Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


WARSAW TALKS AND TAIWAN STRAIT PATROL

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
Library of Congress [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-3-2-12-2
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
August 2, 2010
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 21, 1969
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-3-2-12-2.pdf [3]68.09 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2013/03/19: LOC-HAK-3-2-12-2 IP ACTION November 21, 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR DR. KISSINGER FROM: John a flotdrislge SUBJECT t Warsaw Talks and Taiwan Strait Patrol State is thinking of using the elimination of the Taiwan Strait patrol as a lever to encourage the Chinese to wish to reopen the Warsaw talks. Prior to the formal pitch we will make at the Ambassadorial talks to the Chinese Communists in Warsaw on our modification of the Taiwan 25X1 Strait patr -- and as a means of re-starting such talker They say that 25X1 _25X1 with the adjustments in ship movements through the Taiwan Strait made to satisfy the CRC about our continued presence there, it might otherwise take a while for Peking to learn of the modification (i. e. suspension) of the Taiwan Strait patrol. (In order to reassure President Chiang, we are routing some fifteen ships a month through the Strait to make up in part for the elimination of the destroyer patrol.) I assume that, in the formal channel at Warsaw, State intends to make clear that we are not withdrawing from our commitments. (State's purpose is simply to make some political capital out of a decision taken on budgetary grounds; we would not want the ploy to be misinterpreted as a signal of diminished US interest, which could conceivably encourage Chinese Communist pressure against the offshore islands or elsewhere. I shall be sure that you clear any instruction to Warsaw.) DOS, NSS reviews completed. Although as a general rule I believe we should sheer away from gim- mickry such as this, I consider that under the confusing circumstances which are developing in the Taiwan Strait it would be advisable to move ahead. The draft telegram has already been cleared all over the place, but unless Under Secretary Johnson discussed it with you directly, the matter was not put to us until the draft actually arrived. ___srbert77/710DIS LG:pas: 11/21/69 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2013/03/19: LOC-HAK-3-2-12-2 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2013/03/19: LOC-HAK-3-2-12-2 SECRET/NODIS -2- RECOMMENDATION: That you clear tbsdraft message at Tab A. Approve V Disapprove Att. SECRET/NODIS No Objection to Declassification in Part 2013/03/19: LOC-HAK-3-2-12-2

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/loc-hak-3-2-12-2

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/library-congress
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/LOC-HAK-3-2-12-2.pdf