Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


DEBATE IS FOCUSED ON RESPONSIBILITY OF NEWS MEDIA

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000100680017-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 5, 2012
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 31, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000100680017-2.pdf [3]104.59 KB
Body: 
ILI iIl L I 1 ~IiIIWI~JIIJ1 JJ111III I i L. II 11 I h I Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/05: CIA-RDP90-00965R000100680017-2 `^ r- -"-_'NEW YORK TIMES 31 May 1986 Debate-Is Focused on'Responsibility ofNews edit , By GERALD M. BOYD Mr. Djerejian had said Thursday svac+e+cu The that the White House was in "full New York Times . agreement with the thrust of the state= WASHINGTON, May 30 - Senior ment." He said today that the response Reagan aides are attempting to focus had been "carefully... chosen to draw a the debate over the news media's role 1,distinction between the White House's in reporting national secrets on the. view and the statement. media"s responsibilities, Administra- ^~n(i Lion officials said today. While Mr. Casey and other senior of- The Administration officials outlined . ficials in the Intelligence area have had an approach similar to that taken the lead up to now in advancing the Ad Thursday by William J. Casey, the Di. ministration's concerns about unau- rector of Central Intelligence, and thorized disclosures, the aides said that Lieut Gen. William E. Odom, the direc- the White House's involvement could tor of the National Security Agency, intensify next week. . who played down their recent warnings Senior Reagan aidesare expected to to journalists and asked the media for consider a broad range of classified more cooperation. recommendations prepared by a group The Administration officials said of middle-level officials. No date has their hope was that such a softer ap- been set for a meeting on the issue; one proach would garner more public and set for this week was delayed because Congressional support than one that of scheduling problems, the officials might mire the Issue in concerns about said. freedom'of the press. "It's been the kind of thing more ap- In a reflection of this softer ap- propriately left to the intelligence eliminated a phrase threatening the : "They are responsible for protecting news media with prosecution from a sources and methods and have a right statement issued Wednesday by Mr. to express concern whenever it seems Casey and General Odom. That state- like they might be compromised." ment warned journalists about publish- I But another official said that, while ing sensitive secrets in connection with the espionage trial 'of Ronald. W. Pel- ton. The statement had been prepared for review by Donald T. Regan, the White House chief of state, and Vice Adm. John M. Poindexter, President Rea- gan's national security adviser. White House Backs Off Today the White House went a step further, backing away from one of the most controversial points in that state- ment. It said, "Those reporting on the trial should be cautioned against specula- tion and reporting details beyond .the information actually released at trial." Edward P. Djerejian, a White House spokesman, said today that the use of the word "speculation" had been a mistake. He said, however, that jour- nalist should be cautious in reporting on classified information that "goes be- yond what has been introduced in the trial." "'Speculation' is a very loose term, and in no way do we mean to imply by ,the use of 'speculation,' prior press censorship or press censorship, or in any way impinging on the freedoms of the press to report information and events," Mr. Djerejian said. "So. 'speculation,' perhaps and I do agree, I think a better word than specu- lation could have been found," he said. Other Reagan aides said that Mr. Djerejian's remarks signaled the tack the White House hopes to take in the dispute over unauthorized disclosure. In a Thursday interview with The As- sociated Press, Mr. Casey and Mr. Odom themselves backed away from their statement. Mr. Casey said that the press was being "hysterical" by suggesting that the remarks amounted to asking the media to tear up the First Amendment and scuttle the freedom of the Dress. the dispute had not reached the point 'i l where there has to be the President's involvement" the situation will un- doubtably change if a decision is' reached on the recommendations. Mr. Reagan avoided comment on the' dispute at two recent ceremonies in- volving intelligence agents. Wednes- day night he appeared before the Vet- erans of the Office of Strategic Serv- ices, an organization that includes Mr. Casey. Today he awarded the Distin- guished Service Medal posthumously to Joseph J. Rochefort, a who is cred- ited with breaking Japanese codes dur- ing World War II as a Navy intelligence officer. The Administration officials say! their hope is to frame the debate on the media's role in reporting secrets in the context of the need for. United States in- telligence operations and the need for secrecy to keep such operations func- tioni ng Mr. Casey had taken the lead in ef- forts to persuade The Washington Post not to publish information related to, 11 the Pelton case and had also requested, that the Justice Department. determine ' if NBC Television should be prosecuted for broadcast material related to the . case. Administration officials said that.. while Mr. Casey has not been "free-.. lancing" in his actions, it is unclear whether he was operating with the per, mission of the White House or simply,; Informing it of what he was doing. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/05: CIA-RDP90-00965R000100680017-2

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90-00965r000100680017-2

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00965R000100680017-2.pdf