Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS ATTACHED

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80R01731R000900070004-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 7, 2003
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 29, 1951
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80R01731R000900070004-6.pdf [3]246.08 KB
Body: 
1TAN90,RD FORM NO. 64 0 ApproTHS?1~ # 6239 . ice Memoran DOCUMENT NO. TO : Assistant Director for National Estimates FROM Assistant to the Director SUBJECT: Presidential Address Attached Soviet intentions, you might wish to cormnent on it. 3. We have been asked to make an early return o the draft to 2. Because it ventures into a. discussion of possible or probable delivery in the event of a breakdown in negotiations at haesong. 25X1 25X1 25X1 THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE DECLASSIFIED WHEN SEPARATED. 29 August 1951 NO CHANGE IN CLASS. 0 a OECLASSIW! D CLASS. CF1ANGED To: TS 3 NEXT REVtEW DATE; AUTH: y OAn 4 RIV+EMR, The attached standby address has been prepared for Presi ential 2003' 0#CL~ T0M70004-6 SATES GOVERNMENT .. Approved For Release 2003/ CONFIDENTIAL 30 August 1951 SUBJECT: Comments on Draft Standby Address for Presidential Delivery in the Event of a Breakdown in Negotiations at Kaesong REFERENCE: Memorandum of Assistant to the Director, 29 August 1951. 1. The draft assumes that the Communists will so act that it will be plain to all that they have broken off the negotiations, but that there ,will not have been a new offensive. Ile believe any such clear-cut break- off action is unlikely. In the recent bombing incident, the Communists, clumsy as they were in fabricating the incident, were clever in avoiding the onus of a definitive break. The USSR has generally been extremely careful to avoid the appearance of breaking off negotiations, and the Chinese Communists during the civil wax generally renewed hostilities not after any definite break but while talks were still going on or when they had been tacitly allowed to drop. in our view the two most likely con- tingencies are: (a) That the Communists will allow the talks to-fade away, per- haps to the point where no further meetings are scheduled, but without a formal break-off. In this case, a Presidential speech throwing the blame on the Communists or warning them against Starting a new offensive would presumably be more guarded than the present draft. (b) That the Communists will launch a major offensive, claiming that the US/UN disrupted the negotiations and possibly employing other arguments connected with the Japanese Peace Treaty. In this case, a Presidential speech would necessarily deal with the actuality of renewed aggression rather than merely with the threat. 2. The second half of the draft (from the 2nd paragraph of page 7 on) deals with the risk of war with the USSR in highly generalized terms, including reference to present Us policies but also carrying a strong hint of unspecified US offensive action (e.g., the 2nd paragraph of page 12 and the closing sentence of the draft). We suggest that initially emphasis be given to the UN determination to reach its objectives in Irea by whatever means are required, including the military moves already covered in pages 9-11 of the draft. Instead of stressing the possibility that Communist China might engage in aggressions elsewhere in Asia (which is not regarded as likely in US intelligence estimates), it would be better to emphasize CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2 80R01731 R000900070004-6 App ~e ,Fjp,-Re, Icase'22003 that the probable intensification of the war in '1~orea is liI.ely to lead to full-scale war between the UN/15 and Communist C??ina. Thereafter, the re- sponsibility of the USSR and the risk of general war between the US and the USSR could, be considered, along with a statement of whet the American people must do`to meet this situation. 3. It is noted that no part of the draft is addressed directly to the fighting men in Korea. Explanation of the situation to these men ap- pears vital. 4. On pages 5 and 6, reference is made to lDroduction of "heavy weapons, ammunition, or airplanes" in Communist China. Since Communist China does produce some ammunition, it is suggested that this read: "heavy weapons, artillery, tanks, or planes." (Note that there are two references.) 5. On page 7, reference is made to Communist capabilities: (a) If reference is made to possible further Coimxunist aggression in Asia (see comment 2 above), from an intelligence standpoint an early at- tack on India appears unlikely, though it may be desirable for policy reasons to refer to such an attack as an eventual possibility. We suggest the wording: ". . . against Indo-China, Burma, and the rust of Southeast Asia." (b) The possibility of attack in Western Europe might be empha- sized more, together with an explicit statement that tho Soviet Union is in a state of war-readiness both in Europe and in the Far East. 6. From the intelligence standpoint, it seems unwise at this time, when the emphasis should be on resistance to aggression, to suggest that the real American objective is the reduction of the Soviet orbit (pages 12 and 13). 25X1 =IILISAM L. GER Assistant Director 'dational Estimates Approved For Release 2003/ R01731 R000900070004-6 25 1OURCE: CIA CONTROL NUMBER: 23 DATE OF Au 51 DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED: 29 Aug 51 COPY NUMBER (S) : Orig LOGGED BY: mars ~.~ 25 NOTICE OF DE HMENT WHEN THUS FORM IS DETACHED FROM TOP SECRET MATERIAL IT WILL BE COMPLETED IN THE APPROPRI ATE SPACES BELOW AND TRANSMITTED TO CENTRAL TOP SECRET CONTROL FOR RECORD. The Top Secret material detached from this form was. DOWNGRADED By RE DESTROYED (S IGNATUI DISPATCHED (OUTSIDE CIA) T0: ORM N0. t,-'R 1410 Approved For Release 2007/Ot/2$ ~2DP80R01731 F~0Q09Q0070004-6 SIGNATURE RECORD, AND COVER SHEET DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION REGISTRY NUMBER OF PAGES:). DOCUMENT NO. Memo NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS:lCC 6239 W 3 TS DRAFT ATTENTION: THIS FORM WILL BE ATTACHED TO EACH TOP SECRET DOCUMENT RECEIVED BY THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OR CLASSIFIED TOP SECRET WITHIN THE CIA AND WILL REMAIN ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS IT IS DOWNGRADED, DESTROYED OR TRANSMITTED OUTSIDE OF CIA. ACCESS TO TOP SECRET MATERIAL IS LIMITED TO THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHOSE OFFICIAL DUTIES RELATE TO THE MATERIAL. EACH ALTERNATE OR ASSISTANT TOP SECRET CONTROL OFFICER WHO RECEIVES AND/OR RELEASES THE ATTACHED TOP SECRET MATERIAL WILL SIGN THIS FORM AND INDI- ICATE PERIOD OF CUSTODY IN THE LEFT-HAND COLUMNS PROVIDED. THE NAME OF EACH INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SEEN THE TOP `SECRET DOCUMENT AND THE DATE OF HANDLING SHOULD BE INDICATED IN THE RIGHT-HAND COLUMNS. R D iEFE RE TO RECEIVED RELEASED SEEN BY OFFICE SIGNATURE DATE TIME DATE TIME NAME OFFICE SYMBOL DATE InR ;, 1 A . UMEiNT NO. D DECLASSIFIED - -- ? CLASS, CHANGED TO: TS s NEXTREVIE W DATE: f 1+1 AUTH. HAT . _ VIA J :J J J 1 3 `. -~ DECLASSIFY ENS ARAT D FR( M1NCL URES ~~. TOP SECRET PREY 100 Ajf6Fb9YAcPFof` ida`9b 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R017~31 8000900070004-6 world -- with a tall. tale like t.hat. we imo,,tiT wnere a_L~ uui c.." -

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp80r01731r000900070004-6

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80R01731R000900070004-6.pdf