Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


THE SOVIET ALUMINUM INDUSTRY: SLOWING GROWTH AND INCREASING DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN RAW MATERIALS

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
25
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 29, 2009
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 1, 1984
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3.pdf [3]1.24 MB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Directorate of Secret Intelligence The Soviet Aluminum Industry: Slowing Growth and Increasing Dependence on Foreign Raw Materials Secret SOV 84-10100 July 1984 Copy 5 2 1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Intelligence Foreign Raw Materials The Soviet Aluminum Industry: Slowing Growth and Increasing Dependence on This paper was prepared b of the Office of Soviet Analysis, with a contribution Comments and queries are welcome and may be directed to the Chief. Soviet Economy Division, SOYA, Secret SOV 84-10100 July 1984 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Summary Information available as of 31 March 1984 was used in this report. The Soviet Aluminum Industry: Slowing Growth and Increasing Dependence on Foreign Raw Materials F--] first, accounting for 23 percent). The USSR has rapidly expanded its capacity for aluminum production, partly with the help of Western technology. Although most of the capacity installed in the 1960s was of domestic origin, all plants built or under construction since the early 1970s have used Western technology extensive- ly. Imported automated control technology, for example, has helped the Soviets to reduce the industry's high consumption of electric power and to ameliorate its chronic labor shortages. Even though growth has slowed sharply since 1975, the USSR is the world's second-largest producer of aluminum, accounting for 19 percent of world output (the United States is Because the Soviets treat nonferrous metals as strategic materials, Moscow publishes little data on aluminum production. During the 1960s and early 1970s, aluminum production in the caused by shortages of labor and inadequate maintenance. USSR increased at an average annual rate of 10 percent, mainly in response to increasing demand from the defense, electrical, and construc- tion industries but also in support of growing export commitments. Since 1975, growth has slowed to an average of 3 percent a year in the 1976-80 period and 1 percent a year in the 1981-83 period. The main causes of the slowdown are: ? A cutback in investment mainly in response to slower growth in demand for aluminum. ? Delays in finishing new production capacity, notably at the Sayansk aluminum plant. ? Excessive equipment downtime at the Krasnoyarsk aluminum plant, 25X1 25X1 Because most of the factors causing the production slowdown have continued into the 1980s, we estimate that aluminum production will grow at about 2 percent a year through 1990. 25X1 expansion in the supporting domestic raw material base. The growth in capacity to produce aluminum has not been matched by the share of raw ma- terials obtained from domestic sources has dropped from 70 percent in 25X1 1970 to 65 percent in 1982. As a result, the Soviets have had to depend in- creasingly on imports of bauxite and alumina; this dependence will continue to increase for the balance of the 1980s as domestic reserves of high-grade bauxite are being rapidly depleted. Prospecting throughout the USSR has not revealed any large deposits that would be economical to iii Secret SOV 84-10100 July 1984 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 develop. We project that by 1985 the USSR will import 40 to 45 percent of its bauxite and alumina needs; by 1990 this share will rise to 45 to 50 per- cent. The USSR is also a world leader in aluminum exports, which have been di- rected mainly to Eastern Europe and Japan. Moscow earns relatively little hard currency from these exports, however, and-as indicated by our projection of relatively slow growth in aluminum production-is unlikely to earn much more through 1990. Although Soviet aluminum production is small compared with steel production, wider use of aluminum alloys could help relieve the tension between supply and demand for some types of steel in a limited number of products. Again, however, the relatively small increases in production projected for the 1984-90 period would prohibit a large increase in new ap- plications. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Expansion of Capacity, 1959-83 The Contribution of Western Technology 2 Why the Slowdown in Production? 10 Delays in Finishing Planned Construction 11 Labor Shortages and Inadequate Maintenance of Equipment 1 2 Increasing Dependence on Foreign Raw Materials 1 2 Estimating Soviet Production 19 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Figure 1 USSR: Estimated Production of Primary Aluminum, 1959-838 I 0 1959 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 I I 1 1 61 63 I I I I I 65 67 69 ' Output of secondary aluminum (recycled aluminum) is not included in this graph; see appendix for a discussion of the methodology used to estimate production. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 secret The Soviet Aluminum Industry: Slowing Growth and Increasing Dependence on Foreign Raw Materials Introduction Aided by Western technology, the USSR has become the world's second-largest producer of aluminum. It accounted for 19 percent of global output in 1982, while the United States accounted for 23 percent (table 1). A lightweight metal that has relatively high strength, good resistance to corrosion, and good elec- trical conductivity, aluminum is important to many Soviet industries and is vital to the defense industries. We estimate the latter directly consumes about 15 percent of domestic production of aluminum. This report discusses the Soviet aluminum industry's devel- opment over the past 25 years, the contribution of Western equipment and technology, the causes of the marked slowdown in growth since 1975, the growing dependence on foreign sources for raw materials, and the outlook for aluminum production and use in the 1980s Expansion of Capacity, 1959-83 Annual output of aluminum grew from an estimated 515,000 tons in 1959 to 2.8 million tons in 1983 (see figure 1). Nearly 85 percent of this growth occurred before 1976, however, when production grew at an average annual rate of 10 percent a year. In 1976-80, growth slowed markedly to 3 percent a year and during 1981-83 to 1 percent a year. delivery schedules Growing export commitments and increasing domes- tic demand-primarily in the defense, electrical and construction industries-have driven the expansion of the aluminum industry. The industry was created in the 1930s, mainly to support production of military aircraft, and expanded during the next two decades. Since the late 1950s increasing civilian demand and export commitments have also contributed to the industry's growth. Although the share of aluminum production directly consumed by defense has declined (from roughly 35 percent in 1960 to about 15 percent in 1982), the defense industries are still one of the largest and most important single users of aluminum and are granted the highest priority in quality and Table 1 Leading Producers of Primary Aluminum, 1960-82 a United States 1,827 3,607 3,274 USSR 565 1,640 2,735 Canada 691 972 1,075 Japan 133 733 351 West Germany 169 309 723 a Primary aluminum is the product of smelting alumina in an electric furnace. US primary aluminum production declined by 30 percent from 1980 to 1982, mostly because of weak markets in the transportation and construction industries caused by declines in the sales of new domestic automobiles and new houses. Japanese aluminum production decreased by almost 70 percent during the same period because high energy costs forced Japan to increasingly rely on less expensive aluminum imports. Source (except for USSR) is the Aluminum Association, Inc., a US-based trade group. Data for USSR derived as explained in the appendix. Siberia: The Center of Growth. Most growth in the industry during the 1960s and 1970s resulted from plans made in the 1950s to construct new capacity in southern Siberia where there are relatively inexpen- sive sources of hydroelectric power (see box, page 3). Over 90 percent of capacity added since then was constructed at four Siberian locations that began production between 1962 and 1967-Novokuznetsk North, Krasnoyarsk, Bratsk, and Irkutsk table 2). These plants established southern Siberia as the center of aluminum production and have account- ed for about 70 percent of total production annually since 1975 (figure 3). The plants at Bratsk and Krasnoyarsk accounted for half of domestic production in 1982. Each has an annual production capacity of roughly 800,000 tons, making them the Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3 Figure 2 Aluminum Production Facilities Sweden Finland d Alumina plant Combined facility S tsk rasn k tsk i The United State.P r menl has not renpg nized the incorporation of E@~innie, Latvia, and Lhuama into the Soviet Union ?ther boundary representation .a not naeeaaariy-ho"tah- vokuzretsk largest aluminum plants in the world.' The only other major addition of new capacity since 1965 has been at Tursunzade in Central Asia. Although this facility began limited production in 1975, it is still under construction and is not expected to reach full output of approximately 400,000 tons until the late 1980s.F_ The Contribution of Western Technology. Growth in aluminum production since 1959 has been fueled by a nearly constant share of industrial investment allocat- ed to the nonferrous metals industry (table 3). Al- though the trends are not published, the evidence indicates that investment in the aluminum sector has slowed in recent years. A Soviet journal has stated that during the period 1971-75 more than a fourth of the capital investment in nonferrous metals was allo- cated to the aluminum industry. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 f I flltrasn tLJ insk Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret High Power Requirements The aluminum industry directly consumed more than 4 percent of the electric power generated in the USSR in 1982, making it one of the largest users. Nearly all of this power is used in the electrolysis reduction process, which requires an average of 17,000 to 18,000 kilowatthours (kWh) to produce 1 ton of aluminum. Aluminum plants are the major industrial consumers of electricity generated by the Siberian hydroelectric power plants (GES). The Bratsk plant consumes 16 billion kWh of electricity a year-nearly 70 percent of the power generated by the Bratsk GES. When completed, the plant at Sayansk will use almost a third of the electric power generated by the Sayansk GES. Table 2 USSR: Aluminum Plants Date of First Estimated Aluminum Production Production in 1982 a (tons) aluminum combine 25X1 Zaporozh'ye alumina 1933 and aluminum combine Kamensk-Ural'skiy 1939 87,000 alumina and alumi- num combine Novokuznetsk 1943 72,000 aluminum south Krasnotur'insk 1945 alumina and aluminum combine Yerevan aluminum 1950 32,000 Despite the industry's high consumption of electric Kandalaksha 1951 53,000 power and periodic shortages, availability of generat- aluminum ing capacity does not appear to have been a major Nadvoytsy aluminum 1954 60,000 constraint in planning new production capacity. Tar- Sumgait aluminum 1955 52,000 gets for generating capacity generally have been met Volgograd aluminum . 1959 172,000 in southern Siberia, where most of the growth in Irkutsk aluminum 1962 238,000 aluminum production has occurred. Novokuznetsk 1963 163,000 aluminum north 25X1 Much of the investment since 1970 probably reflects expenditures for the acquisition of Western equipment and technology. All new plants built or under con- struction since the early 1970s-the Tursunzade and Sayansk (figure 5) aluminum plants, the Nikolayev alumina plant (figure 6), and the prebaked anode plant at Tursunzade-use Western technology exten- sively (see box, page 9, for a discussion of the prebaked anode technology). The Soviets have been trying to upgrade technology used in automation, electric power use, pollution control, and other pro- Krasnoyarsk 1964 672,000 aluminum Tursunzade 1975 240,000 aluminum a See the appendix for a discussion of the methodology used to estimate production. b Projected, with probable production of 50,000 tons in 1985. When the plant is completed, production is expected to reach 400,000 tons. duction-related equipment. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Figure 3 USSR: Growth and Distribution of Capacity for Aluminum Production by Geographic Region, 1960-858 Million metric tons Table 3 USSR: Five-Year Plans in the Nonferrous Metals Industry 1966-70 1971-75 1976-80 1981-85 Plan (estimated) Total (million rubles) Share of industrial investment (percent) 5.5 5.0 5.2 5.1 a The Nonferrous Metals Industry investment figure for 1966-70 is from Ekonomika Tsvetnoy Metallurgii SSSR, Moscow, 1976, p. 126. The figures for 1971-75 and 1976-80 are from Tsvetnoy Metally, September 1983, p. 5. The estimated figure for 1981-85 is based on a Soviet statement that investment in the nonferrous industry during 1981-85 is planned to rise by 20 percent compared with that in 1976-80 (Ekonomika Tsvetnoy Metallurgii SSSR, Moscow, 1983, p. 124). Although none of these sources provides an indication of whether the figures are expressed in constant or 'current prices, the figures for 1971-75, 1976-80, and 1981-85 are probably in constant 1973 prices. However, the 1966-70 figure could be expressed in either 1969 or 1973 prices. In either case, the difference would be small and would not substantially alter the results. ? In this paper the North European region includes the area north of 55 degrees north latitude (roughly north of Moscow) and west of the Urals; the South European region includes the area south of this latitude and west of the Urals. b Projected. One of the Soviets' key objectives in seeking Western help in building the Sayansk plant is to gain advanced automation technology so that the plant can operate with less manpower. Negotiations with a US-West German consortium for a smelter that had computer- ized automated equipment supplied by Alcoa ended in 1979 when the United States embargoed computer technology following the invasion of Afghanistan. In 1980 the Soviets contracted with a West German and French consortium for a smaller smelter (400,000 tons instead of 500,000 tons), technology, and help in building the plant.' The Soviets often import technology for new alumi- num plants and reproduce the technology in other plants. Potline operations, for example, were partially automated between 1958 and 1978 by installation of computerized equipment (the alyuminii system), cop- ied from French equipment and produced in the 2 The cost of the smelter under negotiation with the US-West German consortium was estimated at $600 million in 1977; that of the West German-French consortium's smelter, about $450 million in 1980. As part of the contract, the West German company (Kloeckner) will buy back 10,000 tons of aluminum a year for two Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Iq Next 2 Page(s) In Document Denied 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Production Processes Aluminum is extracted from aluminum-bearing ores in a two-step process. Raw ore-such as bauxite, nepheline, or alunite-is processed into aluminum oxide, or alumina. This intermediate product is then sent to an aluminum smelter. Production of alumi- num from alumina is based on an electrochemical reaction in which aluminum oxide is decomposed into metallic aluminum and gaseous oxygen in the pres- ence of an electric current. This reaction occurs in specially designed electrolytic cells (also called pots). Alumina is dissolved in these cells in a bath of molten cryolite, a material that acts as a catalyst. The cell is a rectangular steel tank, the inner surface of which is lined with carbon brick and serves as the cathode. The anode, also composed of carbon, is suspended from the top of the cell so that its lower surface is immersed in the molten bath. When a continuous direct current is supplied, molten alumi- num accumulates at the bottom of the cell, where it is periodically siphoned off. The molten bath is moni- tored continuously and replenished when necessary to ensure that there are no interruptions in the reaction. operations. Vertical Soderberg (VS) cells operate well at amperages of up to 160,000 amperes, while the older HS cells are limited to approximately 85,000 amperes. Because the aluminum output of a cell is directly proportional to the cell's operating amperage, the output of a YS cell is theoretically nearly twice that of an HS cell The second process uses a prebaked anode composed of pure carbon that is cast and baked into rectangular blocks. The anode, consisting of a set of such blocks, is suspended above the cell so that its lower portion is immersed in the solution. Blocks are replaced period- ically as the reaction progresses. The prebaked pro- cess is more energy efficient than the Soderberg method but is otherwise identical. The Soviets began using prebaked anodes (imported from France) in the Tursunzade aluminum plant which began operation in 1975. In 1978, French companies completed con- struction of a plant at Tursunzade to produce pre- baked anodes for aluminum plants. We expect any new Soviet aluminum plants, such as the one under construction near Sayansk, to incorporate this tech- nology. For the same amount of electric current, these prebaked anodes allow higher yields of alumi- num per cell than Soderberg anodes. The prebaked anode process also allows a more effective collection and recycling of toxic gases, a serious problem in other aluminum plants. Banks of electrolytic cells, or pots, are connected in series and arranged end to end in two rows in long, narrow production buildings called potrooms. Two such potrooms form a complete electrical circuit, or potline, at the majority of Soviet aluminum plants. Plant sizes in the USSR vary from two potrooms to the giant Siberian aluminum smelters that contain up The Soviets use two aluminum production processes that differ only in the type of anode used in the electrolytic cell. The type of anode in use at a plant can be identified by analysis of the plant's anode fabrication facility. The Soderberg, or continuous self-baking anode, is formed from a paste consisting of coke, tar, and pitch, which is placed in a rectangu- lar steel mold. The mold is suspended above the electrolytic cell, and as it descends into the molten bath, the bottom portion of the paste is baked. Electricity is supplied to this anode by means of steel pins embedded in the paste. As electrolysis pro- gresses, the baked, lower portion of the anode dis- solves and new carbon paste is added continuously to the top of the mold. to 24 potrooms. Plants built before 1959 employ the Soderberg proc- ess in which current is supplied through a series of steel pins embedded horizontally in the anode paste (HS cells). Beginning with the design of the smelter at Volgograd in 1959, Soderberg anodes with steel pins embedded vertically were employed. This change allowed the Soviets to mechanize aluminum smelting Aluminum electrolysis requires high-amperage, con- tinuous direct current. Power entering the plant must therefore be rectified, or converted from alternating current to direct current before it can be sent to the potlines. This is accomplished by a bank of current rectifiers in each potline circuit. These rectifiers are installed in a separate building at one end of each potroom. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Se,1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3 USSR. This equipment, reduced total power consumption in the electrolysis process by 1.5 percent because it more accurately positioned the electrodes in the pots. It also reduced labor requirements on the potlines by roughly 25 percent (although it requires more specialized repair personnel). Assimilation of this system was slow; for example, installation of the first system began at the Volgograd plant in 1959 but was not implemented According to a Soviet technical journal, a new auto- mated control system, elektroliz, underwent prototype testing at the Volkov plant in 1978 and is slated to replace the alyuminii system. This new system report- edly includes Soviet-made M-6000, M-7000, SM-1, and SM-2 minicomputers. The SM-1 and SM-2 minicomputers were copied from imported US Hew- lett Packard HP-2116 and HP-3000 minicomputers. One goal of the 1981-85 plan is to supply technologi- cally advanced anodes-probably from the Tursun- zade plant-to existing plants. The Soviets hope that installation of this equipment will reduce the indus- try's annual consumption of electrical power by 2 billion kilowatthours (kWh) (about 4 percent of total consumption) and significantly increase the proportion of high-quality aluminum produced Installation of gas purification systems for pollution control also is scheduled at selected aluminum plants during the 1981-85 period. Controlling pollution has been an important objective since the mid-1970s. The Soviets claim to have spent 100 million rubles on environmental protection equipment for the industry during 1976-80 (most of this was probably at the ' As an incentive to stimulate modernization, bonuses are awarded for introducing advanced technology; production targets often are lowered temporarily to allow for assimilation of new technology. Despite these incentives, new technology has been assimilated slowly in plants reflecting difficulties in adapting new equipment into existing production lines and the plant managers' reluctance to make changes because they fear underfulfillment of even reduced French-built Tursunzade Plant). Decreasing the level of pollution at all of the plants could help ease labor turnover by reducing health hazards.4 Why the Slowdown in Production? The dramatic slowdown in the growth of aluminum production that began in 1976 resulted from: ? A cutback in investment mainly in response to slower growth in domestic demand for aluminum. ? A shortfall in meeting production targets because of delays in constructing aluminum plants . ? Labor shortages and inadequate equipment maintenance. Slow assimilation of new production technology and periodic electric power shortages exacerbated the slowdown. Delays in rail shipments of raw and semi- processed materials have not substantially affected production schedules because most inum plants have stockpiles. Cutback in Investment. We believe that the primary reason for the much lower growth during the last half of the 1970s was a reduction in investment funding. While no official investment figures for the aluminum suggested that a large cutback in investment allo ca- tion compared to the period 1971-75 severely limited plans for new alumina and aluminum production facilities. Although investment growth in the nonfer- rous metals industry has grown moderately since 1975, investment in the aluminum industry declined ' Excessive pollution inside aluminum plants has been a major problem. Unvented fluoride gas given off in excess during the electrolysis process reportedly causes severe bone deterioration in many potroom workers after several years. Older workers are regularly tested for fluoride levels in urine; if the level is too high, the worker is retired. Younger workers frequently are unwilling to accept this risk to health and find jobs elsewhere. Because of exposure to fluoride, potroom workers work only six hours a day and are allowed to retire at age 45. The short workday means that more potroom workers are needed, thus exacerbating the labor shorta ge Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3 Secret partly because of increasing costs and rising invest- ment in other nonferrous metals.' Increasing costs and technical difficulties in extract- ing and processing raw materials have exacerbated the investment cutback in the aluminum industry. A Soviet technical journal has reported that, between 1976 and 1980, the capital investment required to increase production by 1 ton rose 8 percent for alumina and 3 percent for aluminum.' The cutback in investment may have been planned partly in response to slower growth in demand. The sharp slowdown in planned industrial output and investment in the 1976-80 period may have caused slackening demand for aluminum as an intermediate product in the machinery sector. Also, military de- mand for aluminum-which has the highest priori- ty-probably has slowed. We estimate that during the 1976-80 period actual production of aluminum grew much faster than military hardware consumption, largely because of a slowdown in the growth of aircraft and missile production (about 30 percent of the military's aluminum consumption). This trend appears to have continued in the 1981-82 period Delays in Finishing Planned Construction. Failure to finish construction of new aluminum production ca- pacity is another reason for the production growth ' Soviet literature indicates that the Norilsk Metallurgical Complex probably absorbed most of the increase in investment in the nonferrous metals industry from 1971-75 to 1976-80. Most of this investment probably went to.build new copper, nickel, and cobalt production facilities that will supply most of the production in- creases for these metals during 1981-85. Further, Soviet literature has revealed that, from 1975 to 1980, the aluminum industry's share of total productive fixed capital stock of the nonferrous metals industry declined sharply. 6 As the growth of primary aluminum production has fallen off, the Soviets have begun to increase production from secondary sources-waste and scrap. They claim that using these sources more than doubles labor productivity and requires only 3 percent of the fuel and 16 percent of the capital necessary for production from the raw material. In 1981, production from secondary sources was about 200,000 tons or 7 percent of primary production. (In 1982, US production from secondary sources was nearly 45 percent of Figure 7 USSR: Additions of New Capacity for Aluminum Production, 1959-85 0 1959-65 66-70 Projected. slowdown in the period 1976-80. Delays, as well as lower targets for new construction, caused incremen- tal growth of new capacity to fall for the first time since 1959. Only 410,000 tons of new production capacity were added in 1976-80, compared with 790,000 tons added in during 1971-75-a decline of 48 percent (figure 7). Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Nearly all of the scheduled increase in production during 1976-80 was to have come from the startup of new capacity at Sayansk, Tursunzade, Krasnoyarsk, and Bratsk. While production increased at Bratsk and Krasnoyarsk, there have been serious delays at Sayansk and Tursunzade. Delays in building the Sayansk aluminum plant were partly due to the US embargo on the sale of advanced technology, which halted negotiations between Alcoa and the USSR. This project is now scheduled for completion in the 1981-85 Plan. According to Soviet press articles, delays in constructing new capacity at the Tursunzade aluminum plant were caused by poor planning and shortages of construction materials.' The continued sluggish growth of aluminum produc- tion in 1981-83 also was due mainly to the inability to Labor Shortages and Inadequate Maintenance of. Equipment. Labor shortages and inadequate mainte- nance of equipment contributed to the slowdown in aluminum production growth during 1976-80. Al- though plant production (in tons) is not available, a 1980 article in a Soviet technical journal cited the giant Krasnoyarsk plant as operating at only 75 percent of capacity.' Because this plant accounted for more than 25 percent of capacity during 1976-80, underuse could have a major impact on the total production of aluminum. F_ I Krasnoyarsk's inadequate maintenance facilities and shortage of skilled labor caused excessive downtime of the electrolysis cells, resulting in consistent underful- fillment of production targets. Persistent labor shortages, have been a major problem throughout the industry. Generally, the work force is 10 to 15 percent short of prescribed manning levels because of compe- tition for labor from higher paying industries, the ' Izvestiya, 30 October 1983, p. 2. ' Construction of new facilities may have a low priority because of an unexpected slowdown in annual increases in demand for alumi- num resulting from the slowdown in industrial growth since 1976. "'Attaining Planned Capacities at Nonferrous Metal Enterprises," health risks associated with excessive pollution, and the location of a large amount of production capacity in Siberia where the harsh living conditions inhibit an influx of labor.1? costs as well as reduced aluminum production. Other Causes. Supplies of electricity have been taut throughout most of the Soviet Union since 1975. Limited supplies, in turn, have resulted in periodic power shortages that have caused cutbacks in produc- tion at aluminum plants in the western USSR, includ- ing those at Nadvoitsy and Kandalaksha. In Siberia heavy reliance on hydroelectric power has made alu- minum plants susceptible to seasonal power shortages due to lack of rainfall." Insufficient rainfall, together with coal shortages at thermal power plants, has led to temporary cutbacks in electric power generation and reductions in aluminum production. One plant has had to take the extraordinary step of periodically shutting down several electrolysis pots because of interruptions in power. Shutdowns entail high restart Increasing Dependence on Foreign Raw Materials 25X1 Since the mid-1960s, domestic output of raw materi- als and alumina has failed to keep pace with the growth in aluminum production capacity. The Soviets have been unable to meet increasing requirements for domestic raw materials because of the rapidly deplet- ing reserves of high-quality bauxite and the unexpect- ed cost and technical difficulty of exploiting nonbaux- ite ores.'Z In 1982, domestic high-grade bauxite met roughly 23 percent of requirements for making alumi- num (figure 8)~ 10 Soviet aluminum plants, particularly the giant Siberian plants, require a large labor force. For example, in 1978 at the Bratsk plant there were 10,000 to 12,000 workers-including wage workers (75 percent), administrative personnel (20 percent), and support service personnel such as electricians, repairmen, and janitors (5 percent). As an incentive, the Bratsk plant pays workers 1.4 times standard wages plus 10 percent extra for each year of employment at the plant for the first five years. Labor requirements are much higher at Soviet plants than they are at US plants because of their lower level of automation and absence of incentives for enterprise manag- " Water shortages that began in 1981 cause ydroelectric power shortages through 1983. 'Z The USSR is like most industrialized countries in that it does not have sufficient reserves of high-quality bauxite to support its Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 9 X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Figure 8 USSR: Sources of Raw Materials for Making Aluminum, 19828 Imported high-grade bauxite-25.0 Imported alumina-10.0 Domestic low-grade bauxite-20.0- Domestic high-grade bauxite-23.0 The only large source of bauxite is the Severouralsk mine in the northern Urals. During 1976-80 it sup- plied nearly all the domestic high-grade bauxite. Its reserves appear to be nearing exhaustion, however, after almost 50 years of continuous exploitation, and its operation has become more difficult and costly. During 1982, its bauxite production dropped dramati- cally. A sustained reduction in the amount of bauxite mined will force the Soviets to rapidly increase im- ports of bauxite. Soviet journals have revealed that, despite years of intense prospecting throughout the USSR, no large deposits of high-grade bauxite that are economic to develop have been discovered (see box, page 14). The Soviets have found several small deposits, but their complex geological structure makes them unsuitable for industrial use. Consequently, Moscow has relied increasingly on foreign sources of bauxite and alumi- na (figure 9).13 " The USSR has had a long-term bauxite supply agreement with Guinea-its largest supplier-since the early 1970s. Under this arrangement, the Soviets receive about 2 million tons of bauxite a year. The Soviets pay for part of the bauxite through compensating trade; the remainder is shipped as repayment for Soviet investment in Guinean bauxite production facilities. In 1983 the USSR signed a bauxite supply agreement with Jamaica whereby the Soviets will receive I million tons of bauxite a year for three years, starting in 1984. Part of the bauxite will be paid for in hard currency and part by compensating trade. Hungary is the USSR's largest supplier of alumina. Imports of alumina are included in a Soviet-Hungarian Figure 9 USSR: Imports as a Share of Total Raw Materials Used in Producing Aluminum, 1960-908 Percent 50 Includes bauxite and alumina, expressed in terms of aluminum content. b Projected. In 1960 domestic raw materials were used for about 85 percent of aluminum production; in 1970 this share had fallen to about 70 percent, and in 1980 to about 65 percent. Furthermore, the share of aluminum produced from domestic raw materials will continue to decline as aluminum production capacity continues to increase. As its dependence on imports has increased, the USSR has stockpiled imported bauxite at three alu- mina plants located in the European USSR-Nikola- yev, Zaporozhye, and Kirovabad. The largest of these, trade agreement designed to take advantage of relatively cheap Soviet electric power. Under this agreement, first signed in 1961 and recently extended to 1990, 1 ton of aluminum is exported to Hungary for every 2 tons of alumina imported from Hungary. In March 1984, the USSR and Greece signed an agreement that the Soviets would supply technology and equipment to build a 700,000- ton alumina plant in Greece. The Soviets will recoup most of their investment by purchasing 380,000 tons of alumina per year for 10 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3 Secret High-Grade Bauxite-Search for Substitutes Recognizing the inadequacy of high-quality bauxite deposits and the desire for self-sufficiency in raw materials, the Soviets planned for extensive use of low-quality aluminum ores-low-grade bauxite, nepheline, and alunite. The USSR has successfully exploited its low-grade bauxite (generally less than 40 percent alumina). Most of these low-quality ores contain large amounts of silica, which increases the cost of processing. Further, many deposits can only be exploited at greatly increased cost because of their remote locations. Despite these costs, the Soviets have continued to increase production of aluminum from low-grade bauxite. In 1982, alumina produced from low-grade bauxite supplied approximately 20 percent of the aluminum industry's requirements.C Around 1950, the Soviets successfully produced alu- mina from nepheline at two small plants at Pikalevo and Volkhov in the western USSR. Soviet planners determined that, by using the byproducts of the nepheline process to produce cement, soda, and pot- ash, large-scale production of alumina from nephe- line would be 20 to 30 percent cheaper than using domestic bauxite. Plans made in the 1950s called for 50 percent of alumina production in the 1970s to be processed from nepheline. In 1956, construction of a large alumina plant at Achinsk in southern Siberia was planned to exploit local nepheline syenite ores (25 percent alumina content). Construction actually began in 1964 but was not completed until 1972. Delays were attributed to the region's severe climatic conditions and to technical problems in developing large-scale processing of nepheline ores. Many of these problems were not fully solved. By the early 1970s, Soviet planners had concluded that processing nepheline on a large scale was more technically difficult and costly than they had originally thought, so they curtailed extensive plans for this process's development and increased bauxite imports instead. In 1982, alumina produced from nepheline supplied about 18 percent of the aluminum industry's require- The Soviets' experience in producing alumina from alunite, an abundant nonbauxite ore with only 18 percent alumina content, also did not full their earlier expectations. They had calculated that the cost of producing alumina from alunite would be 40 percent lower than if imported bauxite were used. In 1964, six years behind schedule, the Soviets began production of alumina at Kirovabad from alunite mined at the nearly Zaglik deposits. Severe mainte- nance problems and shortages of processsing chemi- cals, resulting in the plant's inefficient, uneconomic operation, have prevented output from reaching the planned 250,000 tons a year. In 1982, production of alumina from alunite supplied about 4 percent of the total requirement for alumina. Despite the costs associated with low-grade bauxite, nepheline, and alunite, the Soviets have continued to increase production from these ores. The USSR is the only country to make extensive use of these low- quality ores. Other countries, including the United States, have decided that they are too costly to process on a large scale Nikolayev, is designed to handle foreign bauxite, which is brought in by ship, unloaded, and stored in a large open area Uses of Aluminum Aluminum's characteristics make it an ideal material to use in transportation systems, consumer goods, and electrotechnical products. A substitute for some types of steel, aluminum alloys will probably be used more 25X1 to make up for persistent shortages of steel." " We are unable to determine the relative costs of production of 25X1 aluminum or steel. Soviet literature, however, has indicated that substitution of aluminum for steel is often advantageous when weight reduction and corrosion resistance are important. Relying on imports of raw materials rather than on domestic production from Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Raw Materials Logistics Aluminum-bearing ores are processed at 10 alumina plants in the USSR and shipped by rail to the 15 aluminum plants. Each alumina plant can process only one grade or blend of ores at a time because each requires different processing temperatures and times. Thus, each plant usually is limited to a specific source for. its supply. Plants generally are near ore deposits to minimize the cost of transporting large quantities of ore. For instance, bauxite from the Severouralsk mine in the northern Urals is processed at the nearby Krasnoturinsk and Kamensk-Ural'skiy alumina plants. The primary criterion for locating aluminum plants has been the availability of inexpensive hydroelectric power because of the enormous amount required for production. Plants can process alumina, a homoge- neous material, from any source. Most aluminum plants, however, are not near alumina plants, so large quantities of alumina must be transported long dis- tances. About 70 percent (1 million tons a year) of the alumina produced in the Urals at Krasnoturinsk and Kamensk-Ural'skiy is shipped 2,400 to 3,000 kilome- ters by rail to Siberian aluminum plants for process- ing. Some alumina produced at Nikolayev supplies Siberian plants and must be transported over 4,500 km by rail. The Siberian plants require huge amounts of alumi- na. The annual requirement at Bratsk, for example, is about 1.6 million tons; daily, two or three trains, each with 50 to 60 hopper carloads of alumina, supply this plant. To compensate for occasional delays in shipping, aluminum plants maintain about a 15-day supply of alumina. Despite the quantities of alumina shipped over long distances, shipping charges add only about 5 percent to the cost of producing aluminum; in contrast, electric power constitutes . about 40 percent of the total cost. Exports-25 manufacturing most major weapon systems including aircraft, missiles, ships, and land armaments. Aircraft production consumes about 25 percent of the alumi- num delivered to military industry. Several different aluminum alloys are used to make structural airframe components to meet weight, strength, and other de- sign requirements. For example, a Defense Intelli- gence Agency assessment of the applications and properties of alloys used in the structural airframe of a MIG-21 (Fishbed), a general purpose fighter air- craft produced for the Soviet Air Forces from 1959 to 1979 and now produced for export, indicates that aluminum accounts for more than 50 percent (3 to 4 tons) of the empty weight of the aircraft. Missile production consumes about 6 percent of aluminum delivered to the military. Nearly all airframe bodies of surface-to-air missiles are made from aluminum alloys. 25X1 Civilian. In the USSR the electrical industry con- sumes some 17 percent of aluminum production (it takes about 8 percent in the United States)." In the Defense. Soviet use of aluminum in production of defense durables and other military-related activities currently takes about 15 percent of domestic produc- tion (the US defense sector takes about 9 percent of domestic production) (figure 10). Aluminum is used in "These estimates include only civilian consumption. Defense con- sumption of aluminum for construction and electrical use is includ- Figure 10 United States and USSR: End Uses of Aluminum, 1980 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Table 4 USSR: Unwrought Aluminum Exports, 1970-82 a Total 369 406 455 518 529 502 538 572 621 570 566 566 600 Of which: Eastern Europe 282 316 357 388 394 379 403 403 426 429 452 428 410 Japan 25 21 38 47 42 43 69 92 111 74 62 65 82 France 1 14 14 12 9 12 14 24 30 21 11 5 40 Other OECD 34 27 40 41 49 45 41 38 38 27 23 25 28 a This table includes only unwrought aluminum. Data for wrought aluminum (mostly rolled products) are not available after 1975; Soviet wrought aluminum exports amounted to 101,500 tons in 1975, most of which probably went to CEMA countries. Data for 1970 to 1975 for total aluminum exports are taken from official Soviet trade statistics; data after 1975 were taken from UN trading partner statistics and may be slightly understated because some countries do not report data to the United Nations; East European trade data from 1970 to 1975 were taken from official Soviet trade statistics; data after 1975 were taken from East European trade total production substantially. 1960s the Soviets began substituting aluminum for copper in power cables and wire. By 1970 about two- thirds of electric power cables were made with alumi- num; the Soviets plan to eventually produce all power cables from aluminum. Aluminum plants at Bratsk and Irkutsk account for 70 to 80 percent of production of aluminum wire rods. The Sayansk plant will have a large facility for making wire rods that will increase makes handling materials difficult. Roughly 10 percent of aluminum production in the USSR goes to the construction industry (about 17 percent in the United States). Aluminum is used to make various building products, including window frames, doorframes, and building panels. Aluminum building panels, lightweight and easy to handle, are used extensively in Siberia where the harsh climate Although obtaining allocations of aluminum for new products is often difficult and periodic shortages occur in industries that have low priority (transportation and consumer industries), production of aluminum ap- pears to be sufficient to meet most of the domestic books, where available (Poland, East Germany, Bulgaria, and Romania imports for 1975 to 1982 were estimated); Soviet imports of aluminum are negligible. b From 1978 to 1980, exports of unwrought aluminum declined, from about 621,000 tons in 1978 to about 566,000 tons in 1980. Nearly all of the fall in exports during this period was to OECD countries (particularly Japan and France) probably because of changing world market conditions. Similarly, an upturn in world demand interrupted and reversed the slide in 1981-82. demand. Moreover, the USSR has consistently ex- ported at least 20 percent of its domestic production." Trade. The USSR is the world's second leading exporter of unwrought aluminum." It exported rough- ly 600,000 tons in 1982-nearly a fourth of domestic production. Of this, nearly 70 percent went to Eastern Europe-mainly East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Yu- goslavia, and Hungary (table 4). The USSR is not a significant force in the non-Communist aluminum market; in 1982 such exports amounted to only about 165,000 tons, with almost 50 percent going to Japan. 16 Despite an export surplus, the USSR would not be able to increase the production of aluminum fast enough to meet a sudden, large increase in total demand. There is little slack at most alumina and aluminum plants, and construction of new production capacity requires long leadtimes, even at locations where adequate transpor- tation and electric power are available. A large increase in military demand, however, could probably be met by reallocating aluminum to defense industries from nondefense consumers, reducing alumi- num exports, and drawing down national stockpiles of aluminum. - - - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Although the USSR imports more than one-third of the raw materials needed to make aluminum and only exports about 25 percent of aluminum production, there is probably a net economic gain in its trade balance because of the large price difference between raw materials and aluminum." Sales of aluminum have been a relatively small but stable source of hard currency earnings for Moscow for several years. In 1983, exports of aluminum probably earned $250-300 million, supplying about 1 percent of total hard currency earnings for the year. Outlook The expansion of Soviet aluminum production is scheduled to proceed even more slowly during the 1981-85 period than in the previous five-year period. Production in 1985 is planned to be 15 to 20 percent or 400,000 to 500,000 tons greater than in 1980, reaching an estimated 3.11-3.25 million tons (table 5). Some of this growth may come from modernization of plants and a rising share of capacity use at the Krasnoyarsk aluminum plant, but most will have to come from construction of new production capacity." If new plants operate at the same level as most existing plants (90 percent of capacity), at least anoth- er 450,000 to 550,000 tons of new production capacity will have to be brought onstream during the period to meet the 1985 goal. The Soviets have announced plans for new production capacity at Bratsk, Krasno- yarsk, Tursunzade, and Irkutsk; they also intend to begin production at the Sayansk plant by 1985. On the basis of our analysis we estimate that the Soviets will increase production capacity by only 190,000 tons, far less than required to meet the planned output targets. As a result, the average annual rate of growth "The February 1984 spot-market price for aluminum, for example, was $1,650 per ton while the spot price for bauxite was about $30 per ton (from 4 to 8 tons of bauxite are required to produce I ton of aluminum, depending on the grade of bauxite). A precise calcula- tion of the net balance of trade is not possible, however, because some of the imported bauxite and exported aluminum is paid for through compensation agreements rather than hard currency. Also, most Soviet exports of aluminum are to Eastern Europe and are not paid for with hard currency. Finally, other factors also have to be considered such as the net cost of imported equipment used to produce aluminum. " According to Soviet literatur many aluminum plants are scheduled for equipment modernization during the 1980s. All evidence indicates that, to date, none of the Table 5 USSR: Projected Production of Primary Aluminum, 1984-90 a Production (thousand metric tons) Increase (percent) 1984 1985 2,895 b 2 1986 1989 3,145 2 1990 3,250 3 a Output of secondary aluminum (scrap, recycled aluminum) is not included in this table; see the appendix for a discussion of the methodology used to estimate production. b Soviet literature states that aluminum production in 1985 is planned to grow by 15 to 20 percent over the 1980 level, reaching an estimated 3,110,000 to 3,250,000 metric tons. of aluminum production will fall to about 1 percent a year in 1981-85 compared with the 3-percent-a-year average achieved during 1976-80.20 We project that Soviet aluminum production will grow at a rate of about 2 percent a year during 1986- 90, reaching 3,250,000 tons by 1990. 20 The Soviets have not disclosed specific targets for aluminum produced from scrap; however, they plan to increase the production of all nonferrous metals from secondary sources by 20 to 25 percent during 1981-85. Production of aluminum from secondary sources probably will increase at a slower rate than these figures suggest because, as Soviet publications note, aluminum scrap collection is disorganized and most aluminum is not recycled. Further, second-, ary processing facilities, which do not have proper equipment, roduce low- quality aluminum of limited use. 1 ::1 two to four years is required for construction of new capacity at existing aluminum plants, and up to 10 years-from the start of construction to initial produc- tion-are required for new plants. For example, in 1965 the Soviets announced plans to build the Tursunzade plant in Tadzhikistan. Although construction started in 1966, production did not begin until 1975~~ 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 2oA] 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Despite the slow rate of growth that we project, there probably will not be domestic shortages of aluminum. A large increase in domestic consumption, however, probably would force a substantial reduction in ex- ports. For example, if total domestic consumption were to grow at the same average annual rate as planned total industrial output in 1981-85-4.7 per- cent-the Soviets could meet this demand by reduc- ing aluminum exports about 10 percent each year from the previous year. Because of long-term trade agreements with Eastern Europe, such a decrease would probably eliminate aluminum exports to the West by 1990, while forcing a small reduction in those to Eastern Europe. As a second example, if military consumption alone increased as much as 10 percent a year from 1984 to 1990, even allowing for a 2-percent annual increase in civilian consumption, aluminum exports would have to decline at a rate of about 1 to 2 percent a year .12 There is considerable potential for growth of alumi- num use for civilian purposes, particularly in trans- portation, container and packaging, and consumer durables.21 Soviet industries generally use a higher percentage of steel products than Western countries do. Although Soviet aluminum production is small compared with steel production, wider use of alumi- num could help offset shortages of some types of steel for a limited number of products. For example, increased use of aluminum cans would cut losses from food spoilage." The small increases in aluminum production projected for 1984-90, however, will not be sufficient to encourage new applications. " These scenarios assume no change in stocks. 2' Accurate Soviet aluminum consumption stat -are no avail- able for these industries. However, use of aluminum in these industries is at an early stage compared to that in industrialized Western countries. In the United States, the transportation, con- tainers and packaging, and consumer durables industries accounted for about 3,000,000 tons of end-use shipments of aluminum products in 1982, more than total Soviet aluminum production in that year. For example, production of beverage cans in the United States required the lar est share uminum sheet and reached 53 billion cans in 1982 '? Aluminum container production is different from steel container production. To produce more aluminum containers, the Soviets would have to import or produce the necessary equipment. Losses from food spoilage are a major problem in the USSR and have amounted to 20 to 30 percent of total farm food production in the Shortages of labor will continue to be a major prob- lem in the aluminum industry. Although planners have emphasized that increased automation would reduce the need for large numbers of laborers, the USSR has been unable either to produce the neces- sary equipment or to rapidly assimilate and spread foreign technology. Moreover, introduction of auto- mated equipment may not be the hoped-for panacea because there are few trained technical personnel at aluminum and alumina plants. If the introduction of more advanced equipment were accelerated, require- ments for specialized technicians would probably in- crease faster than their supply. Taut supplies of power probably will continue to limit expansion of the aluminum industry and interrupt production at plants in the western USSR. Seasonal droughts in Siberia, even though they probably will continue to cause periodic shortages of electric power, will not constrain future expansion of the aluminum industry there. Meanwhile, depletion of reserves of high-grade baux- ite will continue and will cause mining to become increasingly expensive. The Soviets, therefore, will be forced to import increasing amounts of bauxite and In 1982 the Soviets imported about 10 percent of their alumina needs. Unless there is a major expansion in alumina production capacity, they will be forced to increase imports to meet increased aluminum nrnrinn tion plans. project that Soviet dependence on foreign markets for raw materials will increase from 35 percent in 1980, to 40 to 45 percent in 1985, and to 45 to 50 percent in 1990. 25X1 25x1 ' Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Appendix Estimating Soviet Production Our estimate of Soviet aluminum production is de- rived by adding the estimated production of each of the 15 aluminum plants in the USSR. We estimate production by assuming that new capacity operates at 50 percent of estimated maximum capacity during the Table 6 USSR: Estimated Production of Primary Aluminum, 1959-83 a first year of operation and 90 percent afterward.25 The year Production Increase one exception is at the Krasnoyarsk plant. As noted (thousand (percent) lant was reported as operating at metric tons) p s 1980 thi i n e r , li ear reduced capacity. Using this method, the production time series in table 6 was derived by adding the production from annual additions of new capacity based on correlating Soviet announcements of new additions to capacity with overhead photography. The calculation of maximum production capacity at each plant is based on information derived from technical specifications of aluminum An alternative method provides another helpful cross- check of our methodology. According to Soviet litera- ture, in 1937 the USSR produced 37,700 tons of aluminum." This is the only figure on aluminum production ever known to be published in the USSR. "The 50-percent figure is used to account for low production associated with equipment startup. The 90-percent figure was derived by taking the ratio of reported production data and our estimate of production capacity for plants where data are available. Itog~eniya Vtorogo Pyatiletnogo Plana Razvitiya Narod- nogo Khozyaystvo Soyuza SSR, Moscow, 1939, p. 24.F 1959 515 1960 565 10 1961 630 12 1962 730 16 1963 810 11 1966 1,135 15 1967 1,285 13 1968 1,370 1 1976 2,400 2 1977 2,455 2 1978 2,525 3 1979 2,630 4 1980 2,705 3 1981 2,720 1 1982 2,735 1 1983 2,795 2 a output of secondary aluminum (recycled aluminum) is not included in this table. 19 Secret Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3 Secret Secret Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/29: CIA-RDP85TOO313R000200020007-3

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp85t00313r000200020007-3

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85T00313R000200020007-3.pdf