Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


EXTENT AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE SOVIET-YUGOSLAV RAPPROCHEMENT

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 12, 1999
Sequence Number: 
16
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 16, 1957
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8.pdf [3]387.15 KB
Body: 
0 e4r 6' tApproved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T000/TA pproved For ReleaV000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000140030016-8 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICE OF NATIONAL ESTIMATES 16 August 1957 STAFF MEMO: 40-51 SUBJECT Extent and Implications of the Soviet-Yugoslav Rappchaiit 1. The Khrushchev Tito meeting in Rumania on 1 and 2 August may hav resulted in B re f a rapprochement than either of the p rticipante is as yet Waling to admit. Yhgeslav officials have repeatedly asserted that Tito has in no way conceded any of Yugoslavia's indepen nce or ideological convictions and Belgrade ha a encouraged the prasion that the new ecord has again been accomplished only en the basin of an "agreement to disagree." Nevertheless. a compromise &ming ment. one that does not involve any major conc ssiens on either si but which is still one step beyond the 1956 understanding. may have been worked out in secret. 2. Such a compromise might involve, on the Soviet side a renewed pledge to recognise genuine Yugoslav ind ['cadence. This would not moan endorsement of Yugoslav eovereignt3. ideological concepts ammompopmmUSCUMENTINO 'NO CHANGE IN CLASS. C3 74., DECLASSIFIED CLASS. CHANGED TO: IS S C NEXT REVIEW DATE: AUTH: HR 70-2 INVEVER: ? !? V Y4/ Approved For Releas43000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A0005.Dp30016-8 SECRET er economic practices, but would imply that, while scarcely admissable elseuhere in the Bloc, Yugoslav "deviations" will be tolerated for Yugoslavia (Khreshchev, speaking extemporaneously in Prague last months told the Yugoslays to keep their precious workers councils if they wanted to, but not to expe t applause from the Bloc). In eddition, the Soviet Union may have committed itself to "encourage" the Satellites -- particularly Albania and Bulgaria -- to mind their manners and "make up" with Yugoslavia (there are some indication.. that this process is already underway)., The Yugoslays, for their part, could have agreed at least temporarily to recognise (not endorse) the Bloc ac it is -- i.e as a Bloc. This in turn, would imply a Yugoslav willingness to end missionary activities in the Satellites* and a promise to cease ," specific pressures against individual Satellite lea s Belgrade presumably would not aeree to either of these "concessions," however unless it was ensured as it probably was -- that the Bloc is evolving in the direction desired by Yugeelavia, i.e. toward Satellite As engaged in last summer and fall, particularly in Poland and Hungary. ** As once exerted against Rakosi. A Yugoslav promise to accept unpalatable Satellite leaders is not without precedent e- Belgesde apparently agreed to accept Hungarian leader Erne Gera just prier to last Fall's revolution. SECRET Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8 Approved For ReleasW000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000Vp30016-8 'equalitT" with the 'IniarA,, ;A l'ilgoslav spokespa-, recently told th. Amer:eon ambassador in zalarade that his government im cotimtAio but. the future of relations wlthin the l;-loc and fmrovments tn the neer futore5' Ygi;.:01314.**15 nay alma have-*Teen tocon-,-,der ftlaratAy the na:mttoo of me.T,torF;hip in some I:gee or "international' ...,ommunigt al-ganiastIchs, Blierade'e pos tion on. thin is not as inflexia ov morsatmes maintains; it is oven arixios, to partoiatt P-kAoon orca.nizatiabs If It roars tencerning domlnatIoA .'an boo Aled, It 1411M already become a C.Mi observer and recent p.rt4 tr it may rn-join the 'Aerld Federation of Trade `!niona (fror4 vtitti it was ousted in 19.50* The Yugo& ve OtoutlY maihts.lai that thil? will never enter inte a revival .:airriltiform, but their Attttude tuwari an international ..;armlniet or "soetalist" organiv., Orasj. membership and loose structure mighl devote itsblr nn te the publication of jeurnal 7lay not be 4utte so nileativeo' 1,1.though the rapprochement may thus have gone boyend te 0,?:repent, .or iast year4 the natives for tne accord aDcear 'Lc rnt.'ne Vrte 4.:,,t'imate :Soviet ala ntly inuetc be rtInavad "f-..t wan TIto, after all. who C;xist suggested to ttte tonnlin of an internatinnAl. -,ommunist organisation to laice the defunct Cori_ntern., Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8 Approved For Releavw2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A00054030016-8 SECRET Yugoslav membership in the Bloc? Moscow presumably foresees various stages in the gradual attainment of this aim, with each stege perhaps representing a specific Soviet accomplishment -- such as a Yugeslav agreement to participate in a loose revival of the Cordnform. The timing of such a procedure and the extent to which the Yugoslays are expected to surrender their independence when back in the Bloc would presumably depend largely on Yugoslav reactions; Moscow might ultimately settle for a Yugoslav status roughly similar to that of either present-day Poland or even Communist China. 60 'Why the USSR feels that this is the most desirable course of action (instead of merely i olating Yugoslavia from the Blocs as Stalin did) is presumably related to the change in the evereall Soviet outlook and reflects, among other things, de-Stalinisatione peaceful coexistence, and the general campaign against the West, MoscoW's apparent urgency since the Soviet Presidium shakeup in restoring good relations with Yugoolavia, however, may have merely been the result of Khruehchev's specific desire to achieve success in a personal policy that was highly controversial. 7. Yugoelav motives for seeking accord with the USSR are only in part practical (e.g0 desire for Soviet economic aid). Probably more important are less tangible considerations. Belgrade, for 4 - SECRET Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8 ? Approved For Releasca000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A0005Q90030016-8 SECRET example, does not enjoy its spiritual isolation from most ?1 the socialist woad. Its Communist missionary fervor cannot operate in a vacuum it must develop some measure of legitimate prestige and party contacts within as well as outside the Bloc if its influence is tep be felt. Perhaps temporarily able to curb its desire to propagate its own brand of Marxism, it, nevertheless, probably hopes in the ling tun to become a powerful source of enlightenment tor the entire Socialist camp, It may also feel that its power and global prestige (something of which /ageslavs are apparently very conscious) will in the long run be enhanced by good relations with the USSR and by the emergence of fteslavia as an indispensable bridge between the two worlds* 8* If a sort of tactical quid pro quo has, in fact, been worked eut between Tagealavia and the USSR, the stability of the present rapprochement will presumably rest on firmer foundations than the 1956 accord. Discussion apparently has been on a relatively frank basis and Molotov is no longer in a position to hinder good relations, But the current mood in both countries rests to a large extent on unrealistic optimism a general belief in each country that its own tenets will ultimately -- and perhaps dialectically triumph. Further, because major obstacles admittedly remain unaltered, 5 - SECRET Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8 SECRET because Khrushchev is impulsive and Tito is something of a crusader and because any number of imponderables could threaten the accord the success of the current rapprochement is by no means assured. 9. Skepticism in both capitals is undoubtedly strong. Tho Yugoslays still fear Stalinist influence in Moscow, the Soviet loadera-- legitimately -. still fear Yugoslav influence in the Satellites - Thus Belgrade is continuing its public emphasis on "equality," Moscow is maintaining its heavy pitch ccneerning Bloc unity. A feeling in Moscow that its recognition of Yugoslav independence is again having major repercussions in the other Satellites (regardlees of what the Yugoslavs do), or a Yugoslav feeling that the USSR is net satisfactorily veleping Satellite equality, would stirnlate renewed discord. "Outside" events or agencies -- another Hungary, some Polish action or major changes on the world scene -. could also prove too much for the agreement. Unless further compromises can be worked out the long-run prospects for genuine rapproche nt are Alm. Violent discord need not arise, but relations may never go beyond the present fairly flimsy.- and uneasy rapprochement. 6 - SECRET ?Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8 Novi *so? _Approved For Releavs,2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000$10030016-8 -.8EMET"' IO. Thereforer our most recent estimate* that the Yugoslays "will seek opportunities to expand economic and political contacte with the Sino-Sivist !floc" -- without, however, compromising their "independent foreign policy" ...Appears to zrnain essentially sound. 25X1 A9a * NIE 31$79 "YUgoslevies Policies and Prospects," 11 June 1957 7 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79t00937a000500030016-8

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79T00937A000500030016-8.pdf