 2) July 11, 1973 TO: HENRY KISSINGER FROM: DAVID BRUCE SUBJECT: Your Visit to Peking 6. Taiwan -- In the wake of Senator Magnuson's banquet remarks about Taiwan independence it would be desirable for you Co reaffirm strongly the direction of U.S. policy as discussed previously with the Chinese and embodied in the Shanghai Joint Communique.You could also take the opportunity to point out that neither Senator Magnuson nor pro-Taiwan advertisements in the New York Times and Washington Post are indicative of U.S. policy. I have received no hint in Peking of any undue Chinese concern over the U.S. military presence in Taiwan, and it is possible that in the near term the Chinese may regard these forces as contributory to the stability of the Asian-Pacific Region. However, if there are any developments with respect to U.S. troop withdrawals from Taiwan, I believe that You should coMmunicate them. 7. 'Japan You are probably aware that Chou En -lai has been telling visitors lately that Japan is at the crossroads," that is, it can either continue along a course which is reasonably congenial to the Chinese, as at present, or one which could cut across Chinese bows. I doubt that the Chinese presently believe there is much possibility of a revival of Japanese militarism (although they may claim that there is), but what does concern them is the prospect of Soviet-Japanese collaboration in ways which would be harmful to China. They appear particularly apprehensive about bilateral Soviet-Japanese exploitation of strategic Siberian resources. Judging by Chou En -lai's remarks to me on June 25 they appear resigned to some form of Soviet- Japanese exploitation of these resources but look to the U.S. to join in so as to exercise some moderating influence over the Japanese and to keep them from falling wholly under Soviet sway. You should be prepared to address this issue and bring he Chinese up to date in what is being done on the US. side with respect to Siberian developments. Again, the question o Soviet-inspired Asian Security Pact may come up in connecti with Japan, and you may be called upon to talk to this issue. TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYE$ ONLY No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 iri No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 / SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY As it looks from here the Japanese do not appear much interested in the security pact, although they may from time to time say vaguely encouraging things about it in hopes of getting more out of the Soviets than they have so far on the northern territories issue. 8. Korea - The FRC has made a concerted effort lately to identify itself with DPRK policies regarding relations between North and South Korea, particularly Kim Il -sung's "new line and five propositions for the independent and peaceful reunification of Korea," and consequently may have lost some of its flexibility on the Korean question. It would be a pity if such is the case, since the result might be a return to the frozen situation of the past if Kim Il -sung should decide that the South-North talks are frUitless and break them off. We and the Chinese both need to keep our options open on Korea so as to assure continuation of the talks, and we for our part have done so with respect to UNCURK and the UN Command in relation to this year's U.N.G.A. session. A discussion of the Korean situation would appear to be in order in which you could sound out the Chinese position and urge that we both do what we can to encourage progress on the South-North talks within the limitations of our mutual needs to back up our respective Korean allies. And since we have made certain concessions or adjustments it policy on our side/, it would be desirable to see what adjustments, if any/ the Chinese may have made on theirs. Policy adjustments should not be all on one side. 9. Laos and South -Vietpam You are ,unquestionably far more knowledgeable on theSe,sUbj.ects than I, and about all I can say is that the Chinese appear anxious that the eeasefire hold in South Vietnam and seem reasonably confident that the issues between the sides in Laos will be cleared up so that a political settlement will insue. About all that. I can suggest is that you.review U.S. policies with respect to both countries, pointing up the positive aspects and assuring the Chinese as before that we are prepared to accept a "peaceful, neutral, and independent" Indo-China, including Cambodia as well as Laos and South Vietnam. 10. Economic Issues The Chinese ar an:ious to wrap up the Claim.Blocked Assets Agreement as a first step toward obtaining MFN treatment, but are evidently having trouble over both the wording and substantive contents of the draft agreement w presented to them in Paris some three months ago. Chang Wen-chin TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 ,'..-301"s4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3 ?Oi ARA Date TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY has told us that despite agreement in principle the Chinese were having difficulty working out language "suitable for public consumption" and complain that the late introduction of the question of Chinese railway bonds outside the framework of the Claims-Blocked Assets Deal had complicated the matter. The former question iS Probably relatively simple but the latter is not. The Problem is that while the claims-blocked assets arrangement is strictly governmental since it involves Chinese assets sequestered under FAC regulations and Claims File with the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, we have taken the poSition that pre l94:9. Chinese Railway Bonds held by Americans are a private matter between the holders and the PRC. Thus there is a Prospect that 011 law suits may :.:.be Placed against the PRC by bond holders seeking redress, Chinese goods shipped to the U.S. sequestered by the ports, and (b) complaint, may be made to congress by bond holders, hence interfering with MFN legislation. The Chinese may well raise this issue with you at least at the Chang Wen-chin level, and may declare they understand from your February discussions of this issue that all American claims were to be included in the Claims- Blocked Assets Deal. I think you should be prepared to go int the matter in some detail, and I hope that some formula can be found to be resPonsive to the Chinese needs. 11. Warm Regards. END OF MESSAGE. End all sections. TOP SECRET/SENSITIV EXCLUSIVELY EYES Q? LY No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/12/08: LOC-HAK-462-6-18-3