FITNESS REPORT - MILLS, MONTRELL EUGENE

Document Type: 
Keywords: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
0001308864
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Release Date: 
February 19, 2008
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2005-00558
Publication Date: 
April 26, 1960
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon DOC_0001308864.pdf176.9 KB
Body: 
 SEQJWT (Whe llled In) EMFgR                N  MBER 1960                FITNESS REPORT SECT                               GENERAL 1. NAM            (Last)               (First)          (Middle) 2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX 4. GRADE MUM$ Mo t                               Be 31 January 1921L -  Male GS-13 S. SERVICE DESIGNATION I- OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE-,                                                   7. OFF/DIV/BR OF-ASSIGNMENT S               Investigator s.                        CAREER STAFF STATUS                                   9.                            TYPE OF REPORT NOT ELIGIBLE MEMBER DEFERRED INITIAL REASSIGNMENT/SUPERVISOR PENDING DECLINED DENIED ANNUAL REASSIGNMENT/EMPLOYEE 10. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P. 1?. REPORTING PERIOD SPECIAL (Specify) I 28 February 1960 F. M :.2/28/59     12/3175S. SECTION B                        EVALUATION OF PERFORM ANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES List up. to s.ix of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period.Insert rating number-which best describes the ee erf s EACH specific-d 7 Consider ONLY effecti eness in perf rmance f 'that d whi mpl r fr t All i h l p v e o m u . o o u manner n c oy y{z; emp oyees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised)x 1 - Unsatisfactory       2 - Barely adequate 3 - Acceptable 4 - Competent   5 -Excellent 16 - Superior    7. - Outstanding - SPECIFIC DUTY NO. i  Plans and arranges RATING SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4   Plans and..organize's RATING assignment instructions to effect No. work to:achieve expeditious and eco- No., investigative coverage of persons 5 nomical completion of investigative 5 and thinks. ass. =tents.       i SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2 Applies RATING SPECIFIC DUTY NO. S   Reports  on information RATING to conduct of investigations an  com- NO. obtained through investigative pro- NO, pletes investigations consistent 5 cessing and prepares correspondence 4 therewith, in connection therewith, SPECIFIC DUTY NO.3 RATING SPECIFIC DUTY NO. S RATING Performs specialized and delicate NO. NO. service requiring tact, poise and 5 judgment. SECTION C          EVALUATION OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION Take into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position - performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on lob, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the rating number in the box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance. 1 - Performdnce%in' many imps, 4ant'respaets fails to meet r'equ?remerits.                                       RATING .                         is deficient. in one of more;important.respects            : i      NO. J Performarree meets most requirements but 3 - Performance clearly:I eete asic regl{irements   - J4"- Performance clearly 'excee' f?bo,sic requirements                    5 5:9 Performance in- every important respect is, superior; 6 - ~erformonr a in every respect is outstanding. , SECTION D                        DESCRIPTION OF ,THE EMPLOYEE,., a      J 71n the rating boxes beIow,-check) (X) the-degree,t9 which-eacg characteristic applies to the employee; 1 - Least possi4le degree     2- Limited degrees 3 - Normal degree -  4 - Above overage de gree -? 5_-Outstanding degree CHARACTERIS CS NOT APPLI- T B- ' -          RATING I SABLE G SERjiED 4 5 GETS THINGS-DO  E -, x RESOURCE-FU x ACCEPTS-RESP-ON IBILITIES                                                ?. n x CAN M   E-DECISIONS ON HIS OWN WHEN-NEE ARISES x DOES I?IISJO  WITHOUTT STRONG $V.I?PORT. FACILITATES SMQO H   PERA.TION OF HIS.QFFICFt. WRITES EFFECTIVELY SECURITY CONSCIOUS x THINKS CLEARLY x DISCIPLINE IN ORIGINATING, MAINTAINING AND DISPOSING OF RECORDS x OTHER (Specify): SEE SECTION 'E' ON REVERSE SIDE FORM    S s-S5   45 OBSOLETE PREVIOUS EDITIONS. APPROVED  FOR RELEASE DATE:  NOV 2007 SECTION E           NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCE Stress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated In current position. Indicate suggestions made to employee for improvement of his work.  Give recommendations for his training.  Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assuming greater re- sponsibilities. Amplify or explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the best basis for determining future personnel actions. A thoroughly capable, competent, and objective Resident Agent, Mills' performance is distinguished by the professional manner in which he handles an extremely heavy case load in a large, active area.  Operating with a minimum of supervision, he consistently turns in a large number of completed assignments, and to do this he works hard, puts in long hours, does a tremendous amount of driving, and does not spare himself.  His cooperative attitude and the pride he takes in handling his territory are outstanding. He possesses and exercises good judgment and initiative, he knows his territory well, and has developed excellent contacts and valuable sources of, information. Durigg the present rat;ang.;,period;, he has shown considerable i fprov    t in handling his administrative matters, but his reports are Ittill      as concise as they should be,  This is a minor matter, however, en c rsidere'd in his over-all performance.  He presents an excellent Tersonable.a  earance, meets people easily, and is extremely security I c t s.    nsidering his experience, his temperament, and capabilities, ;.consc is    liev d that he possesses a`very good potential with our Organization. SECTIO              N,F                              CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS 1. ,. . ' . , ..                                         BY EMPLOYEE I certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report. DATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE       -- j 2.,    D 7J                           J                  BY SUPERVISOR...,.       ~.       J . MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS PEEN IF.THIS,REPORT,HAS.NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GI-VE,EXPLA4AT4ON   -, -  ,--o-- UNDER MY SUPERVISION #2 ' Will be shown to employee'`a`t conference time, 2 May 1960. ~.- IF R  PORT,ISN,OT BEING MADE AT..THIS TIJ1E, GIVE_REASON:           ~. EMPLOYEE UNDER MY.SUPERVISION LE THAN 90 DAYS                              REPORT MADE WITHIN             AST 90 DAYS                                                                                                                                                                                              ... OTHER (SPecify): DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR TY PED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNAT URE 19 April 1960 Special Agent in Charge 3.                                             BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL I WOkJLD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME,-EVALUATION. I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE'A HIGHER EVALUATION. I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION. I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS.  I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL -.            In view,0#,the =.ratings given in Sections B and D,:- it:?as.r he .,' reviewer's opinion that Section C should reflect a rating of 4/5 rather than S                                                                             J . DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL 26 April 1960 Chief, T SEC  T (When tiled In) SECRET