PLUGGING THE HOLES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00561R000100100049-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 24, 2012
Sequence Number: 
49
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 24, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00561R000100100049-7.pdf122.21 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100100049-7 ARTICLE APK D ONPAM EDITOR & PUBLISHER 24 May 1986 Plugging the holes Reagan administration gets aggressive in trying to find information 1E a j rs; fires two, threatens the media with criminal prosecution BY JaneS R The Reagan administration's cam- paign against leaks of classified infor- mation is beginning to bite. In less than a month, the adminis- tration has fired two mid-level offi- cials for giving out classified informa- tion, threatened the Washington Post and four other publications, and asked the Justice Department to con- sider criminal prosecution of NBC. Said White House spokesman Larry Speakes: "The position of the White House is that anyone who vio- lates the law should be prosecuted, whether it be a publication or whether it would be a member of the adminis- tration that is leaking classified infor- mation." The case of NBC was referred to the Justice Department by Director William J. Casey of the Central Intel- ligence Agency. He acted within hours after the NBC Today program reported that Ronald W. Pelton, now on trial in Baltimore as an alleged Soviet spy, had told the Soviets about "a project with the code name Ivy Bells - believed to be a top-secret eavesdropping program by American submarines inside Soviet harbors." In asking the Justice Department to consider criminal prosecution of NBC, Casey cited a 1950 statute that prohibits anyone from knowingly and willingly disclosing classified infor- mation about American communica- tions intelligence. The Justice Depart- ment will decide whether to pursue the case. A prosecution would be the first under the 36-year-old law. Before the NBC broadcast, the administration had given numerous indications that it was serious about prosecuting leaks, especially any con- cerning the techniques or effective- ness of United States use of commu- nications in gathering intelligence. Casey had personally warned Washington Post executive editor Benjamin C. Bradlee and managing editor Leonard Downie Jr. not to publish a story the paper was prepar- ing about the Pelton case. "I'm not threatening you," Casey told the editors in a face-to-face meeting, "but you've got to know that if you publish this, I would rec- ommend that you be prosecuted under the intelligence statute." Casey said he had conferred with Angola and Afghanista., Deputy Attorney General D. Lowell Jensen about prosecuting "abso- lutely cold violations" in stories already published - not only by the Post, but also by the New York Times, Washington Times, Newsweek maga- zine and Time magazine. Casey apparently did not ask for- mally for prosecutions in these already-published stories, but his dis- closure of its attitude appeared to be at least a warning against further sen- sitive stories about communications intelligence. The Washington Post decided to hold up, at least temporarily, the proposed story that brought Casey's threat of prosecution. The Post finally ran the story on May 21, 17 days after it was originally scheduled to appear in the paper. Deleted from the story was informa- tion deemed by the Reagan adminis- tration to be damaging to national se- curity. The Post reported that following Casey's meeting with the newspa- per's editors, President Reagan, on May 10, telephoned Post Co. chair- man Katharine Graham to urge that the newspaper not publish the article. Post editor Bradlee was quoted in his newspaper's story as stating he continues to believe that the paper's original story would have revealed nothing that was not already known to the Soviet Union. Bradlee added that the Post decided to eliminate from the story the description of technology Pelton is alleged to have betrayed because of concerns of the newspaper's lawyers. The government officials who were fired for leaking classified informa- tion were Spencer C. Warren, a mem- ber of the State Department's policy On the dismissal of Warren, State Department spokesman Charles E. Redman said: "We regret that because of this transgression the department is losing an otherwise productive and trustworthy employee, but we believe that leaking of classified information is a serious breach of the discipline required of all public servants. It is essential that the public be informed concerning the activities of its government. "However, we must also recognize that the national interest often requires that information concerning the national defense and foreign rela- tions be protected against unauthor- ized disclosure. "Officials who leak do not serve the larger national interest by dis- closing information, but instead may well be undermining the process of making foreign policy and protecting our national defense." At the White House before the NBC incident arose, spokesman Speakes resisted reporters' efforts to suggest that some of the material that aroused Casey had been alluded to by Reagan before the newspapers pub- lished it. He said the president had not violated the bar against indicating how the United States gathers com- munications intelligence. "The White House position," he occurred ortwill occur and the (CIA) director makes a recommendation to the Justice Department, this would be a matter of prosecutorial discretion, which means the Justice Department would decide whether to prosecute or not. planning staff; and Michael E. Pills- "Generally, decisions about prose. bury, an assistant undersecretary of cutions are made by the experts at the defense. Justice Department based on the evi- Warren was blamed for telling the dence and the criteria for whether Washington Post and Washington they would have successful prosecu- Times about a cable from the U.S. tion. The position of the White House Ambassador in Argentina complain- is that anyone who violates the law ing that visiting congressmen had should be prosecuted, whether it be a pressed Argentine officials to con- publication or whether it would be a demn U.S. policy in Central America. member of the administration that is Pillsbury was accused of leaking leaking classified information ....A information about the shipment of gentleman at the Defense Department stinger aircraft missiles to rebels in ended his service there rather promptly three of four days ago." Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100100049-7