Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE MATERIALS HANDLING STUDY (NON DIGTALLY STORED DATA)

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
NGA Records (Formerly NIMA) [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79B00873A001800010045-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
10
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 13, 2012
Sequence Number: 
45
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MISC
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79B00873A001800010045-6.pdf [3]393.7 KB
Body: 
I L_ Z 2' A16,-- ? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 T AP ' D RAF T DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE MATERIALS HANDLING STUDY (NON-DIGITALLY STORED DATA) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Purpose. This development objective contains the background, concept, and scope of a Government sponsored study and development program to improve the handling of non-digitally stored information and material used in the NPIC imagery exploitation process. 1.1.1. For the purposes of this document, the words "information," "material (i.e., substantive information in 1aP copy form)," and "data" are intended to mean that "information," "material," and "data" which is not suitable for digital processing, storage, and retrieval. 1.2. Background. Current and anticipated increases in the volume of * - M. collateral data inputs to NPIC make desirable a study to determine if more rapid and more efficient methods of screening, handling, storing, updating, and accessing these materials can be developed. It is currently estimated that there are between 1,000,000 and 2,000,000 deparate items on hand (e.g. 1,250,000 maps and charts, 75,000 reports, 150,000 photographs, 20,000 books and magazines, 50,000 to 100,000 other miscellaneous indexes and files),aa4-,&,R- f' -?=~ n.el,~m l o A,~~e~--c-at "^ The manual methods used for handling (i.e., reproducing, retrieving, controlling, and transportin) these items are unwieldy and time Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Page 2 consuming. it is believed that some form of automation to handle those materials will improve the effi~ciency and cost effectiveness C'~, Trr-a r~1 LyI W5 C,.15o b4,e/aJ Vim[&4 of4center operations..iture increases in the volume of acquired imagery and supporting data, t~ require extensive streamlining of present procedures. 2. CONCEPT 2.1. Purpose. The planned program will encompass the identified problem areas and suggest additional problem areas through the investigation ana analysis of current procedures, recommendations for possible detailed alternate solutions, and the establishment of practical and feasible current ana future automation levels. Ultimately, the results of these studies will be used to develop and install appropriate instrumentation and procedures to minimize the problems in handling of information and data. 2.2. Scope. The total program, as envisioned, will be divided into the following three separate but interrelated phases. Proposals solicited hereunder are to be restricted to the tasks outlined in Phase I (Paragraph 2.2.1.) and Phase II (Paragraph 2.2.2.). Phase III Paragraph 2.2.3.) is included as a matter of information and as an aid in developing the material required under Phases I and II. 2.2.1. Phase I, Investigation and Analysis. The contract- or will thoroughly investigate, review and analyge current procedures for handling the various forms of material and data within NPIC, determine the requirements for such materialand',~dat4 in terms of quality, volumes, response times, search strategies, flows etc., generate alternative Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 ? Page 3 conceptual plans for systems to satisfy these requirements, and evaluate the alternatives in accordance with the criteria outlined in Paragraph 3.1.1. 2.2.1.1. The conceptual plans should include recommended solutions to the material and data handling requirem4.s identified during the investigation and as a minimum must consider I the following problem areas: (a) Means of improving access to, updating, and distributing textual collateral data. (b) Methods for selecting, controlling, retrieving, c' Ifktcraf ph&tccra Pk (c) A method for storing, retrieving, and displaying maps and charts in support of the photographic interpretation effort. (d) Techniques for automatically producing, up- dating, storing, retrieving, and displaying mission coverage plots and mosaics. cy r 2.2.2. Phase II, System and Equipment Definition. Based on the conceptual plan resulting from the study in Phase I, alter- nate techniques for implementation of the conceptual design.. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Page 4 will be developed and evaluated. The report on this phase will include a thorough analysis and comparison of all alternates considered, i.e., rejected proposed alternates will be discussed as well as the alternate system which is deemed most desirable. The report will be both quan- C4-d f1I ("-[41 titativeVV in measuring one proposed alternate against the other and in demonstrating the amount of improvement each alternate could achieve over the present system. The use of aperture cards, microfiche, closed-circuit TV, and other known methods of storing, retrieving, and disseminating data should be considered in developing the alternate systems. A detailed system plan based on the selected alternate should be pre- pared and should include system and equipment parameters, implementation time, impact on operational and using components of the center, personnel and personnel training requirements, and the estimated costs of the proposed system for development, installation, and operation. 2.2.3. Phase III, Equipment Development, Acquisition and Installation. Utilizing the specifications generated!.tjnder Phase II, it is the intent of the Government to solicit proposals for 6L modern materials and data handling system. P%pr osals will include equipment modification, development, phase-in, installation, check-out, and training of personnel. It should be reiterated that Phase III is discussed here for information and guidance only and is not to be included in the proposal. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 V Page 5 3. REQUIREMENTS 3.1. Phase I Objectives. Two major reports stemming from the Investigation and Analysis Phase (Paragraph 2.2.1.) are to be delivered. The first report is to cover the contractor's nalysis of NPIC processes and the identification of requirements for information utilized by NPIC,which will not be handled in the digital system. The second report is to present the alternate conceptual designs generated by the contractor to meet the identified requirements. 3.1.1. In developing the alternative conceptual designs the following criteria will be utilized for evaluation purposes. Current procedures should also be evaluated, utilizing the5G1r4 criteria, so that judgment can be made as to the amount of improvement the implementation of the proposed concepts are designed to achieve. (a) Form and Organization of Information. A measure of how adequately the form, organization, and content of the information agrees with that required by the users for optimum performance of their functions. (b) System Performance. Time from receipt of infor- mation into the system until it is available to a user and length of the time from query to response. (c) Reliability. Consistency of expected performance and ability of system to perform major functions in event of individual component failure. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 - Page 6 (d) Ease of Phase In. An indication of the amount of disruption of Center activities during implementation of the system. (e) Expansibility. Difficulty (time and cost) of adding to the system to meet increased demands. (f) Flexibility. Ability of system to handle new or unexpected demands. (g) Compatibility. A measure of the ability of the system to function harmoniously with the automated and non-automated systems within and external to the Center. (h) Facility Requirements. The need for unusual site preparation, utilities, communication circuits, etc. (i) Personnel Requirements. The number and skill types required for system operation. (j) Total System Cost. This includes all initial and operational costs. Initieal implementation costs should be separated from the predicted annual operating costs. 3.3. Phase II Objectives. Three reports are to be delivered under the System Equipment Definition Phase (Paragraph 2.2.2.). The first report covering item (a) below, will include the comparison of alternates mentioned in Paragraph 2.2.2. and will utilize the same criteria (Paragraph 3.1.1.)for comparison specified for the comparison of concepts in Phase I. The second report covering item (b) below will be such that it is suitable for use on a basis of a request for a proposal directed toward Phase III (Paragraph 2.2.3.) without extensive rewrite Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 w Page 7 or modification. The third report will cover item (c) below. (a) Development and evaluation of alternate methods for accom- plishnngi.the functions of the system defined by the conceptual design resulting from Phase I. Alternate methods for accomplishing the major subsystem tasks will be evaluated and reported upon, as well as alternates for accomplishing the overall system functions. (b) Establishment of a detailed system configuration, including overall operation, description and detailed specifications of system components, and component interfaces. Detailed specifi- cations should be divided into logical subsets to permit use of multiple sources for Phase III. (c) Preparation of a detailed implementation plan (PERT) for the system. Budgetary costs and schedules for procurement and installation of equipment, facilities preparation, system testing, and personnel training should be included. 4. GENERAL 4.1. Computer Interface. Inasmuch as NPIC operates a central computer system, it is mandatory that all listing, indexing, and control functions to be performed under the proposed plan be compatible with the existing computers. 4.2. Proposals. The proposals should be comprehensive, well organized, explicit, clear, concise, and limited in content to that information required to qualify the prospective bidder and demonstrate ability to perform satisfactorily within the scope of this document. The format of the proposal should be arranged to separate company and personnel Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 w Page 8 qualification sheets from the main body of the proposal. 4.2.1. Delivery. While it is the wish of the Government to accomplish the aims of this program as expeditiously as possible, sufficient time should be allotted for a thorough and a mplete accomplishment of the aims set forth herein. Tentatively it is envisioned that the following time spans will be allotted to the various phases. Phase I - Six months (Report covering NPIC analysis to be delivered after 3 months. See Paragraph 3.1. Phase II - Six months to twelve months Phase III - Twelve months 4.2.1.1. Adequate time (approximately four weeks) shall be allowed for Government review and checking following the issuance of each report (both interim and final), required under this program since in each case the content of the reports will form the basis for subsequent work. 4.2.1.2. As a result of Government review, a limited amount of revision and rewrite may be re- quired. Proposals submitted here ynder should include provisions for this contingency. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 4.2.2. Costing. Cost proposals should be presented in such a manner that the cost of Phase I can be readily separated from the cost of Phase II. 4.3. Program Interface. Although the work to be performed under the terms of this document is confined to the development of a non-digital material handling system, interfaces will exist between this program and other studies underway within NPIC. It is anticipated that liaison between the contractor selected for this program and the contractors conducting related internal studies will be such that this program will result in a compatible and integrated system. 4.4. Administration. The Government will retain overall control of this program. Written approval from the contracting officer must be obtained before any changes in objectives, costs, or priorities are effected or before any subcontractor or consultant is employed. 4.5. Contractor Responsibility. The contractor is expected to pro- vide competent and cooperative administrative service. He will be vested with certain authority to control the direction and degree of technical effort within the bounds of the estimated costs. As a part of his overall responsibility, the contractor will be responsible for the work performed by all of his subcontractors and consultants. The fact that the Government has granted approval of the use of a specific subcontractor or consultant (See Paragraph 4.4.) in no way relieves the contractor from this responsibility. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6 Page 10 4.6. Technical Representatives. The contracting officer will designate a technical representative to authorize specific'.develop- ment efforts of the contractor. Such authorization shall be given in writing in its original form or in confirmation of an oral author- ization. The contractor will accept no other authorization except that of the technical representative or contracting officer. (A r 4.7. Reports. Regua-l-r reports will be required throughout the life of the contract. All reports will meet the basic requirements of specification DB-1001, date 31 August4: 1966, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENTATION, attached hereto. 4.7.1. Monthly Progress Reports covering each specified phase or subphase of this program will be submitted. 4.7.2. Final Reports will be submitted as indicated and will contain the information described under each Phase of this program. 4.7.3. Detailed Specifications submitted under Phase II will conform to documentation standards mutually agreed upon by the Technical Representative and the Contractor. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/14: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01800010045-6

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79b00873a001800010045-6

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/nga-records-formerly-nima
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79B00873A001800010045-6.pdf