Published on CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom)


YUGOSLAV-SOVIET RELATIONS

Document Type: 
CREST [1]
Collection: 
General CIA Records [2]
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79R00890A000900080017-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 19, 2000
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 23, 1958
Content Type: 
BRIEF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79R00890A000900080017-2.pdf [3]263.72 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 200 /08/29 CIA-RDP79R00890A000900080017-2 Y os AY-SW The :cent ov ie to Yugoslav-Soviet relations since Khrushchev began wooing Yugoslavia in 1955. A. All, bers of the bloc followed meow's lead and wtthdr their official delegations. Likewise,, bloc members appear to falling into f Moscow's strong rebuttal of the Yugoslav ck in full. Czechs have (ally indorsed the scow attack, and l;aria initiated its own direct attack on the Yugoslav program. ;4 has associated itself with some of Moscow own road to socialism. icisa, but has recognised Seigra C. In lieu of delegations the bloc seal the congress an "observers." 1. With the exception of the Polish aambass 1. C nniet China's Peoples Daily i has printed Moscow's nalysis of the Yugoslav draft party program conded as non- ' Ti 23 April -deana tt n of the Yugoslav party fight to follow following a break In the anti-Soviet speed highlighted the, Moscow imposed boycott. 18 April, the Soviet theoretical journal g+unist in a det=ailed Marxist virtually every basic principle of Yugoslav ideology. Approved For Release 2000/08/29 C4DP79R00890A000900080017-2 Cott of the Yugoslav party congress in conjunction with Approved For Release 2000/08/29 : CIA-RDP79R0089OA000900080017-2 A. Ko unisst made aaade it clear that unless Tugoelavs non-. rx role telly dropped there is no hope for any future via in the Communist wort R. Moscow gave its condemn tiau of the Yugosiasvprogram coverage in radio broadcasts to foreign audiences, Tito seriously concerned over the dispute, there is 1, likelihood that he will knuckle under. A.. Concessions on the main issues would represent an abandoaaaa cnt of the Yugoslav road to socialism. 1. Tito's internal position andhis position in history it; primarily by his *$heres 2, past Soviet lecturing to the Yugoslavs has generally &gerved to strengthen the latter in their non-conformity, Aware of Soviet intentions to boycott the congress since 5 April, Belgrade on 17 April announced changes in its draft. Belgrade apparently hoped this old persuade dos to attend the cou:#ress. These concessions were not on basic Ideology, but were an obvious effort to meet Soviet complaints concerning draft prograa m" s foreign policy p Yugoslav ambassador I*igunovic in Moscow net with Zbru*bchev but the seating reportedly terminated in bad feeling as Yugoslavs probably indicated they could concede iothiog further. 25X1 C(a) Iiicunovic has requested ressiga nt as a re Of his fruitless efforts to achieve a normalization is Yugoslav- Soviet relations Approved For Release 2000/08/29 : CIA-RDP79R0089OA000900080017-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/49"CIA-RDP79R0089OA000900080017-2 C. Tito in his opening Speech at the congress confirmed the nkovi> subsequently declared that "certain very r+espaibie people who are our neighbors, instead of profiting fro-,4 the the USSR, leaving this to his chief lieutenant R&nkovie. isv road to socialises, but he hurled no fire and brimstone experiences of the past, are again sharpening the old n.ad rusty weapons of the Comisiform. if. The diet attack on the Yugoslav pargram was cast in terms of an ideological schism between Yugoslavia and the bloc. If t oslavs refuse to concede, Yugoslavia will be In ideological Isolation to a degree similar to that of 1948. Apparently :,scow and Belgrade still hope to avoid ccmpletc break as in 1948. the USSR hopes to maintain at least "correct" state relations! The visit of Soviet President Yoroshilov to Yugoslavia in May which has not as yet been cancelled,, suggests t Tito still supports most Soviet foreign policy objectives. 1, Tito's speech before the congress any economic relathnss. Soviet relations were progressing "very favorably," The relatively neutral tone of Tito's National Assembly on however 1. onfidence. uggest that Tito any be interested in r Yugoslav; American aid to which no strings were attach that termination of its military aid had "negatively influenced" t-Yugoslav relations. Approved For Release 2000/08/29 :ACIP79R00890A000900080017-2 Approved For Release 2000/2": CIA-RDP79R00890A000900080017-2 V. The Yugoslavs are no in rather genera; The visit by Tito to Gaulks scheduled for late spring now considerable significance for Tito's relations the bloc. The polish observer at the T W slay congress has not acted in concert with his bloc colleagues. Western urope's socialist parties have refused the congress largely because of Tito's treatment of the more recent trials of several pro--war Yugoslav . G. Yugoslavs, nevertheless, are likely to continue to hope that history is on their side (fits in his October rore article clearly statedd, this belief) and that ultimate; views will win out without si socialist world, modification Approved For Release 2000/08/2,_CIXDP79R00890A000900080017-2

Source URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79r00890a000900080017-2

Links
[1] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document-type/crest
[2] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/general-cia-records
[3] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79R00890A000900080017-2.pdf