Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP86R00893R000100090027-3
Body:
C Cf 'n CT
Approved For Release 2008/12/09 : CIA-RDP86R00893R000100090027-3
NIO/SP COMMENTS ON DRAFT OSWR STUDY,
"PROBABLE SOVIET VARIABLE CYCLE ENGINE TE HNOLOGY" (C)
1. A good study. One of its strong points is that--unlike many
technical assessments--it presents a "tutorial" on the system or technology in
question. In this case, the tutorial is found in the last paragraph on
page 7, noting the differences between the types of engines at issue.
However, this treatment needs expansion to aid the uninformed reader.
Specifically, there should be an explicit discussion of the relative
advantages of turbofan vs. turbojet engines, which a variable cycle engine is
supposed to incorporate. In other words, for what flight conditions are
turbojet and turbofan engines most suitable, and to what extent can a variable
cycle engine be expected to match the optimum performance of each of these
engine types?
2. A second area for improvement is the discussion of Kolosiev. It
appears that most of the section beginning on page 11 could be eliminated or
put in an annex. Why is it important for the reader to be led though the
evidence on this individual? If the identity of Kolosiev is vital to an
understanding of this development program, its importance should be explicitly
stated at the beginning of this section.
SECRET