SLOW PACE SEEN FOR REVAMPING SECURITY POLICIES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830052-4
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 24, 2012
Sequence Number: 
52
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 28, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830052-4.pdf188.83 KB
Body: 
N, _ :ILII! hI I I i ,III I'IIII11. ILJtIIIJIILILIliII1I I1il1DII1Wi 1 iL I_11_ .. II I I l Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/24: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830052-4 ARTICLE AP 'MD ONPA Slow Pace Seen. For Revamping. Security Policies Officials Cite Concerns Raised by Spy Cases 6 By STEPHEN ENGELBERG Special to The New York Times WASHINGTON, July 27 - Senior of- ficials in Congress and the Reagan Ad- ministration say it will take years to fully repair the weaknesses in security policies brought to light by the recent series of damaging espionage cases. Despite the distress sparked by last year's breaches in the nation's most sensitive military and Intelligence agencies, proposals for security im- provements are moving at an uneven pace, and have been slowed in some in- stances by interagency disagreements over how best to deal with the problem, the officials said. "I think we're way behind and we have a long way to go," said Senator Patrick J. Leahy, the Vermont Demo- crat who is vice chairman of the Select Committee on Intelligence. "With some notable exceptions, particularly in the C.I.A., I don't think near enough has been done. If this were private in- dustry, the board of directors would be fired for a performance like this." Lack of Overall Policy But Administration officials say they have begun a major effort to protect sensitive information and assign greater importance to security issues. They say that some initiatives, such as a 16 percent reduction in the number of people who have access to secret infor- mation, are already showing results, but they acknowledged that others will take substantial time to carry out. A Senate Intelligence Committee re- port issued late last year found "trou- blesome evidence of a lack of overall national policy guidance, especially with regard to security programs and countermeasures that are supposed to protect classified information." Just last week, Jerry A. Whitworth, one of 11 Americans charged with es- pionage last year, was convicted on 12 of 13 counts of spying for the Soviet Union and tax evasion.. Security ex. perts say the Whitworth case and the others have each pointed up major weaknesses in security, personnel and NF'W 'r ORS: TIMES 28 July 1986 counterintelligence policies. Employees at various agencies were able to smuggle secret documents out of buildings, unimpeded by even a ran- dom search of briefdases. And officials say the cases point out the threat posed by the number of diplomats allowed ro staff Soviet posts in the United States. A key area of concern is the granting and renewing of security clearances; the spy investigations.have shown that people can be cleared for access to se- cret data early in their careers and then never be re-examined. John A. Walker Jr., a former Navy chief warrant officer who recruited Mr. Whitworth as a spy, was, for exam- ple, never reinvestigated from the time he received a top-secret clearance in 1965 until his retirement in 1976. Mr. Walker, who pleaded guilty to espio- nage last October, began spying for the Soviet Union by 1968, and Federal in- vestigators say he was paid more than $1 million over the next 10 years. Mr. Whitworth's first re-examina- tion did not come until nine years after he received his top-secret clearance and he was approved. But he had begun passing sensitive information to Mr. Walker four years earlier, in 1974. Since 1983, Pentagon rules have re- quired reinvestigations every five years for those holding clearances of top secret and above. Periodic reap- praisals are crucial to improving se? curity, said Mary C. Lawton, the Jus- tice Department's Counsel for Intelli. gence Policy. "If you look at all the spy cases," she said, "most people were pretty clean coming in. They soured afterwards." A Four-Year Backlog More than 90 percent of the 3.5 mil- lion security clearances are held by members of the armed forces or mili-' tary contractors, and Pentagon offi- cials estimate that the current backlog of people awaiting reinvestigation numbers 250,000. L. Britt Snyder, the Pentagon's Director of Counterintelli- gence and Security Policy, acknowl- edged that it would take as long as four years to eliminate the backlog. Mr. Snyder said that Congress last year gave the Defense Investigative Service, which carries out the investi- gations, an additional $25 million to hire 600 to 700 additional investigators. The money was not included in the Ad- ministration's budget request for the Pentagon and was added by Congress. Senator Leahy contended that the Defense Department's budget requests have routinely slighted security pro- grams in favor of more visible items like new weapons. "The problem is, they're much more into public rela- tions than security," he said. "Security measures are not glamorous. No one gets to sit on the bridge and comm- mand them. We just don't see the Sec- retary of Defense or the Secretary of the Navy up here asking for more money for security." Mr. Snyder said the Pentagon has begun to carry out the recommenda- tions of a commission headed by Rich- ard G. Stilwell, a retired Army gen.: eral. Among these are plans, beginning Oct. 1, to expand the investigation re- quired for the clearances to use infor- mation classified "secret." The expanded investigation will in clude a credit check and written inquir- ies to previous employers. Now, access to "secret" information - which nearly three million people have - is granted if the serviceman or employee does not show upon the files of the Fed- eral Bureau of Investigation or Penta- gon investigative agencies. A more extensive background inves- tigation, involving interviews with references, is done only for top-secret clearances. Government Changes Slowly "To me, the pace seems pretty fast' because it takes so long for anything to change in the Government," said Mr. Snyder. "Things are happening in due course, although it may look slow to an outsider. It takes a long time for a place the size of D.O.D. to make its policy changes felt at the lowest levels." Mr. Snyder and others said that one of the most significant changes in the past few years was the high-level inter- est in the problem, spurred by the spy cases. "In the past, people who raised these subjects tended to be scoffed at," said Roy Godson, a Georgetown Uni- versity professor who served on the Central Intelligence Agency's transi- tion team when the Reagan Adminis- tration was first taking office. "Now they're taken seriously. Still, there's still a long way to go between a com- mitment to change and actually mak- ing improvements in security for a vast bureaucracy." The espionage cases have also illus- trated specific failings in the agencies involved. The Central Intelligence Agency, for instance. has been revising its rsonne rules since the case of owar a former officer w o was dismissed-after bein trained for service in Moscow. utricials familiar with the case say that Mr. Howard was able to tell the Soviet Union about American techniques for contacting agents in Moscow. This in turn allowed the Russians to make a series of ar- rests and expulsions, and in at least one case, the execution of a Soviet citizen working for American intelligence. Mr. Howard was dismissed from the after failing a ra or lie- detector, test on drug use and other misdeeds. Under its new policy the agency would place such an employee in a less sense ivf ition rather than dismiss him out e t and ieopardize the in ormation a possessed. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/24: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830052-4 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/24: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830052-4 A. Interagency Study Group One Administration effort to im- prove security throughout the Govern- ment has gained momentum this year after several years of inactivity. An in- teragency committee headed by Miss Lawton of the Justice Department, which began meeting in 1983, is rewrit- ing the 33-year old executive order that sets standards for granting security clearances and investigating employ- ees. On May 1, 1984, the committee asked the National Security Council for guid- ance on the scope of its work, but it got none for nearly two years. The council finally resolved the questions last Feb- ruary, after Congressional insistence. Miss Lawton of the Justice Depart- ment, who is chairman of the panel, said she expects its work to be com- pleted by the end of this year. She said the group has been struggling to come up with procedures and rules that would improve security while still meeting the Defense Department's need for upwards of three million se- curity clearances for employees and contractors. Cost Is a Key Factor Cost and practicability are impor- tant considerations in the committee's work. One proposal that was consid- ered and rejected called for clearance holders to submit an annual form on personal financial data. But the Penta- gon reminded the group that this would require hiring enough people to read and analyze a cascade of three million new records each year. "Ideally, you would have person-by- person judgments based on a back- ground investigation for every single person, but we can't afford that," said Miss Lawton. "Our attitude is: 'What is the best we can reasonably expect?' There is no way we can reach ideal." She said the Pentagon has estimated' that it would cost $80 billion annually to perform a full investigation, complete with field interviews, of all personnel and contractors who have access to classified information. Another perennial Government ef- fort called for by numerods studies is a reduction in the amount of classified data. The theory, according to counter- intelligence experts, is that when everything is classified, nothing is. Cutting the amount of classified infor- mation has proved difficult for the Rea- gan Administration. According to an: annual report by the Information Se- curity Oversight Office, the total num- ber of decisions to classify data rose by 14 percent from 1984 to 1985, to a total of more than 22 million. In 1981, there were 17.3 million such decisions. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/01/24: CIA-RDP90-00965R000201830052-4