CABLE TO HENRY A. KISSINGER FROM GERARD SMITH

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-486-11-4-6
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
December 20, 2012
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 8, 1971
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-486-11-4-6.pdf91.07 KB
Body: 
1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/ 2 ~ /20 : LOC -HAK-486-11-4~6 00 25X1 ? tev+~"?"?` "`~ ONLY DE 2404 25111127 ZN7 MMNSH 0,-091121Z ZYH R4 SALT HELSINKI TO THE WHITE HOUSE I 14 9 3: =4191T VE 091045Z FM: AMBASSADOR 5Ir1I''H SALT:: HELSINKI 0218 ,: 0: HE WHI -E HOUSE EXCLUSIVE EYES ONLY DR. HENRY A. KISSINGER 25X1 DEAR HENRY: 1. ON PRESENT TENTATIVE SCHEDULE SALT V HAS ABOUT TWO WEEKS TO CO.. 2. I WILL CONTINUE TO PRESS FOR MORE RADAR CONTROL. 3. HROUGH SEVERAL SPECIAL GROUPS WE' WILL BE . RYING 0 WORK OU ACCEP, ABLE LANGUAGE ACCOMMODA" INS 0 NARROW DIFFERENCES IN 1EX': S OF CER. AIN SOVIET AND US AR' ICLES, AD REFERENDCM, REPEAT AD REFERENDUM, FOR WASHING. ON APPROVAL. 4. 1 HAVE STRESSED, WI`ROU SUCCESS, NEED "0 GE ON WI H OFFENSIVE FREEZE MEASURES NECO IA- ION. ONLY SOVIE OFFENSIVE MEASURE MOVE WAS TO REJEC. US PROPOSED FREEZE ON SLBM ZEM F WORD AS "PROPOSAL." (A SOVIE DELEGATE -- SHCHUKIN -- DESCRIBED EW APPROACH (SIC). HE CORREC'ED IN--ERPRE-~ER' S FIR"S;.' RENDERING CONS RUC' ION. SOVIETS APPAREN'::'LY DO NO' IN END FUR` HER DISCLOSURE OF '.-HEIR "OFFENSIVE MEASURES" POSI.. ION UN' IL A' LEAS: AN UNDER- STANDING ON APM LEVEL HAS BEEN REACHED. 5. I CONTINUE TO HAVE SOME CONCERN ABOUT A DEAL THAT GAVE SOVIETS RIGHT TO HAVE TWO ABM SYSTEMS -- ESPECIALLY WHILE SCOPE OF RADAR CON~.ROLS AS YE': UNCLEAR. BU':" ' 0 PROVIDE WASHING! ON WI - H FAC UAL BASIS FOR FINAL ABM "LEVEL" DECISION, I PROPOSE TO PRESS SEMENOV FOR SPECIFICS OF THE ICBM DEFENSE ASPEOT OF THEIR "ONE AND ONE" PROPOSAL OF 7 SEEPTEM$ER. SEMENOV HAS SAID SPECIFICS AVAILABLE IF WE AGREE IN PRINCIPLE TO THIS L I' AS "THEIR REAL PROPOSAL" AND SAID "I,' WOULD GIVE HE US HE OP ION 0 HAVE A DEFENSE OF WASHING ON IN HE FLIT URE SHOULD YOU SO DESIRE AND IT WOULD GIVE THE USSR A SIMILAR OPTION TO DEFEND AN ICBM FIELD.") LIKELY MINIMUM PRICE OF ADMISSION TO SPECIFICS OF NEW PROPOSAL IS INDICATION TO SEMENOV THAT WASHINGTON'S FIRST REACTION TO PROPOSAL IS INCLINED TO BE POSITIVE BUT DEFINITIVE REACTION IS DEPENDENT ON CLEARER UNDERSTANDING WHICH ONLY IS ATTAINABLE IF SPECIFICS ARE DISCLOSED. IF THERE IS OBJECTION TO MY TAKING THIS POSITION, pLEASE~ ADVISE. HOPE TO REACH YOU BY PHONE TODAY. WARM REGARDS. GERRY :1 IT H 5 00 2404 State Dept. review completed No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/12/20: LOC-HAK-486-11-4-6