Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP72-00337R000400030105-6
Body:
25X1 Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP72-00337R000400030105-6
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP72-00337R000400030105-6
Approved For Release 2005/12/14 CIA2-003378000400030105-6
Journal - Office of Legislative Counsel
Thursday - 13 February 1969
Page 4 25X1
Senator John Stennis (D. , Miss. ), and left with him unclassified basic
material on the Middle East countries as an outgrowth of our briefing of
Spell a short time ago. Spell was most grateful for this material and said
it would be extremely useful to him in working for the Senator in this area.
Talked with Spell, at some length, about our problem with the
Ervin bill (S. 782). Spell recalled the problem from last year and was
sympathetic to our situation. In this connection, he thought it might be
useful for us to allude to the problem which selective Service offices are
having as a result of a provision in the Selective Service Act which permits
a draft registrant to examine his selective service file. Spell pointed out
that dissident groups are creating a real problem by utilizing this provision
in the law to harass selective service offices and have practically brought
the work of these offices to a standstill in the state of California. Spell
agreed that Senator McClellan (D. , Ark.) might be vexy helpful to us in
solving our problems with this legislation.
SECRET
Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP72-00337R000400030105-6
Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP72-00337R000400030105-6
Journal - Office of Legislative Counsel
Thursday - 13 February 1969
Page 5
16. Met with Ed Braswell, Staff Director of the
Senate Armed Services Committee, and left with him copies of our package
on S. 782. Braswell felt that in our presentations on this bill we should
stress the unique Agency situation and the fact that the use of things such
as psychology testing and the polygraph are conditions of employment which
most applicants appreciate and readily agree to. In this connection,he pointed
out the ingrained opposition which Senator Ervin ( a former judge) has both~
to the polygraph and to undue emphasis on security. Braswell said that 15X1
Ervin also tends to dislike the approach of what he might consider to be
over zealous anti-communists,
In discussing the Ervin bill, Braswell asked if we had determined
just what the Administration position would be on this legislation. I told him
we had discussed the matter with Ken BeLieu, who felt he could be of little
help to us at this point in time. I told him that we were also contacting the
Civil Service Commission in this regard. Braswell thought this was a good
idea since an Administration position will have to be reached on this legislation
eventually. I also told him that the Director was planning to write Senator
Ervin a letter asking for an opportunity to be heard on this bill in executive25X1
session. Braswell thought this was highly desirable,
\ J JOHN M. MAURY
Legislative Counsel
cc:
ODDCI
Ex-Dir-Compt
OPPB
DD/I
DD/S
DD/S&T
EA./ DDP
Mr. Houston
Mr. Goodwin
Item #1 - Office of Personnel
Item #5 - Office of Logistics
Item #6 - SB Divisio
SECRET
Approved For Release 2005h2/14: CIA-RDP72-00337R000400030105-6