SOVIET DELEGATES AT THE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ORIENTALISTS, CAMBRIDGE, UK

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00926A007500230003-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 25, 2001
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 28, 1954
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00926A007500230003-3.pdf230.77 KB
Body: 
nw. K DEC 1951 *d Approved For Release 2001/11/21 : CIA-RDP80-00926A007500230003-3 U.S. Officials Only CONFIDENTIAL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY INFORMATION REPORT COUNTRY USSR SUBJECT Soviet Delegates at the International Congress of Orientalists, Cambridge, UK PLACE ACQUIRED (BY SOURCE) DATE ACQUIRED (BY SOURCE) 25X1C 25X1A REPORT NO. RESPONSIVE TO 1 2 CD NO. 00/C NO. ORR NO. DAS NO. OCI NO. DATE DISTR..;41rOat 1954 DATE (oF INFO.) NO. OF PAGES N ? IN ? 14 A INA OF 1111 UNIT10 STATIC WITHIN TNIM1ANINO OP TITLI II SICTIONS 713 ND 714, OF TN1 Use, COM Al AMINORD, ITS TRANSMISSION OR NO. OF ENCLS. ATION OF ITS CONTINT1 TO ON RICILIPT NY AN UNAUTNOR1110 PINION IS ? SUPP. TO THIS IS UNEVALUATED INFORMATION REPORT NO. SOURCE 25X1X 1. The International. Congress of Orientalists held 21 Aug 54 through 28 Aug 54 at Cambridge University, UK t some 20 dole tem from the USSR. 25X1X who attended 25X1X the ongress, tion came withou an nv he Congress committee, They were invited to the UK by the Soviet diplomatic mission in London. This got the Soviet delegates off to a bad start, Then, to mdd to the situation, the Soviet diplomatic officials gave a reception to which all delegates were invited. The UK hosts thought this to be in very bad taste and apparently other delegates from Western countries thought the same. 2.the papers delivered by the Soviet scholars were out- 25X1X 111,11111111111111in spite of their propaganda. The Soviets were openly critical of the colonial policy of the UK, France and, to a degree, of the US, while pointing out at great lengths, how much the Soviets had done for undeveloped areas now under Soviet control. One of the UK delegates, a former member of the UK colonial office, protested from the floor that it appeared as though the Soviet government looked upon its recently acquired areas as colonies as defined by the Western colonial nations. This caused the Soviets to tone down their comments. 3. The scholars of the Soviet delegation were under the leadership of L P potapov? 25X1X Re is an authority on the Turks of Siberia and is Director of the uti Azrnropology Museum. Potapov., prior to 1941 was not a Communist Party member but he knew how to get along with the Communist hierarchy. I do not think he is in accord with the principles of Soviet Communism but at the same time he has never been apparently offensive. He has been awarded the Stalin Prize for his work in anthropology. The person who pulled the puppet strings for the Soviet cholars was Evgeni Mihailovich Zhukov, who was elected corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1944. Zhukov is identified as being an expert on Japanese political history. Re is about 48 years of age. 14? onmpleted his graduate studies at the Leningrad Institute of Oriental_Iahgui in 1931-1932. Zhukov U.S. Officials Only CONFIDENTIAL ipTkThRIBUTION 10 STATE EAT IARMY NAVY T IAIR FBI ., This report is for the use within the USA of the Intelligence components of the Departments or Agencies indicated above. It is not to be transmitted overseas without the concurrence of the originating office through the Assistant Director of the Office of Collection and Dissemination, CITA Approved For Release 2001/11/21 : CIA-RDP80-00926A007500230003-3 naPO 25X1A Approved Fclacispigicaly/M/MAIAMIZIM)0926A007500230003-325xi A - 2 - came to the Lenigrad Institute as a full fledged Communist P rty member and during his stay was active in the Institute's central committee, From 1932 to 1936 he devoted his time to writing newspaper articles on Japan for Pravda. In 1936 he went to Moscow for an assignment with the USSR foreign office and thence to Japan. In 1938 he returned to the USSR for work in the Academy. Most of his time was occupied in the "secret division" that kept the personal Mess: of the people employed in the Academy. Zhukov was responsible for the purging of many Soviet scholars for deviationism. He saw Trotskyism in almost everyone whom he thought was an intellectual superior, and owing to his Party loyalty, his judgment was accepted without question. found Zhukov 25X1X, to be intellectually incompetent and obnoxious Zh ov marriedda Tseitlin, daughter of a jewish physician Leningrad. She was then a member of the Young Communist League ttsiu. now I assume she is a full fledged Party member. Zhukov has never written a scholarly work -- most of his material follows the Party line and appears in government, newspapers. During hi g attendance at the international Congress of Orientalists, according to my source, he devoted his time to keeping the other delegates in line -- a Job for which he is eminently qualified. Other Soviet Orientalists who attended the congress includes a. OntijrBel a ev, an Arabist? who ie a non-Party member, an expert on Persian quali is in his field. b. Evgeni Eduardovich Hertel!, non-Party member; an expert on Persian literature. He has had a difficult time surviving Communism, and, during the purges of the 1930'5 he spent some time in jail- He is an outstanding scholar who is unable to do anything about his untenable situation. 25X1X ant17'12E1Ama, a Kazakh, d. rirnuj Gershevich, a Russian-Jew, .M=M 25X1X e. rnujrIlyinskiy, a Russian, 25X1X f. jrfntilIvanov, a Russian, who is a specialist on the history of Central Asia. Hs is a Partymember and follows the Communist line to the letter. g. ermy fuldashevs a Tatar, 25X1X h. PrmaKalyanov, a Russian, is an expert on Sanskrit and Indian history. 40 ic. a rarty member. He is not a serious scholar. Despite his Psrty membership he is a likable and harmless person. i. rnujilarliza (if this is his name), is a Russian. He is not a Party membsrs and during the purges of the 1930s he spent some time in jail. He is an expert on Russian and Oriental history. i. enul Kuliyev) a Turkman, k. OnliirTukhvinskil a Russian, 25X1X 25X1X 1. A N Kononov, a Russian, is a Party member but a harmless Communist. He is well known for his works in the Turkish language. m. Asjauber, a Russian-Jew, 25X1X 6. The Soviet delegates were friendly with the Western group but did not discuss matters that were not covered in their papers. All of the Soviets' papers were printed in English. Their talks, however, were delivered in Russian. 25X1X said that the Soviets came out with what might be termed as a "scientific or 25X1X scholarly offensive." means by this statement but it could be that owing to the Soviet dominance at. trie meetings they were trying to force their ideas on the other scholars. - end - LIBRAO SUBJECT & AREA CODES C-02-00i5 W54 CONFIDENTIAL I82, 1(GM)(N) US OFFICIALS ONLY 917.ov5 Approved For Release 2001/11/21 : CIA-RDP80-00926A007500230003-3