'SCAM,' SAYS REWALD COMPANY TRUSTEE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00494R001100710160-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 26, 2010
Sequence Number: 
160
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 2, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00494R001100710160-1.pdf140.38 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00494RO01100710160-1 alonolulu SfAr7;0ug4tiq Wednesday, Oetob.r 2, INS A-3 Scam,' Says Rewald. ompany Trustee By Charles Memminger Star-Bulletin Wviur The government rested its case against Ronald Rewald yes- terday after eight weeks of trial in which 132 witnesses were call- ed and thousands of pages of documents were admitted into evidence. But the main point of the gov- ernment's case was summed up in one word by its final witness, Thomas Hayes, administrator of Rewald's bankrupt company. Assistant US. Attorney John Peyton asked Hayes what was the business of Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham & Wong. "Scam," Hayes replied. It was Hayes who first called Rewald's operation a scam and a Ponzi scheme. On Aug. 44 1983, five days after' Rewald attempt- ed suicide, Hayes walked the few blocks from federal court to the Grosvenor meter and took control of the company. Hayes, who looks somewhat like Norman Mailer said the door to Bishop, 'Baldwin was locked when he arrived: But he said he got in through a back door when Rewald's office man- ager. Sue Wilson, opened it. ONLY MOMENTS before, angry creditors had forced Re- wild a company into bankruptcy arid Hayes had been .named in- tetim trustee. As trustee, it was hip job to secure all Company eta, freeze all bank ,accounts d keep flies from disappear- a ishop, Baldwid's cass, sine files already __ had- been rjjtiry and tax evasion trial. d after Wilson realised Hayes w&s taking over the !company, ,she attempted to walk' out with a tack of mail, he said ; ayes said he trailed her to the elevator and even rode to the ground floor with her, ex- plaining his court-appointed duties. She rode back up with him, handed over the mail and then "threw the mail key at me," Hayes said. `That was the last time I've seen Sue Wilson." WILSON WAS ONE of Re- wald's closest office workers, signing many of the checks that went out and managing the of- fice. At one point, she was being paid $57,000 a year, more than Sunlin Wong, company presi- dent. Hayes said he found no ac- counting books for the company. Within hours of walking into the office, he told, his attorneys, James Wagner and Don Gelber, `"This looks like a scam," Hayes testified. It also didn't take long to real- ize that much of the company money, which Hayes said was investors' money, was spent on Rewald's personal possessions. Some 30 hours after the bank- ruptcy declaration, Hayes was back in court to get an order ringg any of his persoonaal > ~ assets. Eventually, US. Judge Martin Pence froze all of Rewald's assets, leaving the one-time multimillionaire indigent. HAYES SAID he then began a "lone and arduous task" of tracking Bishop, Baldwin's finan- cial activities and searching for any hidden assets. There were a number of rumors and leads, all of which turned out to be false, Ha es said. Rewald's attorney, Robert Smith, first told Hayes that most of the investors would turn out to be fictitious. Hayes said be found out -that all of the investors were real. Hayes said he then was told that there were secret assets overseas invested by the CIA. Rewald was let out of prison. where he was beingheid on $10 million bail on state theft charges, to go to the trustee's office to show him where the hidden assets were. But none were found, Hayes said. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00494RO01100710160-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00494RO01100710160-1 Star-bulletin Hayes then checked out rumors that CIA money was fun. neled into certain accounts - In- eluding those of former CIA field office chief Jack Klndscbi and retired Air Force Gen. Ar. nold Braswell - through Chase -Manhattan Bank. Nut Hayes said be found that the money put into those accounts came from y or through a:- HAYES SAID eh did not check _ out rumors that Rewald was in- volved a diit4y arms dal with aiwan, deaplte seeing ? telexes between ltewald and two consultants concerning the al- leged dpcc~~. The overnm~ernt eon- rOu Rewald fWms t u 6 deal would bathe generate~d! some to minion in commissions to pay off investors. The only re assets Baldwin were ~thee Affi iccefurni- ture and a few businesses that were 4Dws, Hayes said. Altho million had moved through Rewald's bank accounts during Bishop, Baldwin's heyday, at the time Mayes took over the main bank account was over- drawn, he said. Hayes said be has filed a claim against the CIA but does not ex- pect to collect ey the agency. OtherInve aallssoo have sued the CIA in an attempt to regain their lost money. REWALD CLAIMS the CIA set up and ran his company and is responsible for the investors' money. He claims he lived a lav- ish lifestyle for the CIA in order to mingle with highly placed for- eigners.. The CIA denies that but does admit it used Rewald for "light cover" for a few of ifs#Aents. It claims it gave Reward only $2,900 for telephone and telex expensae. will be mat- temp'' anorasys they bs tin eD at the CI ~ ta&w d Its th Involvement with Rewald. Feder- al Public Defender Michael Le- vine, his deputy Brian Tamanaha and associate counsel Wayne Parsons, will put on fewer than 30 witnesses. Among them, however will be former CIA Honolulu field office chief Jack Rardin and former CIA agent Charles Richardson. Rardin took over the field of- fice from Kindschi and vas the last CIA official Rewald had con- tact with. Rewald allowed the CIA to use his company, CMI Corp., as & ,cover for Richardson, who operated out of the West Coast. RICHARDSON invested some of his own money with Rewald but withdrew it after the CIA found out about the investment. Richardson also induced other CIA employees to invest with Re- wald. They ended up losing their money. Richardson was fired from the agency after Bishop, Baldwin's collapse. Both Richardson and Rardin will be "hostile witnesses" for the defense, meaning they are not cooperating in the defense case. Government attorneys gave no reason why they called certain CIA employees but not Richard- son and Rardin. One of the first witnesses for the defense will be an official from the National Football League, who is expected to testi- fy that Rewald had signed con- tracts with three teams. Re. wald's claims that be played professional football have been questioned by the government. STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00494RO01100710160-1