HAK'S DECISIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
August 5, 2010
Sequence Number: 
14
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 23, 1974
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4.pdf284.65 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 w ! 239WOZ EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY MAY 23, 1974 HAKTO 135 TO s GENERAL SCOVCROFT FROM BREMER/AONPERT SUBJECTS MAX'S DECISIONS IMMEDIATE I. HAK DECIDED AS FOLLOWS ON YOUR ACTION CA$LZS TO MINI TOMAX 2781 APPROVED. TOHAK 2861 APPROVED. TOHAK 2871 LESER SHOULD MEET WITH THE VICE PALSIDENT. 2. BEST REGARDS. 0 0 Pier w I T A `.:EXCLUSIVELY EYZ~ State Dept. review completed page 4 & 8-9 ON-FILE NSC RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS APPLY pages 1-5 MORI/CDF C03344596 pages 1-2 C03345658 page 4 C03345659 pages 8-9 25:25X1 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 1WF 0 CONFIDENTIAL EXD LUSIV ELY EYES ONLY May 23, 1974 HAKTO / 3 5 IMMEDIATE FROM: Bremer /Gompert SUBJECT: HAK's Decisions 3ilz 1. HAK decided as follows on your action cables to him: TOHAK 278: Approved TOHAK 286: Approved TOHAK 287: Leber should meet with the Vice President. 2. Best regards. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07 : LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 W SCOWCROFT ASKS IF YOU THINK LEBER SHOULD CALL ON THE VICE PRESIDENT. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07 : LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 7 w 12z D 2303452 MAY 74 ZFF-1 ZFF-4 ZYH FM THE SITUATION ROOM TO ANCONSUL JERUSALEM ZEN Co N F I D E N T I A L EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY WH41466 TOHAK287 PLEASE DELIVER TO BREMER/RODMAN FOR THE SECRETARY TO: JERRY BREMER/PETER RODMAN FOR SECRETARY KISSINGER FROM: BRENT SCOWCROFT FRO DEFENSE MINISTER LEBER WILL VISIT WASHINGTON MAY 30-JUNE 1 TO MEET WITH SCHLESINGER, JACKSON, KENNEDY, SYMINGTON AND NUNN. LEBER HAS ALSO REQUESTED TO MEET WITH YOU AND THE VICE PRESIDENT. WITH REGARD TO ` THE VICE PRESIDENT,, WE HAVE FOR OBVIOUS REASONS TRIED TO KEEP HIS MEETINGS WITH FOREIGN DIGNATARIES TO A MINIMUM. CONSIDERING LEBER'S STRONG. PRO U.S. PROCLIVITIES, HOWEVER, I THOUGHT YOU SHOULD HAVE THE OPTION OF MAKING AN EXCEPTION AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE VICE PRESIDENT SEE HIM. IF S0, WE MAY BE ABLE TO ARRANGE IT AS A LOW KEY DROP-BY AT THE VICE PRESIDENT'S HILL OFFICE FOLLOWING LEBER'S MEETING WITH THE SENATORS. I WILL RECOMMEND AGAINST A MEETING UNLESS I HEAR OTHERWISE FROM YOU. WARM REGARDS. 192 2852 w%T%4 v . . NO MORI/CDF C03345658 page 4 State Dept. review completed page 4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 L No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07 : LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 W SCOWCROFT PROPOSES NSSN, ON U.S. POLICY WITH RESPECT TO THE NPT. APPROVE AS AMENDED DISAPPROVE (NO NSSM) No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07 : LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 w,. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 WA S05 0 00 RUEHDM DE RUEADWW 2828 1421719 ZNY SSSSS 0 221622Z MAY 74 FM THE SITUATION ROOM //TOHAK 278/1 TO USINT DAMASCUS BT S E C R E T SENSITIVE EYES ONLY WH41454 PLEASE DELIVER TO BREMER/RODMAN FOR THE SECRETARY MAY 22, 1974 TO JERRY BREMER/PETER RODMAN FOR SECRETARY KISSINGER FROM B RENT SCOWCROFT 1. AS YOU KNOW9 WE HAVE ASKED FOR AN UPDATE ON NSSM 156 ON INDIAN NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENTS. IN ADDITION, IT APPEARS THAT WE SHOULD ALSO REVIEW THE BROADER ISSUE OF U.S. POLICY CONCERNING THE NON- PROLIFERATION TREATY. TO DO THIS, WE WOULD PROPOSE THE FOLLOWING NSS,M: QUOTE NATIONAL SECURITY STUDY MEMORANDUM PAGE 2 RUEADWW 2828 S E C R E T TO: THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE THE CHAIRMAN, ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE THE DIRECTOR, ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY SUBJECT: NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY THE PRESIDENT HAS DRECTED A REVIEW OF U.S. POLICY CONCERNING THE NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY (NPT). THE STUDY SHOULD REVIEW PRESENT U. S. POLICY CONCERNING NON- --1'A-L-7.UERATIQN AND HE NP.T-- IN THE LIGHT. OF CHANGED C00 -0"- SINCE COMPLETION O NSSM 13, AND, IN PARTICULAR, IN LIGHT OF INDIA'S ANNOUNCEMENT OF ITS UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR TEST. THE STUDY SHOULD CONSIDER THE FULL RANGE OF ISSUES POSED BY THE CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING OUR POSTURE TOWARD NON-PRO- LIFERATION AND THE NPT AND PRESENT OPTIONS FOR FUTURE U.S. POLICY. IT ALSO SHOULD CONSIDER SPECIFICALLY WHETHER THE U.S. PAGE 3 RUEADWW 2828 S E C R E T SHOULD PRESS FOR RENEWED SUPPORT FOR THE TREATY BY THOSE NOW PARTY TO IT AND ACCESSION TO THE TREATY BY THOSE NOT YET SIGNATORS, AND IF SO HOW AND TO WHAT EXTENT. THE OPTIONS SHOULD INCLUDE CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC, CONGRESSIONAL AND DIPLOMATIC POSTURE FOR THE U.S. THE STUDY SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE STUDY DONE IN RESPONSE TO NSSM 13 AND SUBSEQUENT WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, PART- ICULARLY THAT IN PREPARATION FOR THE 1975 NPT REVIEW CON- FERENCE. IT ALSO SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE WORK DONE IN CONNECTION WITH NSSM 195 AND THE UPDATING CURRENTLY UNDERWAY IN CONNECTION WITH NSSM 156. THE PRESIDENT HAS DIRECTED THAT THE STUDY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE NSC UNDER SECRETARIES COMMITTEE AND BE FORWARDED NOT LATER THAT JUNE 12, 1974. UNQUOTE 2. IF YOU CONCUR, WE WILL ISSUE THE NSSM. BT 2828 NN NN No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07 : LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07 : LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 v SCOWCR OF T ASKS YOUR APPROVAL FOR THE ISSUANCE OF INSTRUCTIONS TO THE U. S. DELEGATION NEGOTIATING U. S. -SOVIET NE ENERGY AGREEMENT. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07 : LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 0 238608Z MAY 74 ZFF-1 ZFF-4 ZYH FM THE SITUATION ROOM TO AMCONSUL JERUSALEM ZEM S E C R E T SENSITIVE EXCLUSIVELY EYES ONLY TOHAK 286 PLEASE DELIVER TO BREMER/RODMAN FOR THE SECRETARY. MAY 22,1974 Tot HENRY A. KISSINGER FROM: BRENT SCOWCROFT RUSH HAS SENT IN A REPORT ON THE PROGRESS IN OUR NEGOTIATION OF A SUMMIT ENERGY AGREEMENT WITH THE USSR. OUR ORIGINAL PROPOSAL HAD TWO CENTRAL ELEMENTS -- AN EXCHANGE OF INFORMATIOU ON ENERGY PRODUCTION, DEMAND, RESERVE, AND TRADE% AND COOPERATION ON ENERGY R&D IN CERTAIN AREAS NOT INCLUDING OIL AND'GAS EXTRACTION TECHNOLOGY. WE ALSO PROPOSED TO INCORPORATE IN THE AGREEMENT SOME ENERGY R&D WORK THAT IS PLANNED BUT NOT YET EXECUTED UNDER THE S&T BILATERAL ("REPACKAGING"). THE SOVIETS ARE PROPOSING, AS A COUNTER., (1) THAT THE AREAS OF INFORMATION EXCHANGE BE LIMITED TO FORECASTING METHODOLOGY AND TO THE COOPERATIVE PROJECTS THEMSELVESo (2) THAT THE TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATION FOCUS CONSIDERABLE EFFORT ON OIL AND BAS, AND (3) THAT WE NOT TRANSFER THE S&T PROJECTS TO THE ENERGY AGREEMENT. THE SOVIET PROPOSAL IS TROUBLESOME SINCE (1) WITHOUT MORI/CDF C03345659 pages 8-9 2!25X1 State Dept. review completed pages 8-9 THE INFORMATION EXCHANGE WE WILL HAVE NO QUID PRO QUO TO BALANCE THE TECHNOLOGY COOPERATION WHICH WOULD FAVOR THEM (AND POSSIBLY, THEREFORE, BE A SOURCE OF SOME CONGRESSIONAL CRITICISM), AND (2) OIL AND GAS TECHNOLOGIES ARE OFTEN COMMERCIALLY SENSITIVE AND LARGELY BEYOND THE USE'S ABILITY TO TRANSFER EVEN IF WE WERE SO INCLINED. WE STILL BELIEVE REPACKAGING TO BE A GOOD IDEA IN ORDER TO HAVE AS COMPREHENSIVE AN AGREEMENT AS POSSIBLI No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 THE SOV ~s. (I !lArr" bP'f I Yrr rr? TU&SP V""V m L-An..vr* ~i-rn~rurer No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4 US SUB.S?ANii.ve. no W1.4,.1d n~ rrs ~~i~aK{ vt.eta. rnvaj.r.+~~? i, i -,ANTICIPATED A U.S. TEAM, HEADED BY AMBASSADOR STOESSEL, WILL. BE INVITED TO MEET IN MOSCOW NEXT WEEK FOR FURTHER NEGOTIATION. RUSH PROPOSES THAT IN THE NEXT MEETING WE SHOULD (1) CONTINUE TO PUSH FOR A BROAD INFORMATION EXCHANGE ON ENERGY, (2) SEEK A FORMULATION OF COOPERATION ON FOSSIL FUELS WHICH IS NOT SPECIFIC REGARDING PARTICULAR PROGRAMS, AND FAILING THAT, ADD SEVERAL MORE SPECIFIC PROJECTS TO DIMINISH THE PROMINENCE OF OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY; AND (3) URGE REPACKAGING BUT, IF UNSUCCESSFUL, BE PREPARED TO ADD SOME NEW BUT LESS WELL DEVELOPED AREAS OF COOPERATION IN NON- CONVENTIONAL FORMS ON ENERGY (SYNTHETIC FUELS, HYDROGEN, PETROCHEMICAL FEED) TO GIVE THE AGREEMENT GREATER BREADTH. CHUCK COOPER, WITH STATE CONCURENCE PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING AMPLIFICATIONS TO OUR NEGOTIATING POSITION: -- ASSUMING THE SOVIETS AGREE TO AN INFORMATION EXCHANGE, IF MIGHT BE DESIRABLE TO SEEK TO ESTABLISH IN THE AGREEMENT A MECHANISM FOR THE EXCHANGE. A WORKING GROUP OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE DEVOTED TO THE FUNCTION (AS IN THE AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT) WOULD BE ONE POSSIBILITY. WE SHOULD MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO LIMIT THE DISCUSSION OF OIL AND GAS TO A BROAD STATEMENT, AND NOT BECOME SPECIFIC AS TO THE TYPES OF COOPERATION ENVISAGED. IT SHOULD BE LEFT TO THE JOINT COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP SENSIBLE PROGRAMS..' -- WE SHOULD GO AS FAR AS THE SOVIETS ARE WILLING IN BRINGING ALL EXISTING COOPERATIVE ENERGY PROJECTS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. -- BECAUSE OF OUR PRESENT.UNCERTAINITY CONCERNING THE ATTAINABLE SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT, AND ALSO BECAUSE OF THE REORGANIZATION OF THE ENERGY AGENCIES UNDERWAY IN OUR GOVERNMENT, IT IS PREMATURE TO NAME OUR EXECUTIVE AGENT. THIS ASSIGNMENT SHOULD BE LEFT OPEN FOR THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. SUBJECT TO YOUR APPROVAL I WILL ISSUE INSTRUCTIONS IN YOUR NAME TO THE U.S. DELAGATION APPROVING RUSH'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLDING IN COOPER'S AS OUTLINED ABOVE. WARM REGARDS. 652 2950 4 Ppvwa s L:` b1. mp'A %_ No Objection to Declassification in Part 2012/03/07: LOC-HAK-260-3-14-4