TEST AND EVALUATION REPORT P. I. STAGE RETICLES

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78B04560A007400010020-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
12
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 6, 2000
Sequence Number: 
20
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 1, 1974
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78B04560A007400010020-2.pdf843.22 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2001/08/13 : CIA-RDP78BO456OA007400010020-2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY TECHNICAL PUBLICATION NATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION CENTER TEST AND EVALUATION REPORT P. I. STAGE RETICLES N P I C/R -09/74 FEBRUARY 1974 Approved For Release 2001/08/13 : CIA-RDP78BO456OA007400010020-2 Approved For Release 2001/08/13 : CIA-RDP78B04560A007400010020- FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY IPIC R-09/7)4 TECHNICAL PUBLICATION TEST AND EVALUATION REPORT P. 1. STAGE RETICLES FEBRUARY 1974 Comments and queries regarding this report are welcome. They may be directed NPIC/TSG/ESD/TEB, Code 143, Ext. 3681 NATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION CENTER Approved For ReleagSPFo6 d lA P b'4y560A007400010020-2 Approved For ReleaRQMOQ/IUPWIA&A -Abid4'960A007400010( 1/R-09/7+ 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION 3. TEST DETAILS 4. OPERATIONAL SUITABILITY 5. CONCLUSIONS DISTRIBUTION LIST FIGURE 1. Enlarged Photograph of the P.I. Stage Reticle Page iii Reverse side blank Approved For Release-20 O~Q8/13fAC1 76 4560A007400010020-2 Approved For ReleagOB0W iAbIAII*bP O 'S6OA007400010 b R'-09/7+ Figure 1. Enlarged Photograph of the P.I. Stage Reticle 1 Approved For Rele qo8 HV? LCle-i?Paft0 560A007400010020-2 Approved For Reid 26 RI HALdI C 14560A00740001I} -2-09/74 Five P.I. stage reticles all essentially identical and manufactured to meet Center development objectives, were tested in May 1973. Test Report TSG/ESD/TEB-22/73 describes the results of the earlier test program. In brief, the report concluded that the P.I. stage reticles met all design objectives except for one major one. "The graduation marks of the reticles are not in focus when they are used in conjunction with in-focus imagery. This condition, in particular, exists when the reticles are used with higher (60-120X) microscope magnifications." Recently, four additional P.I. stage reticles were manu- factured with two changes in design from the earlier model. This report describes the Test and Evaluation Branch's (TEB/ ESD/TSG/NPIC) evaluation of these latest reticles. 2001/08/13 Approved For ReFOR, OFFICIAL CIA- ONLY 4560A007400010020-2 Approved For Rele W 6&kW4h IC MPM13Y4560A00740001 N U -09/74 The P.I. stage reticle (Figure 1) is a relatively in- expensive mensuration device designed for use by photointer- preters. Basically, it consists of two precisely (positional accuracy +1 micron) graduated scales, one in metric units (0.02 mm smallest graduation) and the other in English units (0.0001 ft. smallest graduation). The scales are abrasive- resistant chrome deposited on optically polished glass, 21 mm in diameter. To facilitate handling the glass reticle, it is mounted in the center of a transparent 90 mm diameter, 3 mm thick plastic holder. The reticle is positioned on top of photo imagery and under viewing microscopes for making measure- ments. Changes Made by Manufacturer ? Protective Coating on Reticle Holder - The reticle holders are made of clear plastic "photoplast" material having a photographic emulsion on one side. Concentric circles are photographically printed on the holder to assist the photo- interpreter in centering the reticle. The emulsion of the photoplast part in the first samples of the P.I. stage reticle was protected by a thin coating of silver lacquer which the manufacturer centrifuged on the bottom surface of the holders. This increased wear resistance. The reticle holders on the latest samples are reported to have been coated with silicon monoxide by a vaporization process. The reason given for the change was that this would provide a more'uniform surface flatness. ? Reticle Mountin - Samples tested in May 1973 had reticles recessed to a specified 0.001 inch (+.0005, -.0000) above the bottom surface of the reticle holders. Of the latest samples submitted for testing, two were reported to be recessed 0.0005 inch and the other two mounted flush (0.0000 inch) with the holder surface. Prior to TEB testing, the holders were marked for iden- tification. Holders No. 1 and 2 have recessed reticles, whereas Nos. 3 and 4 have flush-mounted reticles. Approved For ReI 2a-FU LC1 -K0 4560A007400010020-2 Approved For Releg6W:#,~Cb('4560A00740001EB1SZI-09/7+ Reticle Line Quality Each reticle was examined at 200X magnification for line smoothness and breaks. Three reticles had no defects, but No. 2 had minor breaks in graduation lines. Reticle Mounting Test Procedure - A B$L Dynazoom microscope was used at 200X magnification to provide a minimum depth of focus measur- ing device. Each reticle and holder was placed under the microscope and on top of satin-finish ground glass. The ground glass was brought into focus and the focus position recorded. One end of the measuring scale was then brought into focus and the new focus position (in microns) recorded. This procedure was repeated for each end of the millimeter scale and foot scale. Focus readings were made on four dif- ferent occasions over a 2-day period. These readings were then averaged. By this procedure, the position of each reticle in its holder with respect to a flat surface was determined. Reticle tilt was measured by taking the difference in average focus readings from one end of each scale to the other. The height of each reticle center above the flat surface was calculated by averaging all "focus difference" measure- ments made of that reticle. For reporting, this is called the reticle recess. It possibly includes some movement away from the surface because of nonflatness of the reticle holder. Test Results - Reticle tilt is calculated to be less than minute of angle in most cases and less than 2 minutes in the worst case. The "focus shift" needed from one end of a reticle scale to the other was no greater than 3 microns in most cases and 7 microns at worst. The millimeter scale is 10 mm long; the foot scale is approximately 12 mm. Approved For Release 2001/08/13 : CIA-RDP78BO456OA007400010020-2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Approved For ReleFa26WW/41*I-Ci flPhbY4560A00740001vvzi}' z -09/7+ Reticle No. Measured Distance Specified by Manufacturer Microns Inch 1 25 0.00086 0.0005 2 19 0.00065 0.0005 3 13.2 0.00045 0.0000 4 11.8 0.00041 0.0000 Discussion - For comparison, four of the five reticles teste in May 1973 were recessed approximately 61 microns (0.0021 inch) and the other one 93 microns (0.0032 inch). The P.I. stage reticle is likely to be used with the B&L Zoom 240 microscope. The theoretical depth of field of this instrument at 120X magnification is 28 microns (0.0011 inch). Therefore, any reticle recessed more than half that amount, 14 microns, is likely to be out of focus. Reticle Focus Versus Photographic Imagery Each P.I. stage reticle was positioned over selected targets on aerial film imagery while viewing with a Zoom 240 microscope. Various magnifications up to 120X were used. At magnifications up to 90X, no shift in focus is necessary to keep both the photographic and reticle images in sharp focus with either reticle sample. At 120X magnification there is a need for a focus change between photographic imagery and the recessed reticles. This is because the line width of the reticle graduations marks enlarge in their partially out-of-focus condition. This con- dition was not evident when using the flush-mounted reticle samples. Approved For Relea,Sb fOQ,1 MAElt-jg~PbW4560A007400010020-2 FFI Approved For Ref "2 iALC kV'64560A00740001%'b x'09/74 4. OPERATIONAL SUITABILITY One recessed and one flush-mounted reticle sample were o erationall used b photointerpreters in IEG for 2 weeks, STATINTL Verbal reports from these activities indicate that the latest samples of the P.I. stage reticle are well liked. IEG presently lacks the 120X capability for their Zoom 240 micro- scopes; therefore, tests they made were at 6OX magnification. At this magnification both reticle samples were satisfactory. Their preference, however, is for the flush-mounted reticles. This is because they anticipate soon having the 120X Zoom 240 capability with its smaller depth of field. The two reticles operationally used by IEG were examined for possible wear of the reticle lines and concentric circular lines on their holders. There was no evidence of damage after 2 weeks of photointerpreter use. Approved For Release 2001/08/13 : CIA-RDP78B04560A007400010020-2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Approved For ReleY CW4'/E>iflJAICIfA bl4 560A007400016WJ&12R-09/74 Both the recessed and flush-mounted samples of the P.I. stage reticle submitted for testing are satisfactory for operational use with microscopes up to 90X magnification. At higher magnifications, the flush-mounted samples were superior in performance. This is because of the very limited depth of field at higher magnifications and the need to keep both film imagery and reticle graduations in focus simultaneously. The new vacuum-deposited silicon monoxide protective coating on the reticle holders is expected to satisfactorily inhibit surface wear because no evidence of damage was detect- able after 7 weeks of use. All of the design objectives for the P.I. stage reticle have been met. Approved For Rele 08' f/l?ALCI1RP3M?f560A007400010020-2 Approved For ReIF A 4 & L & 6WW64560A0074000 Distribution List Activity NPIC/TSG/TOS (Thru Ch/TSG) NPIC/TSG/ESD NPIC/PSG/RERD/PB NPIC/PSG/R&RD Library NPIC/PS/PAB NPIC/IEG/TPS ODEE/IRDD OD&E/ IRDD STATINTL DIA/DI-8 Arm SPA STATINTL ffic g O9/7)4. No. of Copies Approved For Relp;U 26ffffl ~ (MfD&~t~94560A007400010020-2 Approved For Releas(FM lUff ACI1L1$ S190456OA007400010020-2 Approved For Release ~1 8k~ ikllbWBT&Bp4560A007400010020-2