Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES: SELECTED ECONOMIC DATA

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
19
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 13, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5.pdf [3]371.7 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Industrial Countries: .Selected Economic Data Eu2.rrt 83 - io (`-11 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Industrial Countries: ? The US share of the economic output of industrial countries fell sharply Economic Power Shifts from 1950 through the early 1970s, and thereafter stabilized. ? The largest US loss occurred in the 1950s, reflecting mainly the recovery of war-torn Europe and Japan. The momentum of this catchup lasted well into the 1960s although the changes in relative GNP shares slowed considerably. ? During the 1970s the US share changed little. ? The gains of the EC Nine came entirely in the 1950s; after that the group's proportion declined slightly as the share of the United Kingdom and West Germany fell somewhat. ? Japan's gains came during the 1960s when its economic growth pace topped an extraordinary 10 percent a year. Japan's share increased slightly in the 1970s as its economy continued to grow somewhat faster than that of other industrial countries. Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Industrial Countries: Economic Power Shifts Share of total industrial country GNP, in 1975 prices Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Industrial Countries: ? The US current account position relies heavily on service transactions. Current Account Balances, 1982 ? In recent years, the United States has had the largest trade deficit among industrial countries but has achieved by far the largest surplus on the service account. ? France, Italy, and the United Kingdom tend to follow the US pattern, al- though oil exports helped Britain to achieve a trade surplus last year. ? Japan, West Germany, and Canada usually run trade surpluses and service deficits. Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Current Account Balance of Industrial Countries, 1982 Trade Versus Services Tradea Services and private transfers Total United States Japan West Franceb United Italyh Canadab Germany Kingdom aBased on balance-of-payments definition. h tatimated Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Industrial Countries: ? The most commonly used indicator of a country's balance-of-payments Current Account position is its balance on current transactions. This includes exports and Trends imports of merchandise, trade in services, return on capital invested abroad, and salaries earned abroad. ? The United States and other industrial countries, as a group, usually run current account surpluses. These surpluses create the capital flows the LDCs need to finance development efforts. By the early 1970s the industrial country surpluses reached some $15 billion a year. This normal surplus situation was distorted after 1973 because the huge oil price increases temporarily led to large current account deficits for the industrial world and made OPEC a major source of capital for LDCs. ? From the early 1950s through the middle 1960s, the United States ran fairly large surpluses while the other industrial countries had deficits; thus, the United States was providing capital to help the LDCs develop and to assist other countries of the industrial world in restoring their economies. As these other industrial countries improved their economic strength, they too began to run current account surpluses. ? By the late 1960s, the US current account position began to deteriorate sharply, reflecting the continuing competitive losses to other industrial countries. In this regard, it became clear that the dollar was overvalued. ? Since the realignment of the key world currencies against the dollar and introduction of floating exchange rates in the early 1970s, the US current account position and those of other countries have experienced wide swings, reflecting ongoing exchange rate changes and the sudden rises in oil prices. Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5>,> Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 -601963 65 a Includes goods, services, and private transfers. Data for 1982 are estimated. I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I C I Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 US Current Account ? Service transactions have played an increasingly important role in US Trends current account transactions. ? While the US trade balance (on a balance-of-payments basis) has deteriorated from near zero in the first half of the 1970s to an average deficit of some $30 billion per year since then, the service surplus has climbed fairly steadily, reaching $36 billion in 1982. Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 US Current Account Trends: Trade Versus Services -40 1970 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Japan: Imports of ? Japanese imports of manufactures are small by any measure. Manufactures ? They are small relative to those of other industrial countries. ? They are small in relation to Japanese exports of manufactures. ? They are small in the two-way trade among industrial countries. Thus, Japan has not yet developed the large and fairly even flow of manufac- tures with other industrial countries that has characterized the growing interdependence among countries of North America and Western Eu- rope, and between these regions. ? They are small when measured against GNP. Despite 10 years of considerable efforts by the United States and the EC to make Japan open up its market, the ratio of Japanese imports of manufactures to GNP re- mains near the low level of 1970. In contrast, the United States and the EC have each greatly increased their relative purchases in the past decade. ? Japan shields its domestic market from foreign competition mainly through an informal interaction of various interest groups, while tariffs and other statutory trade restrictions play a minimal role. ? Foreign firms in Japan must deal with (1) an array of restrictions involving inspections and approvals handled by an ambiguous bureau- cratic process, (2) informal cartel arrangements among major producers, and (3) unwritten guidelines under which buyers purchase goods mainly from Japanese firms. As a result foreigners cannot easily pinpoint where and how the restrictions are being applied. Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Imports of Manufactures: Japan, the US and the ECa Compared Value in 1982 Billion US S EC United States Japan Ratio to Exports of Manufactures, 1982 Percent EC United States Japan Regional Trade in 1982 Billion $ EC from US 31 US from EC 28 US from Japan Japan from US _ J 1 1 EC from Japan 16 Japan from EC i 5 As it Share of GNP Percent 1970 1980 a Excluding Denmark, Ireland, and Greece; 1981 data or Itah b II vcluding intra-LC trade. ?2.2 12.4 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Impact of Japanese ? The United States has taken the brunt of the Japanese export surge. US Exports of consumers, of course, have benefited from the Japanese price/quality Manufactures competition. ? Despite the recent rapid rise in Japanese exports to the EC, that group takes a much smaller amount of such Japanese manufactures relative to GNP than does the United States. In fact, the EC absorbed in 1982 about the same share of GNP that the United States did in 1972. ? In Italy and France the purchases of Japanese manufactures remain an especially small portion of these countries' GNP. Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Industrial Countries: Imports of Manufacturers From Japan 1972 United States 1982 Canada 1972 1982 ECa United Kingdom West Germany France Italy 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Japanese Surges in ? Japanese companies are most aggressive in exporting manufactures when Export Growth domestic demand falters. They do this by rigorous marketing and by convincing workers to temporarily accept cuts in real wages. ? Firms in other countries also pursue such recessionary strategies, but the Japanese do so in a much more forceful manner because of their particular mode of business operations. Japanese companies are much less able to reduce costs during recessionary periods. Their lifetime employment practices mean that they cannot easily lay off workers. Their comparatively high reliance on loan capital rather than equity capital means they are burdened with continuing high debt servicing payments and gain little by cutting back dividends. ? The unusually high coincidence of recessionary periods among industrial countries (1974-75 and 1980-82) made the Japanese export drives even more politically sensitive. Many countries accused the Japanese of pursuing export-led growth at the expense of other industrial countries. Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Japanese Surges in Export Growth (Average Annual Rise in Volume of Exports) Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 United States: ? The US economy increasingly is dominated by service activities. Service- The Growing producing industries now account for more than 70 percent of the US la- Importance of the bor force and in the last decade provided for almost 90 percent of its Service Sector growth. ? Relative to goods production, however, the service sector has been given little attention because of the paucity of information on services and the vague nature of these industries. In the international field, for example, the United States divides "merchandise" trade into 10,000 categories; in services there are fewer than 10 breakdowns. ? Indeed, the US economy is experiencing a service transformation, in which a new set of linkages are being established through the growth of "integrative services" that interconnect firms, units of firms, and indus- tries at different stages of production or in different locations. The distinctions between goods and service industries are increasingly break- ing down, as the two aspects merge with each other. The most dramatic expansion is now taking place in this integrative part of the service sector that combines high technology with management/ marketing know-how. This "information economy" marries computers and communications, which include "software" of all types, and a great variety of financial and diagnostic services. Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 United States: The Growing Importance of the Service Sector Share of Total Employment Service- producing countries Goods- producing industries Service Share of Growth in Employment Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Selected US Service ? The other private services category contains some of the most dynamic Industries: Share of and important service sector industries. But, because of the accounting Foreign Revenues method used in balance-of-payments statistics, the category includes only a small portion of the actual sales of these industries. For example, another effort to try to account for the total foreign revenues of the industries in this category came up with more than $30 billion in 1980. This compares with less than $4 billion under the balance-of-payments definition. ? Much of what might be included in the other private service balance-of- payments category shows up in other service elements such as fees and royalties, direct investment income, and private transfers. Large revenues received by these industries also are likely to be included under merchandise trade. For example, the price of computer hardware often includes considerable outlays on software. ? Among many private service industries, foreign revenues now provide a major share of the total revenues. In accounting, advertising, banking, construction, and motion pictures, foreign revenues account for 30 percent or more. ? While the proportion of revenues derived from foreign sales remained relatively low in the case of consulting, franchises, and information, they are climbing rapidly and ar,; making an important contribution to earnings. Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5 Selected US Service Industries, Share of Foreign Revenues, 1980 Advertising Motion picture rental Accounting ("Big Eight" firms) Banking Construction (top 400 firms) Accounting (all firms) Leasing, transport and equipment Lodging Information Consulting Franchises Legal services Approved For Release 2010/07/13: CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp85t00287r000501390001-5

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85T00287R000501390001-5.pdf