MEXICO - CIA DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION ON LEE HARVEY OSWALD ON MARCH 24, 1964

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP10M00666R000503450003-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
26
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 11, 2011
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 26, 1964
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP10M00666R000503450003-2.pdf1.1 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2011/09/22 : CIA-RDP1 OM00666R000503450003-2 MEMORANDUM March 26, 1964 SUBJECT: Mexico - CIA Dissemination of Information on Lee Harvey Oswald on March 24, 1964 The CIA directed a memorandum to J. Lee Rankin (Commission Document No. 631) in which it set forth the dissemination of the information on Lee Harvey Oswald. I realize that this memorandum is only a partial answer to our inquiry to the CIA dated March 16, 1964 and I hope that the the complete answers will give us/additional information we requested. We would like to know just when[the Mexican station got the information with respect to Lee Harvey Oswald and what was the information and how was it obtained. How did the information get from Mexico to the CIA in Washington, and in what foam did it come? At what point was the information that the Lee Harvey Oswald was probably the Lee Harvey Oswald who had defected and was married to a Russian developed so that when the telegram went from the CIA in Washington to the various agencies it contained such information. In other words, I would like to know whether this was information available in Approved For Release 2011/09/22 : CIA-RDP1 OM00666R000503450003-2 Approved For Release 2011/09/22 : CIA-RDP1 OM00666R000503450003-2 i1exi.,o or did this additional r- at=on get in the message on'': after it reached T~Ta3h_r.?: ... he information ...,as being disseminated to the varic.:3 ager.cies. As you know, we are trying to get an explana- tion of the photograph which t^e I showed Marguerite Oswald soon after the assassin=-4-n. I hope that paragraph 4 of the memorandum of March 2L, 1 3,54 sent Mr. Ran-kin by the CIA Is not the answer which the CIA intends to give us as to this inquiry. We should also deter = :.e .ihy the Navy never furnished the CIA with. cc.ies of the sou recent photographs of Oswald. Approved For Release 2011/09/22 : CIA-RDP1 OM00666R000503450003-2 Approved For Release 2011/09/22 : CIA-RDP1 OM00666R000503450003-2 DRAFT/1 r 64/mfd MEMORANDUM FROM: Coleman-Slawson SUBJECT: Statement of Pedro Gutierrez Valencia In a letter to President Johnson dated December 2, 1963 and in three statements summarized by the FBI in Commis- sion Nos 564, 566, and 663, Gutierrez has stated that on September 30, 1963 or on October'l, 1963, probably the latter, he saw a Cuban give money to an American, just outside the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City, and he claims now to identify the American now as Oswald. He fixes the time of the event as approximately 10:50 a.m. The Mexican police check of Gutierrez shows him to be a responsible and respected person, and a car answering,: the description of the one he claims to have seen the American and Cuban enter has been found to have been registered during the years 1963-64 under what is probably a fictitious name. His statements must therefore be given serious consideration. The following inquiries might be worthwhile: 1. Guiterrez says that the woman whose credit he checked showed him a card which identified her as a "second counselor" of the Cuban Embassy. (Commission No. 564, page 4.) Perhaps CIA or FBI or some other source has a way of finding g'~ ^?+,.,far ~ "a..'2 = ..:~*as~?~r~_,*.~~ ~~.he said that altriaugh it involved a certain smrsmt of cam~ro- mi.se of has security arraug. nts, the e=Wreisr vas acceptable teen balanced againet the inapt rtame of the 0cca6i?a.7 [tie than ba'ietl y discussed the statommut of Silvia Duran which we bad read earlier in the day in the MI offices. OW CIA had not yet seen this d-istesaeat