Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


AIDING THE CONTRAS

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00587R000100250012-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 24, 2011
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 5, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00587R000100250012-3.pdf [3]330.55 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100250012-3 WALL STREET JOURNAL 5 March 1985 STAT STAT Aiding the Contras Why the Covert War in Nicaragua Evolved And Hasn't Succeeded Mishaps and Bad Judgments Have Plagued Program, But Gains Have Occurred The Umpire and the Salesman By DAVID IGNATIUS And DAVID ROGERs ~Orrers el THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Jose Francisco Cardenal still has the degeared index card that the Central Intel- ligence Agency man in Miami gave him arforeM . Carden a;'s first meeting in July- :992 with "John," hir CIA contact in Tegu- cigalpa, Honduras. The card instructed the Nicaraguan ex- ile leader to arrive at 7 p.m. at the Hotel La Ronda in Tegucigalpa and take the stairs-not the elevator-to Room 333. He should knock on the door and say, "I am early." The CIA mar. would respond, "No. You are exactly on time." The rendezvous went like clockwork, and it opened a direct channel between the then-leader of the Contras and the CIA station in Teguci- galpa. The CIA's secret war against the Marx- is: Sandinista government in Nicaragua has rarely worked so smoothly. From its start in 1981, the agency's Contra program has been plagued by mishaps and political misjudgments. The troubled history of the program shows that, however adept the CIA may be at arranging secret meetings abroad, it has considerable difficulty try- ing to run a covert war from an open soci- ety like the U.S. Gains and Losses The Contra program has achieved some military gains. The often brutal covert war has hurt the Nicaraguan economy and put pressure on the Nicaraguan government to negotiate with the rebels and the U.S. It ..as also reduced the flow of arms into El Salvador. But there have been heavy polit- ical and diplomatic losses. Political prob- !ems in Washington, especially the CIA's srrained relations with Congress, under- .n,.ined support for the program and led Congress to cut off funds last year, forcing attack -Nicaragua the Contras to turn to private contribu- C shot down one is u Lions Y1 planes, accord ing to the CI A sum- mary. "The Project," as CIA personnel The CIA officers involved in the Contra dubbed the Contra program, will face in- program were enthusiastic and sometimes tensive public scrutiny during the next few eccentric. One, a retired Army major who months as Congress debates whether to re- wrote a controversial CIA manual on psy- sume financing. Interviews with Contra cholog;ca! warfare, liked to dress entirely leaders, Reagan administration officials, in black and called himself "the Priest or- members of Congress and their aides, and Death"; the Contras used a less r:reten U.S. intelligence officials may provide tious name for him: "the Umpire." Duan some lessons for the next round of Ameri- "Dewey" Clarridat- the senior CIA official can policy in Central America. They also w iT re program sported safari suits reveal new details about how the CIA ran its first bi in the field and at home decorated his jeep g paramilitary program in more with a post-Grenada bumper sticker that than a decade. Some highlights: -American read: "Nicaragua Next." goals in the Contra pro- From its first days in office, the Reagan gram were confused. The Reagan adminis administration viewed Central America as tration originally sold the program to Con- a test of U.S. ability to contain commu- gress as a way to harass Nicaragua and to nism. The situation there seemed to be de- halt arms shipments to El Salvador, even teriorating fast in early 1981, as Nicaragua though some U.S. officials and most Contra rushed weapons into El Salvador by the leaders from the beginning held the truckload. To the new administration the broader goal of removing the Marxist gov- question wasn't whether to use American ernment in Managua. The official CIA Po- power against Nicaragua and its patron sition was a Catch-22: The secret war Cuba, but how-overtly or covertly. didn't violate a 19S2 congressional ban An internal debate raged in early 1981 against overthrowing the Sandinistas be- about what strategy the U.S. should adopt, cause the Contras weren't strong enough to Alexander Haig, then the secretary of win. state, argued that the U.S. should "go to -The program got off to a bad start the source" by pressuring Cuba directly. when the CIA turned to a surrogate, the - After Mr. Haig outlined a set of tough mill- right-wing military dictatorship in Argenr -, tary options against Cuba at a National Se- tina, to organize and train the Contras. The curity Council meeting in mid -1981, one Argentines already had a small training NSC member turned to another and whis- program for the Contras in Honduras, and pered: "Did you hear what I heard? This by working with them the U.S. shielded its guy will get us into a war." own involvement. But the heavvhanded Ar Instead of going to the source, the Rea genune approach tainted the movement in gan administration decided to go to the the eyes of many Nicaraguans. The U.S. CIA. Officials viewed covert action as a had few alternatives, since the CIA at the sensible middle course between doing noth- time didn't have any reliable paramilitary ing and declaring war. But the precise capability of its own. strategy wasn't well-formulated. The CIA, -CIA planners, eager to show results says one U.S. official, became "a substi- once they began running the program di tute rectly, used aggressive military tactics Tfor crisis a the CIA IA t nature C nthat sometimes backfired politically. In ad- pressure The on t the program put dition to training the Contras, the agency find a quick fix. The b y administration's immediate worry was to used a separate and secret paramilitary cut down arms shipments to leftist Salva- force composed of what were called dorans, and this put a priority on military UCLA-unilaterally controlled Latin as- action-rather than politics-in building sets-to mine harbors and raid targets in the Contras as an insurgent movement. Nicaragua. A U.S. official who helped run And although the administration talked re- the program concedes that tactics were sometimes "overzealous." peatedly about developing a broad eco- `The Priest of Death' nomic and political strategy in Central the emphasis was on A secret CIA document lists 19 such op- - milita y in pressure. ry . erations in early 1984, and the intensity of the attacks and the level of U.S. involve- ment are larger than previously reported. Americans flew-and fired from-a heli- copter launched from a CIA "mother ship." A fixed-wing U.S. plane provided so- phisticated radar guidance for the night- time attacks. In the turmoil following one Co bNW Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100250012-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100250012-3 President Reagan approved the basic elements of the program: In early 1981, he agreed to begin rebuilding the CIA's co- ,-n-action capat.'!ity; a March 1981 deci- sion authorized the agency to develop a :goad political-action effort in Latin Amer- ica: a November 1981 directive committed the U.S. to "assist" in developing an anti- Sandinista guerrilla army. The political decision to conduct a co- ver, war in Central America revived an old problem for the CIA. Agency officials don't like running secret armies because the programs usually don't stay secret and because U.S. political leadership often gets cold feet. From the outset, the Contra pro- gram carried these same risks and wor- ried many career CIA officials. Bad Track Record The U.S. track record hasn't been very good: In Cuba, Indonesia, Laos and Kur? distan, the CIA has recruited guerrilla ar- mies and the:i, when the political winds changed back 'ome, abandoned them. One CIA paramilitary veteran, bemoaning the cutoff of funds to the Contras, says rue- fully: "We leave them hanging every time. " A more immediate problem for the CIA was the lack of paramilitary skills at the agency. During the 1970s, CIA training camps and bases had been closed and the agency's paramilitary experts, derided by the brass as "knuckle-draggers," had been purged. A special covert-action unit, known as the International Activists Divi- sion. was little more than a shell, staffed by wary survivors of the 1970s. "When we started up the program, you couldn't find five guys who knew what they were doing in terms of organizing a resis- tance operation," says a U.S. official who helped manage the program. To gain ex- pertise quickly, the agency tried to lure back the old-timers, the "hairy-neck para- military types," offering them one-year contracts. The agency also began acquir- ing the assets-boats, airplanes, helicop- ters and Third World nationals-for the se- cret strike force that would later be used to mine Nicaraguan harbors. La Tripartita The structure of the program was known as La Tripartita. The idea was to combine American money, Argentine trainers and Honduran territory to create a guerrilla army known as the Fuerza De- mocratica Nicaraguense, or FDN. Later, the U.S. financed other guerrilla groups operating from Costa Rica. The FDN embodied the political ten- sions that have plagued the Contras from the beginning. Founded in August 1981, the group combined a rightist military leader- ship. directed mostly by people who had been loyal to deposed Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza, with a moderate politi- cal leadership. It wasn't a comfortable niarriae. The head of the Argentine training mis- sion in Honduras was Col. Osvaldo Ribeiro, known as Ballita, or the Little Bullet. He became a prominent figure in Teguci- galpa, living in a large house, distributing American money and dispensing what CIA officials viewed as unsound military ad- vice. For example, since his own experi- ence was in urban rather than rural com- bat, he advised the Contras to mount a pro- gram of urban terrorism. The CIA wanted to cultivate a popular insurgency in the countryside. The Argentines also apparently toler- ated a practice of killing prisoners. A for- mer Contra official describes the informal rule for dealing with captives: If a pris- oner has ammunition when captured, let him live, since he hasn't fought to the last bullet; if a prisoner hasn't any ammuni- tion, kill him. (To stop the killing, CIA offi- cers ordered in mid-1982 that all prisoners be brought back to base for interroga- tion.) Coordination Difficulties The CIA's goal was for the Contras to coordinate with insurgents inside Nicara- gua, but that proved difficult. One U.S. of- ficial recalls: "The moderate opposition was in flight. We would make contact with people in Managua and ask them to help I us and they would say, 'Can you get me a green card?' " to live in the U.S. To supervise the expanding American effort, the director of central intelligence, William Casey, named Mr. Clarridge head of the Latin American division af the agency's directorate of operations. The Contra program to some extent had been thrust on the CIA, but Mr. Casey; who helped run covert operations during World War II, was determined to make it work. He seemed to have found a soulmate in Dewey Clarridge, an ambitious, hard- charging intelligence officer. Mr. Clarridge impressed the CIA direc- tor as an activist in an agency that had be- come cautious and demoralized during the 1970s. He had served most recently in Rome, where he had won points by giving an elegant late-night supper for Mr. Casey in 1981. He had little background in Latin America but much enthusiasm. "Dewey is more responsible than any- one for what success there was," says one U.S. official. "But Dewey cut corners and rammed things through. He crossed the line from being a professional intelligence officer to being an advocate." The program was managed in Washing- ton by a "restricted interagency group," or RIG. The group was headed by the as- sistant secretary of state for Latin Amer- ica, initially Thomas Enders and later Langhorne "Tony" Motley. Other mem- bers were U.S. Army Gen. Paul Gorman, representing the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who was later replaced by Navy Vice Adm. Ar- thur Moreau; Lt. Col. Oliver North, a Marine officer with extensive paramilitary experience who served on the NSC staff; and the CIA's Mr. Clarridge. All were, by temperament and background, aggressive risk-takers. Leadership Recast As the American role increased during 1982, the CIA decided to repackage the FDN leadership. The aim was to broaden the group's political appeal and reduce the rightist Argentine aural by bringing in well-known Nicaraguans with good anti-So- moza credentials. The head of the CIA's Central America task force visited Miami in November 1982 to interview candidates for the new FDN board of directors. He called himself "Tony Feldman." (Mr. Clarridge has been identified in print previously by the Associated Press, the Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal as director of the CIA's Latin American division. Other CIA operatives discussed in the article are identified by the code names they used in dealing with Contra leaders.) Edgar Chamorro, who joined the new leadership, remembers the pitch this way: "Feldman said that he was speaking on be- half of the U.S. government. He said that the president was interested in finding a solution to the problem. He said it was im- portant to do it before the election year. He spoke in very confident terms. He said that the Sandinistas must go." "I called him the Salesman," says Mr. Chamorro of the CIA official. He recalls that Feldman even promised that there would be a Lear jet to fly the Contra lead- ers from Honduras to Miami on the week- ends to see their families. Not only was there never a Lear jet; the Contras waited nearly a year for the CIA to provide a sim- ple cargo plane that could drop supplies to i the fighters inside Nicaragua. The Unveiling The repackaged FDN was unveiled at a Dec. 7, 1982, press conference. To avoid awkward questions to Mr. Cardenal from reporters, a group that Feldman charac- terized as "sharks," the CIA asked the for- mer FDN leader to get out of Miami for Contnli Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100250012-3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100250012-3 -7 t,ie day. The new FDN leader was a ai- caia;uan businessman named Adolfo Ca- erg. CIA hn.ndlers arranged a public-rela- tions tour for the %-w FDN directors, Mr. Charnorro stn: s. They were packed off to the :led N meet with represen- tatives of nena.1:,-ned countries. and in March 1953 they traveled to Europe to meet with nnn-'`Marxist European social- I ists. For the European trip the agency pro- ?v-ided each director with S150 a day in ex- pense mon=_v, delivered in a bulging atta- che Lase. The real action was taking place in Honduras, w; ere the FDN was building a large guerrilla force. By early 1983, an es- timated 7,000 FDN fighters were based in camps along the Honduras-Nicaraguan border, and they were beginning to operate overnight inside Nicaragua. The guerrillas did more than just harass Sandinista troops. They raided villages, burned crops, destroyed roads and blew up bridges. By CIA estimates they killed 55 Cuban ad- visers in 1984. Boxes of Cash The Americans provided the money- $300,000 a month-and it arrived every two weeks in cash, in large boxes filled with L.S. dollars, Honduran lempiras, and Nica- raguan cordobas, according to Mr. Cha- morro. The fighters were supposed to live on $1 a day. The FDN directors, who mostly stayed in Miami, were receiving about $2,000 a month. The Contras never controlled their own splitting the country in two and establish- weapons and logistics. The Americans sup. ing a Contra shadow government. plied guns, ammunition, uniforms and But the optimism faded, at least offi- most other military gear-apparently to cially. An internal report by the CIA in- make sure the guerrilla army didn't grow spector general in early 1983 concluded faster than Congress had authorized. When that the insurgency couldn't succeed at its Congress cut off funds in 1984, the Contras current levels. A June 30 National Intelli- suffered from their lack of logistics train- ?ence Estimate, representing the collec- ing, tine judgment of the intelligence commu- "They didn't know how to buy rifles or pity, was even blunter. It said the Contras webbed belts or any of the things they would have difficulty holding large popula- needed,'' says a U.S. official. tion centers, let alone toppling the Sandin- Mr. Chamorro ves most of the CIA op? istas. eratives in the field high marks. "George," Conservatives were angered by the in the CIA officer with whom he maintained telligence estimate, but it also served Mr. daily contact, was "first-rate" and "a Casey's purposes by giving him a shield bright young man with liberal ideas," he says. The veteran officer who ran the training camp, "Col. Raymond," was "as good as you can find." The Project was expanding rapidly in mid-1953, despite a 1982 congressional amendment specifying that CIA covert money couldn't be used to "overthrow" the Sandinistas. The amendment was a warn- i ing shot from Congress of its growing un- ease about the direction of the program. Mixed Assessments Within the CIA there were mixed as- sessments about the Contras' prospects. An internal planning memo prepared in 1982 had set out a timetable leading to the fall of Managua by Christmas 1983. Later, CIA officers encouraged the Contras to at- tack the Rama Road, a route for arms shipments from the port of El Bluff to Managua, and there were even dreams of against criticism that he was trying to overthrow the government. CIA officials recognized that they were running out of time and might soon lose congressional support for any paramilitary effort. So they began planning, in mid-1983, what would prove the decisive operation of the secret war: the mining of Nicaraguan har- bors. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100250012-3

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp91-00587r000100250012-3

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP91-00587R000100250012-3.pdf