Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


THE CURRENT JAPANESE ECONOMIC SLOWDOWN

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
12
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 2, 2010
Sequence Number: 
95
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 1, 1971
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4.pdf [3]472 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 C M10,6P- , /J' 1 7I-o7c1 / Confidential DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Intelligence Memorandum The Current Japanere Economic Slowdown Confidential ER IM 71-242 December 1971 copy N2 84 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 WARNING This document contains information affecting the national defense of the United States, within the meaning of Title 18, sections 793 and 794, of the US Code, as amended. Its transmission or revelation of its contents to or re- ceipt by an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. wour i e,awd.d r w wee. L'. .wadi.o and d.c in Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 CONFIDENTIAL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence December 1971 INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM The Current Japanese Economic Slowdown Introduction 1. Japan is currently experiencing an economic slowdown after five years of unparalleled growth. Persisting for more than a year, the slowdown has reduced economic growth from a whopping 12% average to about half that rate. The slower growth of domestic demand has reduced import growth markedly, while producers have pushed exports to maintain output. The resulting increased Japanese trade surplus with the United States contributed greatly to the mush- rooming US balance-of -payments deficit, which re- sulted in suspension of the dollar's convertibility and imposition of the import surcharge on 15 August 1971. Many Japanese now blame the US measures for the failure of an expected summer economic recovery to materialize. This memorandum examines the causes of Japa..'s economic slowdown and assesses the eco- nomic outlook for 1972. Back rg ound 2. Japan's extraordinary economic progress since 1955 has followed a pattern of rapid growth in two- to five-year spurts interrupted by a slow- down of a year or so. During the slowdowns the growth rate usually fell to about half of the annual average during the preceding boom period (see Figure 1). The factor mainly responsible for the downturns in 1958, 1962, and 1965 was mi_.netary re- straint prompted by balance of payments difficulties. In each case import growth exceeded export growth during the boom period, and Japan recorded a large balance-of-payments deficit. With only small foreign Note: This memorandum was prepared by the Office of Economic Research and coordinated within the Direc- torate of Intelligence. CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 CONFIDENTIAL exchange reserves available, Tokyo invoked restric- tive monetary measures to cool down the economy. Over the long run, however, exports have been grow- ing more rapidly than imports, and by the late 1960s this balance-of-payments constraint was no longer operative. Figure J. Real GNP Growth in .Japan, 1955 to 1971 (Percent Increase) 10 1971' *Estimated 3. The 1966-70 economic boom was postwar Japan's longest. With the transition to a balance-of-pay- ments surplus and a high level of domestic and foreign demand for Japanese products, investor confidence in the country's economic future grew and investment .rose to an extraordinarily high level. Gross invest- ment increased an average of 22% annually during 1966-70 reaching 39% of gross national product during that period's last three years. This ratio compares - 2 - CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 CONFIDENTIAL with about 25% for the European Community countries as a group and 18% for the United States. Moreover, relative to other industrial countries, especially the United States, an unprecedentely large share of Japanese investment was in plant and equipment. For example, 1910 private Japanese plant and equipment investment accounted for 21% of GNP compared with 10% in the United States. The high and growing propor- tion of GNP devoted to investment unquestionably was a major factor in the economy's rapid growth. 4. There were two relatively distinct stages in the economy's most recent boom. The first was 1966-68, when expansion occurred partly as the result of increased capacity utilization. This was possible because of the slowdown the year before, v; hen produc- tion fell short of capacity. By the end of 1968, however, the slack was completely taken up, and in- vestment in inventories and fixed capital began to increase more rapidly than GNP in anticipation of a sustained rapid growth in demand (see Figure 2). Although large gains in output continued in 1969-70, wage increases began to outpace productivity growth and, as wholesale and export prices began to rise, Tukyo became concerned about the economy overheating. Consequently, as early as September 1969 the Bank of Japan increased the discount rate, indicating a shift to restrictive monetary policies. Causes of Japan's Economic slowdown 5. Monetary restraint thus has been partly responsible for slowing down economic growth. High interest rates induced producers to restrict inven- tory buildup and probably played a role in the re- assessment of planned fixed investment. But at the same time, more fundamental factors were affecting economic expansion. The extremely high investment rate had created some overcapacity by early 1970, and inventories of finished goods relative to GNP were becoming very high. Under these conditions the growth rate of both inventories and fixed investment tapered off. The government's policy of monetary restraint probably cut back investment growth further than desired. In any case, the rise in aggregate demand slackened appreciably. Producers' inventories grew as they tried to maintain full production, but firms :goon were forced to cut back, compounding the depressing %ffcect. - 3 - CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 CONFIDENTIAL Figure 2a. Growth Rates of Gross Fixed Investment, Private Consumption, and Gross National Product Quarterly 1965 to 1971 30% -- Gross Fixed Investment Growth Rate Private Consumption Growth Rate GNP Growth Rate (Nominal) I t I i 1 1 Figure 2b. Index of Capacity Uti!lzation in Manufacturing (1965=100) L I I I I I I i l 1 I I I i 11 J V I I I 1905 66 67 66 69 70 1971 - 4 - CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 CONFIDENTIAL 6. Real GNP growth fell to about a 5% to 6% annual rate in the last quarter of 1970 and during most of 1971, compared with 12% annually during the previous boom. Hardest hit were the basic indus- tries -?- notably steel and aluminum -- and the capi- tal goods producers. Steel outs At during the first nine months of 1971, for example, was some 6% below the same 1970 period. 7. The Japanese also have indicated that their economic slump has been due to lower than expected domestic demand for automobiles and television sets, but there is little justification for these asser- tions. Domestic autombile purchases have slowed since 1970, but this was widely expected as the market approached saturation. Moreover, the 80% increase in automobile exports in the first nine months of 1971, compared with the same period in 1970, largely offset the slowdown in domestic pur- chases. Japanese consumers did reduce their tele- vision purchases in late 1970, when the US Tariff Commission revealed that Japanese color television sets were being sold in the United States at much lower prices than in Japan. But the drop in sales was only temporary. 8. Altogether, private consumption demand has fared quite well throughout the economic slowdown. Underlying this trend was the fact that unemploy- ment has remained at less than 1.5% of the work force. Moreover, wages increased by some 15% in nominal terms and 10% in real terms in 1971, or only slightly below the rapid pace of recent years. - 5 - CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 CONFIDENTIAL 10. Although confidence about future export growth may have been adversely affected recently, Japanese export performance has remained a bright spot in the economic picture. Exports during the first 11 months of 1971 were up some 25% over the corresponding 1970 period. Recent export growth thus has considerably exceeded the average 18% rate of 1965-70. Because weakening domestic demand has at the same time caused imports to stagnate, the trade surplus will nearly reach an extraordinary $8 billion in 1971 -- the largest recorded by any coun- try in the past two decades. Japan's surplus with the United States alone probably will approximate $3.3 billion. Government Efforts to St_.mulate the Economy 11. Tokyo's efforts to stimulate the economy were focused on monetary policy until recently. From 28 October 1970 to 28 July 1971 the Bank of japan cut the discount rate in four steps from 6.25% to 5.25%, a postwar low. These moves had little effect, how- ever, because by the time the government acted, the problem was no longer a shortage of funds but over- capacity and reduced investor confidence. 12. By mid-summer 1971, Tokyo decided to pursue an expansionary fiscal policy. The Diet passed the government's supplementary budget bill in early November. Unlike the legislation adopted during the '1965 recession, which simply allowed borrowing to offset lower-than-expected revenues, this bill calls for increased expenditures and reduced income taxes. Much of the increased spending is earmarked for education, public welfare facilities, highways, drainage systems, and housing. The bill will nearly double the planned government deficit in fiscal year (FY) 1971 (ending 31 March 1972). This deficit is to be financed by selling $2.5 billion worth of national bonds. 13. In early December the government was planning to offset the deflationary impact of an assumed 15% revaluation of the yen by increasing current and capital outlays in FY 1972 by 18% and 30% respec- tively, compared with FY 1971. Moreover, Tokyo announced its intention to consult with the Bank of Japan concerning another cut in the discount rate to as low as 4.75%. Although the yen has now ben CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 CONFIDENTIAL revalued in dollar terms by nearly 17%, Tokyo thus far has indicated it does not intend to change its budget plans. Short-Term Prospects 14. Most Japanese forecasters have been predict- ing that the economy will continue in the doldrums through the first quarter of 1972 and rebound there- after. For example, the respected Japanese Economic Research Center (JERC) recently predicted annual rates of real GNP growth of 2.7% in the first quarter and 5.7%, 7.7%, and 13.2% in the remaining three quarters, for an overall 1972 gain of 7.4%. Since the JERC assumed only a 14.3% revaluation in terms of the dollar, it probably would project a somewhat slower recovery now. The actual revaluation of nearly 17? in terms of the dollar and 11% overall should slow the growth of exports and affect the growth of GNP by more than the JERC estimated. 15. Many Japanese economists believe that economic growth will accelerate mainly because of rapidly increasing housing investment and government capital outlays. According to the JERC, expansion in housing investment will rise from the 1971 rate of 12% to a little more than the 21% rate of 1966-70. The greatest spur, however, is expected to come from government capital outlays. These expenditures are projected to grow 32% in 1972, compared with the 15% average of 1966-70. Inventory rebuilding is also slated to boost investment, but spending on new plant and equipment will grow very little because of over- capacity. Both consumer and government consumption are forecast to continue their steady upward pace. 16. All of the JERC's estimates, except that for government investment, lie within what we con- sider to be a reasonable range,* although several are near the range's extreme (see the table). The JERC's estimated 7.4% rise in real GNP, for example, seems optimistic -- although possible. We judge ThTheJERC employs an econometic model, while our estimates are extrapolations of past trends, adjusted to take into consideration the present economic sit- uation and the economy ?s behavior during past recovery cycles. - i - CONFIDE vTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 CONFIDENTIAL that real GNP will increase between 5% and 8% in 1972, with 6-1/2% being the best estimate. 17. Even though the government is intent on in- creasing public investment and opportunities abound, it probably cannot boost such outlays by anything near the 32% foreseen by the JERC. There is a con- siderable leadtime between the planning and actual construction phase of road, railroad, housing, and school projects. Indeed, the government will have difficulty getting large infrastructure projects under way because the construction industry is already working near full capacity and housing con- struction is expected to rise. 18. Whatever its economic growth. rate during 1972, Japan is likely to maintain a highly favorable balance-of-payments position. The Japanese will have a trade surplus of some $6 billion even if imports grow by 25% in dollar terms (compared with 7% in 1971) and exports by only 10% (compared with 25% in 1971). With such a trade surplus, the Japanese could be expected to have a current account surplus of more than $4 billion and a basic balance of at least $2.0 billion. A substantial net outflow of short-term capital is likely as the $5 billion or more borrowed abroad during 1971, mainly as a hedge aga4_nst the yen's revaluation, is repaid. But with Japanese foreign exchange reserves now amounting to $15 billion, this outflow will not present any dif- ficulty for Tokyo. - 8 - CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4 CONFIDENTIAL Estimated Japanese Growth Rates in 1972 Private consumption Government consumption Fixed investment Private housing 22.5 12.5 to 22.7 Plant and equipment 1.9 -2.0 to 5.0 Covernment 32.1 15.0 to 25.0 Inventory investment 16.6 16.6 to 10.0 Exports a/ 0.3 0.3 to 6.8 Imports a/ 7.5 5.0 to 10.0 Nominal GNP 12.8 9.3 to 13.6 Inflation 5.4 4.5 to 5.5 Real GNF 7.4 4.8 to 8.1 a. Because of yen rava nation, grates of growth of imports and exports calculated in yen for purposes of estimating GNP do not correspond to the rates of growth of exports and imports calculated in dollars for purposes of the balance of payments. For information on ,Tapan Is balance of payments outlook, see paragraph 18. - 9 - CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/03/05: CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp85t00875r001700020095-4

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85T00875R001700020095-4.pdf