Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


CIA SUPERGRADE STRUCTURE

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
10
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 18, 2001
Sequence Number: 
19
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8.pdf [3]581.58 KB
Body: 
Dp5 63-- 4-2 ? Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 Ald SECRET MERIRANDUM Fat: Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT : CIA Supergrade Structure PROBLEM: To determine the appropriate supergrade structure for C/A in terms of: a, Supergrade ceiling, b. Grade distribution of mapergrade positions, c. Distribution of supergrade positions among major components. 2. ASSUMPTIONS: a, A method of fixing and periodically adjusting the CIA supergrade structure should be incorporated into the Agency salary adminis- tration program. b. To assure equitable compensation for personnel assigned to the most responsible Agency positions the number and distribution of CIA supergrade positions shot3:1 be reviewed periodically to maintain alignment with dompenaationpractices of other corn- parable Federal Agencies. c. Th* supergrade category of positions, for purposes of external Agency comparison, includes all full-time positions with authorized salary levels equivalent to or above the base of the 0546 grade level, regardlees of the type of authority for the rate. It includes statutory positions, Foreign Service pomitions in the Department of State wholly within the supergrade range, OS positions authorized by other legislation, positions in agencies excepted from the Classification Act which are compensated at or above the 05.16 level, etc. 3. FACTS BEARING Off THE PROBLEM: a. In the Federal Government there are numerous basic authorities which establish positions at salary levels above 084.5. These include the followings Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CliSHOTER-04718A001800060019-8 ' ApProved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 25X9A2 SECRET 1), Executive Pav, Act . Polk 359, 2), Classification Act of 1949 as amended. 3). Defense Production Act of 1950 as extended. (4)0 Appropriation and Deficiency Fund Legislation, (5). Organic Legislation Establishing Agencies. (6), Reorganisation Plans. b. There has been a continuous upward trend in the number of super-. grade, positions in the Federal Government. Reorganisation Flans and Supplemental Appropriation Acte for Federal Agencies during the past several years have included authorisations for additional supergrade positions. P.L. 763? effective 1 NoveMber 1954, inp creased the number of supergrade positions authorised under the Clasaification Act of 1949 from 400 to 550. The President has recommended that the existing ceiling on supergrade positions under the Clasaification Act of 1949 be removed? co The supergrade structure for the Federal Government as a whole and format individual agencies is of pyramidal form with fewer positions authorised for each successive grade or salary level above 08.15. Representative patterns are depicted in Annex I hereto. d. The present supergrade Classification attractant of CIA is as fellows: 1:0 DISCUSSION: a, There is no regulatory requirement or official guide to fellow in determining the size and ocaposition of the CIA Supergrade structure. Therefere, &logical 'moo:his to compare the "supergrado/totalcpersoitheratios of agencies having missions and function comparable with those of CIA, as was done in the previous SupergradeAuthorisation Study of 12 December 1952. Using this method, agencies hewing the following basic characteristics Approved For Release 2001/07/12 :cialile78-04718A001800060019-8 ' Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 2 X9A2 25X9A2 A were selected for cemparisan purposes: foreign or inter. governmental operations or relations; national defense or national security rune:Ione; functions requiring civilian staff personnel in numerous technical end specialised fields,, b. The results of inter.egency supergrade structure sapper/sons are as follows: ' % Supergrades to Tottl Personnelasem.eioSadPosint Total Personnel Central Intelligence Als$2c7 State Departatent 11,690 Atomic 4nergy Commission 5,983 Foreig: operations 09066 90518 Administration WS, Deformation Federal civil Defense Administration 679 Beninese and Defense &MUSS Administration h00 Office of Defense Mdbilitation 263 232 L 112 L 43 69 0.72% 21 3.09% 27 645% 32 12.16% co The following conelderations are important in determining the significance of variations in Agency supergrade percentages: (1). The Department of State (1098%) Tlex Department is meat nearly comptrable to C/A because of its woridowide mission, nectars of functivms, and dispersion of employees and activities. The total personnel figure for the Department of State0 110690 excludes 9,371 nonocitisen employees overseas, mostly non. professional and comparable to CIA indigenous employees under various types of contracts and not included in cur total strength figure. /n addition, the Department of State FS0.2 class; #110130 . 12,700 p.a.; was net inoludei in the ever- grade categery since the entrance rate was below that of 05460. 800060019-8 Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 SECRZT (2L ABC ()AV) - The pr1.saa7 factor warranting ,IEC's ratio is its responsitility for staff control and on arvision over contractual operations employing thominds of additional paavomel arnd involving Urge szpanditures of funds. FOA 4.71%) The low rating comet/I:ands with the Fak laillff1011 of ZeillOrtila dofense and economic support to "selected sea- gralArical amass a mission believed to be less respell:ale than the basic functions of the CIA rind the .uepertreant of t'tzttet. (4). 1153:A 072%) X011 rati.og due to cosamerstive3.y recent soparatton frail the Depailarant of States aims the agency's snporgrade pooitzloyas consist primarily of those received from that Depart- naeito , Office of Defame libbilisation 112.3.0)3 Baldness caul Defense Sonvicas::Adialid.stration (6.75P3 Federal Civil Defense AtTfintink. trction (3.09%) The high ration of these agencies ore doe te their statue as "etenaV aMeett *Joh maintain a nualcuo high-levta staff paranoia to faclatatA) rapid empension =dm? emergency conditionsA Fedefai 'Civil Defense Administrations in adilitions met envervito a Urge icaater of volunteer Remit- nel not included in the ivory total. (6):0 The dentin ESUpgrartgla ratio or the Mei, Deptrtatent of 3tAite9 roxi(ign?Oporations' Adadristratioal .and L8Infetanation lavatri ' .peeitiaenkt 456 expergri4 posit5.ons) is 1837%.: '81,4110, Of Ciftieratig. ?OOLVOttte of functionts. .operational laituationas porateartel.Staffing 4iequirsamaterS and aectri.?nts 25X9A2 Pertinent to establishment of the Agency etaPfenrede StaltotaZos deterainctien es to the distribution of the supergrade coitire Peattions, ky.17ada levels. Althoff* no statutory requiranent makes this action neoessam for OIA, Cosgrove he heretofore soft a mandatork weds diettbution for Classifiottion Let3 currentlys ToPer- grade distritettiono for the folloating :inmates uere also rerriesed in tho process of determining a reasonable distritration for clAs SECP.Ze Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA,-DID78-04718A001800060019-8 25X9A2 25X9A2 Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 (a) SEiCRET all Federal Agencies under the Clastification Act; (b) Departtent- ' of state; (c) Atomic Energy Commission; (d) Foreign Operations Adstration; and (e) the U.S. Information Agency. These , distritmtions are presented graphically inkier= I, An analysis of theme grade distributions points out a gaaeral consistency with the organiaatianal principle that each succeeding higher level Of positions has broader area or functional responsibility and co euently fewer authorised positions than the next lower inaemuCh as a composite erpergrade ratio of State? AEC, FOA, and USIA Is used as the basis far establishing the Agency Supergrade the same approach ma- be followed for determining the Agency supergrade distribution pattern. Duo to our excluding from supergrade status of Aie F50-2 Class of 4?artment of State and at the WM time considering SECRET - 5 - Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 25X9A2 Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 7krii "LT Since the military strength is included in computing the super. grade authorisation, general or flag rank ?military officers on active duty and Foreign Service Officers with rank of FSO-1 or higher class detailed to perform the duties of Agency positions should obligate a supergrade ceiling position. f. Upon conclusion of the previous aupergrade study., 12 December 1952, The: supergrado ceiling was sub-alloted to manor compomenteitmeed on the follouing formula: NuMber of Supergrade Positions X Approved for each Component by the Sneergrade Review Board. Since that date there have been several adjustraents in the ceiling , tweed wen changed operational reentirements in the Office of the DCI and the reorganisation of the Deputy Director (Support) Components. Alternate methods of allotting the supergrade ceiling among the Agency Components which have been investigated involve distribution of this ceiling based on the ratio of: (1). Component TIO to Agency WO (By number of Tib positiome). 2): Component Gail% (Civilian and Military) to Agency Ceiling. 3) Number of 06.9 and Above Personnel on Duti7rn the Component to Number of 08.9 and above personnel on duty in the Agency.. (4). Mber of 110 positions above 0S-9 in the Component to the Number of positions above OS-9 on the Agency TX71 (5). Number of WO positions ithin the O5-13 to 0845 range in the component to the total number of OS-13 to GS-15 inclusive Agency Tit posItions. (6). Number of TAD positions in 08.15 in the component to the total =Ober of G6-15 ;maniocs on the Agency VO. Alternate aupargrade ceiling distributions resulting from application of the above ratios are as follows: 25X1A * 3 ceiling spaces transferred from DIVP to m/s per Noti Approved Fa karaDATTOM/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 SECRET 25X9A2 25X9A2 Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 SECRET Rather than select any single one of the means set forth for distributing the supergrade authorisationsammg components, a combination of two or mare of the alternates could be used. If thee ntceJandthenumberofGS- to OS tions were se , an average of e results in the following distribution: Component Current Supargrade Ceiling Supergrade Ceiling Based on Personnel Ceiling and No. of GS tos. This ceiling distribution considers both the size of the component and the level of its positions and is therefore believed mare equitable than a distributiou4bidh weed consider a single factor. However, the Ots of the Office Of the Director and the need for a Snpergrade Re Mutt likewise be considered. The latter requirements can be t byaproportionate adjustment of DD/S, and DD/P ceiling as fellows: Component Cnirent SG Ceiling Resod Adj. for Recommended Ceiling Snpergrade on Comp. Ceiling DCI a:SO CIA Super- Obligated Ceili4 kGB.. Ptak .Reserve .ade a. The composite supergrade ratio of the Department of State, Foreign Oparatione),Admiastration, Atomic Energy Commi.ssion and U.S. Information Agency provides a sound and defensible basis for establishing and pertbdically adjusting the CIA sopergrude authorisation. SECRET Approved For Release 2001/07/12 r CTAGRDP78-04718A001800060019-8 Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA41M8-04718A001800060019-8 25X9A2 25X9A2 b. The CIA supergrede authorisation should be distributed by super - grade toveis consistent with practices in the four outside agencies; AEC, State, )1)A? USIA. c. The; CIt supergrede authorisation should be distributed among Agency compon-onts on the basis of the component ceiling and the number of OS-13 to CiS.15 positions authorised, with appropriate adjuttments as indicated to meet requirements of title Office of the Director. d. General or flag rank arilitary officers on active duty and Foreign Setvice Officers with rank of F50-1 or higher class who are detailed to perform the duties of Agency positions should henceforth obligate arapargrada ceiling positions. 6. ACTION RECOMMENDMI a., Consistent with Composite aupergredeftotal personnel ratios and suneiwade distribution patterns of the AEC, State, FOA, and USIA, The CIA supergrade ceiling should be distributed by components as follow t: c. Genera) or flag rank military officers on active duty and Foreign Service Officers of rank F50-1 or higher class who are detailed to perforri the duties of Agency positions should henceforth obligate ruperg 'ads ceiling positions. ANNEXES I. Comparison of Supergrade II, CIA Supergrade Structure ACTION BY APPROVING AUTHORITY: APPROVED: /07 L. X. WHITE Deputy Director (Support) Structures Other Agencies Prevent and Proposed Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 Statutory Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 Ann I SUPERGRADE STRUCTURES - OTHER AGENCIES 23 If 2 2C 886 U.S. Ocnrornmant Total GS (Statutory Positions Ezokuled) (Aa of January 1955) 232 143 Thpartuant of State AEO FOA USIA ( ? _4As of April 1955.....--2.4 * Exc1ud0043 FSO-2 Position, sEcur Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 25X9 Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8 Approved For Release 2001/07/12 : CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-04718a001800060019-8

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP78-04718A001800060019-8.pdf