REVISION OF(Sanitized)

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
Release Decision: 
Original Classification: 
Document Page Count: 
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 5, 2000
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 26, 1975
Content Type: 
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00357R000600080021-9.pdf169.27 KB
Approved For, ~ Se-200 5/01 F A-F P.Ft84 .0 O35 00600080021-9 ~ ' b~y:di tfaiei7 E2~ YtE?~l i ~1.vl 2 6 AUG 1975 DDSFTT 3410-75 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Review Staff, Office of Personnel SUBJECT : Revision of of Central Intelligence. 0 1. I have reviewed both the current and draft regulation. The latter is a vast improvement over the former, since it legitimizes the supervisory function that many SPS personnel perform and is a much more straightforward piece of writing. 2. While I understand the reasoning behind the minimum experience requirement occasions may arise when an individual being consi ere -or a pose ion is fully capable of assuming SPS level responsibilities but lacks the required seven years of experience. To accommodate such situations, I suggest the revised regulation be modified to permit Agency components to assign individuals with less than seven years experience to SPS positions. Exceptions of this sort would have to be fully justified in writing and would need the concurrence and approval of the appropriate deputy director, Director of Personnel and the Director Executive icer DDS$T Approved For n` P 110000600080021-9 ~KI F.20G~ ~4.i 3 iF tY iia `.~'`381? ^ UNCLASSIFIED ^ INTERNAL ONLY [] CONFl~t:NT1Al ^ SECRET Approve or V RPM EM82-609 -24 96 . ECORD SHEET PERS _ 626 C of C 13465 Chief, Review Staff, OP TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) DD/Pers-P&C DD/Pers 5. D/Pers FORM L 1 O USE PREVIOUS oge Rel 3-62 v EDITIONS RET Chief, Review Staff 626 C of C 2 October 1975 COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) Attached is a second revisApfN the SPS Regulation, L DDS& asked that we remove the time restrictions on experience, and we found that government as a whole has gradually dropped the specific time periods, so deleted the seven and three year experience requirements. [para e(1)1 In discussions we found that the Directorates have not been obtainin DCI approval for intea-Directorate moves of SPS personnel for several years. Practice becoming policy, we dropped that requirement as well. However, we did retain the require- ment for DCI approval for inter- Directorate moves and included the review authority for vacancies and assignments of the Supergrade Revi Panel, albeit as far as we can find out, the Panel has met only once and then to discuss allotments of positions rather than vacancy and PqO'Dle- How ver, it is also includ i Supergrade Personnel, and is supposed to be a functioning Panel. The Comptroller representative informally coordinated on the first revision and had only editorial com- ments on the Comptroller paragraph. Do you-wish us to informally co-- ordinat agai with the Comptroller and DDS in view of the substantia change, though it only reflects cur rent practice? Insofar as DDS1T is concerned, I would think the curren version would cause no problems . in fact, it reflects the .r practices 2- 01020011-9 1 USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED 0 UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET -7 F OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP T D ADDRESS DATE INITIALS 1 626 C; o C 2 z"Y 4 5 ~ 6 ACTION DIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY APPROVAL DISPATCH RECOMMENDATION COMMENT FILE RETURN CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGNATURE Remarks t 1:. t FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER FROM: HAMS. AD DA _ DID / &" keproved For Relea 121002=4104a-&-k -19367 UNC 8/;;/75 I , (AA N0. 237 Use previous editions F0111-N67 021-9 Approved For Release 2002/05/01 : CIA-RDP82-00357R000600080021-9 Approved For Release 2002/05/01 : -RDP82-00357R000600080021-9