FITNESS REPORT - MILLS, MONTRELL EUGENE

Document Type: 
Keywords: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
0001308879
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Release Date: 
February 19, 2008
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2005-00558
Publication Date: 
January 24, 1964
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon DOC_0001308879.pdf139.08 KB
Body: 
 EMPLOYEE SERIAL NUMBER FITNESS REPORT SECTION A                                    GEN ERAL I. NAME              (Last) (First)            (Middle) 2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX 4. GRADE 5. SD MILLS, Montrell      E. 1/31/24 M GS-13 6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE 7. OFF/DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT S. CURRENT S Investigator R. A. O 9. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENT 10. REPOR CAREER             RESERVE               TEMPORARY INITIAL F REASSIGNMENT SUPERVISOR CAREER-PROVISIONAL (See instructions - Section.C) ANNUAL REASSIGNMENT EMPLOYEE SPECIAL (Specify): SPECIAL (Specify): I I. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P. 12. REPORTING PERIOD (From- to-) 31 January 1964 1 January 1963 - 31 December 1963 SECTION B                          PERFORMANC E EVALUATION W - Weak       Performance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires positive remedial action, The nature-9f the action. could range from counseling, to.further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section C. A- Adequate    Performance meets all requirements. It is. entirely satisfactory and Is characterized neither by deficiency nor excellence. P - Proficient Performance is more than satisfactory:` Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner. S_ Strong      Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency. 0 - Outstanding Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition. SPECIFIC DUTIES List up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised). SPECIFIC DUTY NO. I RATING LETTER Plans and arranges assignment instructions to effect investigative coverage of persons and things. S SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2 RATING LETTER Applies                   to conduct of investigations and completes investigations consistent t erewith. P SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3 RATING .LETTER Performs specialized and delicate service requiring tact, poise and judgment. S SPECIFIC DUTY NO.4 RATING LETTER Plans and organizes work to achieve expeditious and economical completion of investigative assignments. S SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5_ RATING LETTER :Reports on information obtained through investigative processing and prepares;, correspondence in connection. =therewitri. P SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 8 APPROVED  FOR RELEASE RATING LETTER DATE'.: _ NOV 2007 OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION ,., ..r     . a  ...    ,t: ?`? thing about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his currerit'position such as per- Take into account ever RATING LETTER y formance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on ob, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and ee's overall performance during the rating period e of em lo r knowled o d l t B li i t t l i , y g p s. ase on y u a tat ons o . en ar m particu S place t e letter In the ra ing box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance. 0 JAN 1964 FOR m 45   OBSOLETIL PREVIOUS EDITIONS. SEC xrwE T (When  filled In) SE  ET (When F lied In) SECTION C                             NARRATIVE COMMENTS       t)PItIPP Indicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper persp   ai, "ffrtrelationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for t b ping.  Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or We4visory-duties must be described, if applicable.                                                                                             j(/ '94 Mills continues to handle his                                                               resident aigogc),                               an E exceptionally fine manner.  He is a veritable ''work horse'nlans his work well, makes the best use of his time; produces more than his share of very acceptable work and never spares himself.  He has continuously had more work-.than he could possibly handle, but- has kept right on in an efficient and capable manner-and without letting-:it lower his morale. With the opening of the new residency in                  he will be relieved of the responsibility for that area.   ex as developed many :excellent-sources.of,:information,and'contacts in his territory which he uses ,to good, advantage.- --He:is cooperative, :always wiliing'.to change his plans and itinerary when more pressing assignments arrive.  He is dependable, uses good judgment, has a keen sense of humor and his :,personality is an asset.  He is security conscious and has consistently been, :one.: of :bur. maiicstaysi, SECTION D                         CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS BY EMPLOYEE I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT DATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE 2.                                               BY SUPERVISOR MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION Discussed telephonically.  Will be.shown to employee 88 at the next conference. DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR YPED OR P  INTED NAME AND SIGNATUR E 21 January 1964 Special Agent in Charge BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL 3. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL 1/ Aghly competent investigator who has maintained an unusually high production of work.  I concur in the rating of "Strong" and feel that he should be given an assignment in the Headquarters area in the near future to ensure his full development. Subject has no supervisory responsibilities. DATE                OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL 24 January 1964             DD SE  ET