MEMO TO INSPECTION BRANCH/PD/OL FROM CHIEF, ENGINEERING STAFF, OC

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78-03424A002000060016-8
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 7
• Document Creation Date: December 22, 2016
• Document Release Date: September 19, 2011
• Sequence Number: 16
• Publication Date: September 16, 1960
• Content Type: MEMO

Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424AO02000060016-8
CONFIDENTIAL
TO: Inspection Branch/PD/OL DATE: 16 September 1960
CONTRACT NO.: 602, T.O. 1
YRp(s Chief Engineering Staff, OC REPORT NO.: 11 - PAUL
(If final, so state)
VdblkV-q cs ?; A?ency-SmIL'
+
i
D
es
gn
?12, 031-13 , Classification Equipme:tt ? UICLABSxlM
Commodity/Service Recorders CS 1
No. of Prototypes 1 each type Contract Completion Date 15 September 1959
The Contractor is on schedule NA Yes No
The Contractor will remain within his allocated funds Yes X No
An extension of time will be necessary X Yes No
All phases of the technical progress are satisfactory Yes X No
mr- ,,,.ornl l nprfnrmance of this contractor is: L-1 Satisfactory
y
a
o
R+
Comments
field use. Operation of the C9-12 and CS-13 is still not satisfactory a tier re-
field
by the contractor. Evaluation of the oCB.14 could not be
the additional~worktrequired done
of equipment Malfunction* It is planned
so' other contractor.
Recommended Action Task settlement.
Subject to Improvement
L_._/ Unsatisfactory
NOTE: If unsatisfactory or subject to improvement, indicate reasons under
comments
evalustion has shove all three a pments unsuitable for
rator
b
D L
Date of Visit to Contractor's Plant 25 August 1960
Chief, Engineering Staff, OC
Inspected by:
Division: OC-E/R+D-EP
Extension:
rnhiCInrI IT1 A I
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424AO02000060016-8
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424AO02000060016-8
CONFIDENTIAL
MI.
TO: Inspection Branch/PD/OL DATE: 18 July 1960
CONTRACT NO.: 6C2, T.O. 1
FROKt Qtiefs La~riU( StOff, 00 REPORT NO.. 10
(If final, so state)
Address
WMIMM E; W?
Recor"ra 08-12, CB-33i CPCWsif ication t?UNC SS37M
Commodity/Service
No. of Prototypes) "Ch t M
The Contractor is on schedule 1A Yes 1 No
The Contractor will remain within his allocated funds 8A Yes IA. No
An extension of time will be necessary __ Yes MA No
All phases of the technical progress are satisfactory $A Yes NA No
The overall performance of this contractor is: 7 Satisfactory
Subject to Improvement
Unsatisfactory
NOTE: If unsatisfactory or subject to improvement, indicate reasons under
comments
Comments ~~t if t:nd ?tvttr to det.miw thetkes his
to "9thss aaaWatq.
Recommended Action " to& *PM !W possible int.
Contract Completion Date 15 Seper 9
Date of Visit to Contractor's Plant 30 J=G 1960
A!rPM=t
Chief.. Mwnftemng > 00
Inspected by:
Division:
Extension: _
CQW'NTIAI
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424AO02000060016-8
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424AO02000060016-8
COiVFIDENTIAL
TO: Inspection Branch/PD/OL DATE: 9 March 1960
FROM: Chief, Engineering Staff, OC
CONTRACT NO: 602 T.O. 1
REPORT NO:
If final, so state
Contractor
Design + Fabrication Contract-SECRET:Agency-STERILE
Commodity/ServiceReeorders CB-12, CB-13, CB-14Classification Equipment-UNCLASSIFIE
No. of Prototypes 1 of each type Contract Completion Date 15 Sept- 1959
The Contractor is on schedule Yes x No
The Contractor will remain within his allocated funds Yes X No
An extension of time will be necessary x Yes No
All phases of the technical progress are satisfactory Yes X No
The overall performance of this contractor is : U Satisfactory
E Subject to Improvement
L7 Unsatisfactory
NOTE: If unsatisfactory or subject to improvement, indicate reasons under
comments.
A time extension and cost overrun has been received and Will be
Comments processed. All equipments have been received and are under test
and evaluation at the R+D laboratory. The CB-12 has been tested
and several deficiencies remain.
Recommended Action Process cost overrun per contract obligation - Keep
task open for possible amendment when laborat ory eval-
uation has been completed.
Date of Visit to Contractor's Plant 17 February 1960
Chief, Engineering utarr.-w
Division:
Extension:
Inspected by: -
ranni ttr t'niTIAi
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424AO02000060016-8
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424A002000060016-8
TO: Inspection Branch/PD/OL
FRQ(s Chir!, Ha rift Staff, OC
Contractor
Addressee
DATE : 23 Deg . ? 1 1952
CONTRACT 6020 T.Q.
REPORT NO.: a _
final) so state)
Contract: SECRET--Agencyt 51'. 1IE
Commodity/Service D04 an and Pnt, - eats c Classification F.Wil rZ=+,t22MA ,
Rseordars 0-12, 011-13, OD -14
No. of Prototypes I of .mush ~ Contract Completion Date 15 1959
The Contractor is on schedule Yes is No
The Contractor will remain within his allocated funds
Yes __.,&No
An extension of time will be necessary Yes No
All phases of the technical progress are satisfactory
The overall performance of this Contractor is : Li Satisfactory
__ No
Subject to Improvement
a
'Unsatisfactory
NOTE: If unsatisfactory or subject to improvement, indicate reasons under
comments.
(aantractorts nii srs MR-1 and MR.4) dui the p ad. Cmtraetor
has bow adcrd to rrgusst t1~ ela nsic*.
Recommended Action GM44 n i tjnhn=~r jtndr-
Date of Visit to Contractor's Plant 11 Dee bar 19,50
APPROVED:
Inspected by:
Division:
Extension:
Chief, E: 4#4et ri g Staff, 00
CO 1D TIAL
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424A002000060016-8
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424AO02000060016-8
~ui~rlL)LI IIHL
.............
TO: Inspection Branch/PD/OL DATE: 10 Noymnber 1959
CONTRACT NO: 602, T?0? 1
FR (: Chief, RnginNring Staff, OC
REPORT NO: 7
(If final, so state)
Contractor
Cantraat- ,Agtnay-8? t2Ia
Commodity/Service Dssigan and labla.Qatim of Classification
CCB -120 CB-]339 OB-14
No. of Prototypes 1 Of each time Contract Completion Date 11 Oetob' 1959
The Contractor is on schedule Yes _Z _No
The Contractor will remain within his allocated funds Yes a No
An .~. t '-ision of time will be necessary Z Yes No
All phases of the technical progress are satisfactory Yes = No
The overall performance of this contractor is: L7 Satisfactory
jJ Subject to Improvement
0 Unsatisfactory
NOTE: If unsatisfactory or subject to improvement, indicate reasons under
c::>mments.
Comments Bquipment received to data under this contract has failed and has been
returned to the contractor repair* for The GB-12 hm bow resu ed
for acceptance and has motor trouble for the second time
Recommended Action Past recomsemdsd - continued technical monitors!
Date of Visit to Contractor's Plant 23 October 1959
APPROVED:
Chief, *tgins~rring StAff , OC
Inspected by:
Division:
Extension:
t,nNFII)Fn!TILI
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424AO02000060016-8
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/09/19: CIA-RDP78-03424A002000060016-8
~
11
CONFIDENTIAL
FROM Chief, Engineering Staf f j, OC
? ~O2s -T~ l
if f'inal so state
Contract or_ __ J
Address
Design and Fabricate
Conunodity/Serv* ce_CB-12,
No. of 'rot,otype,s 1_ each gf_tyVI____
The Contra.:tor Is _)ii
The Contractor lwi11 remain i