TWO TEXANS PLAY ROLE IN LAROUCHE CASE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90G01353R001300090006-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 23, 2012
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 27, 1988
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90G01353R001300090006-7.pdf209.4 KB
Body: 
STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/23 CIA-RDP90GO1353R001300090006-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/23 CIA-RDP90GO1353R001300090006-7 Ail Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/23: CIA-RDP90G01353R001300090006-7 Two Texans Play Role in LaRouche Case By John F. Harris Waahinictm lh,t Staff Writer HORSESHOE BAY, Tex.-When the federal government wanted to ,learn more about the shadowy, con- spiracy-obsessed world of intrigue traveled by political extremist Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr., it talked to people who knew the terrain: two swashbuckling Texans who for years have made the world of con- spiracy and intrigue their natural habitat. Gary Howard and Ronald Tucker emerged two weeks ago as key fig- ures in the continuing federal con- spiracy trial against LaRouche in Boston when documents released in the case seemed to bolster a central theme of the LaRouche group's de- fense: that the government secretly tried to infiltrate the group ? at the same time that officials assembled their criminal case against the pe- rennial presidential candidate. The two longtime government informants said they were as a in October 1984 by the FBI and the CIA if they would be willing to pen- etrate and gather information about the Loudoun County-based LaRouche organization. But How- ard and Tucker, in an interview in this resort community west of Aus- tin, said the infiltration was aborted before it got under way because government agents did not give the go-ahead. The emergence of Howard and Tucker has provided a strange twist in a trial already noteworthy for exotic characters and unexpected contortions. The Texans, who were key informants several years ago in highly publicized cases for the U.S. Customs Service, said they have operated for years as government informants involving terrorist or- ganizations and that they were once contacted by the family of Andrei Sakharov concerning a plot to help free the political dissident from the Soviet Union. Some federal officials and others familiar with the proposed infiltra- tion of the LaRouche organization acknowledge that a meeting be- tween federal agents and the two Texans took place, but they dispute Howard and Tucker's contention that it was the government who initiated the meeting. Sources say it was Howard and Tucker or their attorney who sought the contact. The FBI and the CIA, whose rep- resentatives were e alleged tie been present in the Washington law office Where Howard and Tucker claimed the LaRouc a enetration was first discussed,-have declined to comment. One source said no re resentative was resent. Despite Howard's and Tucker's statements that the infiltration nev- er- actually occurred, the defense insists that there may yet be evi- dence of a politically motivated gov- ernment vendetta. "Certainly it has implications for the case," said William Moffitt, an attorney for Jeffrey Steinberg, a top LaRouche lieutenant on trial in Bos- ton. "There are too many coinci- dences here." LaRouche group lawyers say the proposed infiltration was part of a larger government campaign to de- stroy his organization. The prosecutor in the case, As- sistant U.S. Attorney John Mark- ham, has said in the courtroom that the LaRouche group's allegations of a conspiracy against it are baseless. LaRouche and some associates are charged with conspiring to ob- struct a federal investigation into allegations of credit card fraud in connection with his 1984 presiden- tial campaign. Last week, prosecu- tors in the three-month-old trial sought to show that intense pres- sure from LaRouche led fund-rais- ers to make false promises to pro- spective donors. Another mystery to surface from the declassified documents in Bos- ton was the aborted scheme to free Sakharov, in which family members would pay the Texans to help free the physicist from the Soviet Union. Howard and Tucker said in the interview that members of the Sakharov family advanced them $20,000 in October 1984 as the initial payment in a planned $2 mil- lion deal in which the Texans claimed they could win Sakharov's release by using highly sensitive intelligence information as leverage against the Soviets. Efrem Yankelevich, a Sakharov in-law and resident of Newton, Mass., acknowledged that his family paid money to private intelligence operatives who claimed that they could help free Sakharov, but re- I IM New TOrK I Imes The Washington Times The Wall Street Journal The Christian Science Monitor New York Daily News USA Today The Chicago Tribune fused to say how much money or whether Howard and Tucker were party to the deal. Yankelevich also revealed that in late 1984 or early 1985 he met with LaRouche at his estate near Leesburg in an effort to raise mon- ey to meet the costs asked by the free-lance operatives. LaRouche seemed interested, but never con- tributed any money, Yankelevich said. Howard and Tucker said that af- ter the proposed LaRouche and Sakharov cases fell through, gov- ernment representatives contacted one or both of them to do a variety of jobs on the government's behalf: to investigate Libyan money laun- dering in Europe, to learn about alleged terrorist camps based in wow Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/23: CIA-RDP90G01353RO01300090006-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/23: CIA-RDP90G01353RO01300090006-7 Mexico, and to share their findings with the chief counsel for Vice President Bush. The men said the federal govern- ment has cast them unfairly as ren- egades who manipulated the gov- ernment for personal gain. Also, they have filed suit in U.S. Claims Court in the District against the Customs Service, claiming they are owed $1.4 million from an aborted sting operation in the early 1980s against an alleged international arms merchant. "They call us bounty hunters," said Howard. "There is nothing that we have ever done that we weren't requested to do" by the govern- ment. The FBI document revealed in the Boston case takes a different view: "It is the opinion of [FBI agents] that [retired Army Sgt. Maj. Fred] Lewis, Howard and Tucker will sell information to any and all U.S. agencies. Once they have provided the information, they will then attempt to sell it to other agencies." Howard and Tucker said the pro- posed LaRouche and Sakharov deal- ings were arranged through the same contact, F. Keith Adkinson, the director of Democrats for Rea- gan in the 1980 campaign and a former attorney for the. two Texans. Adkinson has declined to comment on the alleged events. Howard said he met Adkinson in September 1984 on a hunting trip in Texas, where the two men hit it off. Within several weeks, they were discussing the possibility of forming a company together, How- ard said, with the attorney using his political connections and the Texans their intelligence back- "still willing to reinstitute the con- ground to win business from cor- tacts that you had made before" porations and governments. with the LaRouche group. A prospective firm, never actu- One phone can prompted the end any formed, was to be called Man- of both the LaRouche and Sakharov gudai International. A brochure for ventures, according to Howard. this proposed venture explained In early 1985, Howard said he that the group took its name from a received a call from the LaRouche select cadre in Genghis Khan's organization asking him to come to army of fighting men "who loved Leesburg to discuss the Sakharov death and the proximity of death, case. not because of any particular rea- Howard said he was angry with son, but simply because they were the Sakharov family for spurning his born that way." instructions not to discuss their The document stated that Man- dealings with other parties. Notified gudai "is not a traditional security, of the call from the LaRouche or- firm or international investigating ganization, Adkinson advised How- firm. It is a 'can do' action firm ded- and and Tucker to drop all dealings icated to achieving results for its with LaRouche, the Texans said. clients." ' This was not the end of their Initial meetings to discuss the dealings with or on behalf of the LaRouche and Sakharov projects federal government, according to took place in Adkinson's office, Howard and Tucker. Howard and Tucker said. In later exchanges, they said, a Howard said he was considered key entre to the government was for a possible LaRouche infiltration John Cupp, who was said to have because he had been introduced to played a role in the Iran-contra af- Steinberg earlier that year by Lew- fair. Cupp served in the late 1970s is. Lewis' name surfaced two weeks with Lewis in the Army's elite Del- ago in the Boston LaRouche trial in to Force antiterrorist unit, Lewis a telex from retired Air Force ma- said in an interview. jor general Richard V. Secord to Lt. When Howard, Lewis and Tucker Col. Oliver L. North saying that learned information that they said "our man here claims Lewis has info indicated terrorist camps were op- against LaRouche." erating in Mexico, Lewis said he The Texans said they were put in gave this information to Cupp, who touch with the Sakharov family then sent it to North via Secord. through a private detective who Cupp and Secord confirmed the knew Adkinson. events in interviews. Howard said the FBI seemed ea- Later in May 1986, Howard, ger to pursue a LaRouche infiltra- Tucker and Lewis said they met lion at their first meeting. Later, with Boyden Gray, the chief counsel however, . interest appeared to to Vice President Bush, to discuss wane. the alleged terrorist bases in Mex- Howard said the agency failed to ico. follow a prearranged plan to use Gray did not return telephone Adkinson as the liaison to give the calls for comment. According to go-ahead for the infiltration. In- others familiar with the meeting, it stead, he said, the bureau repeat- was arranged through Gary Paint- edly contacted him directly. In what er; a politically connected sheriff in Howard said is a tape of a telephone Midland, Tex., where Howard and conversation with a Dallas FBI Tucker now work as part-time dep- agent, a voice asks Howard if he is uties. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/23: CIA-RDP90G01353RO01300090006-7