GWARDJA SPORT CLUB
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80-00810A005400410012-7
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date:
August 23, 2010
Sequence Number:
12
Case Number:
Publication Date:
January 13, 1955
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP80-00810A005400410012-7.pdf | 149.48 KB |
Body:
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/23: CIA-RDP80-00810A005400410012-7 \A
CLASSIRCATO ( '1,),,
CENTRAL'INTELLIGENCEE AGENCY _ REPORT
SJEJEC'
NQ OF EN 'LS..
(LUSTED BELOW
SUPPLEMENT TO
REPORT NO..
min .a
"RR it
tf fY01
UL;.3.'till
tmrd ja Sport C1 b
NO,
NO. OF PAGE ,
THIS !a UNEVALUATED I NFORMATJON 50X1-HUM
1. The Gwardja Sport Club has as its patron General &wietlik and as its president
Colonel Fialek (firm). 50X1-HUM
2? The manager of the Gwardja Sport Club on the national level is t)a to Kraft former mans er of the cl b
20 To manager of the Warsaw tu' nch of the Gwardia Snort Glub is Gsnts n Kntw'k1 l f i1 _
4.
T'hie Gwardja wring team trains in the Bala }dxovska in Warsaw.
5,, All members of the Gward j a Sport Club w` o travel outside of Poland are enloyeea
of the Polish Ministry of Public Security (MBP), They receive athletic scholar-
ships of 1,200 zlotys per month, ulth 400 zlotys per month additional for subsivt?,nco?
50X1-HUM
Lint: Probably Major General honrsd Swietliks TJnder.Seeretary in the
Mini etr7 of Public Security (1953)
OL-A, r'1 ICAI'ION. _.CA"FID=-IAL
AVY NSRB ~lIS1RtBU,TftNd _ .
ral
L = '_ Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/23: CIA-RDP80-0081 OA005400410012-7
TATE
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/23: CIA-RDP80-0081 OA005400410012-7
WARNING.-Material on the reverse of this sheet may carry a classification of CONFIDENTIAL,
SECRET, or TOP SECRET.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Date of Info.-The date or dates on which, or between which, the events described in the
report occurred or the conditions described existed.
Place Acquired.-The place where the information was first acquired by a controlled indi-
vidual. A date following in parentheses indicates when the information was acquired.
Source Description.-A description of the individual from whom, and, when pertinent, of any
other individual through whom the information was received.
Source Evaluation.-An indication of the reliability of a source, expressed either verbally or
by means of a letter inserted parenthetically in the source description. Reliability includes com-
petence, objectivity, honesty, and other factors likely to affect the accuracy of the source's reports.
The source evaluation is definite in the sense that it reflects everything known about the source,
including his previous record of reporting. If the report was received from one source through
another, each is evaluated separately. The key follows:
A : Completely reliable. B : Usually reliable. C : Fairly reliable. D : Not usually reliable.
E: Not reliable (applied to sources of doubtful honesty or loyalty, regardless of their compe-
tence). F: Reliability cannot be judged (applied to untested or insufficiently tested sources).
Appraisal of Content.-A tentative opinion by the issuing office as to the probable truth of
the report, expressed either verbally or by means of a number from 1 through 6. It is based on
immediately available information which may or may not be complete, and does not purport to
constitute final evaluation. The key follows :
1: Confirmed by other independent and reliable sources. 2: Probably true. 3: Possibly true.
4: Doubtful. 5: Probably false. 6: Cannot be judged. Documentary: Based on an original
document which has been seen by a staff member of the issuing office.
The appraisal of content is independent of the source evaluation. A "B" source may submit
a "4" report; and "E" source may submit a "1" report. Reliable sources tend to produce accurate
reports, and conversely a series of accurate reports tends to establish the reliability of the source,
but there is no necessaryrccrelation in any particular instance.
E ?uations, coviments am criticisms by any recipient of this report
will be welcomed by the originator, and will be taken into account in
further reporting on the same subject.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/23: CIA-RDP80-0081 OA005400410012-7