Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


BAIRD-ATOMIC, INC.'S INVOICE NO. 5151-1 DATED 30 NOVEMBER 1957

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP64-00360R000700140021-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 22, 1999
Sequence Number: 
21
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 13, 1957
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP64-00360R000700140021-7.pdf [3]77.44 KB
Body: 
Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP64-003R000700140021-7 Sec-221o9 Copy L of 6 13 December 1957 NF DRANDUM FOR: Project Finance Officer Project Director of Administratic Baird-Atomic, Inc.'s Invoice No. 5151-1 Dated 30 November 1957 1. Attached is Baird-Atomic Inc.'s bill for $9,216.57. This bill is submitted for work done for which I was responsible at the request of Mr. Bissell. It was agreed that Baird's expenses should not exceed a cost of $10,000. 2. Mr. Bissell approved a contract for 25X1 A of a meeting attended by himself and myself on 7 November 1957. The contract was intended to termin- ate on 22 November 1957. 3. I have no quarrel with the Per Diem rate (upon which we mutually agreed) nor the hourly rates for labor. Neither have I any c ~saJr n,e~~ 4,L~-A-,41apn! With cost of direct materials ($19). I have, however, some comments relative to time for which reimbursement is claimed. First, as noted above, W. Bissell did not give approval for commence- ment of work under the contract until 7 November 1957 although the schedule of direct labor, Per Diem and travel expenses include amounts for the mouth of October ($302.69) in addition to probable work per- formed during the first 6 days of November. I was not aware that we were paying Baird for their expenses incurred in "selling" the idea to us. I will clarify this point with Mr. Bissell and inform you on this matter. 4. Besides my general comment that their charges for direct labor are considerably higher than I anticipated, I can find no other fault with their invoice. Their schedule of direct labor notes that 15 scientists contributed time/effort to this contract. I cannot dis- prove that this number were not involved, but in my two trips to Boston Sanitized - Approved For Rele RDP64-0036OR000700140021-7 Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP64-003 R000700140021-7 25X1A 25X1A for discussions with them I on no occasion had. discussions with more than 6 or 7, and was not wader the impression that as mny people spent as many hours on this contract as shown. I make this con ent not to debate the justification of their invoice but merely as a mat- ter of record. Attachment Invoice No. 5151-1 Sanitized - Approved For Relea _ . ? ClA-RDP64-0036OR000700140021-7

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp64-00360r000700140021-7

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP64-00360R000700140021-7.pdf