Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


DEMOCRACY IN GREECE--TOWARD A NEW BEGINNING

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 11, 2004
Sequence Number: 
38
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 21, 1967
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0.pdf [3]717.03 KB
Body: 
August 21, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE amendment to the laws governing the Pov- erty Program. This measure gave preference to the use of free competitive enterprise in alleviating the burdens of suffering and pro- viding a new horizon of opportunity for the disadvantaged segment of our nation. It was ultimately accepted with substantial Demo- cratic support. Your organization, over the years, has been keenly interested in the health of its mem- bers and in the problems of health generally. From the beginning you have favored hospi- tal insurance under Social Security, pay-as- you-go. So have I. And I can say to you truth- fully that without the constructive interest and support of Republicans in the Senate and in the House of Representatives Medicare would not be the law today. Las year the Congress of the United States finally recognized the fundamental inequity of treating workers In agriculture less favor- ably than those in industry.-The national minimum wage law for agriculture was a pro- posal which I had repeatedly introduced in the Senate, with the official support of the Republican - party of California. The bill which was passed last year by the Congress was essentially this proposal. This year it is fair to say that there would not have been a Consular Treaty with the Soviet Union were it not for the overwhelm- ing support of Republicans, and particularly of the Republican leadership, who joined to overcome a major assault on this Interna- tional agreement originally proposed in the Eisenhower Administration, and which bore General Eisenhower's earnest approval. There is, of course, an area of necessary bipartisanship. Since the time of Arthur Vandenberg, the United States of America has based its foreign policy on a broad range of national support. The actions of our Presi- dents, whether Republican or Democrat, have been based on a bipartisan approach to America's role in the world. It is necessary that our nation be united in the face of the seemingly never-ending crises erupting throughout the world. The Republican party has supported the American effort in resist- ance to aggression in Vietnam. It has main- tained firm support of the Atlantic Alliance and of a strong policy of good will and part- nership with the American republics of the Western Hemisphere. In addition to the crucial questions of for- eign policy, there are other fields where bi- partisanship is essential. It is particularly necessary when any measure requiring a two- breaking of a filibuster. The present rules of public, Jordan, and Israel; the report of the Senate call for a two-thirds majority to my study mission, entitled "War or Peace those e present and voting ng to put an end nd to the rule of unlimited debate. Bipartisan co- in the Middle East" was distributed to operation is necessary to overcome endless all Members of this Body last April. In talkathons. And they occur, believe it or not, that report, which was released prior to on a wide gamut of legislative proposals, al- the Coup d'etat on April 21, 1967, I con- ways by a small group who know they don't cluded inter aria that: have enough votes to prevail, so they decide 1. The justification for military aid to to talk the proposal to death. necessary any area Greece is simply no longer there. The fact rules that we have given military aid to Greece Thus, Republicans of the have Senate are Involved. _ for so many years should not blind the Con- the aisle in with me propos- - m gress to the desirability of terminating fur- bers on the e other er side of joined ing a bill ill provide e for disclosure phe tes ther military aid to Greece and Turkey and sof Members Congress, acandidates devoting far greater diplomatic efforts than sets or key y sand members anfor d we have hitherto to arms control and dis- armament measures in the Northeast Medi- ranking Congress, members s o o their of the staff ta Executive Branch aon n an annual basis. We believe that such legis- terranean and Aegan area. lation is in the public interest. 2. Our friendship for the Greek people I have listed a broad range of achievement should lead us to continue economic assist- of the minority party. It is true that without ance on a limited basis, one which would be votes legislation cannot be passed. The multinational to the maximum extent pos- thirds vote comes before the Senate, for ex- ample, in the ratification of treaties or the today. My concern now is no longer over the questionable effectiveness of the al- leged partial embargo imposed on ship- ments of U.S. military equipment to Greece following the coup; an embargo designed to encourage the colonels, in Secretary Rusk's words to give "concrete evidence that the new Greek Government will make- every effort to reestablish democratic institutions." Instead, my overriding concern stems from the disturbing rumors that, despite the lack of "concrete evidence" that the junta is moving to restore democratic in- stitutions, the full resumption of arms shipments to Greece is now being con- templated at the highest levels of our Government. The familiar argument is now being heard that the military junta-despite Its lack of popularity among the Greek electorate-has never- theless succeeded In establishing its con- trol over the Greek nation and must be dealt with on the basis of vague assur- ances that the country will return to constitutional rule at some indefinite time in the future-the very distant fu- ture, one might add, if the colonels have any say in the matter. In short, the pe- riod of watchful waiting may soon give way to the policy of business as usual. We cannot indefinitely ignore a friendly gov- ernment, it will be contended, whose in- ternal politics the United States cannot presume to direct or control. The great fallacy in this line of rea- soning is, however, becoming increasingly obvious-particularly with respect to those states which depend directly upon the United States for their very survival. The practical impossibility of remaining neutral in thought, word, and deed was clearly illustrated just a few weeks ago when the State of Israel was seriously threatened by an Arab diplomatic offen- sive. Only certain misguided officials in our own State Department seem to be deluded from time to time by such pro- fessions of innocence on our part. Greece's close identification with the United States was assured 20 years ago when the Truman doctrine was first adopted and the country was narrowly saved from a Communist takeover. Since the end of World War II, we have given billions of dollars . in assistance to Greece-almost one and one-half billion in military aid alone. We have, therefore, a huge stake in Greece's political and economic destiny. In reality, we are now faced with a re- gime in Athens which is both totalitarian and unpopular, enjoying-for the mo- sure which it brings to bear can help keep Unfortunately, the trend in U.S. policy ment at least-the tenuous support of the majority party responsible to the public toward Greece has been running in pre- the Greek Armed Forces. Although a sues will. and The minority preparing its party, legislative s e anticipating u - - cisely the opposite direction in recent democratic constitution is promised, we proval al and force the years: that is, military aid was continued have no tangible evidence it will be forth- tions, can seek public approval own majority to take action, even if its own meas- as heretofore, while the Export-Import coming in the foreseeable future. In the ures fail to pass. It is this ability to innovate Bank has denied long-term credits to the name of anticommunism and patriot- . Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0 S 11865 and come forward with new and dynamic pro- Bank of Greece for the development of posals which keeps the American body politic the Greek economy. I do not, however, healthy. It is true of Republicans and Demo- wish to dwell upon these specific policy crats alike that a good proposal will meet sup- port from both parties. My esteemed col- decisions, as quite obviously, the Greek league, , the Dean of Senate Republicans, situation has changed rather dramatic- George Aiken of Vermont, recently made the ally since the military regime assumed point: power just 3 months ago. "As Republicans, let us not be afraid of the The point I wish to emphasize, Mr. 'me, too' charge which is sometimes levied President, is that if the justification for against us. If a Democrat says we need better military aid was no longer there before health, I am not going to come out for poorer the recent coup, it is still less justifiable " health just to disagree with him. All responsible Republicans recognize the wisdom of his point of view. This mechanism works both ways-whoever comes up with the best approach to a modern problem will ulti- mately win support in the Senate-and at the polls. The Republican party in Congress plays a vital role in keeping alive the possibility of change in the national Administration. Its role is to provide the counterweight in the delicate mechanism of our national political life, insuring that when the majority has spent its force there will be another element waiting and ready to keep the nation mov- ing. Like collective bargaining and free com- petitive enterprise, the two-party system is a vital institution in our American life. The give and take between opposing forces in the market place, as well as in the political arena, has permitted peaceful change; it has en- couraged national growth. So, too, has our modern labor relations system. America has forged the instruments of her society from the hard metal of human experience, from the triumphs and tragedies of experiments of many centuries. By apply- ing the test of free human action our people have found an important answer to regulat- ing life among peaceful and productive peo- ples who cherish human values. This, then, is the genius of American institutions-hu- man reason and human freedom applied to the continuing struggle for growth and change, with a decent regard for the rights of others, prosperity and a better life for all. Mr. CLARK. Mr. President, the recent crisis in the Middle East must not over- shadow the equally significant tragedy which has befallen Grece. Last November, I visited this troubled S 11866 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0 CONGP.ESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE August 21, 1967 ism, the junta has imprisoned thousands of public servants and ordinary citizens, imposed total censorship on the press, outlawed political opposition, and in a mood of petty vindictiveness, "added Melina Mercouri to the growing list of glories that were Greece"-in the words of the New York Times-by canceling, or pretending to cancel, or purporting to cancel, her Greek citizenship. Miss Mer- couri's reaction succinctly summarized the popular Greek attitude toward Colo- nel Pattakos, member of the Greek junta, when she said: I was born a Greek and will die a Greek. Pattakos was born a fascist: and will die a fascist. To most informed observers, Miss Mer- couri has a far longer life expectancy than the regime of Colonei Pattakos and his cohorts, whose official public state- ments are tinged with a 'kind of puri- tanism, a pious fundamentalism worthy of the Salem witch trials, of almost 200 years ago, which is strikingly at odds with contemporary Greek and American character. The implications for U.S. policy are clear: Inaction in this situation must inevitably be interpreted in the minds of most Greeks as acquiescence; and ac- quiescence-because of the nature of our relationship with Greece as moral in- sensitivity and support. When the junta passes from the scene, as pass it will, the result will be a tarnished U.S. Image and a diminution of U.S. influence in Greece, unless steps are taken now to disassociate the Government of the United States from those presently in power. To make this disassociation cred- ible, moreover, a suspension of arms shipments to Greece pending a discern- ible move by the colonels. in the direc- tion of democracy, would seem to be a minimal requirement. I strongly urge the administration to take this step be- fore it is too late. Mr. President, to place the current Greek tragedy in its proper perspective, it may be well to review very briefly the recent political history of this embat- tled nation, Following the defeat of the Commu- nist insurgents in 1949, there was a need for a political environment in which Liberal parties could emerge; some con- structive political force had to fill the vacuum created by the total defeat of the Communists and the absence of strong modern Greek democratic insti- tutions. Few farsighted Americans showed alarm over the emergence of a liberal party which disassociated itself from the outlawed Cominunist left. The decade of the fifties witnessed a period of much-needed.political stability and remarkable economic growth under the conservative leadership of Gen., Alexander Papagos and then Premier Konstantin Karamanlis.: Eventually, however, the process of attrition set in- a process I might add which is character- istic of all truly democratic institutions- and the parties in opposition gained elec- toral power and influence-a trend which was accelerated by the unexpected resig- nation of Karamanlis in the spring of 1963. Tie ' victory of liberal candidates of the Center Union Party in the parlia- mentary elections of 1964, and their ac- ceptance by opposition leaders,, indicated that a, viable democracy, with the ingre- dients of stability was now functioning, at last in an embryonic stage. There weri, of course, factions which opposed these developments, and it is now clear that some conservative leaders, with close ties to the Greek Army, took great pairs to persuade American diplomats in Athens to look upon the government of (teorge Papandreaou with suspicion and disdain. This change in attitude, even if it was not accomplanied by an offic:.ai change in policy, was considered by n any to reflect a growing disenchant- ment with the Center Union govern- ment by the United States. There is evi- dence to suggest that the fall of Papan- dreaou in July 1965 was accompanied by an almost total break in communica- tion:; between American diplomats and leaders of the Center Union, one of Greece's largest political parties. This dissatisfaction of American offi- cials with the leadership of the Center Unic.n is important because Greek politi- cians have become accustomed to prob- ing the mood of American diplomats be- fore taking a stand on issues affecting Greece's international position. There- fore, it was not difficult for the Greek public to believe that the United States would at least give silent approval to any political move against the Center Unicn in the name of anticommunism. 4fte - all, the public was being told that American policies in Vietnam were guided by the same principles that led us to ir. tervene in Greece 20 years before- with the result that we are now support- ing % military dictatorship in Vietnam as well as in Greece. In this connection, I should like to call attention. to the remarks of the dis- tingiiished junior Senator from Rhode Island [Mr. PELL], who was one of the first Members of this body to comment on recent developments in Greece. In an excelent speech which appears in the CONI:RESSIONAL RECORD of May 4, the Sen- ator stated: Wl.en a government is brought down by force the United States usually sits on its- hands when -a coup is staged by forces of the right. but whe::i the overthrow is carried out by tl e left we condemn the action, and occa- sionally commit our power to reverse it. The reason for this: difference in our reaction is clear enough. Euightist or conservative forces usualy represent the status quo, so we tend to be more tolerant of their political activi- ties, wen when a constitutional government is th(: victim. Sir ce 1960, for example, the United States has given at least tacit approval, and in most cases quick recognition, to seven new regimes resul Sng from right wing, military coups in El Ealvadore, Korea, Burma, Guatemala, Ecuanlor, Ghana, and Indonesia. During the same period we supported only one left wing coup and that was in Yemen. M3? guess is that we made the wrong choice there. This last comment is mine, and i iot Senator PELL'S. Mn President, I wish to commend the Senator from Rhode Island for his per- ceptive observations and to associate my- self with therrl. The prospect of a victory by the Center Union in the elections scheduled for May 1967, was anathema to those Greek mili- tarists who had profited by its downfall 20 months earlier. To the forces of the right, a victory by the Center Union- even in a fair election-was unacceptable. Once this conclusion had been formed, all that was required was to find the right moment. There is probably - never a moment at election time when at least one faction in Greece is not formulating a plot of one kind or another. This is one unfortunate result of all extremely fragmented polit- ical community. But at the same time, only members of military factions could ever have a chance of illegally imposing themselves on the country, for it is they alone who have the power of the gun- a very persuasive force under any con- ditions. Although we were aware last winter that a coup was being planned in mili- tary circles, we did not, of course, know exactly when or by whom they would be staged. Apparently our ignorance was shared by the entire Greek political spec- trum, from the far :left to the far right, including elements of the Greek military who were busy devising plots of their own, and even by the King. My concern, therefore, is not over an apparently un- avoidable intelligence gap, but over our failure to make clear that the United States would regard any unconstitutional step as totally lnacceptable. We are now led by the State Depart- ment to believe that the United States, and indeed the world, is faced with a fait accompli. But there is a widespread feeling, both here and abroad, that our passive acceptance of this illegal gov- ernment merely perpetuates a morally and intellectually bankrupt regime. Are we then not giving' silent approval to measures which offend the American sense of decency? The policy of the Department of State in the months following the coup has been based on an illusion; it relies on the premise that' a partial suspension of"military aid shipments will succeed in pressuring the Greek junta to broaden its political base and direct Greece to- ward a return to constitutional democ- racy. Such a theory, however, ignores the realities of the situation: Officers now ruling Greece base their power on in- fluence within the military establish- ment, and any movement toward even- tual civilian rule places that power in jeopardy. Given this set of circum- stances, the adoption of halfway meas- ures obviously has not worked, and in my judgment it will not work. Indeed, there is a serious question in my mind as to whether a total embargo on U.S. military assistance will convince this junta that it is moving in the wrong di- rection; but perhaps others in positions of some influence will draw the appro- priate conclusion. At least a, degree of firmness on the part of our Government, some tangible indication that we mean business, will be more likely to restore Greek democ- racy than the delicate, carrdt-and-stick Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0 August 21, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -SENATE approach which has been employed to date. Such action will also have the de- sired effect of serving notice to the peo- ple of Greece and to the world at large that the United States does not in any way condone the assumption of power by a small, unrepresentative minority in a land which has been aptly described as "the oldest democracy and the newest police state." The nature of Greek politics is some- what baffling to foreigners. It is still somewhat Byzantine, and as I stated in my report to the Committee, on Foreign Relations in April of this year, following a trip there, "political leaders tend to represent family and regional rather than national interest." The monarchy plays a role unlike the throne in other European countries. Its mere existence has been a subject of public debate for over 50 years. Twice during this century, Greece has returned to a republican form of government. Thus, the philoso- phies of national parties are colored by attitudes their members hold regarding the responsibilities they feel a monarch should undertake, if any at all. At the present time, young King Con- stantine is surrounded by ambitious and reckless men, who are using the prestige of his office to rule with an iron hand. This places him in a most precarious position, as any miscalculations on his part could once again rekindle the smoldering and hostile controversy over the status of the monarchy. Nevertheless, the King does represent a unifying force which offers the best hope of restoring some ?emblance of po- litical stability and order to the Greek Nation. It should be our policy to en- courage him in this effort, rather than to undermine his position by accepting the present rulers as legitimate. For if the King is ever to assume the initiative in establishing a more representative government-a formidable task at best under the present circumstances-he will need all of the moral support he can muster from the United States. Thus far, such support has been barely dis- cernible, if not altogether lacking. Mr. President, the King of Greece is reported to be on his way to the United States for a conference with the State Department and, presumably, President Johnson. I would hope that while he is here he would have an opportunity to learn something of the views of the American people on this issue, which I believe are in accord with the views expressed in this speech. I would hope that he would have an opportunity to talk with prominent Greco-American citizens and with mem- bers of the Committee on Foreign Rela- tions. I hope he will not be so surrounded by representatives of his own junta, who no doubt will accompany him, and by representatives of the State Department, who will no doubt drastically disagree with what I have to say, that he will have no opportunity to find out for him- self what people really think. Mr. President, Greece is a relatively poor country. Its human and natural resources must be used as efficiently as possible in order for the Greek people to enjoy the minimum standards of pros- perity. Over the past few years, Greece has made great strides in this direction, although she still concentrates too much of her national income on military af- fairs-perhaps as a consequence of the historic threat to her security posed by her neighbors to the north-Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, and to a lesser extent Albania, not to mention her traditional rivalry with Turkey to the east over the island of Cyprus, or other historical grounds. This threat is, however, more historic than real under present circumstances, for despite the reappearance of mutual recriminations in the press of late, we have no real evidence of planned military aggression against Greece by any other Balkan state. In fact, with U.S. participation and en- couragement, considerable progress had been achieved in recent years toward the stabilization of Greece's relations with her Balkan neighbors within the frame- work of the Balkan Pact. Unfortunately, the military junta has now unilaterally terminated border arrangements with Yugoslavia and has suspended agree- ments by which that country used Salo- nika as a free port. Predictably, the result has been a noticeable increase in tension between Yugoslavia and Greece, which runs counter to U.S. objectives in the area. Again, as I concluded in my Middle East report of last April: The age-old reliance of the nations in-this area on force and violence as the ultimate weapons to achieve their national ambitions must, in the long run, be eliminated if we are not to have a recurrence of those Balkan wars which have so often triggered larger conflicts; conflicts which, in a nuclear age, the world can no longer afford. There are several steps our Govern- ment can take to assure the Greek people that we wish to adhere to the principles of our historic and sympathetic ties. First, we should use all proper powers of persuasion to insure due process of law for all those imprisoned as political enemies of the state. Second, we should acknowledge with all due respect the condemnation of this regime by other NATO allies, such as Denmark, and con- sider the merits of having proper NATO authorities review the impact that this recent coup will have on Greece's role in the alliance. Third, we should suspend all military assistance to Greece. Mr. President, the United States did not instigate the coup of April 21, but neither did we do anything to prevent it. Let us not compound that error by con- tinuing to drift into an alliance with another inept dictatorship. We are al- ready handicapped with enough inept dictatorships all over the world. Let us act now, before we become once again the unintended victims of our own inertia. Mr. President, on the 19th of August a news article appeared in the Wash- ington Post under the byline of Leslie Finer. The headline is "Greek Trial In- dicates Struggle Inside Junta." This is a first-class account of a strug- gle for power which appears to be going on within the military junta now ruling Greece. Its outcome could decide whether the country returns to normal political life or comes increasingly under mono- lithic army control. S 11867 The article concludes: Unlike the official leadership, the junior, more extremist group, is apparently not con- cerned with the fear that, by suppressing all moderate political opposition, it is making underground Communist opposition a cer- tain alternative. - Mr. President, that is exactly what is happening in Greece today. Mr. President, I ask unanimous con- sent that the article to which I have re- ferred, entitled "Greek Trial Indicates Struggle Inside Junta," written by Leslie Finer, and published in the Washington Post, of August 19, 1967, be printed at this point in the RECORD. There being no objection, the article was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: GREEK TRIAL INDICATES STRUGGLE INSIDE JUNTA (By Leslie Finer) ATHENS, Aug. 19.-A struggle for power ap- pears to be going on within the military junta now ruling Greece. Its outcome could decide whether the country returns to nor- mal political life or comes increasingly under monolithic Army control. One the one hand is the group of generals and colonels, whose declared promise is to restore parliamentary democracy. On the others is an unseen directorate, composed of junior officers, for whom any kind .of politi- cian or political activity is anathema. This conclusion is difficult to escape in view of the astonishingly inept handling of the Averoff case. On Wednesday Evangeros Averoff, Foreign Minister in the right-wing government of Constantine Karamanlis from 1955-63, was sentenced by a military tribunal to five years in jail for breaking emergency regulations. The next day it was announced that he would be granted a pardon. [Averoff is expected to go free Monday, UPI quoted informed sources in Athens as saying.] Now, almost before the storm of protest over the Averoff affair has, died down, his former colleague in the Karamanlis govern- ment, George Rallis, will on Monday face a court-marital on the charge (which has now become almost comically notorious) of hav- ing some friends home for a drink without obtaining police permission for a party of more than five people. When the police raided Rallis' house, he was caught playing bridge. But, unlike Aver- off, he can claim that those present in excess of five were not invited but just happened to drop in. With nothing much to lose, Rallis was ex- pected at his trial to make a scalding politi- cal attack on the regime. But in view of the government's admission of error in the Aver- off case, Rallis must think carefully what tactics to adopt. The court too will face an embarrassing choice between a sentence which defiantly defends the justness of the previous one or weakly bows before the storm it generated. It will not be surprising if the solution to the dilemma is found by the simple expedi- ent of postponing the trial sine die. In the long run, the Averoff incident may prove most damaging of all by the light it has shed on the power conflict within the regime. When Averoff walked into court he was politely greeted by the military prosecutor, who assured him that he had nothing to worry about (in fact, the prosecutor asked for an acquittal). The chairman of the court also (a perma- nent high-ranking Army legal officer) nodded to the defendant reassuringly, and conducted the trial in a manner which clearly presaged a verdict of not guilty. But 90 minutes of argument behind closed doors failed to deter the junior officers of the Approved For Release 2004/05/25: CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0 S 11868 Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE August 21, 19:67 bench from their purpose of passing a spite- ful sentence. The significance of all this lies in the clues to the people who had no hand in the perse- cution of-a- respected right-wing politician, and who were shocked when it happened. One of these was King Constantine, who took the initiative in demanding a free par- don. Another was the civilian Prime Minis- ter Constantine Kollias, who persuaded the government to agree to the King's demand. It is likely that most, if not: all, of the official military leaders of the regime were ignorant of the treatment handed out to Averoff till after the event. Unlike the official leadership, the junior, more extremist group, is apparently not con- cerned with the fear that by suppressing all moderate political opposition, it is making underground Communist opposition a cer- tain alternative. ROUTINE MORNING BUSINESS The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore. Under the previous unanimous- consent agreement, there will now be a period for the transaction of routine morning business. MESSAGES FROM THE PRESIDENT- APPROVAL OF BILL A message in writing from the Presi- dent of the United States was communi- cated to the Senate by Mr. Geisler, one of his secretaries, and he announced that on August 19, 1967, the President had approved and signed the act (S. 1762) to amend section 810 of the Housing Act of 1964 to extend for 3 years the fellowship program authorized by such section. EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED As in executive session, The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore laid before the Senate messages from the President of the United States submitting sundry nominations, which were referred to the appropriate com- mittees. (For nominations this day received, see the end of Senate proceedings.) MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSE-EN- ROLLED BILLS SIGNED A message from the House of Repre- sentatives, by Mr. Bartlett, one of its reading clerks, announced that the Speaker had affixed his signature to the following enrolled bills: H.R. 1282. An act to provide for the with- drawal of wine from bonded wine cellars without payment of tax when rendered un- fit for beverage use, and for other purposes; H.R.2470. An act to provide for the free entry of certain scientific instruments and apparatus for the use of Tufts' University, Mount Holyoke College, and the Massachu- setts Division of the Ameican Cancer So- ciety; and H.R. 6056. An act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 to provide rules re- lating to the deduction for personal exemp- tions for children of parents who are divorced or separated. EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS, ETC. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore laid before the Senate the follow- ing oorrmunicat.ion and letters, which were referred as indicated : CoMMlss:oN To STUDY SELF-DETERMINATION BY THI: TRUST TERRITORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS A communication from the President of the United States, transmitting a draft of a joint :,esolution regarding the Status of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (with accompanying papers); to the Com- mittee on Interior and Insular Affairs. REVISION OF Sor"wooD LUMBER STANDARD A letter from the Secretary of Commerce, transmiting, for the information of the Senate, a e announcement relating to the re- vision of the softwood lumber standard (with an accompanying paper); to the Committee on Comn cerce. THIRD I'R.EFERENC]c AND SIXTH PREFERENCE CLAS$IFICATIONs FOR CERTAIN ALIENS A letter from the Commissioner, Immigra- tion and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, transmitting, pursuant to law, reports relating to third preference and sixth preference classifications for certain aliens (with accompanying papers); to the Com- mittee o]i the Judiciary. PETITION The .F.CTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore laid before the Senate a resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles, Calif., favoring the enactment of legislation to decrease foreign aid appropriations, which was referred to the Committee on Appropria- tions. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES The fallowing reports of committees were sulcmitted: By Mr. BIBLE, from the Committee on In- terior ani Insular Affairs, with an amend- ment: S. 814. 9 bill to establish the National Park Foundation (Rept. No. 532). By Mr. NELSON, from the Committee on Interior end Insular Affairs, withoutamend- ment: S. 1972. A bill to provide for the disposi- tion of funds appropriated to pay a judg- ment in i avor of the Emigrant New York In- dians in Indian Claims Commission docket No. 75, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 536). By Mr. JACKSON, from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, with amend- ments : H.R. 535. An act to provide that the United States shall hold certain Chilocco Indian School lands at Chilocco, Okla., in trust for the Cherokee Nation upon payment by the Cherokee Nation of $3.75 per acre to the Fed- eral Government (Rept. No. 535). By Mr. BREWSTER, from the Committee on Commerce, without amendment: H.R. V 8. An act to amend section 209 of the Mere cant Marine Act, 1936, so as to re- quire future authorization of funds for cer- tain programs of the Maritime Administra- tion (Reid. No. 533). By Mr ERVIN, from the Committee on the Judiciary, with amendments: S. 1035. A bill to protect the civilian em- ployees of the executive branch of the U.S. Government in the enjoyment of their con- stitutionui rights and to prevent unwar- ranted governmental invasions of their pri- vacy (Rel it. No. 534). NOMINATION OF THURGOOD MAR- SHAL::-EXECUTIVE REPORT OF A COMMITTEE EX. REPT. NO. 13) Mr. R%RT. Mr. President, as in execu- tive session, from the Committee on the Judiciary, I report favorably the nom- ination of Thurgood Marshall,, of New York, to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, and I submit a report thereon. I ask unani- mous consent that the report be printed, together with the minority views of Sen- ators MCCLELLAN, EASTLAND, THURMOND, and ERVnc. The 'ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore. The report will be received and the nomination will be placed on. the Execu- tive Calendar; and, without objection, the report will be printed, as requested by the Senator from Michigan. BILLS INTRODUCED Bills were introduced, react the first time, and, by unanimous consent, the second time, and referred as follows: By Mr. HART (for himself and Mr. MAGNUSON) : S. 2321. A bill to supplement the antitrust laws of the United States in order to pre- vent anticompetitive practices, by providing for just compensation upon termination of certain franchise relationships; to the Com- mittee on the Judiciary. . (See the remarks of Mr. HART when he in- troduced the above bill, which appear under a separate heading.) By Mr. TYDINGS: S. 2322. A bill to provide for a study with respect to the adequacy of legal. services and programs in the 'United States; to the Com- mittee on the Judiciary. (See the remarks of Mr. TYDINCS when he introduced the above bill, which appear under separate heading.) FRANCHISE COMPETITIVE PRAC- TICE ACT OF 1967 Mr. HART. Mr. President, on behalf of myself and the Senator from Wash- ington [Mr. MAGNUSON], I introduce to- day, for appropriate reference, the Franchise Competitive Practice Act of 1967. In brief, this bill provides for just compensation to the franchise upon termination of certain franchise rela- tionships. Franchising has enjoyed a tremendous growth since the end of World War II. Today almost any item or service which the public desires is available under a franchise program. The franchising sys- tem is of mutual advantage to the fran- chisor and franchisee. The franchisee is provided with an opportunity to become an "independent" businessman benefited %by national advertising, know-how, proved bookkeeping methods, and so forth, without having to undertake the enormous financial burden required by a single business. The franchisor is able to organize a nationwide distribution sys- tem without the attending problems of employees, taxes, and so forth. The rela- tionship is much like a partnership in which both parties gain or lose by the other's action. - The Antitrust and Monopoly Subcom- mittee has held three sets of hearings on franchising during the past 2 years. One thing that becameclear was that the bal- ance is titled somewhat in favor of the franchisor. Numerous franchisees testi- fied repeatedly that they constantly lived with the fear of arbitrary cancellation of the franchise and the preempting of established customers by the franchisor. Approved For Release 2004/05/25 : CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp69b00369r000200300038-0

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP69B00369R000200300038-0.pdf