RAUTENBERG, ERWIN; CIA DOCS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
0001528807
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
12
Document Creation Date: 
June 22, 2015
Document Release Date: 
May 26, 2009
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2007-01743
Publication Date: 
July 10, 2000
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon DOC_0001528807.pdf284.84 KB
Body: 
GREENBERB APPROVED FOR RELEASE DATE: 29-Apr-2009 Jane C. Gumbrewicz 202-452-4877 gumbrewiczj@gtlaw.com July 10, 2000 Kathryn I. Dryer Information and privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D. C. 20505 Re: Request for Records under Freedom Of Information Act Reference No. F-1999-01980 Dear Ms. Dryer: On September 13, 1999, Raymond B. Kim submitted a Freedom of information Act request to your office on behalf of Erwin Rautenberg. A copy of the original request (without attachments) is enclosed. In your letter of 29 February 2000 (attached), the request was accepted and the process started. We have not had any communication with your office since the letter of February 29. Please confirm that the process has begun and estimate a time for completion of the request. You can contact me by telephone at 202-452-4877 or by mail at the address below with the information requested. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 800 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W. SUITE 500 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 202-331-3100 FAx 202-331-3101 www.gtlaw.com MIAMI NEw YORK WASHINGTON, D.C. ATLANTA PHILADELPHIA TYSONS CORNER CHICAGO BOSTON PHOENIX WILMINGTON Los ANGELES DENVER SAO PAULO FORT LAUDERDALE BOCA RATON WEST PALM BEACH ORLANDO TALLAHASSEE FEB 2 9 2000 Mr. Jon W. van Horne Greenberg Traurig 800 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20006 Reference: F-1999-01980 Dear Mr. Van Horne: This is in response to your letter of 7 February 2000 pertaining to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from your client, Erwin Rautenberg, for records concerning the Air-Sea Forwarders case. Your letter responds to our 13 October 1999 letter in which we stated that we could search for the requested records, but that we would not proceed without a fee commitment. You state that "on behalf of Mr. Kim and Mr. Rautenberg, [you] are willing to pay all reasonable and standard processing fees,... [but request that we] provide [you] with prior notice in the event that [we] determine that such fees will exceed $1,000.00." We also note your statement that Mr. Raymond B. Kim, signer of the 13 September 1999 request letter and then with Goldberg, Scott, Belfield, Steinberg & Cohen, is now with Greenberg Traurig. Now that you have provided a fee commitment, we have accepted your request and placed it in the "all other" fee category. It will be processed in accordance with the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. ? 552, as amended, and the CIA Information Act, 50 U.S.C. ? 431. Our search will be for documents in existence as of and through the date of this acceptance letter. The heavy volume of FOIA requests received by the Agency has created delays in processing. Since we cannot respond within the 20 working days stipulated by the FOIA, you have the right to consider this a denial and may appeal to the Agency Release Panel. It would seem more reasonable, however, to have us continue processing your request and respond to you as soon as we can. You can appeal any denial of records at that time. Unless we hear from you otherwise, we will assume that you agree, and we will proceed on this basis. Sincerely, Kathryn i. Dyer Acting Information and Privacy Coordinator Jon W. van Home (202) 331-3154 vanhomej@gtlaw.com Kathryn I. Dyer Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 February 7, 2000 Re: Request for Records Under Freedom of Information Act Reference No. F-1999-01980 Dear Ms. Dyer: The subject request for records was submitted by letter of September 13, 1999, signed by Raymond B. Kim, then with the firm of Goldberg, Scott, Belfield, Steinberg & Cohen, and now with Greenberg Traurig. The request was made on behalf of Erwin Rautenberg. A copy of the original request (without attachments) is enclosed. By letter of October 13, 1999, copy enclosed, you denied Mr. Kim's request for a fee waiver. By letter of October 29, 1999, copy enclosed, Mr. Kim requested an estimate of the fees. No response has been received to Mr. Kim's letter of October 29, 1999. To facilitate the processing of the subject request, on behalf of Mr. Kim and Mr. Rautenberg, we are willing to pay all reasonable and standard processing fees authorized by 5 U.S.C. ? 552(a)(4)(A) and applicable regulations. Please provide me with prior notice in the event that you determine that such fees will exceed $1000.00. A PARTNERSIIII' of LINITt.U Li %BILITI ENTITIES 800 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W. SUITE 500 WASIIINGTON, D.C. 20006 202-331-3100 FAX 202-331-3101 www.gtlaw.com MIAMI NEW 1URF WASHINGTON, D.C. ATI..ANTA PHILADELPHIA MCLEAN CHICAGO BOSTON PHOENIX WILMINGTON .'.1U P.tt l.n FORT LAUDERUAI.E QOf.:. RATO\. WEST PALM BEACH ORLANDO TALLAHASSEE. Kathryn I. Dyer February 7, 2000 Page 2 In so agreeing, we do not waive our right to appeal the denial of our waiver request or the amount of fees ultimately charged. -Sincerely yours, Jon W. van Home Enclosure: Three items of correspondence cc: Mr. Erwin Rautenberg Raymond B. Kim 1 I,%rr%i: I,-nIr -,r L 'II1 r.n Lit it it u n F"TITIF- 81)0 Cu\\FcTICCT %\ F:\t F. N. W. ?I IT F. 51)1) Wits HI \CTU\. D. C. 21)006 202_-331-3100 F. 21)2-331-3101 w%w.gtIaw.eom N11%\11 \F\T I,IHK u 15nr\,;T,,\. D.C. PIII1.II,F:I.1'III% )11.1.F1\ 01111:%ru 13u5TU\ I'I1111:\I\ 1\ IL31I\4TU\ Si? P.uLU F?IIT LUUUFHUULF: I30r.% 11%Tu\ WEST Ni, .%BE%C.n OHI..1\U? TuLU1t55F:F; Jon W. van Home (202) 331-3154 vanhomej t@g 1aw.com VIA FED EX January 28, 2000 Kathryn I Dyer Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Re: Request for Records Under Freedom of Information Act Reference No. F-1999-01980 Dear Ms. Dyer: The subject request for records submitted by letter of September 13, 1999, signed by Raymond B. Kim, then with the firm of Goldberg, Scott, Belfield, Steinberg & Cohen, and now with Greenberg Traurig. The request was made on behalf of Erwin Rautenberg. A copy of the original request (without attachments) is enclosed. By letter of October 13, 1999, copy enclosed, you denied Mr. Kim's request for a fee waiver. By letter of October 29, 1999, copy enclosed, Mr. Kim requested an estimate of the fees. No response has been received to Mr. Kim's letter of October 29, 1999. To facilitate the processing of the subject request, on behalf of Mr. Kim and Mr. Rautenberg, I am willing to pay all reasonable and standard processing fees authorized by 5 U.S.C. ? 552(a)(4)(A) and applicable regulations. Please provide me with prior notice in the event that you determine that such fees will exceed $1000.00. In so agreeing, we do not waive our right to appeal the denial of our waiver request or the amount of fees ultimately charged. Sincerely yours, Jon W. van Home FOIA Request No. F-1999-01980 January 28, 2000 Page 2 Enclosure: Three items of correspondence cc: Mr. Erwin Rautenberg Raymond B. Kim OCT 13 1999 Mr. Raymond B. Kim Goldberg, Scott, Belfield, Steinberg & Cohen 1925 Century Park East Suite 2200 Los Angeles, California 90067 Reference: F-1999-01980 Dear Mr. Kim: This acknowledges receipt of your 13 September 1999 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on behalf of your client, Erwin Rautenberg, for a list of 193 specific records pertaining to the "Air-Sea Forwarders Case." Among the 193 line items are 39 entries for which you have provided redacted copies of documents and requested "unredacted" copies. Your request has been assigned the reference number above for identification purposes. Please refer to this number in future correspondence about this request. We have determined that we can search for the records you have requested on behalf of your client. With regard to your request for a fee waiver, we have determined that disclosure of the requested documents will not contribute significantly to the public understanding of U.S. Government operations or activities. Therefore, your request for a fee waiver is denied. With regard to the determination of a fee category, the determination can turn on the use to which the requested information would be put, rather that on the identity of the requester. As it is not clear from your letter to what purpose any disclosed records would be put, we ask that you provide us such information so that we can make a fee category determination. We have enclosed a copy of our fee schedule for your guidance. We will be unable to begin processing your request until you have provided the clarification requested above. Meanwhile, will hold your request in abeyance for 45 days from the date of this letter pending your reply. Sincerely, Kathryn I. Dyer Information and Privacy Coordinator Enclosure G O L D B E R G '; C 0 T T B E L F I E L D T E I\ B E R v V C O H E N September 13, 1999 Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Re: Request For Records Under Freedom of Information Act Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is written on behalf of Erwin Rautenberg to request the disclosure of copies of materials available from the Central Intelligence Agency under the Freedom of Information Act and ,he regulations of your agency, including, but not limited to, Code of Federal Regulation ? 1900, et seq. The documents requested are described in greater detail below in the "Addendum to Freedom of Information Act Request" attached to this letter. Under present regulations and case law pertaining to the Freedom of Information Act, the below-described documents are available to Mr. Rautenberg and other members of the public. They are not exempt from required disclosure under present interpretations of the Act. The Central Intelligence Agency is believed to have custody of the below-described documents. However, if the Central Intelligence Agency does not have custody of these documents, I hereby request that you provide me prompt notice of their present location so that a request for disclosure may be made to the agency holding these documents. If any portion of this request is deemed denied, I request a detailed statement of reasons why the Central Intelligence Agency is withholding documents. I further request that the Central Intelligence Agency prepare an index or similar statement of the nature of the documents being withheld. I hereby request that the Department of Justice furnish the requested records in complete and unredacted form. I further request, pursuant to the Act and 32 CFR ? 1900.13(b), that these records be furnished without charge or at a reduced rate because this request is in the public interest and is likely to contribute significantly to the public understanding of the operations or activities of the United States Government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester. I92 CE\TUR1 P>Ri+ E ~ 4 T SUITE 2200 L1: A\3ELE~. l~ 90067 TEL 310.55 .9700 Fxx 310._; 37.970~ GOLDBERG. SCOTT, BELFIELD, STEINBERG & COHEN A PROFESSIONAL LAw CORPORATION Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency September 10, 1999 Page 2 of 2 If no fee waiver or reduction is granted, the requester agrees to pay the reasonable charges incurred under regulation for the search and copying of the requested documents, upon presentation of an invoice along with the finished documents. If search and copying fees exceed $500, please telephone me in advance at (310) 557-9700 for agreement to such charges. I look forward to hearing from you within twenty (20) working days with the documents requested. Very truly yours, GOLDBERG, SCOTT, BELFIELD, STEINBERG & COHEN A Professional Law Corporation GOLDBERG. SCOTT, BELFIELD, STEINBERG & COHEN A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency September 10, 1999 Page 3 of 2 bcc: Matthew S. Steinberg, Esq. Erwin Rautenberg