SALT II BOTH CARTER AND BREZHNEV ARE RISKING MUCH IN THE UPCOMING BATTLE OVER RATIFICATION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370028-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 16, 2004
Sequence Number: 
28
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 17, 1979
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01315R000400370028-1.pdf113.42 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/01/12: CIA-RDP88-01315R0004P03T9Q2A8 ," , (AJ, (I, ,a w- Article appeared on page C-1, 3 TI-IE BOSTON GLOBE 17 June 1979 Both Carter and Bre'zhnev *are 1 much in the upcoming battle over ratification This is the first of a five part series by The Globe's diplo- matic correspondent analyzing the issues and implications of the Senate debate on the ratification of S.-1LF 11L By William Beecher Globe Washington Bureau EXCERPT: L?t7 ;:des agree the pivotal Senate battles probably will ioliowitig issues: Encryption. The CIA wanted the White House to push toori a ban on encryption, the encoding of test data radioed i:o.,m Russian missiles. Instead the parties agreed only nn, r.o pt that information necessary to monitor compliance '.vith !rea.: c::nstramts. Critics want an amendment calling fora total' ban on encryption, insisting that otherwise the burden is on the United States to prove to the Soviets that information being denied is vital toy monitoring compliance. The Administration willi argue that it has sufficient data on what radio channels the Russians have customarily used on previous missile tests for various kinds of data, and if key channels aro suddenly encrypted, the United States would know it and insist that. it "top. , . . o Loss of CIA Iritt'iiansites. Two electronic bases in Iran provided important intelligence on the critical launch phase of missile firings from Tyuratam, one of-the two most important Soviet ICBM test centers. Sen. John Glenn (D-Ohio) wants Russia either to permit US spy flights through Soviet air space near test complexes, oi? to allow the emplacement of unmanned "black boxes," which would allow the US to monitor tests remotely. - The Administration hopes that U2 flights on the Turkish side of the border will suffice, as- suming the Russians don't object to them. o MX Mobilebasing. When the United States was considering shuttling the MX ran- domly among several silo-like holes, the Rus- sians insisted this w91~t9tl~rt~ devise an effective monitoring scheme. The Rus-! .cam,,: hnuan'tewn ackPd about the trench bas- guagge stating that the treaty is being ratified only with the'understanding that the trench sys- tem is permitted. But since the first IVIX isn't due to become operational until a year after the treaty expires,, the argument has more to do with nailing down the issue so it doesn't turn into a big hassle in SALT III. Protocol. A protocol to the treaty, to expire in 1981, would ban the deployment of mobile ICBMs and of ground-or sea-based cruise mis- siles. Sen. Gary Hart (D-Colo.) wants a resolu- tion making clear that the protocol cannot be ex- tended beyond that time without the approval of two-thirds of the Senate. The Administration will not oppose this reservation, but will fight an attempt to kill the protocol outright and ex- punge it from the treaty: ` a Backfire bomber. The Administration will strenuously, resist an attempt to get Backfire counted as a strategic weapon, arguing that the lRussians would never agree, and that this would amount to killing the treaty. Further, officials will point'out that there are more than 500 American planes --- based in the United States; in Western Europe and on-aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean - all of which have contigency assignments to drop nuclear weapons on Sovieti territory. And the United States successfully re- i sisted any of those being counted as strategid,4 weapons. - In addition to wrangling over treaty lan- I guage; the Senate also will doubtless debate- what has been happening to the balance of pow- er during the 10 years of SALT, as. well as whether the United States should try to insist that passage of the treaty and extension of Most- Favored-Nation tariffs to the Soviet Union% should be linked to Soviet cooperation, rather than confrontation in the Mideast and elsewhere- around the world. SALT I was sold partly on the, premise of linkage. j A v t f i l y d e eran o many nat ona securit ebates{ e 2005/01/12: CIA-ROPt8&-fi4rM ODt4POiZQOi3i Assage in these term. ?