OFFICE OF SECURITY FUNCTIONS PERSONNEL SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIONS DIRECTORATE

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 49
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 8, 2000
• Sequence Number: 18
• Content Type: LIST

Approved For Release 2000/09/02 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
C N 1. D
OFFICE OF SECURITY FUNCTIONS
Personnel Security and Investigations Directorate
Tab 1. Staff Personnel Clearances
2. Covert Clearance and/or Approvals
3. Staff-like Clearances
-Industrial Security Approvals
5. Investigations (Field)
25X1A
25X1A
. Security Interview and Polygraph Examination
7. Research and Training (Polygraph),--
9. Furnish Security Advice/Guidance to Agency Employees
10. Security Support to Operations`
11. Operational Support (Field)`
"12. Employee Reinvestigations
='13. Security Liaison and Agency Panel Responsibility
"14. Certification and other Security Actions 25X1A
L-15. Facility Access, and Joint
Publications Rea searc ervice Approvals and AEC "Q"
Clearances
16. Cover Support and
Documentation`'-
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 061626
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
t,i3y.i ~_ 7 S13j.,
Policy and Management Directorate
Tab 20. Case Processing and Control
21. Master Index Activity
22. Systems Support Activity
23. Security File Control
24. Case Analysis and Information Support
25. Security File Storage Control
26. Registry and Courier Service 25X1A
27. Records Administration
28. Release of Investigative Data to Other Agencies
29. Centralized Compartmented Clearance Records
30. Provide Policy Guidance Concerning Compartmented
Intelligence Security Activities
31. Staff Security Assistance to a National Office.
32. Security Support and Policy Guidance to Certain
Activities of the Intelligence Community .
33. Investigation of Intentional, Unauthorized Disclosures
of Compartmented Intelligence Information in Public
Information Media Channels
L-/34. Information Systems Security Program Management, Policy
x/35. Computer Security Guidance
36. Provide Policy and Planning Coordination for the Office
.of Security
A r
Approved For Release 20.001091024, '.CI r-1 DP83B00823R000700020018-0 P., i
Development and External Support
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
J i t ' a
LF.
x `i5 r
Tab 37. Budgetary and Fiscal Administration
38. Logistical Administration
39. Personnel Administration
40. Training
25X1A
Physical, Technical and Overseas Security Directorate
41. Provide Security Staff Guidance/Assistance to Agency
Overseas Installations
42. Plan, Develop and Conduct an Agency Safety and Fire
Prevention Program
43. Provide Security Staff Guidance/Assistance to Agency
Installations
25X1A
45. Service Security Safekeeping Equipment in the Headquarters
Area
25X1A
49. GSA Guard Program Coordinator
50. Security Duty Officer Program
51. Parking Ticket Program
52. Identification Program
46.
47. Reception Program
48. GSA Guard Program
25X1A
Approved For Relea : ?00 09/Q I , RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
Policy and Management Directorate
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
Physical, Technical and Overseas Security Directorate
Tab 54.
55. Physical Security Equipment Program
25X1A
Office of the Director of Security
25X1A 57.
58. Management and Supervision,-,,
25X1A
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02: CA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
;r z ~.3 d F L
OFFICE OF SECURITY FUNCTIONS
Personnel Security and Investigations Directorate
Tab 1. Staff Personnel Clearances
2. Covert Clearance and/or Approvals
3. Staff-like Clearances
-Industrial Security Approvals
7. Research and Training (Polygraph),,.
9..Furnish Security Advice/Guidance to Agency Employees
10. Security Support to Operations
11. Operational Support (Field)
12. Employee Reinvestigations
? 13. Security Liaison and Agency Panel Responsibility
'14. Certification and other Security Actions
p.15.
25X1A
. Security Interview and Polygraph Examination,-
16. Cover Su.ipportt: and Documentation'
17.
18.
19.
25X1A
25X1A
25X1A
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 061626
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
Policy and Management Directorate
Tab 20. Case Processing and Control
21. Master Index Activity
22. Systems Support Activity
23. Security File Control
24. Case Analysis and Information Support
25. Security File Storage Control
26. Registry and Courier Service
27. Records Administration
28. Release of Investigative Data to Other Agencies
29. Centralized Compartmented Clearance Records
30. Provide Policy Guidance Concerning Compartmented
Intelligence Security Activities
31. Staff Security Assistance to
32. Security Support and Policy Guidance to Certain
Activities of the Intelligence Community .
25X1A
33. Investigation of Intentional, Unauthorized Disclosures
of Compartmented Intelligence Information in Public
Information Media Channels
34. Information Systems Security Program Management, Policy
n
evelopment and External Support
L/"35. Computer Security Guidance
36. Provide Policy and Planning Coordination for the Office
of Security
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83BOO823ROO07000200-18-0
Policy and Management Directorate
Tab 37. Budgetary and Fiscal Administration
38. Logistical Administration
39. Personnel Administration
40. Training
Physical, Technical and Overseas Security Directorate
41. Provide Security Staff Guidance/Assistance to Agency
Overseas Installations
42. Plan, Develop and Conduct an Agency Safety and Fire
Prevention Program
25X1A
43.
25X1A
25X1A
45. Service Security Safekeeping Equipment in the Headquarters
Area
46.
47. Reception Program
48. GSA Guard Program
49. GSA Guard Program Coordinator
50. Security Duly Officer Program
51. Parking Ticket Program
52. Identification Program
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83BOO823ROO0700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-ROP83B00823R000.700020018-0
f.J'J i
25X1A
Physical, Technical and Overseas Security Directorate
Tab 54.
55. Physical Security Equipment Program
25X1A 56.
Office of the Director of Security
25X1A 57
58. Management and Supervision's
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CI R P83B 08 0
C "C:ii:'i`i Y. The Office of ecurity n~i~~~~~s~~f~
Oi ?~
sible for exit interview briefings of
staff and contract internal personnel.
ACTIVITY CODE ? B. (b) 1 CO1IPC-` T_ OS/PSi;
,
r ' 1
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
1
25X1A 30 May 72
is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X _No
it.-ho is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency employees, Office of Personnel, and Office of Security
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the }eneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X INTO
Cap the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes . Iti'0X
1 so ho:?:?
n;o you eaz ... - r espnns-i'bi.-i i ty for the cti ity should be. trans errs A
to another `OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
r where
Can another co ponent do the activity more efficiently? Less Costly?
Yore prop ly? Yes, o X If soy which Conponesnic and why?
o s h activity include 1nything CAL; st io 2 ~~ j the 1 ig t of
e-Lat No X If so, w?:hat?
this c c i :+_C.1' e roij 1;.,e.d in scos t_Z0T :i' iCi:-'c_ T..Z'_ : i hou
..- a l i 1. e e c s e l.7'?. _ L . _ _. 1 ?J~ _.._
J
?C)t_ Ct 3. i_ 1 o
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release.2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
IDF.N":IPICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component
responsible for official foreign
travel briefings of staff and
contract internal personnel.--
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 2 COMPONENT: _OS/PS I/I:Ai3
EVALUATION: DATE:
What. is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
26 Oct 72
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Agency and its employees.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do (es) the beneficiary (ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes _ X N0
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? YesNo X_
If so, how?
D~ ou feel 41 res on fo h cct.iti:Lt} should he trcnsft red
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
if so, where and 4V !y
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Zw.atergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discs)'tinu d t;ithout:
significant ef:Fect on overall Agency security? Yes_ Y o x
IF o, how?
Is .:here any activity not now, being; pursued by OS That you steel is more
.1.;"ipC)rt nt than this one? Yes _~o X If I-:hat?
.. I
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 25X1A.
Approved For Release
Ih::X ? 1 FICA 'I C' 11 OF ACT I ITY
T -- CODE: I B, (t)) , 3
E t t~ ../: tll S O N
s
COQ IPO\ \T : OS/PSI/ TED
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? . Date (s) ?
25X1A 21 Oct 68
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Agency and its employees.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X `o
Do (es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Cn the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NO-
I_ so, ho;?
D - e e - o v -, ibt r i ' a ' l ~' c ~ v~ le _ L.: a v ~. r ~, ~ s + Y.% .-~. ~~i. ?~~..~ y fi7 L ~C% tt- c ~.vl: 1 ~}' S. h ~CL. ~(. U b C t i c 2 s 1. i''., r r`?CL
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes_ No X
1 f SO
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? YesNo X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
terg to ? Ye J No X I i so, what?
Or C.S
C a n t S activ tti' C)'.:. ?:"c:C~.L.C .I ,! in 1IContinued i thout
Ili s
r_. cc ~l"_- '"C or CVI, ; l i'.g3rc~' S.- - Li:? t~-? `~ ~' --- i\o X
i.:_..2 e y" :LCD Ll?':i.?:1 no ):Oi, bein _,~2rS: 'Ci by OS th you feel is core
t' an 1::1is U!-t ? Yes X r , I-' la t
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
ID:.NTIFIC'iI'ION OF ACTIi%TTY: The Office of Security component
responsible for personal foreign
travel briefings.
ACT PITY CODE: I, B, (b), 4 COMM E\T: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DA'T'E:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
13 April 66
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Agency and the employees
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
.Do( es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes__ NoX
If so,. how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity shou E Cd be transferred
.__ - ..
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes _ No X
If so, i'1' -n attrl 1,r7~u?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes I"T oyXi If so, what?
Can this actiyity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued Iv3_thout
significant . fect on oerall Agency security? Yes No X
T so, Plo1i?
Is th e any activity not now bein pursued oy OS that you :feel is I;'t017e
t t
ir:wortant than this one? Yes NO X If _o, 1: ha__?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release
TFTCATIO OF ACTIVITY:
TI', I_Ti' C031'I , S, (b) , 5 CW?:PQNE NT: OS/ PSI/EAB
E~ LU AT ION: DATE:
.'.hat is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
1~ho is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Office of Security
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be clone more efficiently or less costly? Yes ~'o X
If so, 110"'7?
Do \ ou -f'e } i __ Y'es > i b l i -ty
~?.. cc1.1an l
'.. activity should The ti ' sierx ed
to another CS component or to another Office? Yes :lo X
If so, where and : hy? -
Can another component do the activity more. effic7 en_tly? Less costly?
:gore properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes \o X If so, i?rhat?
Ce . s activity be reduced scope/size or discontinued :~ithout
'13f_Lca:hL o~~fec't on overall tA~ency security? Yes NoX
IS an y aaCtiV_i ty not now be:-no pursued by O.S t ii t E.
? u s
_C-eel I. i; o2'c
Lcnl. ht a-] 1.Fh S oile? y--S to
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
IPNTIF1CftfiON OP ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component
responsible for ma-king the Office
of Security decision concerning
the separation in absentia of an
Agency employee.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 6
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/E lB
EVALUATION: DATE :
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
None. This is an administrative procedure to ,insure that
Absentia separation employees return all Agency property and sign
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force? Yes No Secrecy
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Agreements.
OS and Office of Personnel
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still ,necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes _ NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that respo~:s~billty for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?.
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Water ate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can fills activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
si` nificant rfect on o1 ra.1l Agency security? Yes ~To x
If so hove .
1s 1.h.-re an,,- actiVity not Iloi, being pursued by OS that you feel is more i
ant ..:an . th Is one? Yes No ,- If ' , w 1"._t?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
IL: ' I C :'' I O1. P r~CT I \' I TY .
-~,
I CODU.
1ON-
The Office of Security component
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision concerning an.
employee's intent to take outside
employment while still an Agency
employee.
CO''IPONE T ? OS/PSI/LAB
25X1A
;ghat is (are) our reference (s) for this activity'? -Date (s) ?
5 Feb 70
reference s) still in force? Yes X -No
Is (are) the (
?rho is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) o.f this activity?
Employees component
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No No
ro(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? ~~es Yes - X No-
T-1- Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly.
so, how?
By having the employees administrative component adhere to the
.intent of the regulation.
activity should be transferred
"NI 0-
to another D3 component or to another Office? Yes X
I f so, 1?,he - --
The employees administrative component who should determine
if such employment will effect his performanceo
i Less costl}.7
.C
cien+ly? T
Can another component do the activity more ef~
If so, which component and why?
ore properly? Yes X n?
Same as above.
questionable in the light aE
?r
moos the activity include anything so, 1;hat?
,, _ -ergate? Yes Ro X
0
/r si %e or discOR t inue~ without
e
a~Ct Vlty D x 0duced in srop c}' .~ X ltho
ll A securit-; e
e
'
-
X
, ec is c. ,,, og
icy,
jt
dicating that approval is required
i
on. 4- r `,`~,, feel is ?to-a e.
B rew . t n the re ua.4.t
is se urxtyb si ni icance
onily , s u -y OS t - c
Xe If
octant t- M tlki-s one. x-
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
, B , (b) , 7
 ApI proved For Release -2000/Of9102 : C14-tDP8~~0~t00020018-0
ID NTIFICAT N OF ACTIVITY: The 0 ice o ecur
responsible for making the office
of Security decision concerning
an employee's intent to engage in
a non-Agency training program.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B,
b) , 8
CO`?.'PONENT : OS/ 'SI/EAB
EVALUATION :
1'17hat is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date (s) ?
25X1A 2 April 1964
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Employees component
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes X ha
Ii so, how?
By having the employees administrative component adhere to
the intent of the regulation.
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should. be trap sferrecl
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes X No
If so, where and why?
The employees administrative component. If the employee is
taking too many courses it could interfere with his. Agency
Can anol%e'r component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes)C No If so, which component and why?
As indicated above, the employee's administrative component has
the vested interest in this type of activity. If there is no ?
security significance,-the employees compponent should apprpve the
Does the activity include anything questionable in the ligh-L of request.
ltiatergate? Yes No X If so, i?;hat?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
gency security? Yes X No
rctc;n overal:i. A-1
s_~-,nifican~. el e.
?
so, ho.
I
By rewriting the regulation - indicating approval is required
only if there is security significance.
Is there any activity not no" being Pursued by oS tha t'o iee.L Is l::orE:
i1 :ortant than this one? Yes No X I.f so, : is-t?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release. 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
ID\TTFICITIO\ OF ACTIVITY: The office of security component
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision relative to
an employee's intent to make public
appearances.
r'-Fl- = T Y CODE . I , B, (b) , 9 CO 1PO\E`: T - OS/PSI/EAB
Ff-` - U_\TION DATE:
25X1A
Is (are) the -reference (s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary (ies) of this activity'?
OS and Assistant to the Director
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X NO
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes x No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? YesF'YOX
I so, ho,..?
Do you feel tn? responsibility for the activity should be transferred-
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and ~~hy?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
Nore properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes _ No X If so, iw,hat?
Can this activity he reduced in sco-oe/size or discontinued tiithot t
significant effect on o-?reralT Age secu z ty? Yes_ 'ro X
I the e any activity I of 310, ri being pursu d by OS t-`- yo?' eel is isore
-:.IO;')_ tant i:f :v thi_ one? Yes ~o X Ii GCS L,h t?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date (s) ?
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision relative to
an employee's intent to present a
manuscript to a publisher for publi-
cation.
ACTIVITY _CODE:
I, B, (b), 10
COMPONE\T : OS/PSI/ AB
EVALUATION: DATE :
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A 5 Feb 70
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
OS and Assistant to the Director
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes '6X
If so, how?
Do you feel l:.ft%L responsibility for the activity should be transferre
d
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity m_ore.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinuej without
significant c fec t on overall Agency security? Yes \oX
Tf s0, ho?,'?
`L !1 `re any acL vity not now beefing pursued 1y OS that you eel s more
i.::1nortant than this one? Yes No X If sa, :..hat?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 T Approved For Release 2~h00/09t/g2c C F !?~ Qq QgQ7nQ0020018-0
responsible for making the office
of Security decision relative to
an employee's intent to visit a
foreign embassy.
I, B, (b), 11
C0~1PONE OS/PSi / 17AB T
=t'_ UAT ION
i hat .is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date (s) ?
25X1A 1 April 61
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Office of Security , Cover and Commercial Staff, and
the employee component, and employees.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
r, o (es) the beneficiary (ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
'an the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
I so, how?
Do yo u zeel that re5?~onsibi i .r"ty for the activity should be transferred
to another 'OS component or to another Office? Yes_ o X
If so, where and -why?
Can another co.iponerlt do the activity more e^~ficiently? Less costly?
lore properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
activ.'ity be reduced in scope=/si_Ze or Cj ,`continued without
= S Ti.~ f: can e' f 7.E.'. o n. overall Agency security = i es -- No X
;S th t you feel is more
_e e ariy `,?'" OS ti? t yCou feel if, O C
this on ? Yes i.C) X so, :.T1a t?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83BQ0823R000Jp0018-0
IDENT7f ICAi IO\ OF ACTIVITY:
counsels cAgency eemployees ntpconcerning
their Summaries of Agency Employment.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 16
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT : OS/ PSI/ EAS
D-`TE :
25X1A
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date (s) ?
30 May 72
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force? Yes X No___
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency employees and Office of Security
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do (es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes`o X
If so, how?
t., sferred
Do ou fee that recpons i y for the activity should be t-.,-,
o another OS component or to another office? Yes
If so, where and
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable i n the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
o?' discont nueC! without
7 i
Can this activ:i.ty 0E~ r0dUce~ in scope/size
sign iTicant Test on overall Agency security? i esNo x
f o ~ hole ?
IS there any ci=: v ity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
liaDOrlc_?1t then This ? C s~ -- ,ro X I r Se" what?
olte.
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
I? TIFI.C iTIO OF ACTIVITY:
The Office of Security component that
reviews all retirement actions and
documents the security file relative
to Agency decisions on each individual
case.
:
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 17 CO'.PO` E T: OS/ BSI/ L
Et-_,L UATIW: DATE:
25X1A
1',hat is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? . Date(s)?
30 May 72
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do (es) the beneficiary (ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficientl or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Teo you feel h t respons .i.;_1 ii ty for he activity should be transferred
to another OS coriponcnt or to another Office? Z es^ No x
If so, i-,,he-_re- and why?
Can another co ponent do the activity r_ore effici e ntl; ? Less costly?
More properly? YesNo X If so, which co~ponent and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in
Watergate? Yes N;o X If so, iw.hat?
the light of
Can t' his activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on O";era.ll Agency security? Yes i"o X
so,
Is ~. 'er ; a_1y actI- v.-.ty n ot no J~_1.i1~ F:uSs e Ems`;" OS th yo'.; feel s ;.tort
ortaut grail this o le? Yes No X ?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
 Approved For Release 2000/09102 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020018-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component that
prepares responses to correspondence
received by the Agency or the DCI.
relative to matters under purview of
the Office of Security.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 18 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/' B
Et-ALU_ATION: D.-ILT E:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
UNKNOWN
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
O/DCI and other Agency components .
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do (es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes x
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes x.
I so, how? Index name of correspondent and provide brief
description as to type of correspondence. Destroy actual
correspondence -rather than filing in SRD.
No
No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity `oul be trans er ed
to another OS component or to. another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why-:
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? YesNo X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in. the light of
11atergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes X No
I so, hoar? Review correspondence for threat only.
Index as noted above, and destroy.
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that yo~L :Feel is more
o
, .
1.::':7JOI.'C