Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


SOVIET INTENTIONS AND CAPABILITIES - 1952

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
November 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 20, 1998
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 1, 1952
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4.pdf [3]673.56 KB
Body: 
' Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360Q02-4 iPEFSEIRirr ENCLOSURE nAtt psnuT plum= AND 9APAB1iAlp6 1952, 221LJULLIK 1. To estimate Soviet intentions end capabilities in the event of war daring n 1952. ,24, The problem assuitias tie outbreak of a general war during?! 3.952 as a result of Soviet aggression. 3, It is also astoumed that, at the catbreak of war: hi. The existing military occupation of Germany, Austria, and Japan will still be in offset. lit The European Reooverr Piograai will have resulted in greater eoonomic and politioal Ata ity in Western Europe. a, A North Atlantic kaot i*1iiii tor a system of collective security embracing the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Iceland, Norway, Denmark, the Bewails countries, France, Portugal, and Italy will have been adopted and inplemented. ? it, Substantial US military aidw.iL have been provided to the participants in the North Atlantic Pact and also to Austria, Greece, Turkey, Iran, Korea, and the Philippines, but this aid will not have been sufficient to permit any oontinental recipient to resist Soviet invasion successfully without direct US military support. a. The situation in the Near and Middle East will be relatively Whale, despite underlying tensions. In Mina the Conmuniets will control the national government, bat their actual local control over extensive areas and their relations with llosoow will remain uncertain. The situation in Southeast 'Asia will remain unstable, 1 401k-SECRET Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4 4 Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A0003040360002-4 TeHEPeri? Emosuks 9311 =a= au zit= rounca4LND PSYCHOLOGICAL 1, Soviet war14ms. The rulers of the USSR have as their ultimate objective a Communist world order under their own domination. The role of the USSR in the attainment of this objective is to provide a secure base and powerful support for the international Communist movement. Soviet resort tower in the circumstaneen enVisaged in the Assumptions presupposes a conviction on tho part of, the Kremlin that the progressive economic recovery, political coalesoence, and military rehabilitation of Western Europe pose an intolerable threat to the security of the Soviet Union, or at least such an obstacle to the attainment of its ultimate objective as could be overcome only by military force, and that it had become imperative to act before the relative Strength of the hest had been further enhanced. The immediate Soviet objective in resorting tower, then would to to smash the supposedly hostile alliance of the West and to subject Europe and the Near Beet to Soviet military domination. A consequent objective would be to convert the resources of the conquered area to Soviet use, greatly enhanoing the potential strength of the USSR in relation to that of the surviving capitalist states. It might also be hoped that the strain of war and the oho* of defeat would hasten the expected disintegration of capitalism throughout the world. 2. ?? The hussian people have on occasion r ma :.? icently o foreign invaders from their homeland (e.g., 1812, 1942), but have never successfully waged aggressive warfare azainst a major power. (In 1814. and 1945 they were carried forward by the momentum of their pursuit of a defeated invader and were powerfully aided by Western allies.) The Russian people presently dread war, but coact be driven to it by the absolute power of their totalitarian state. The war would, of course, be presented to them as 'essential to their national survival, and few would be in a position to know better. Secure against imme- diate invasion and ignorant of the potentialities of strategic ban.- li bardment the vast majority would acquiesce in the decision of the KremlinpaIbeit'without enthusiasm. 2 T ?465EER Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4 Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A00030.0360002-4 4111*-5ErarT The immediate poychological reiotien of the Russian people to prompt Allied strategic air attack, indluding the use of atomic bombe: cannot be predicted. The.consequent-diSruption of national life would, however, subject the police contra apparatue to severe strain, and - sustained strategic bombardment would have cumulative psychological effect. Soviet vulnerability to peyehologicel Warfare would increase as time passed without a favorable Militerecision and as a Western eounter-offensive effort got underway. Disaffection in the USSR could not be expected to express itself openly, however, until assured Western support and protection was at beryl. , 3, The situatlonLio the SatellieAtatea. The populations of the Satellite States are thoroughly disaffected toward the Soviet Union. They would welcome war in hope of liberation, The outbreak of hostili. ties would probably raise a wave of anti...Soviet eabotage? perhaps even scattered insurrections, which would be ruthlessly suppressed. Effective resistance movements could not be developed and Maintained until Western forces were in a position to render appreciable support and there was reasonable hope of eventual liberation. lagulaskt. Yugoslavia is a -special case. The outbreak of war would pose for Tito the ultimate dilemma. The primary requirement of his position would be to keep Soviet forces out of Yugoslavia. Active participation in the war, either as hn ally of the USSR or as an ally at the West, would lead directly to Soviet intervention in rUgoslavia and consequently to Tito's own destruction. Neutrality would result in isolation, merely postponing the day of reckoning to a date more. convenient for the USSR. Among these hard choices, indecision and inertia would be on the side of neutrality. Whenever soviet intrusion occurred, the bellicosity of the Yugeolave would favor a vigorous guerrilla resistance. ? 5. ramelizajda.thaAsa. Under the Assumptions the political and economic power of the Communist Parties of Western Europe would be sub- stantially neutralised by 1952, but there would remain, especially in Italy and in Prance, a dangerous fifth column of trained and reliable militants. Their efforts would facilitate the advance of the Soviet armies and contribute materially to the control of civil populations in their rear. 6. Asa; ,,unistchina. The situation which will exist in China in 1952 is a z 1 highly problematical. It has been assumed, with good reason, that the Communists will then control the national government, but that their actual local Control over extensive areas and their - 3 - 4624E6164 Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4 Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002:4 iONEERET. relations with Moscow will remain uncertain. Attive Chinese participation in the war on the side of the USSR is not aloregone conclusion. Never. the:loses the presumption is that Communist china will cooperate as required with the USSR. 7. Communisu i; :The situation which will exist in Southeast Asia in 1952is4eo problematical. Seviet.aligned nationalists will presumably still control most of. Indochina. The existing situations in Burma and Indonesia are particularly susceptible to Communist exploita- tion ands unless radioal solutions ire founds this condition will pre. eumably have developed favorably for the USSR by 1952. Western failure to solve these problems would enhance Communist capabilities for mis. chief in Siam and Malaya. SCONOMIC S. Aiduatrial oarecitr. Sven if the planned development of Soviet and Satellite industrial production Were to be fully realized, the industrial potential of the USSR in Wg would still be markedly inferior to that of the United States. Soviet ghd Satellite industrial develop. ment is retarded ten shortages of high.production machine tools, indus- trial equipment, and precision instruments, and Of facilities for producing them; shortages of skilled personnel, both technical and managerial; low productivity of labor; rail transport stringency; and shortages of high- grade gasoline and lubrioanta, of certain ferro.allop and non-ferrous metals, of certain types of finished Steel, and of industrial diamonds. While the outbreak of hostilities would find the Soviet armed forces gefteralLy well provided with standard equipment, Soviet and Satellite industry could not meet the requirements Of a long war of attrition. 9. Varierebilip? te taleckade. The vast continental area controlled by the USSR istelatively invulnerable te blockades but is under neoessity to eport, not only certain manufactured iteMe indicated above but also natural rubber, industrial diamonds, tuhgeten, tins cobalt, moiybdenum, and high.grade Swedish iron ore. Moreover, it is dependent on Yugoslavia for an adequate supply of lead, zinc, and copper. These needs maybe covered to some extent by stockpiling (especially in the ease of natural rubber), but would make themselves felt in the event of a long war. 10. Transeertaggp. In 1952, Soviet internal transportation will .still depend essentially on the railroads, which now carry about 90 per- cent of all inland freight traffic, Their capacity is barely adequate to meet present industrial needs, and is unlikely to increase at a TGP-SaltET?' Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4 ? Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4 -TOP SECRET greater rate than the expansion or industry. At the outbreak of war this leek of reserve capacity would severely limit the ability of the USSR to support vast armies operating at extreme distances from the centers of Soviet war production. The shift of soviet industry east. ward for greater seaurity actually aggravates this problem and to that extent reduces Soviet offensive capatdlities. There is also the handi- cap of transshipment required by gauge differences between the USSR and the Satellite Stateas Because of limited inland transportation facilitios the USSR must continue to rely to a considerable'extent upon coastal shipping in the slack and Baltic Seas and in the Far East. es 14 Soviet acquisition of the ustria and scion ic facilities Western Europe would greatly enhance the Soviet war potential.- The industrial labor force and skilled manpower (technical and managerial) available to the USSR would each be more than doubled. Western Enropean facilities for the production of precision instrUMents and Machine tools would supply critical Soviet deficiencies. Soviet steel capacity would be almost, -doubled; shipbuilding capacity would be increased five4old. If these facilities were acquired intact and their peaceful assimilation were permitted, the joint economic pcwer of the USSR and continental Europe could probably be made, in the course of ten years, to equal that of ? the United States, ? 140 such gain Could be realised, however, under conditions of mili- tary aggression and continuing war, including demolition, blockade, aerial bombardment, and popular resistance. Deprived of fuel and raw materials which the USSR could not supply from the resources at its command, the industrial Plant of Western Europe could function at net more than 60 percent of, its 194$ capacity. The effects of demolition, boMbing, popular resistance, and general disorganization are lees sus- ceptible to estimate, but might be severe. It may be concluded that the oocupation of Western Europe Could significantly increase the economic capability of the USSR to support a long war, the actual gain depending on the actual degree of des. truction ad popular resistance. In any case, the Soviet liar machine would remain primarily dependent on the wer.industrial capabilities of the homeland. 12. Effect of jhe ecepeetionelirpee Near East. The single critical economic consideration in this area is oil. Its acquisition by the USSR - 5 - APproved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4 ? Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000306360002-4 would be important in terms of denial to the west, but of limited direct benefit to the Soviet Union. Because of traneportatioo difficulties, Bear Eastern oil could not be made available for use in the USSR and Soviet Europe in any significant quantity, although it could be used to support Soviet farces in the Near East. The most important acquisia tion for the USSR, would be the realities at Abadan for the production of high-grade gasoline and alkylate blending agents. These facilities, however, would be sublect to demolition. MILITARY (Chitted) POLITICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL 13. hs tl4ptio P? It is to be presumed that the Atlantic Pact countries would lolly fulfill their commitments on the assumed ioutbreak of var. This would include, presumably, an attempt to hold on the line of the Rhine and the Allais pending the arrival of:teinforce- tents. The quality of resistance would depend, however, upon the morale of the defenders as well as upon 1be quality of their organisation, equipment, and training. The morale factor is likely to .1)0 critical with respect to the continental statee directlarexposed to Soviet mass attack. Their determination cannot be sustained by promises of eventual liberation and ultimate victory, but will depend on confidence in imme- diate and decisive support. If the idea, which the Communists will assiduously propagate, that the 'United States will defend the Rhine to the last Frenchman, should ever, take hold, the moral effect would be disastrous and a collapse of rehistanoe comparable to that in 1940 might well ensue. In this event the analogy to previous experience, 1940-44, might be carried further, with this difference, that European forces outside of Europe would be disposed to continue the fight against Communism without question, Underground resistance within Europe might be gamer in devel- oping without the benefit of Communist leadership and conspiratorial skill and under experienced and ruthless Soviet police control, but would develop as Western counter-offensive action gave promise of approach. ing liberation. 14. den. an These countries would cling to a policy called neutraliv4bmttaatually, directed toward avoidance of Soviet attack on any terms short of national surrender. If attacked, however, they would resist to their utmost ability. - 6 Approved For ReTArtt8-01617A000300360002-4 Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4 get-SKIM& 15. pielan4, The Irish would atleast support the West 'by measures sheet of warp and might well be persuaded to become co-belligerent. 166 alga. Having no hope of accommodetiot with the USSR, Spain would seise the opportunity to escape from iocaatiOn into active alli- ance with the Atlantic Powers and would offer fanatical resistance to Soviet invasion. 17, Seem, If not attacked i Turkey would probably seek to postpone involvement in the ear, but not at the, cost of iodation from the West Or of fatal conoessione to the USSR. If attacked the Turks would resist ? to their utmost ebilitY4 le, glagatijiaLkaa, The frontal resietanoe of these countries to Soviet invasion would be shortlivedi but guerrilla resistance would pro- bably continue, its effectivenese varying with the availablity of support. 19. 2rac. Syria and The political situetiOn in these countries is extrem$y unstable. Thor would seek to avoid involvement in the war, but would be psychelogioally as well as militarily incapable of offering effective aid or resistance to either the West or the usaR, 20. jaw. Israel's posAion ie one of neOtrality between the East and West. Western ties are predominant so tar, however, and, if compelled to take sides, Israel Would probably align itself with the West, ri, 4 These states would be effectiv a igned with the West, thoib in a paesive role =less actually invaded. Egypt is vulnerable to eubversion. 22, adz. The African continent may, be regarded as securely con. trolled by the West, at least during the first phase of the war, despite the existence of certain potential.fooi of disaffection. South Africa would participate actively in defense of the continent, 23. lbeLInitip Wiont Afohatistens,akisten? and India would . endeavor to remain neutral, but would resist attack. Ceylon would be aligned with the West. 24 rioutbadadia The situation in this area in 1952 is proble_ matical, especially so with respect to Burma and Indonesia. Soviet- aligned native nationalists are likely to control Indochina, excepting perhaps the environs of the principal cities. Siam will probably remala Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4 Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000306360002-4 TtefaIDZET--- anti...Soviet, but officially neutral. British control of Ualaya is likely to be secure. The Philippines will be aligned with the United States, 25.' Aumtralia atvi pewjealae. These Dominions would take active part in the war in support of Great Britain, 26, Aggag, The regime in South Korea would be US-aligned, but could offer no serious resistance to Soviet invasion. 27. atm. The Japanese would support OU defense of Japan, not only by reason of traditional Ruesophobia and anti-Communism, but also in hope of rehabilitation as the premier military power in East Asia. 28, Late. Ameace. The Latin American statefewould support the United States within the framework of the Rio. Treaty, in various degrees of effective cooperation. 29, Becaeitp1Pliorit froleable all*: the partioipants in the North Atlantic Pact, Ireland, Spain, Greece, Turkey-, Iran, Egypt, Transprdan, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Ceylon, Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Korea, Japan, and Latin AMerica. la. Zagertain.a.matteas Sweden, Switzerland, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Burma, and Siam, ECCEMIC ? 30 . The Allied economic capability to support a long war is greatly superior to that of the mgt. Given effective organs!. ization and advanced planning for the optimum utilization of available resources, no insuperable economic difficulties should limit Allied 'military capabilities. The principal factors of strength in the Allied position would be a markedly superior industrial potential and comer- ciel access to all the material resources of the World outside the arca of actual Soviet occupation. The principal weakness would be an ines- -capable dependence on overseas shipments, often at long distancesp-with consequent loss of time and effort, limitation in terms of availability of shipping, and exposure to Soviet submarine attack. 31, gfeet 47the lesp.ot_Wegmajmduetry. The war industrial strength of the Allies would be located in the United States, Canada, 8 Approved For Release: CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4 Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000306360002-4 and the Untted Kingdom. Loss of continental European industrial potential (with simultaneous relief, from responsibility for BAP* porting the civilian econ.,v of that area) would not Beriodeli offset the war potential 4) the Allies. The possible reduction of WIWI production by heavy and persistent air and missile attack would be more serious, hut not :stall 32, Effget ofmthe 14084 litier East 040 Loss ci? the oil production of the Near &et would be a severe ?Am to the Allied war effort, although its effect would be cushioned to some extent if responsibility far supplying oil to Western Europe were eliminated at dila the sem, time. The oil ,resouroes remaining available would be sufficient to meet Allied needs, but.the inconvenience and risk involved in long overseas shipments would hinder the conduct of the war, 343. : 9 'AI " IC,' " 41+4 4 -....-' ''. '? :: Ii r` - The adverse ec ., s . 111? t ese resources principally natural rubbers tin end oil) would not be insuperable (they have been lost before, 194245) tut the diversion of effort that would be required to make up for the loos would be hampering. =nay (omitted) - 9 - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-01617a000300360002-4

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP78-01617A000300360002-4.pdf