EASTERN EUROPE'S AGRICULTURAL PERFORMANCE IN 1969 AND OUTLOOK FOR 1970

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
26
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 25, 2011
Sequence Number: 
73
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 1, 1970
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8.pdf1.93 MB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 - I - .._../-J.+v v I I v-- 7 J niidenrtial- DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Intelligence Memorandum Eastern Europe's Agricultural Performance In 1969 And Outlook For 1970 -CooidewtiaL ER IM 70-73 May 1970 Copy. No. 35 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 1a 6 eclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 WARNING This document contains information affecting the national defense of the United States, within the meaning of Title 18, sections 793 and, 794, of the US Code, as amended. Its transmission or revelation of its contents to or re- ceipt by an unauthorized person is prohibited by law, GROUP I Iuluded Iron, aulomndt downgrading and der a rilkatinn Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTIAL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence May 1970 INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM Eastern Eurroo ?e' s Agricultural Performance in 1969 And Outlook For 1970 Introduction In agriculture, 1969 was a disappointing year for all the East European* countries but Hungary. Crop production was down in the northern countries and up in the southern countries from 1968, but only in Hungary did output meet planned goals. Livestock production grew scarcely at all, further widening the imbalance between the supply and demand for meat and meat products. Thase setbacks and mounting consumer pressure for quality foods have caused several East European leaders in recent months to criticize agricultural programs and to propose economic and administrative changes in order to stimulate higher growth rates for agri- cultural output, especially in the livestock sector. The purposes of this memorandum are (1) to review the 1969 agricultural performance of Eastern Europe as a region; (2) to determine the economic effects that 1969 production shortfalls will have on foreign trade, food supplies, and production of livestock products -- especially meat -- during 1970; and (3) to assess current prospects for the 1970 harvest of winter grain. * The terms East European or Eastern Europe in- cZude the northern countries of Czechoslovakia, East Germany, and Poland and the southern countries of Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania. Note: This memorandum was produced solely by CIA. It was prepared by the Office of Economic Research. CONFIDENTIAL ' Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTIAL 1968 1969 (pre iminary) fell to the lowest level in four years. Growth rates varied considerably from country to country: a large increase in Hungary and a small one in Bulgaria, practically no growth in Czechoslovakia and Romania, and significant declines in East Germany and Poland (see Table 1). The best per- formance was turned in by Hungarian agriculture, which achieved a 5/% rate of growth, thereby setting a new high and exceeding the planned goal. All the other countries failed to met plans, which called for changes ranging from a 2% decline in Poland to as much as a 20% increase in Romania. Adverse weather conditions were largely responsible for the slippage in total farm output for the region. - 3 - CONFIDENTIAL Production Declines, 1969 1. Total agricultural production in Eastern Europe declined in 1969 for the second consecutive year to a level no better than that of 1966 (see the chart). Similarly, per capita production also Indexes of net agricultural production for Eastern Europe are... Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Milo Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Table 1 Index of Agricultural Production for East European Countries a/ 1957-59 = 100 Eastern Czecho- East Year Europe Bulgaria slovakia Germany Hungary Poland Romania 1960 107 107 106 108 106 107 107 1961 109 106 106 98 109 113 116 1962 103 114 102 91 100 107 108 1963 106 ill 101 100 113 105 109 1964 112 126 105 102 114 112 117 1965 114 128 102 112 108 114 121 1966 125 151 114 115 120 122 141 1967 128 152 120 121 129 123 145 1968 127 135 123 123 125 124 142 1969 b/ 125' 137 122 113 132 120 141 a.. The value of crop production less feed (including imported grain),. seed, and waste; plus the value of livestock products, including changes in livestock numbers. FAO regional price weights (1952-56) for Western Europe were used to compute the indexes. b. Preliminary. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 S WAREMEMM LIMMUNKMERVAMM Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTIAL 2. The growth of the livestock and crop sec- tors last year showed sharp differences between the northern and southern countries within the region. In the northern countries, livestock pro- duction showed only slight gains, and the output of crops dropped as much as 8% to 12% in Poland and East Germany, respectively. By contrast, the southern countries all registered sizable increases in crop production over the drought year 1968, but livestock production stagnated or declined. The net effect was a decline in agricultural out- put for Eastern Europe as a whole. Nevertheless, the region closed out the decade with 1969 agri- cultural output nearly 15% above the 1961-65 average. Crop Production Mediocre 3. Total East European production of most crops was below the level of 1968 and the annual average of 1962-66. An important exception was grain output, which increased by 3% to a new high of 61 million tons. Sharp reductions of about 20% occurred in the output of potatoes, sugar beets, and oilseeds for the region. Total output of other commodities such as tobacco, vegetables, fruit, and green fodder was at most slightly higher than in 1968. An increase in both the area and yields per hectare of wheat, barley, and corn contributed to the boost in total grain output. For most other crops, how- ever, a late spring combined with summer droughts adversely affected both the areas harvested and yields per hectare. 4. Harvest results within the region were mixed, with crops in the southern countries faring better than those in the northern group (see Appendix Table A-i). As a result of ? excellent growing conditions, Hungary had an outstanding crop year, setting production records in grain (wheat and corn), sunflower seed, grapes, and fruit; except for sugar beets, all other crops showed increases over 1968, but output remained below the 1962-66 average level. Bulgaria and Romania, with less favorable growing conditions, - 5 - CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 MUM ME= 1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTIAL were unable to boost output of wheat above 1968. Although good harvests of corn more than offset the lower wheat harvests, the total grain output in Bulgaria failed to reach the high levels of 1966 or 1967, and that of Romania was no better than in 1968. Both countries claimed relatively large increases for most other crops, except early vegetables, potatoes, tobacco, grapes and, in Romania only, sugar beets. Yields of green fodder crops and pastures were much better than a year ago in Hungary and Romania but only slightly better in Bulgaria because of below-average soil moisture for the second successive year. 5. Crop production in the northern countries was affected by some of the worst growing condi- tions in several years, ranging from spring frosts to summer drought.* As a result; output of all major crops, except for grain in Czechoslovakia and Poland, registered rather sharp declines from the high levels of 1968. The higher level of grain output in Czechoslovakia and Poland reflects an expansion in areas seeded to higher yielding varieties of wheat and barley. East Germany, how- ever, suffered a 12% reduction in grain production as both the area seeded and yields declined. For all three countries, output of nearly all spring- planted crops -- potatoes, sugar beets, oilseed, and forage -- slipped to the lowest level in sev- eral years (see Appendix Table A-1). For example, the East German potato harvest, of which 50% is fed to livestock, was the smallest since 1961. The Polish rapeseed harvest was only one-third that of. 1968; nearly one-half of the area seeded had been lost to winter frosts. The production of forage, fodder beets, and pastures in the northern region also was reduced substantially by the late summer drought. The poor condition of fall pastures caused some premature feeding of short winter hay stocks to cattle and horses. In addition, an early onset of winter and extreme temperatures during the first quarter of 1970 have further aggravated the live- stock feed shortage. - 6 - CONFIDENTIAL I Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8, am= MEM MEMAIMMIMENNEMEM Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTIAL Livestock Production Falters 6. The estimated total value of livestock production for Eastern?Europe in 1969 showed less than a 1% gain over 1968 (see Table 2). This was the second consecutive year of near stagnation of the livestock sector following an average annual growth rate of 4% in the 1965-67 period. Increases in output by two major producers, Czechoslovakia and Poland, prevented a decline in regional pro- ducttion; East Germany and Romania showed no signifi- cant growth, and output declined in Bulgaria and Hungary. The slowdown in production during the past two years can be attributed in most countries to one or more of the following, which may be interrelated: short feed supplies, unfavorable feed/livestock price ratios, labor shortages, and decrease in private holdings of livestock. 7. The numbers of livestock of all major categories declined and, except for cows, at the end of 1969 were at the lowest level in several years (see Appendix Table A-2). Although inven- tories of cows continued to fall in Czechoslovakia and Hungary, most other countries maintained or slightly increased numbers in comparison with the level in 1968. Feed shortages and government efforts to meet strong demands for meat have con- tributed to a high race of slaughter that depleted hog herds during the past two years in many coun- tries; a similar situation reduced,beef cattle herds last year.. All the northern countries had a bad potato harvest (an important hog feed), and only Poland successfully prevented excessive slaughtering of hogs last fall. This was accom- plished by relatively quick government action last October in announcing,supple.mental feed aid to farmers and higher prices for fattened hogs-de- livered after 1 January 1970. The resultant small increase in the number of Polish hogs was equaled only by Romania; declines of 3% to 8% were registered in Bulgaria, East Germany, and Hungary. Last year's decline in cattle herds was relatively small, but the inability of Czechoslovakia and Hungary to arrest a two- to three-year downtrend, especially for cows, jeopardizes plans for any short-run expansion of beef and milk production. The relatively successful expansion of poultry - 7 - CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 _,.` Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Table 2 Annual Rates of Growth for Livestock Production I/ a. Derived from methodology and values computed for Table 1. b. Preliminary. Eastern Czecho- East Year Europe Bulgaria slovakia Germany Hun ary Poland R i g oman a 1965 3.0 6.3 1.9 9.4 -7.9 3.4 2.9 1966 6.4 3.4 4.1 5.0 11.8 4.9 11.5 1967 2.7 8.3 6.0 1.7 4.,8 -1.0 6.3 1968 0.4 1.1 -0.5 4.6 -1.6 -0.7 -0.6 1969 0.6 -4.7 3.2 0.2 -1.0 1.7 0.6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTIAL raising during the 1960s slowed in 1968 and out- put went down slightly in 1969. Feed shortages contributed to a drop in poultry f locks in Bulgaria and Hungary while flocks in the other countries showed no growth last year. 8. The strong uptrend in 1963-68 in the total output and procurement of livestock products in Eastern Europe weakened last year, and the per capita availability of these products declined. This situation has worsened in the first quarter of 1970. The poorest performance was turned in by Bulgaria and Hungary, whose output of all major livestock products declined or failed to increase over the level of 1968 (see Appendix Table A-2). Eastern Europe's total production of red meat showed no gain over the record year 1968; only East Germany and Poland registered increases. Production of pork, which accounts for more than 50% of red meat, declined in all the southern countries and Czecho- slovakia because of the excessive slaughtering of hogs that occurred in 1968. Increased output of beef and veal, a result of slaughtering down herds rather than of improved productivity, was not enough to offset the lower production of pork and mutton. Production of poultry meat continued to fol',!.ow the upward trend of the 1960s, except in Bulgaria, but at a lower rate of growth. and partly at the expense of size of flocks. A 1% increase in milk production represented one of the few bright spots last year for most countries in an otherwise unfavorable performance of the livestock sector., This increase, which raised milk production to a new high, was accompl4.shed by gains in productivity despite poor fall pastures in the northern countries and Bulgaria. Procurement of milk, however, fell short of plans or declined in most countries as a larger share of output was kept on farms for feeding. As a result, commercial butter production fell slightly in Poland, East Germany, and Romania. Egg production showed little change from 1968 as gains in the northern countries were largely canceled by declines in the southern area. Measures to Stimulate Meat Output 9. The unsatisfied demand for livestock products, especially meat, rose sharply last year as personal incomes continued to rise faster than per capita CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTIAL availability and shortages of potatoes and vegetables diverted consumer spending to quality food substi- tutes. It is estimated that per capita consumption of red meat in Eastern Europe last year showed. no increase except for a small one in East Germany. The rising consumer dissatisfaction over chronic shortages of meat as well as some other quality foods has prompted officials in most countries during recent months to announce plans or measures aimed at boosting output of meat, especially pork, during the next few years. Most of these measures will have little impact on output before 1971. These programs involve improving the profitability of livestock raising, expanding the number of large- scale specialized livestock production farms, and increasing sharply the rate of growth of the mixed feed industry. The latter two measures require considerable increase in allocations of capital resources to agriculture, which more countries now appear willing to make. Romania, for example, has unveiled a grandiose national livestock plan which calls for doubling production in the 1971-75 period and in support provides for twice the level of investments to agriculture as compared with those in the current five-year plan. Romania and other East European countries also plan to step up Western purchases over the next two to three years of industrial-type installations for hog and poultry raising. 10. Other measures offering prospects for a somewhat quicker output response have been mostly concerned with improving incomes of livestock pro- ducers. These have included increasing producer prices -- effective 1 January 1970 -- for deliveries of beef cattle and fattened hogs in Poland and Hungary; a reduction in land tax to Polish farmers who contract to sell slaughter cattle above quota; and a reduction of prices for mixed feed in Czecho- slovakia and a price freeze on other production inputs. Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria are believed to be currently reviewing procurement prices for all agricultural products with the intention of raising livestock prices by 1971. 11. In addition to the above programs, offi- cials in the southern countries and Czechoslovakia have made recent statements implying or stating, that more government support will be given to - 10 - CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTIAL boosting livestock output on private plots of col- lective farm members, which has been declining. For Czechoslovakia and Romania this represents a reversal of past policy. Such a change is largely a recognition of the serious meat shortage and the temporary contribution that the private sector might make in providing additional livestock products at low cost to the, government until such time as output from proposed large-scale livestock enterprises can meet demand. 12. Hungary has been the most open about the need to stimulate livestock production on private plots and last March introduced significant changes. In addition to raising producer prices and guar- anteeing feed supplies to private producers, retro- active to 1 January 1970, the government has agreed that the time cooperative members now spend on raising livestock (beef cattle and pigs) may be counted toward pensions and other social benefits, provided that output is contracted for delivery to the cooperative. How successful this measure will be in boosting livestock output on private plots remains to be seen, but this innovation could run into political flak from officials in other Com- munist countries, who have complained that collec- tive members spend too much time on their plots at the expense of collective farm operations. Bulgaria has limited support to guaranteeing feed to private producers who conclude contracts for sale of meat and to taking the limit off the number of animals that can be raised on private plots in mountainous areas. Agricultural Trade Developments, 1969-70 13. Eastern Europe's imports of grain in the fiscal year ending 30 June 1970 are expected to exceed by 0.5 million tons the estimated 5.8 million tons imported last year (see Appendix Table A-3). Import requirements of the northern countries are estimated to be up by at least 1 million tons -- East Germany alone will need another one-half million tons -- because of 1969 production short- falls in feed grain and potatoes. The increase in imports by the northern countries will be partly offset by expected declines in grain imports by Bulgaria and Hungary. - 11 - CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTIAL 14. In addition to grain, the northern coun- tries each plan to increase imports of high-protein feed supplements (oil cake and meals) because of last year's poor harvests rf oilseed and to stretch out supplies of feed grain.. The southern countries, although self-sufficient in grain, also will be in the import market for high-protein supplements and barley to expand output of commercial feed mixes for poultry and hogs. 15. The three northern countries have turned to the West to meet a larger share of their grain import requirements in FY 1970. They probably will receive at most only about 3.8 million tons from the USSR -- East Germany will get 400,000 tons more to meet in part its additional requirements, but Czechoslovakia will get 100,000 tons less.* Thus at least 2.2 million tons, or 1 million tons more than in FY 1969, will have to be purchased elsewhere, largely from Western exporters. The northern countries reportedly purchased more than 1 million tons of EEC feed wheat and barley in late 1969. Poland also extended its agreement with Canada to purchase 400,000 tons of wheat and barley by mid-1971. US grain exports to Eastern Europe in the last half of 1969 were running below a year ago, but sales for FY 1970 are still likely to exceed somewhat the 770,000 tons exported in FY 1969. The bright spots in US grain exports have been the record purchases of US corn by East Germany, which may total one-half million tons by mid-1970, and the April sale of 200,000 tons of barley to Romania on Commodity Credit Corporation credit. In addition, US sales of soybean meal could set a record in FY 1970, if sales continue at the rate of the first nine months. 16. The southern countries' total export avail- ability of grain from the 1969 harvest is little different from that of FY 1969, or an estimated 2.1 million tons. The availabilities of the indi- vidual countries, however, differ sharply from `-hose in FY 1969, with Hungary claiming a record * According to calendar year grain trade agree- ments, which are representative of FY 1970 ship- ments because the majority of the grain will be shipped during January-June 1970, or the Zast half of FY 1970. - 12 - CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CON IIADLA N'l'IAL surplus of 700,000 tons of grain (mostly wheat), Bulgaria a small surplus of corn rather than wheat, and Romania an estimated 1.0 to 1.2 million tons, largely 'nst 1.5 million tons in FY 1969. by last March these countries had found markets for most of their surplus grain in Europe and the Middle East. Because of a late spring, any unsold surplus grain may be withheld from the world market until the outcome of this year's grain harvest is better known. 17. Eastern Europe's strong upward thrust in hard currency earnings during the 1963-67 period from exports of agricultural products -- especially livestock products -- came to a halt in 1968 and, except for Hungary, stagnated or declined in 1969,* mainly because of the supply problems described above. Although exports of meat and slaughter cattle continued to be major hard currency earners for the region in 1969, total value was down slightly. This setback further aggravated the already unfavorable balance-of-payments situation with West European countries for major agricultural exporters such as Bulgaria, Romania, and Poland. Hungary claimed an 11% increase in farm exports to "capitalist" countries over the reduced level of 1968 on the strength of larger exports of wheat, fruit, and slaughter cattle. Hungary had exceptionally favorable weather and reduced its herds of beef cattle substantially in order to take advantage of strong demand in Italy, its chief market for meat. 18. Czechoslovakia and East Germany, both de- pendent upon other Communist countries for a major share of their agricultural imports, were forced in 1969 to spend more hard currency than they had planned for potatoes, foodstuffs, and meat. Shortages in the other Communist countries in 1970 will again boost the hard currency expenditures of Czechoslovakia and East Germany. East Germany claims that imports of agricultural products from Western countries this year will run more than $80 million above the amount originally planned. Czechoslovakia also has indicated that record imports of meat -- more than 100,000 tons -- and * Statistics on the value of agricultural trade are in terms of calendar years. - 13 - CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONFIDENTJAL, eggs are planned for 1970 in addition to animal feeds; a larger share must be purchased from Western countries than in previous years. Czech officials have already warned that the large expenditures of hard currency for these imports may reduce imports of industrial goods. Hungary and Poland can expect smaller net foreign exchange earnings from agricultural trade this year because neither plan an increase in exports, but do plan higher imports of some agricultural products, par- ticularly pork and high-protein feeds. Thus the southern countries and Poland will be unable to improve their balance-of-payment position with Western Europe in 1970 by expanding net agricul- tural exports. Production Plans and Prospects for 1970 19. In spite of the inevitable plans for in- creased agricultural output from 12% to 16% in Bulgaria and Romania, to 3% in the northern coun- tries and 1% in Hungary -- prospects are hardly encouraging. Little increase in livestock output seems likely in Hungary or Bulgaria. Feed supplies are somewhat better than a year ago, but the number of productive livestock is down, and gains in pro- ductivity are unlikely to offset this loss. Attempts to rebuild herds also will restrict meat output until late 1970 or early 1971, especially in the northern countries, where a long, severe winter has reduced productivity of livestock and depleted already short fodder supplies. Even with larger harvests of potato and fodder crops than the exceptionally poor one of last year, the impact of more feed on boosting livestock productivity, especially meat and milk, will not be felt much before early 1971. Procurement of slaughter animals and eggs in most countries fell in the first quarter of 1970 compared with a year ago. This trend may continue into the third quarter before being reversed. 20. Prospects for crop production in most countries are currently no brighter than for live- stock production, although more favorable weather over the next several months can substantially improve prospects. As of 1 May, the outlook for the important winter grains (wheat, rye, and barley) was less favorable than a year ago. The CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 assified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 (.X)N F'I I .VN'L'J A), area seeded to winter grain last fall was reduced and germination delayed because of dry soil condi- tions. Winter wheat plantings, especially in the southern countries, entered the winter poorly developed, making them very susceptible to winter- kill. In early December, a long severe winter not in throughout the region with snows occurring an late an early April. Floods followed from the thawing snow and above-normal precipitation. The full extant of damage to winter grain is not yet known, but reports of winterkill, snow mold, and wator-loggcd grain fields point to above-normal losses of winter grain arean.* It is unlikely that all the damaged areas of wheat can be replanted to spring wheat because of the late spring. 21. Bad weather also has seriously delayed spring planting operations for the second succes- sive year, with the greatest setback to the northern countries, especially Last Germany. Those countries, fwd with relatively short growing seasons, were unable to start field work in many areas until early April, some four to six weeks behind schedule. By mid-April, farmers in the northern provinces of East Germany and Poland had barely started the seeding of spring grain, normally completed by this time. The shortened period for spring planting in the northern countries threatens plans for expanded acreages of root, forage, and vegetable crops. Based on preliminary reports of fewer signings of grower contracts, shortages of need potatoes, and the acreage reductions experienced last year under a protracted planting period, a decrease rather than an increase may occur in plantings of potatoes, sugar beets, and spring grain. Moreover, the later these crops are planted, the less chance there in for maximizing yields. 22. in the southern countries, excessive moisture and cold temperatures have delayed spring planting, but an of 1 May the outlook was slightly better for spring crops than a year ago in Bulgaria and Romania,** although not in Hungary. Early 144 Unknown amagcr va ine d to crops by la .i hay floodo in Romania may reduce: cfarlivr prcupecte. in of 25 May an estimated oral-half' million oar oo of agricultural land had barn flooded with r;oro ex- pected when the Danube crusts n the Delta. - 15 - CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 (;UN I"I I )F;N'L'I AL, Vegetable crops, an important foreign exchange earner for Bulgaria and ilomania, are expected to be below normal for the second successive year. For other crops, however, warm sunny weather dur- ing the May-June period could speed up plant growth and overcome moat of the delay in vegetation. The area planted to corn and late vegetables could be the largest in several years: officials are pushing those crops to replace lamagod winter wheat areas or to compensate for smaller acreages of spring barley and oats. An oft May, soil mointuro was adequate throughout the area for the germination of spring crops and uustainod development of winter grains. Conclunionrs 23. Agricultural production in Eastern Europe declined last year for the second consecutive year, and the outlook for 1970 in not bright. The area's aggregate production of most crops dropped below the levels of both 1960 and the 1962-66 annual average, with the important exception of grain out- put, which not a new high of 61 million tons. Sharp reductions of 20% or more occurred in output of root crops, oilccedn, and forage, reflecting shortfalls in the large producing countricu of East Germany and Poland. Thu value of livestock produc- tion, unlike crop production, increased, but by lean than It for the second connr+cutivo year. Gains in livestock production in the northern countries offnct dnclinor. in thn unuthernn couunn- trieu . 24. Shortages of livestock product`, especially pork, eggn j and butter, worsened during 1969, and no significant improvement is expected before late 1970, if then, in most countries. Unnatinfied demand for moat continued to grow as personal incomes rose and as Shortage-s- of vegetables= and potatoes put added pressure on retail nunpliec of livestock products, especially in Czecho nlovakia, East Germany, and Poland. febuilding of horde and attempts to maintain livestock exports are likely to exclude any increano in meat supplies through most of this year. 25. The large shortfall in output of important livestock feed., such an potatoes, fodder beets, CON I:II)I N`I'IAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 CONV1I)1?N'1'IA1, green forage, and -- in East Germany -- grain, han forced all the northern countrion to increase imports of grain and high-protein tiupplementn during 1'Y 170 in an effort to prevent a signifi- cant drop in liveutock herds and meat production. Total East, European imports of grain this fiscal year may exceed by 0.5 million tone the estimated 5.0 million tones imported last year. 11otai avail- able grain for export by the southern countries approximates that of last year, or about 2 million tons. Uecreaaed exports by Bulgaria and Romania will be offset by export of 700,000 tons (montly wheat) by Hungary, which had exceptionally good weather and a record harvent. 'Inc ?strong prefer- ence of Hungary and Romania for exporting r;rain to the Wont and soviet reluet:ance to incretan;c exports; to Eastern Europe have forced northern countriclu to p''rchane more Wortern grain thin year. The United States sham of this larger market shown no sign of increasing. 11wever, Us Hale of soybean meal to Eastern Europa could net a record thin fiscal year, if sales for the balance of the year continue at the name rite an during the first nine months. 26. The outlook for any n igni f icant qa i sass in agricultural production thin year by any 1.a nt Iuropean country In dim. Growth of livostc)ck production in the southern countries: will be, limited by the smaller numbers of productive live- stock at the beginning of 1970 eonpared with a year ago, and in the northern countries by s hor; aness of fodder and rna1Icr herein. Also at, of 1 May crop prospects, wer?? not no rood an a year a o in the northern county ica and Hungary, and no belt ter in Bulgaria and Romania. Ai fall drou,.;ht, -a ionq severe winter, excennive nprin(i precipitation, and floods have caue'?:1 cite nni vo d.11-Inge to F 3. i. ". r grains, delayed the planting of port: nprinri crops beyond the optimum, and reduced acre 3rsen of s;o;--.e crops. ravorable weather durin(i the ronthn can of course i -.pravo the current 1trKs;}?C] to , but 'A" ncct?'3 unlikely that Lnc nl;it'~ {I lsi7! }t[iri,s~a i ivi. .+,. 196) can be repeated or that more than save: afte harvcntn. of r ont other crop?; can be e>:1 c-ctcd. (ON FI I)ENTI Al. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 (X)NFlI)EN'i.'TAl :;tat Inticnl CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 [IMMEWAM11 ININIMNAM Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 A-1. !.water: ::c rcpe. Pro~cct.io a of Selected Croy s Million metric TOMS ~rww +. V}74~1. is czec"ho- s 1o'i aEia Est G'rL'ma.r "` rga^. LP' olaz d R = wnia . . T o t 11. 1962-6:6 a0vc r13:;, 5.17 5.54 6.06 6.85 15.02 11.49 50.13 1967 6.42 6.53 7.35 7.43 16.44 13.44 57 66 1968 5. 2 7.36 7.33 7.80 18.20 12.70 . 59 11 1969 5.93 7.89 6.89 9.00 18.55 12.74 . 61.00 z 3reAd q;;ai l Cl 1952-65 .7,t~t,;w 7.50 2.75 3.22 2.26 10.52 4.63 25.89 z 1967 3.25 3.20 4.00 2.94 11.63 5.39 30 95 1968 2.57 3.92 4.31 3.07 13.19 4.90 . 31 96 z :1969 b/ 2.54 3.95 1.79 3.32 13.34 4.40 . 31.34 E Coarse gran d/ 1962-66 ave.-age 2.67 2.79 2.84 4.59 4.50 6.86 24.25 1967 3.13 3.33 3.35 4.54 4.81 7.55 26.71 1968 2.65 3.44 3.52 4.74 5.03 7.80 27.16 1969 / 3.3) 3.94 3.10 5.68 5.21 8.34 29.66 ?'O tatc.e_- 1962-65 a,:,,cra7e 0.4D 5.74 12.94 1.90 44.14 2.67 67.76 1967 0.3 6.04 14.07 1.51 48.62 3.10 73.72 1968 0.37 6.53 12.64 1.34 50.32 3.717 75.41 1969 0.33 5.02 9.14 1.53 44.35 2.23 63.13 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/10/31: CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030073-8 Table ? -1. rEa;ites:: Europe: Production 0_ Selected Crops (Contir?ued) Mill .0n metric ions Czec o- E3St Co=a ditV and Years Bus'