POSITION EVALUATION FACTORS FOR IMAGERY ANALYSTS
Document Type:
CREST [1]
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP82T00285R000200100008-5
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
1
Document Creation Date:
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date:
April 1, 2004
Sequence Number:
8
Case Number:
Content Type:
MF
File:
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 CIA-RDP82T00285R000200100008-5.pdf [3] | 47.1 KB |
Body:
AFT
Approved For Relea 2004/05/12 : CIA-RDP82T00285R00Q&30010000~`-
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Personnel, DDA
FROM . Deputy Director, NFAC
SUBJECT . Position Evaluation Factors for Imagery Analysts
Discussions have been underway [or several months now between
managers of Agency components with imagery analysis responsibilities
and some of your people from Position Management and Compensation
Division regarding position evaluation factors for imagery analysts.
I understand that as matters now stand, PMCD views imagery analysts
as supportive to all-source analysts, and consequently--according to
PMCD philosophy--should be graded one grade below the all-source
analyst positions.
I want to go on record as being diametrically opposed to the
PMCD position on this issue. Based on my experiences; in all-source
intelligence production offices; as Executive Director and Director
of NPIC; and now at the Directorate level, I am convinced that there
are not any distinction between imagery analysts and all-source
analysts that merit the grade differences which now exist. If any
such distinctions ever did exist they have long since disappeared.
Because of my position on this issue, I cannot. accept the PMCD drafted
factor evaluation system for imagery analysts. Rather, I urge that
you give serious consideration to the draft factors prepared by the
imagery analysis organizations as the guide for future position audits.
25X1
Deputy irec or
NFAC
DRAFT
Approved For Release 2004/05/12 : CIA-RDP82T00285R000200100008-5