Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


CRILE DENIES HE 'MADE UP' SEQUENCE IN CBS FILM

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000707160012-9
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 12, 2010
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 14, 1984
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000707160012-9.pdf [3]161.33 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2010/08/12 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000707160012-9 NEV YORK TIP'S 14 December 1984 C rile Denies He `Made Up' Sequence. in CBS Film By M. A. FARBER George Crile, the producer of a dis- puted CBS documentary on the Viet- nam War, was accused in court yester- day of fabricating a part of the pro- gram that dealt with a supposed ,.over-up" of enemy strength statis- tics after the Tet offensive of January 1968. After four hours of close questioning about intelligence gathering and com- puter memories, Dan M. Burt, the law- y~r for General William C. Westmore- land, suddenly raised his voice and asked: "Mr. Crile, you just made up the whole data-base sequence in the broad- cast, didn't you?" "Mr. Burt, that is not true," the y'it- ness shot back, his own voice tinged with emotion. "I have explained to you the sources of that sequence." 'One of the sources, he underscored, was Comdr. James Meacham, an intel- ligence officer in Saigon who, accord- ing to evidence in the case, often wrote to his wife of the "gargantuan false- hoods" and "mesmerizing lies" in- volved in his work and of how enemy strength estimates had to "come- out the way the general wanted them to." Fifth Day of Testimony Mr. Crile was testifying,for the fifth day at General Westmoreland's libel trial against CBS in Federal District Court. The general's $120 million suit stems from the documentary, "The Upcounted Enemy: A Vietnam Decep- tion," produced by Mr. Crile in 1982. ' ;Yesterday, as Mr. Burt continued his assault on the accuracy and objectivity of the program, he brought out that Mr. Crile had helped to unlock the "mental block" of a key participant in the broadcast, Col. Gains Hawkins, by giv- ing him information before his on-cam- era interview and had secretly tape re- corded telephone conversations with two others, Commander Meacham and Col. Russell Cooley. In July 1983, Mr. Crile was suspended by CBS for a year for having taped without authorization a number of tele- phone'-conversations during the prepa- ration of the Vietnam broadcast, in- cluding one with Robert S. McNamara, the former Secretary of Defense. The names of Colonel Cooley and Com- ri}ander Meacham, who is now the mili- tary correspondent of The Economist, the British magazine, did not emerge then. 'The network's policy required that the interviewee, or the president of CBS News, grant permission for such tang. pi Crile testified yesterday that he used the tape recorder simply as a "backup" to his notes or his memory, particularly when he was discussing complicated subjects. And he denied that he had told Colo- nel Hawkins, a former military intelli- gence officer who informed CBS that he had "arbitrarily reduced" enemy strength estimates in 1967, what to say during interviews in 1981. 'An Act of Courage' "I don't think, Mr. Burt, that you tell someone like Colonel Hawkins that you want him to come forward and make acknowledgments that are deeply em- barrassing to him," Mr. Crile said. "That is an act of courage on his part and it was an enormous self-sacrifice. It is not in any way involved in being able to suggest to him what he should say. These are very major decisions that people of this caliber make." Q. Did you offer to help General Westmoreland. refresh his memory before you interviewed him, sir? A. Yes, I did, Mr. Burt. I spoke to General Westmoreland on two occa- sions and I wrote him a very specific letter and I read that letter out to him on the telephone the week before and I had conversations with him about these subjects, and I will be very happy to go into it in as much length as you would like. Mr. Burt resumed his questioning about Colonel Hawkins's "mental block" regarding a six-week period be- fore the colonel left Vietnam in Sep- tember 1967. But, later,, he questioned Mr.' Crile about a letter and package of official records that General Westmoreland had sent the producer in June 1981, sev- eral weeks after Mike Wallace, the narrator of the Vietnam documentary, had interviewed him. The Repeated Assertion The materials, according to Mr. Burt, concerned the repeated assertion by General Westmoreland during the interview that North Vietnamese infil- tration into South Vietnam in the fall of 1967 had been approximately 20,000 a month - much as the documentary would contend, from other sources as well, when it was broadcast in January 1982. But in 1967, when the general was in-, terviewed on "Meet the Press," he had put the figure at roughly 5,000 to 6,000. And, with the letter to Mr. Crile- a let- ter in which he described his session with Mr. Wallace as being "more of an inquisition than a rational interview" - the general included records that showed infiltration to have been at the, lower level he portrayed it in 1967. Now, Mr. Burt suggested that Mr. Crile had deliberately ignored General Westmoreland's materials and "cor- rection." "On the contrary, Mr. -Burt," Mr. Crile said, "there was no statement anywhere in it that he had made a mis- take and no request for a correction. There was no alert whatever that he in- tended to change his repeated state- ments in the interview. All he said was that there were some documents that he said might be of interest to us." Mr. Burt introduced a note Mr. Crile sent to Mr. Wallace after receiving the materials, in which the producer said "Westmoreland doesn't bring anything to our attention that is particularly relevant. Certainly nothing that causes concern and requires a new look at any- thing we have been asserting." General Westmoreland was com- mander of American forces in Vietnam from January 1964 to June 1968. In his suit, he contends that CBS defamed him by saying that he had deceived President Lyndon B. Johnson and the Joint Chiefs of Staff about the size and nature of the enemy in the year before the Tet offensive. The broadcast alleged a "conspir- acy" in General Westmoreland's com- mand to minimize the strength of the enemy to make it appear that the United States was winning "a war of attrition." As a result of this "con- scious effort," it said, the President and other senior officials in Washing- ton, as well as American forces in Viet- nam, were left "totally unprepared" for the widespread attack in January 1968. One of the five sections of the 90- For Release 2010/08/12 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000707160012-9 Approved Approved For Release 2010/08/12 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000707160012-9 minute documentary also covered what Mr. Wallace and Mr. Crile called an attempt, after the offensive, to "al- ter" or "tamper with" the "historical record" of enemy strength contained in a computer at military intelligence headquarters in Saigon. Because the estimates of enemy strength had been kept low in 1967, and the i asualties at Tet were so high, Mr. Wallace said, General Westmoreland's command was faced with the question: "Whom, are we fighting?" The documentary showed interviews with Commander Meacham and Colo- nel Cooley, whom Mr. Wallace said - and Mr. Crile reiterated yesterday - had "in effect" accused another intelli- gence officer, Lt. Col. Daniel Graham, of "personally engineering a cover-up" of the real size of the enemy. Colonel Graham, who later became a lieuten- ant general and head of the Defense In- telligence Agency, appeared briefly on the broadcast to deny the charge. Yesterday, Mr. Burt brought out that Colonel Graham's superior, Maj. Gen. Phillip B. Davidson Jr. was present during the discussions in the spring of 1968 about "resetting" enemy strength. The lawyer also tried to show that noth- ing in the episode was "dishonest." Mr. Burt played for the jury unused portions of the Meacham and Cooley in- terviews with Mr. Crile in 1981, in'' which Commander Meacham denied' "faking any intelligence" or knowing of any such efforts and Colonel Cooley indicated that a "question of honesty" was not at issue. Mr. Crile, who will continue testify- ing when court resumes on Monday, re- plied that Colonel Cooley's remarks were being taken out of context. The producer said that Commander Meacham had never "disavowed" what he had written to his wife from Saigon. But, when CBS . interviewed him in London 15 years later, Mr. Crile said, the commander got "cold feet." z Approved For Release 2010/08/12 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000707160012-9

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90-00552r000707160012-9

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00552R000707160012-9.pdf