CLASSIFICATION REVIEW PROCEDURE STAMPS AUTHORIZED FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP93B01194R000900010063-3
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: April 29, 2002
• Sequence Number: 63
• Publication Date: August 8, 1979
• Content Type: REQ

Approvedfor Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP93B94194R000900010063-3
8 August 1979
Classification Review Procedure CRP 79-35
REF: CRP 79-2
CRP 79-4
CRP 79-7
CRP 79-25
CRP 79-21
Stamps Authorized for Systematic Review
1. Four principal document stamps are authorized for systematic
review, two applicalbe to CIA permanent records and two to be used on
documents created by other government agencies if they contain CIA
derivative information.
(1) The stamp used on the vast majority of CIA permanent
records is the basic reviewer's stamp. It is also used on
documents created by foreign governments in accordance with
CRP 79-21. It is as follows:
DOCUMENT NO.
NO CHANGE IN CLASS. ^
L: F;ECLASSIFIED
CHANGED TO: TS S C
I7e:i. F FICVIEW DATE:
Hfi 702
DATE: REVIEWER:..
(2) When reviewers encounter CIA documents that contain
information furnished by another government agency or informa-
tion of concern to another agency, and if the document may be
declassified from the CIA point of vi (see CRP 79-2), the
following stamp will be used:
CIA HAS DETFR.MINED THAT THIS DOCUMENT
MAY BE DECLASSIFIED SUBIECT TO REVIEW
BY: ............................................................................
STAT
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP93B01194R000900010063-3
 Approved F.Release 2002/05/17: CIA-RDP93BO1484R000900010063-3
b. Documents created by another government agency, but containing
CIA derivative material or information of concern to CIA (see CRP 79-4)
will be stamped as follows:
(1) If the document must retain a classification:
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION
THAT THE CIA HAS DETERMINED MUST BE
CLASSIFIED AT THE LEVEL INDICATED:
TS S C
AUTHORITY: HR 70-2
(2) If the document may be declassified:
THE C.I.A. HAS NO OBJECTION
TO THE DECLASSIFICATION OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
NOTE: Reviewer
should write in date.
2. Reviewers will also require the following auxiliary stamps to
be used as applicable in conjunction with one of the principal stamps:
a. For upgrading or classifying CIA documents in accordance with
OF7CINAL CL BY _
^ DECL ^ REVW ON
EXT SYND 6 YRS BY
REASON
b. For identification of folders in accordance with CRP 79-25
and for stamping of control sheets removed from top secret documents that
have been downgraded:
JOB #
BOX #
FOLDER #
TOTAL # CIA DOCS. HEREIN
c. For changing classification:
(If Top Secret is needed, see an officer with TS classification authority)
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP93B01194R000900010063-3
 Approved F'Release 2002/05/17: CIA-RDP93B01`ii4R000900010063-3
d. For indicating location of the reviewer's stamp when first
page is too crowded:
See Reverse for Declassification Action
3. If reviewers are lacking any of the above stamps, they should be
obtained from the Information Control Assistant. The following stamp is
obsolete and should be returned to the Information Control Assistant for
destruction:
This document has boom reviewed by the
CIA and a classification retained only
because it contains Information received
from another government agency. The
document may be de;fh6sified subject
to approval by the other agency(s)
concerned. I
Reviewer: ________- Date::;"
STATINTL
ie ,
Classification Review Division
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP93B01194R000900010063-3
 Approved F v Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP93B01 4R000900010063-3
Classification Review Procedure CRP 79-34
Discrepancies in Review Action
1. CRP 79-18 states in part --- "A computer run will be made at
monthly intervals to flag discrepancies in review action on identical
documents. Reviewers will be assigned to re-check the documents in
question, make the appropriate changes on those determined to be in
error, and complete new 4023A forms reflecting the changes." This
Classification Review Procedure deals specifically with Division
operating procedures to resolve review discrepancies and implement
corrections.
2. Per agreement with DARE system analysts, henceforth, the
Information Control Assistant/CRD will key into the computer a require-
ment to produce the run flagging discrepancies as of the first working
day of the month. On receipt of the run in CRD (next day), it will be
forwarded to the Branch Chiefs in the following order: NFAC, S&T, DO,
and DA, who will be responsible for clearing discrepancies in their
respective directorate's materials, as reflected in the OPI field of
the document showing the discrepancy. In case two different OPIs are
listed for the same document involving two directorates, the first
Branch Chief cognizant of one of the numbers will take action to resolve
the discrepancy. It is essential that discrepancies be cleared promptly
and the machine run passed to the next Branch Chief promptly.
3. By the 30th of each month, Branch Chiefs will report to Chief,
CRD in writing the status of review discrepancies appearing in the machine
run for the previous month.
STATINTL
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP93B01194R000900010063-3