Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
Release Decision: 
Original Classification: 
Document Page Count: 
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 27, 2008
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 27, 1952
Content Type: 
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00457R010400060008-6.pdf117.2 KB
The. Comitetul Cinematograf Jr, COU tTPY hwania SUBJECT PLACE ACQUIRED' DATE OF INFO. OF THE UNITEO STATES. WITHIN THE EEANINP - I' 1 TLn *0. SEC IONS i-a AND 744. OP THE U. S. COOtt. AS ANBNDED. 1rS TRANSMISSION OR BETEL' ATIOIT OP ITS CONTEHTA TO OS RECEIPT St' AN UNAUTHORIZED PERSON 20 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP82-00457R010400060008-6 ` .Ci WE ~a 4inp irrng3. CENT A I i Li0~ _ C AGVNCV OFF?ORT t l RN FORMATION REPORT CD NO. T The Cr,`,.tetul Cinematografic was the Rumanian tovernmo:7t eoterpr,s,, for the iroduc tion and distribution of motion pictures thro-t bout, the ca.,;ntry. The k'lorniteilul was under the direct supervision. of the M- Usterial Cow cii wh3;h governs the budget of the motion picture industry :nd makes the chl,ice of themes for all productions: In general the er,\, industry ids demoted to the effort in -which the civilization ~:~ the West wao p,_ctrayed as barbarian. 25X1 25X1 3. The vice president of the Comitetu] Cinematografic.~ was Pavel Constar,:inescut Another ,fficial of the Comitetul was Vasile Tlordeianu,, a Jew of the F umanian Communist Party. DATE DISTR. 27 VEB 1952 NO. OF PAGES 2 NO. OF ENCLS. (LISTED BELOW) SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT NO. THIS IS UNEVAUL(NTED INFORMATION CONF.IDE1 TIAL iTTfl_ CLASSIFICATION Document ti s. . ---+------------ No Change In C1a - O' 25X1 Cws. Ch;tngsd To: TS S C Auth.: tlf 70-2 Date: By Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP82-00457R010400060008-6 the pres-%dent of the Comitetul Cinematografici, was Nicola ( L3o lu The thief of the accounting department at the Comitetul wa.n Arnold Geint;berg? Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP82-00457R010400060008-6 ON 1" fl)t NT"IAL t`,~NTRAI, INTELL.1GENCE AGENCY the Comitet:ta::. was s-{ losing money:, The balance on 30 June i..950 indicated a Toss of 3 ,OOG.,.000 lei for the year, In July '~950, the loss for the month was 6 y600 ,000 lei and in December 195'. the -1-CISS was 4v5()O,yr000 lei? The difference in monthly sums was at.tribut d to -the fact that the Comiteytul iritr3duced some Czech and German motion pictures which proved to be more popular with the Rumanian public The cost of, the films was considered secret and thus no figures could be --bta nec for comparison betrseert the cost of the productions and the total sums received from new m"Rion pictures,, In tuftea, Rumania, which s I