CIA OIL FIGURES RAISE EYEBROWS AMONG EXPERTS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP81M00980R001200070010-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 1, 2004
Sequence Number: 
10
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 23, 1978
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP81M00980R001200070010-1.pdf306.78 KB
Body: 
~ .3 Approved For Release 2004/07/08: CIA-RDP811'1'f00980 WASHINGTON POS CIA Oil Figures Raise Eyebrows Among Experts By Richard Harwood and J. P. Smith Washington Post St atrf Writers This is a story about the Central In- telligence Agency and the domestic. energy policies of the American gov- ernment. It begins, in a public sense, last April, when President Carter revealed in a television appearance that he had received "'disturbing" new findings about world energy supplies. There is less oil and gas available in the world, lie said. than the govern- ment had previously believed. It was therefore imperative that an energy bill be passed to cut clown the waste of ener,gy." His fears were underscored eight months later, on Christmas Day, when The New York Times reported hat Saudi Arabia, with its oceans of oil, may have far less productive capacity than. previously believed. This infor- mation, said the Times, came from "leading energy experts." It was, In fact, the CIA which had raised the alarm about the Sa:!ells, and it was the CIA that had provided Carter with the ammunition for his Warning. Carter acknowledged his debt to the C[A during his television appearance. In so doing, he also acknowledged the dependence of the White House and of Congress on the CIA In the formu- lation of domestic energy policies. For good or ill, the CIA is the gov- ernment', most important single source of iinternational. energy infor- mation, including estimates of how much is out t sere and how much is available to the United States. This may seem both unfortunate and sinister to the agency's critics. It is an inevitable and sensible role for the agency in the minds of others, in- cluding the respected international energy expert at the Library of Con- gress, Herman Franssen. "The CIA," he says, "probably has the best act in town. Nobody else can ( IA, From Al is to he expected. "given that the CIA has been at work for years on the question of estimating... the trend, in foreign capacity and foreign inten- tions with regard to p oduction." "What falls outside of the trad-- tional compass of the intelligence community is that this has gone pub- lic," Schlesinger says. There is another question about the CIA and energy policy, however. It is directed at the agency's capabilities and the quality of its work. Specifically, there is widespread doubt in the energy community about the validity of the CIA report cited by the president, last April and about the CIA report cited by the Times in De- cember. The heart of the April report was a CIA prediction that the Soviet Union would be importing up to 3.5 million barrels of oil per day by the mid- 1980s. Previously, the assumption had been that the Soviets would continue to be sel:-sufficient in meeting their oil and gas needs. The CIA's revisionist analysis i:~ now under serious challenge by Wes, European intelligence agencies. by th