DRAFT INSTRUCTION TO AMERICAN EMBASSY IN TOKYO

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP58-00453R000100010020-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
14
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 18, 2000
Sequence Number: 
20
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 8, 1953
Content Type: 
REGULATION
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP58-00453R000100010020-2.pdf763.59 KB
Body: 
Approved For se 2900/08/25: CIA-RDP58-00453R000100010020-2 Proposed State-Defense Draft of May 8, 1953 DRAFT IPJSTRIJCTTO'f TO j*`RI(',AN. r1?t3A ,SY InN TOK"O No. To the Officer in Charge of the .Ariert..csn Mieaion, Toklro. The t)ecrotary of State refers to the note of April 14, 1953 from the Japanese Minister of Foreign Afffirs?to the Ambassador concerning the revision of ,Article XVTT of the. Administrative Agreement upon the coming Into force of the NATO Status of Forces Agreement. Tn order to be prepared in the event of the rF+tification by the United $tntes of the NATO Status of. Forces Agreement, the Departments of State and "Defense have drafted thv? following documents which are enclosed: (1) a note from the Ambassador to th? Japanese.144inister of Foreign Affairs (2) proposals for, changes in the Japanese draft Protocol to amend Article XVII and (3) proposals for. official minutes regarding 'the Protocol. Any comments of the'' nbassy or the Command with respect to these documents should be telegraphed to the Department as soon as.possible. The Department, is sending. in a separate instruction recommendations for diaciissions with the Commonwealth representatives in Tokyo regarding. the nego- tiption of the criminal jurisdiction provisions of the ?United Nations forces a.greerzent, State Dep6p l F;i fIPsAe&Mt ?V IrQ$ Mo ON 10100010020-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/25: CIA-RDP58-00453R000100010020-2 CONP:rrn NTTAT, S."r T}!T`. INFO!''-cATD_117 a_ agreement, it ;3ho,.ild he made clear to the Jananeoe in some ar+propriate wa? from the cammence lent of the nefoti ations for revision of Article XViI of the Ldniinistrative A reenent that it is ?zn?lerstood that the same criminal ,i1 ri s- dicti on arranpemrnt s that are made arpljcn')le to United States) forces inciudinr; anzr forr.al or informal understandings with respect to nrocecillres and to the ;waiver o l,' the primary rir.=,ht to exercise i,ir:i sriict t9n will also be mach: ar'Plic&)ie to the United nations forces in Japan. The, ')eparinent believes that th- re are only 'r.wo of the 'rni.ted .3, P. proposals which ria.yy ca;ase di.fficiilttr, The first is the nronosal to a.dd to the Javanese draft Protocol a narapraph concerni.nr susnension in the event of hos- tilities. The second involves the arrangement- for the waiver by Ja^man of its primary right to exerci_,:; e jsu ri sdi r.t i on , '-iith reference to the proposed nara!.;ranh concernen ; s,2snonsi.on, the E^,hass?r mar wish to 7)oint out to the Ja-anese that the para?grr nh does not. enable the United States, by unilateral action, to reestablish exclusive ,jutriec1ict-i.on arrangements in the event of hostilities. An revision of criminal. jurisdiction arrangements would have to be made by aareenent hetween the United `Mates and Japan. The United States has declared its intention in the event of hostilities in the TO countries to take steps to suspend Article v.iT of the NATO status of forces anreement so far as it is concerned and to seek excl.iisive litrisdiction in the t!ATC countries, i=1 ~_'1L1 Y."'tl;'37~'!7.~.~_._ ,:?T^nt~i'-1:'T.`T.._S.t'r~~?.'i`. 5..;1i.+_3!J.1',L... _. Approved For Release 2000/08/25: CIA-RDP58-004$3R000100010020-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/25: CIA-RDP58-00453R000100010020-2 ;nrry: IiEI TTAL Sf CUPT7 r I"~ rft ~T I~.1`1 The proposed pr.rarraph concerrzinry, suspersion diescribea the circuimstanees under which the right oi' 5usnension ma. r be exercised as "ho:7ti.litica in the Japan area". T,i.s -phrase includes, of course, armed attack upon Japth It is ,.so b 'oad Incur h to include hosti iAtied in --ha .Rr.ik:;nis rnd other areas near to Jaasne The 'Embassy may assure the Japanese that the United States does not it end to seek suspension of concurrent nirisdiction arrFant~ements in Japan irhi1e hostilities are continuing, in Korea. It is assumed that concurrent ,jurisdiction arrangements will be implemented in s'ich a. w?- ao to avoid any interference with the coninct of hostilities in rorea. The phrase "Japan area" appears in Article TV of the Seciirity Treaty and in Article XXIV of the Administrative Agreement. The Nnartrlent wo,ilri prefer to avoid anv exact definition of the nhraso and to leave its meaninn- to.he worked out in the course of time whenever specific issues are raised. It is desired that the, ^mbasstr seek the t ,ximum waiver which can be obtained of ',hp primary jurisdiction available to the Jnnanese Government under paragrrnh 3(c) of the dra.f"t. Protocol. Preferably this should he rulblic -rnd take the form of P. general waiver on the government level. It is recoini zed., however, that the approach ailed to the Japanese ^ov^rnment must not be such as would react unfavora()ly upon gpnera.l 'Tnited t- tes-.Tan +.npse relations. It is further recor;nized that any effective a'aproach to obtaining such a wa=iver ?rist take into consideration the extreme sensitivit?r of the Jh.naiiese to the exere se by. any nation of e:ctraterri.toriali.t.,,. T':erefore, it is regn steel that Approved For Release 2000/08/25: CIA-RDP58-0045$R000100010020-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/25.: CIA-RDP58-00453R000100010020-2 (;()Ak I`lENTIAT. SEC'T7I T'r IiTO';RA'." T~T~ the rAba3sv explore with the Javanese a'.)thoriti.ea the most effective method of obtaining, a maximUM waiver of pr m- ar,, jurisriictJ on. If a general waiver seems unobtainable, it is possible that a qualified waiver may be used to 300u e,? for United .States -personnel substantial immunit*- from Javanese juris- diction. This'mi ht take ?.'~e fort-1 of the minute -proposed Re para. 3(e.) of the Protocolo The `Inited States is planning; to seek arran eronts with. the VA TO eo'iritries for the rn xirm.im a.npropriate waiver, of local cri final jurisdiction without beaming nnfav'orabl r on general relations between the 'Tited States and the coixntrv concerned. United States Ambassadors in two NATO countries have ,airecdv been anthorized to seek waiver arrangeients. The arrangements will he kept confidential. Recause disclosure of the '!nited :itateja policy would prejudice general relations with the NATO countries and affect negotiations concerning not only the status of forces bb.it also the atationiner of troops in 7'-urope, it ha.s been .greed that tho only public reference to the policy ''should be' along lines that the United States is confident that operating arrnngenents based on rne~o~? relati ns between Rovernments and betwr en our militar.v authorities and local authorities abroad will provide in fact an even nreAter measure of nrote:ction than the sat:i.sf^etory legal quantities estabi.i.shed by the iVTATO Status of roree:s Agreernent.11 Therefore, Japanese officials should be advised only ,in. terms ;of the foregoing quotation unless the T,lnb?ssr is convinced that a Approved For Release 2000/08/25: CIA-RDP58-0053R000100010020-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/25: CIA-RDP58-00453R000100010020-2 30%--T'),,7!TT,T, SYXiT.?IT'f 1?T'i "I; disclosure of the Pill date vritl a.~hall, str1ett~~ confi.d t{.~~~ ~,... th:. Jnp,anese of fl vials concerned The Japanese 9overnmcrit !n-a-," he untrr'llin; to rvke s wyr of the t,l e regiaested. in that event At TI r be i,ossib2.e to work out F, trni.v&r dczctnrati.on along the -lines of. the .1Rp