FITNESS REPORT - MILLS, MONTRELL EUGENE

Document Type: 
Keywords: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
0001309067
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Release Date: 
February 19, 2008
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2005-00558
Publication Date: 
February 20, 1976
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon DOC_0001309067.pdf198.49 KB
Body: 
 FITNESS REPORT                                (b) (6) SECTION A                        GENERAL INFORMATION 1. EMPLOYEE NUMBER    , 2. NAME (Last, first, middle) 3. DATE OF BIRTH 4. SEX S. GRAD E S. SD MILLS, Montrell E. 1/31/24 M 13 7. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE S.  OFF/DIY/BR OF ASSIGNMENT S. CURRENT STATION to. CODE  c  one) Security Officer DDA OL Washin ton X HQS'      DF - It. TYPE OF APPOINTMENT 12. TYPE OF REPORT OTHER (Spec.) X CAREER RESERVE ONTRAC EMPORARY X ANNUAL REASSIGN- MENT S PECIAL 13. REPORTING PERIOD (from-to-) 14. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P. December 1974 - December 1975 31                                                         ry 1976 SECTION B                                                   QUALIFICATIONS UPDATE IF  QUALIFICATIONS  UPDATE  FORM  IS   BEING  SUBMITTED  WITH CHANGES,  AND  IS                                        ATTACHED TO  THIS REPORT,  PLACE  THE WORD "YES" IN THE BOX TO THE RIGHT. IF NO CHANGES ARE REQUIRED,         PLACE THE WORD  "NO"  IN  THE                                               BOX AT RIGHT. SECTION C                                     PERFORMANCE EVALUATION U-Unsatisfactory    Performance is unacceptable. A rating in this category requires immediate and positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section D. M-Marginal          Performance is deficient in some aspects. The reasons for assigning this rating should be stated in Section D and remedial actions taken or recommended should be described. P-Proficient        Performance is satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in the manner expected. S-Strong            Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency. O-Outstanding       Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition. SPECIFIC DUTIES List up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised). SPECIFIC DUTY NO.1  Conducts security inspections of various contractor LRATING ETTER facilities in the United States and provides advice and guidance relative to the Industrial Security standards of this Agency. Prepares              -te  reports S BPECIFICDUTY "o.%Provides industrial security guidance, on a continuing LRAT' 11 ETTER basis, to contractor personnel, to procurement officers, and to technical representatives of various components of this Agency. S SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3 Performs miscellaneous duties as an Area  Security RATING LETTER Officer for the Office of Logistics.   Prepares the necessary reports pertaining to such activity. S SPECIFIC DUTY N0.4 Performs as       Safety Officer, interfacing with LRATING ETTER Agency Safety Officer          matters pertaining to OSHA require- ments, safety suggestions, deficiencies and training exercise. S SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5 RATING LETTER SPECIFIC DUTY NO. s                                                APPROVED  FOR RELEASE LERATING TTER DATE:  NOV 2007 OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION Take into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, RATING LETTER productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accu. S rately,reflects his level of performance. - X  OBSOLETE  PREVIOUS                                            CLASSIFICA)ION                        MAR 1P76                                                           (4) FORM  A JtU SECTION D                         NARRATIVE COMMENTS Indicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations_' for; training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Secti      td;proifde best basis for determinirig future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and cost consciousness in the use of personnel, space, equipment and funds, must be commented on, if applicable. If extra space is needed to complete Section D, attach a separate sheet of paper. '"!! 7 r 7 1 4 0 Mr. Mills has been undV'y" the supervision of this evaluator for the past 17 months.   During this reporting period, his performance has shown steady growth and improvement which justifies upgrading duties 2 and 4 to "Strong" as compared to the "Proficient" rating which he received for the previous period. Mr. Mills has demonstrated a high degree of versatility during this reporting period.  He competently prepared and edited for publication a new Security Requirements Manual for utilization with OL, XG-classified contracts and also planned and coordinated the Security Staff's move to the       Building in a very smooth professional manner. Mr. Mills' maturity and devotion to the Agency and long tenure of exceptional security :experience allows him to interface with his contacts in the private sector in a highly desirable manner. Mr. Mills is highly regard by his co-workers as well as those individuals in other components with whom he has contact.  He SECTION E                    CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS 1. BY SUPERVISOR MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISION /7 IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVI SOR ED OR PRINTED NAME AN  SIGNATURE 2J   t(                    Chief, f 0L 2.BY .EMPLOYEE STATEMENT CONCERNING THIS EVALUATION DATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE OF MY PERFORMANCE ?r ~/ /' HAVE ATTACHED             HAVE NOT ATTACHED / / (   1(/ 3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL Concur wholeheartedly in the comments above.  Tex is a mature and dedicated professional Security Officer who takes great pride in accomplishing his tasks in the proper manner.  He is highly productive and requires little if any supervision in performing his assigned duties. Tex is extremely thoughtful and practical in his approach to problems. He has displayed exceptional initiative in his efforts to assist Agency technical representatives and-contract officers and it is felt he has contributed greatly to the improvement of the Industrial Security Progra through his assistance to these people.   Tex has the ability to be a good supervisor and it is felt he is qualified for a position requiring more responsibility.   He is definitely an asset to this staff an   's DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPE [                       IE AND 81 Chief L 1 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN THE ENTRIES IN ALL SECTIONS OF THIS REPORT. DATJiR 1                                                                     7/ SV~ ELL E SIFIC TION ET FITNESS REPORT - MILLS, Montrell E. Dec 74 - Dec 75 responsive to constructive criticism and only requires a minimum of supervision.  Mr. Mills does not have any supervisory responsibilities in his current assignment. Mr. Mills is a definite asset to this Staff and warrants an overall "Strong" rating in his current assignment. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL  - Cont'd considered by the reviewer to be a very strong performer in all respects.