Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9
RADIO N REPORTS, ~N~.
4701 WILLARD AVENUE, CHEVY CHASE, MARYLAND 20815 (301) 656-4068
FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS STAFF
DIATE September 13, 1984 7:30 P.M. CiTV Washington, D.C.
~~~ Zbigniew Brzezinski/Central America
ANNOUNCER: From Washington, Crossfire. The hosts far
Crossfire: on the left, Tom Braden; on the right, Pat Buchanan.
In the crossfire, Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security
Adviser.
TOM BRADEN: The Russian people don't know it yet, but
their Foreign Minister has accepted an invitation from President
Reagan to meet with him at the White House two weeks from
tomorrow. Questions are all over Washington: Why did the
President extend the invitation? Was it politics? Why did
Gromyko accept? Does he want to give Reagan a leg up, or does he
expect that Reagan will stick to Star Wars and be branded as an
obstacle to negotiations?
There are a lot of such questions. And who might be
able to answer them? Zbigniew Brzezinski.
PAT BUCHANAN: Dr. Brzezinski, Andrei Gromyko and the
Soviets are very sophisticated about American politics. They
know that Gromyko going to the White House is going to undercut
Mondale's big argument that he can't talk to the Russians. Why
would Gromyko be so generous to Ronald Reagan at this point?
Have the Russians concluded, "Reagan's got this thing and we'd
better move early"?
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: There are two reasons, I think,
potentially three. One, the chances are they have concluded that
Ronald Reagan will be reelected. And from their point of view,
it might make more sense to deal with him now, somewhat, rather
than later, when he might need them less.
Secondly, I think the Soviets -- and this is much more
Material wpplied by Radb N Reports, Inc. may be used for file and reference purposes only. It may not be reproduced, sold or publicly demonstrated or exhibited.
Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9
Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9
important -- are beginning to realize that their policy of trying
to intimidate the West, of creating artificially a crisis
atmosphere in order to get the West, and the United States,
particularly, to make concessions has backfired. And the Soviet
Union has become more isolated internationally in the last two
years since at any point from the time of Stalin's death.
BRZEZINSKI: And three, they may be calculating that by
going to the White House, if they don't get something from
Reagan, they can walk out, blame him for to continued stalemate,
get the public opinion to be disappointed, and hurt him.
BUCHANAN: Gromyko may be about to sandbag the Admini-
stration if he comes in and demands, for example, a moratorium on
testing ASATs, and Reagan says, "We can't give you that," and
Gromyko goes out and says, "We came and asked for a simple thing,
and we cannot even get that. We cannot deal with this man."
Do you think the Reagan Administration is taking a risk,
BRZEZINSKI: There is a risk, but I think this risk can
be anticipated. And one way of anticipating it is not to build
up expectations.
BRADEN: Wouldn't Reagan be able to handle that by
simply not commenting very much during the talks?
BRZEZINSKI: Well, I would think, if I were Reagan, I
would say to Gromyko, "Yes, we're willing to negotiate." After
all, nothing's going to be resolved for weeks, anyway.
BRADEN: Tell me, why would the Soviet Foreign Minister
do this and then keep it a secret from the Russian people?
BRZEZINSKI: Well, they are going to inform the Soviet
people. I don't think there's anything particularly unusual
about it. They just don't...
BRADEN: Well, it's been out for two days, and Bob
Kaiser reports in the Washington Post there hasn't been a word of
it in the press.
BRZEZINSKI: Yes, but don't forget they have had a
vicious anti-American campaign going. They have had a personally
vicious anti-Reagan campaign going. It takes them time to change
gears and to let it be known that this is going to happen.
They're going to treat it as a very routine visit, normal, when
the Foreign Minister goes to the United Nations.
Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9
Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9
BRADEN: Dr. Brzezinski, let me go down south for a
minute. Congress cut out the funds for the Contras in Nicaragua.
BRZEZINSKI: Yes. A big mistake, in my view.
BRADEN: All right. But whether you think it's a
mistake or not, as I read what's happening -- and I speak with
some knowledge of the past on this -- what's happening, according
to the State Department spokesmen, is that a million and a half
dollars a month is coming down from voluntary contributions by
American businessmen, plus government money from Israel and
Guatemala and Taiwan. Now just let me go on. My scenario is
that in Israel, Guatemala and Taiwan the station chief is picking
up a satchel and delivering the money to the Finance Minister and
saying, "Here. Do us a favor." And in New York, Chicago,
Cleveland, etcetera, certain station chiefs, or maybe Bill Casey
himself, is saying, "Now, look, send a contribution. I'll take
care of it."
Now, I know what your feeling is on this. But are we
going to have a government according to the Constitution of the
United States, or two governments, one by the Constitution and
one by Bill Casey?
BRZEZINSKI: Well, Tom, you know, the contingency funds,
the unassigned contingency funds of the agency are in fact very
small, and the Congress knows exacty what they are. So you
cannot have funds of this size being transferred out of that
relatively limited fund that the CIA is granted by Congress. So
I don't think the CIA can be funneling in the money. It may be
encouraging this to be done, but that's a different issue.
And after all, in the U.S. a lot of people...
BRADEN: Is it likely that the average businessman in
New York says, "Oh, gee. I'm so worried about those..."
BRZEZINSKI: Tom, I don't think this is being done by
the average businessman.
[Laughter]
BUCHANAN: Has Mondale consulted you?
BRZEZINSKI: No.
BUCHANAN: Not at all?
BRZEZINSKI: Not recently.
Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9
Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9
BUCHANAN: But he's in a campaign and you were the
National Security Adviser when he was the principal political
adviser to Jimmy Carter. Why hasn't he consulted you?
BRZEZINSKI: Because he probably doesn't think that my
advice is any good.
What kind of grades do you give President Reagan in
foreign policy, overall?
BRZEZINSKI: Oh, I can't grade him. I would say on some
things I agree with him, on some things I disagree with him. I
support his position vis-a-vis the Soviets currently. I think
that's been done reasonably well.
BUCHANAN: You support him on Central America, obvious-
ly, the Contras.
BRZEZINSKI: On some aspects of Central America. I
think we should have also moved towards the Contadora formula
much sooner. I think he's been too passive on the Middle East.
I think we haven't handled the Chinese issue all that well. So
it's a mixed performance.
But on the central issue, the American-Soviet relation-
ship, I think we ought to have bipartisan support, and I don't
think we should make that an object of partisan contests.
BUCHANAN: Who would you like to see managing American
foreign policy the next four years?
BRZEZINSKI: Well, that's very hard to say. It depends
BUCHANAN: You've only got two guys. One of the two.
BRZEZINSKI: Oh, you mean between those two.
BUCHANAN: Yeah.
BRZEZINSKI: Oh, well, I'm going to work for bipartisan-
ship rather than to take a partisan point of view.
BUCHANAN: In whose behalf would you prefer to work for
bipartisanship?
BRZEZINSKI: I'm going to vote, but I'm not going to
campaign.
BUCHANAN: But you voted for Carter-Mondale in '76 and
Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9
' Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9
you voted for Carter-Mondale in 1984. Can we assume you're going
to vote for Mondale-Ferraro?
BRZEZINSKI: I don't think you can assume anything,
because I'm going to vote privately. I'm not going to make a
public endorsement.
BRADEN: Zbig, you're a Roman Catholic. I don't mean to
be personal, but it would interest me to get your reaction to
this. You are a Roman Catholic and you are also a conservative.
The Catholic...
BRZEZINSKI: I'm conservative on some issues. The
conservatives think I'm liberal on others.
BRADEN: All right, a conservative on foreign policy,
let's say. Now, we've got a vice presidential candidate named
Geraldine Ferraro whom the bishops, as she goes about the
country, go right on the tube after she comes in to denounce her.
Is there not some danger that we're going to get this election
into a religious quarrel?
BRZEZINSKI: Well, there is such a danger. But unfor-
tunately, I think she has contributed to it. That statement of
hers that the Catholic position on abortion is such-and-such was
very unfortunate. At the best, it was ineptly worded. And I
think she should have stayed out of that.
BRADEN: Okay.
We've been talking with Zbigniew Brzezinski. We want to
thank him for being our guest on Crossfire tonight.
BUCHANAN: Tom, always interesting and instructive with
Dr. Brzezinski. And if I had to guess now or deduce from what he
said, I would say the Brzezinski household is leaning Republican
in November.
BRADEN: Well, the ballot is secret, Pat, and I don't
blame him for not telling you. After all, he did write something
about Mondale in his book which would suggest that Mondale might
have some prejudice toward him.
BUCHANAN: But it is a mark of how far out of touch
Mondale is that Zbingniew Brzezinski is not openly saying we
ought to all go with Fritz Mondale.
BRADEN: Well, the Russians know it too. Otherwise
Gromyko wouldn't be coming over here. It gives Reagan a leg up.
Approved For Release 2008/08/21 :CIA-RDP88-010708000201370008-9