REVIEW OF MILESTONE OFFICE FUNCTIONS & ACTIVITIES

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 67
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 9, 2000
• Sequence Number: 36
• Content Type: MF

Approved For Release 2000/09/03 ? CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
CONFIDENTIAL
s;?//4s---5
MEMORANDUM FOR: Acting Chief, Physical SecuriLy
FROM : Chief, Headquarters Security Branch
SUBJECT Review of Milestone Office Functions &
Activities
The following are identified as the functions and
activities of the Headquarters Security Branch.
I. Provide twenty-four hour security service for Agency
personnel and facilities (Function).
25X1A
25X1A
A. Activities
1. Provide Agency personnel with initial advice
and guidance on a wide range of problems concerning
both security and non-security matters. Serves as a
focal point for either solving these problems in the
Security Duty Office or as a conduit for getting the
employee to the person or office who can assist them.
2. Accepts and evaluates offers of information,
inquiries and complaints from Agency and non-Agency
personnel, both telephonically and in person. These
types of actions are received, evaluated and action
taken generally in accordance with established proce-
dures, but in many instances they are handled on an
ad hoc basis.
4. Reports of security violations in all Agency
buildings in the metropolitan area (with the exception
) are received from the FPOs and pre-
liminary inquiries and reporting conducted.
5. Takes responsive action regarding the various
intrusion and fire alarms and closed circuit TV systems.
Approved ForRelease2000/09/03 : CIA-ADE8r613/WOTO Cri0 dbY20?66W-8 8
CONFiDtri H L
Approved ForRelease2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
6. Coordinates and distributes information on
security matters after hours, including the relaying
cables and dispatches to appropriate officials
within the Office of Security.
/9
7. 6. Appropriate acts as information conduit to
FBI, Setret Service, and local police departments
relative to arrests, accidents, deaths of personnel,
bomb threats, demonstrations, threats on life of
President and other governmental officials, etc.
8. Renders support to various component duty
officers, including, but not limited to, Medical,
Personnel, Logistics, Security, DDO and Ops. Center/DDI.
9. Maintains comprehensive logs and records of
all activities and events. This includes preparation
of emergency reports for senior Agency and OS officials.
10. Monitors the OS radio net which also serves
senior Agency officials including the DCI, DDCI, and
DDA. This activity includes operation and control
of the OS paging system.
11. Effects minor after-hours repairs of safekeeping
equipment.
12. Serves as the after-hours weather watch for
the OS and initiates prescribed and ad hoc emergency
actions, including timely notification of appropriate
officials responsible for action in such emergencies.
13. Maintains phone and radio contact with the
various local fire and police authorities who have con-
current jurisdiction over Agency property and officials.
14. Conducts after-hour security checks of senior
office.; including the D/OS and DCI suites.
15. Conducts after-hours security, safety and
guard post inspections in Agency buildings in the
metropolitan area.
16. This Office serves as contact point for all
Agency personnel. Extension 6161 is provided as the
emergency number for all new EODs and their families,
for employees on TDY or leave, for the families of
personnel in training at outlying sites and etc.
CONHDpITIAL
Approved For Release 2000/09/03: CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
17. Upon direction by designated officials,
responsible for carrying out the initial notification
relative to the various OS emergency plans. These
25X1A plans include CIA Emergency Plans,
etc.
II. Provide a receptionist program to process visitors
into Agency facilities (Functions).
A. Activities
25X1A
1. Process each visitor by completing appropriate
documentation, verifying criteria for access, providing
appropriate badges, and notifying the office to be
visited.
2. Maintain a record of each visitor and appro-
priate data concening each visit.
3. Provide special arrangements for high-level
officials, conference groups 25X1A
4. Provide directions to Agency buildings, infor-
mation on bus schedules, issue shuttle bus tickets
and request cab service.
5. Maintain a daily count on all badges assigned
to visitors and follow up on those badges which are
unaccounted for.
6. Maintain updated directories including names,
room numbers and telephone extensions of areas which
are normally visited in Agency buildings.
7. Maintains an alertness for potential security
problems including cranks, unattended briefcases,
suspicious packages, etc.
III. Provide maintenance on all safekeeping equipment
in the Headquarters and outlying buildings (Functions).
25X1A
A. Activities
3
Approved For Release 2a111)%1!141tP831300823R000700020036-0
IULII 1 1/11-
Approved For Release 2000/09103 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
2. Changes combinations on all safekeeping
equipment and electrical and mechanical door locks
in the Metropolitan area. In addition to the routine
combination changes, effects changes on all safe-
containers which are compromised through security
violations.
3. Installs locks on all newly constructed
secure areas.
4. Provides advisory opinions to the Security
Violations Officer whenever there is a possibility
of a safe cabinet having been defective rather than
improperly secured.
5. Provides after-hours service on major safe
problems which cannot be handled by the SDO.
6. Provides service to open key locks when the
keys have been lost or forgotten.
7. Maintains liaison with Office of Logistics
personnel to ensure that necessary and appropriate
modifications are made on inoperable safe cabinets
prior to their being returned to service.
8. Maintains liaison with safe equipment manufac-
turer's representatives in the area in order to keep
abreast of the latest trouble-shooting and repair
techniques on equipment and to ensure a reliable flow
of spare parts.
IV. Provide escort service for uncleared personnel,
funds and classified materials (Functions).
A. Activities
1. Serves as escort for the movement of large
sums of money and bulk classified materials between
various facilities, -both inter and intra Agency.
Maintains radio contact with the SDO and sounds the
alert on any provocations.
2. Provides escort for the protection of the
transcriptions of the various proceedings taken when
Agency officials attend closed hearings on Capitol
Hill.
4
CONHDEnAL
Approved For Release 2000109/03 : CIA-RDP831300823R000700020036-0
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
3. Provides escort of uncleared working contractor
and char force personnel working throughout Agency
facilities, on a 24-hour, 7-day a week basis.
V. Maintains a system to collect collateral and fines
for the Agency's parking and traffic violators (Function).
A. Activities
1. Receives and processes all traffic and parking
tickets issued each day by the Federal Protective
Officers. Tickets are maintained according to state
and license numbers.
2. Conducts follow-up on all unpaid tickets
by having the Commanding Officer of the Headquarters'
FPOs contact the local police jurisdictions (via
telephone or letter) to establish the identity of the
violator, via his license plate number.
3. Contacts the traffic violators, reminds them
of their obligation. Requests their cooperation by
either paying the collateral or attending court.
4. Collects forfeited collateral fines and
prepares necessary forms and receipts.
5. Maintains active files on all pending tickets
until each violation has been disposed of. These
records are considered to be official court records
and the monies collected public fund.
6. Prepares appropriate documentation relative to
each incident adjuhdicated by the U.S. Magistrate.
This requires preparing a report to reflect the
disposition of each court case as well as the for-
feitures and administrative adjustments.
7. Delivers all monies to the court together with
written disposition of each case.
8. Provides information and guidance concerning
GSA Parking Regulations, collateral fines and court
appearances.
Approved For Release 2cOgL., : ..."-FN,831300823R000700020036-0
NiigrgI:Y12
Approved For Release 2e0 g /b 'r ITIA83600823R000700020036-0
VI. Maintain a badge and credential system for Agency
and Agency-associated types of personnel (Functions).
A. Activities
1. Conducts preliminary security indoctrination
for all professional and clerical employees, at time
of their entrance on duty.
2. Fingerprints all categories of personnel and
process their records through Clearance Division to
the FBI for appropriate checks.
3. Operates a photographic console to take
badges and credential pictures.
4. Operates laminating equipment in preparation
of all types of badges. Maintains contact with the
manufacturer for repairs and service. This activity
includes preparation of passport photographs for
VIPs and emergency TDY and PCS cases. This requires
special processing.
5 . Issues badges and credentials to security
approved personnel.
6. Maintains a record of all badge and credential
transactions in the CENBAD computer system.
7. Maintains daily liaison with OJCS on all
matters concerning CENBAD. This involves trouble-
shooting problems in the system, training of personnel
in the operation of CENBAD. Follow-up on services
which CENBAD has been programmed to provide, establishing
requirements for special CENBAD reports to assist OS
officials in the management planning and programming
and etc.
8. Receives badges and credentials of persons
who have terminated their Agency affiliation. All
records must be changed to reflect receipt of these items.
9. Controls and issues permanent and temporary
CIA contact credentials. Work closely with OTS and CCS
on all such documentation.
6
Approved For ReleasfeIRE/b9R:161W-RDP831300823R000700020036-0
CONHULNIIAL
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
10. Maintains liaison with component security and
administrative officers throughout the Agency for
the purpose of coordinating activities regarding
Agency documentation.
VII. Oversee GSA Federal Protective Officers to ensure
protection and security for Agency personnel and facilities
(Functions).
A. Activities
1. Provides guidance and direction to four
Federal Protective Service Zone Commanders, who
have protective cognizance over all Agency occupied
buildings in the Metropolitan area through verbal
and written instructions.
2. Maintains continual liaison with GSA Headquarters
officials.
3. Serves as coordinator and overseer on all
Federal Protective Service charges, costs, overtime,
staffing and manpower matters. Prepares monthly and
special reports concerning these matters; coordinates
closely with Zone Commanders to ensure that the Agency
receives the service for which it has contracted and
and is being charged.
4. Levies priorities on FPO Zone Commanders to
ensure that special coverage and emergency require-
ments are handled on a timely basis.
5. Conducts periodic pedestrian traffic flow
counts as a means of verifying the need for Protective
Officer posts.
6. Maintains direct daily contact with Federal
Protective Service Zone Commanders on matters of
Federal Protective Officer perfortance, appearance
and demeanor. Ensures that directives and instruc-
tions are carried out properly. Routes admonishments
and commendations of Federal Protective Officers
through the Zone Commander.
25X1A
Chief, Headquarters Security Branch
Approved For Release
rChgagDPIIOR
. _ DP831300823R000700020036-0
UNCLASSIFIED
FOWA
3-62 6 ? u ID
STI3FrIcEnoted eilifiquA0000/09/032 61A-FffkifigeaffiRp070002n36s@cRET
FWJdb
E ONLY
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT:
(Optional)
25X1A
FROM:
Policy and Plans Group
EXTENSION
5311
NO.
DATE
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
OFFICER'S
INITIALS
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
1.
OS/PTOS/Physical
Security Division/HSB
-09.0
Under Objective B57104 the Office
of Security will review and
validate all Office of Security
functions, activities...to ensure
effectiveness, economy and efficiem
The attached documents represent
two milestones under that objective
Milestone 1, the components identit
their functions and activities.
Milestone 2 was establishment of a
format for evaluating these ...
activities. It is requested that
Physical Security Division/HSB
review the attachment and:
a) Certify that there are no
deletions/corrections/additions
11/to be made to the previous
1' listing submitted by your office
b) Review the Identification of
Activity statement on each
evaluation sheet to ensure it fa
equals to the comparable activi
from your offices listing.
c) Use the attached format to,
evaluate each individual activi
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Je1
049,
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
A - - i ... .
_
141
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Offica_auf.accup#0091 vifiqmponsible
trr'
Approved for Release 2000/0981
rraffic3 iKdiki-KPFg844414u
and parking tickets issued each day by the
Federal Protective Officers.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III A (b),
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
ivis ion
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Support of U.S. Magistrate in carrying out his functions re
traffic violations on U. S. Federal property. Could f.nd no
reference to cover this function other than
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
U.S. Government.
25X1A
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? les X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
? Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more.
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFAWCiikinrWIIV2.0007OrSiOtlt-tRgFg)bW08igftrig-illc)insible
tickets.
?
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
III, A, (b), 38 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
ivision/HSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Support of U.S. Magistrate in carrying out his functions re traffic
violations on U.S. Federal property. Could find no reference to
cover this function other than 25)0A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No'
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
U.S. Government
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03: CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000/
ACTIVITY CODE:
T10 Office of Securi*Aupppent responsible
ezi do1-1 WPM" 74gMggl4A70fines
and prepares .necessary. forms and receipts. -
III, A, (b), 39
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Support of U.S. Magistrate in carrying out his -functions re traffic
violations on U.S. Federal nronertv. Could find no reference to cover
this function other than 25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No.
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
U.S. Government.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? les X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS Component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVIZIL: 0 ? 0823R0001001020103?00pons ible
Approved For Reiease 2000/orWifidgilglctive files on all pending
tickets until. each violation has been redeeme
(These records are considered to be official
court records and the monies collected
public fund.)
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 4
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical.Security
ivision
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Support of U.S. Magistrate in carrying out his functions re traffic
violations on U.S. Federal property. Could find no reference to cover
this function other than
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No 25X1A.
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
U.S. Government.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes )e No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No x
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel .is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
Approved F?orRelease-zuub/a/b6 :cal01-(RD1083BDIA234370QWQ)92e914361--Psponsible
IDENTIFICATIPM. OF ACTIVT?T.Y.
for preparing appropriate documentation
relative to each incident adjudicated by the
U. S. Magistrate.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 41 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Support of U.S. Magistrate in carrying out his functions re traffic
violations on U.S. Federal propert . Could find no reference to cover
this function other than 25X1A -
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
U.S. Government.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes / No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000/
ib lert
together with written disposition of each case
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, ?(b), 42 COMPONENT:
EVALUATION:
OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Support of U.S. Magistrate in carrying out his functions re traffic
violations on U.S. Federal property. Could find no reference to cover
this function other than
Is (are) the reterence(s) still in orce? Yes x No 25X1A
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
U.S. Government.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel -that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agencysecurity? Yes ? No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Of SeLurity commpre esRonsible
Approved For Release 2000/M03 impet aawgpmp&pqa70 We
concerning GSA Par10.ng.Regulations, collateral
fines and couTt.appearances.
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), 43 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Support of U.S. Magistrate in carrying out his functions re traffic
violations on U.S. Federal property. Could find no reference to cover
this function other than
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No 25X1A
Who is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
U.S. Government.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes x- No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No x
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security Component res.ponsible
Approved For Release 2000/08h03cDCM4RDPWG0823R000100020930aormat ion
on security matters after hours, including
relaying'cable's,and dispatches to appropriate
officials within the Office of Security.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 7
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1 A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as whole.
Do you feel the activity is gtill necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes 5(
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X-
Tf so, where and why?
? Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agencysecurity? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Securi com onent that
Approved For Release 2000403.9iniisCAIRIZIMEW IQQ9204316t-0
duty officers, including, but not limited to,
Medical, Personnel, Logistics, Security,
DDO and OPS. Center/DDI.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 9
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No x
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why? ?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office Of Security component that
Approved For Release 2000/09102e s CIA-RDP80130 23R00070002003614Y
personnel. Extension 6161 is provided
as the emergency number for all new EODs
and their families,, for employees on TDY
or leave, for the families of personnel
in training at outlying sites and etc.,
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), 17 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical.Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes N No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes ? No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If. so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIApprovad For getetide"2000109/01jalsik-f61583Bribig3 Ansible
for providing twrity-torRgirtsWgry
service for Agency personnel and facilities..
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, 0), 1 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
ivis ion
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3);
25X1A Federal Property & Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the re erence s still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X- No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No A If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall- Agency security? Yes ? No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OE ACTIVITY. 036-0
Approved For Release zuu0/091,030131iseRDR-831MPROMPARPt- responsible
for maintaining an alertnesS fOr potential
security problems including cranks, unattende.
briefcases, suspicious packages, etc.
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), 24 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
givision/H5B
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3): Federal
25X1A Propert and tration Services Act of 1949; as amended;
Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole.
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
No
No X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without.
significant effect on overall- Agency security? Yes No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component that
Approved For Release 2000/0R/A3cac44-13DFRABO 1300117QQQ2QQ3?4
assigned to visitors and initiates action
on unaccounted for badges.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III A, ?(b), 22
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical. Security
Division/HSB
? DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3); Federal
25X1A Property& Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No.
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
No x
Do you feel that responsibility for the ? activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No If so what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall- Agency security? Yes - No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OE_ ACTIVzuu0/09LIY.?/63e.
Approved For Release afiCODIDUBIlati2-3R9007494aM6-Alat
provides Agency personnel with directions
to Agency buildings, issues shuttle bus
tickets, requests cab service and provides
information on bus schedules.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 21
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
DEVITZUWESS
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102-0-);
25X1A Federal PropertyAdministration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes ?X No
Who is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall' Agency security? Yes NO X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office Of Security component that
Approved For Release 2000/99a3rdciA430K01301aer HOZ0002003filtkh -
level officials, conference groups and
foreign nationals visiting Agency facilities.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 20
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical,Security
DiviSiontHSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 162(3);
25X1A Federal Pro ert Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are e re erence s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office Of Security component responsible
Approved For Release 2000/09403pxCIAERIM338008273R01307000200364 on
Agency facility.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 19 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
grVi--srOT-VTISE
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3);
25X1A Federal Property& Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall' Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: IT.1.
Approved For Release 2000/09103 10--RDP63WY812i31:40070371000201X3Mat ,
upori irection by designated officials
25X1A
25X1A
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b),
EVALUATION:
is responsible for carrying out the
initial notification relative to the
various OS emergency plans. These plans
include CIA Emer
etc-. ?
18 COMPONENT: OS/PTO Physical,Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3);
Federal Prorertv & Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No.
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
25X1A
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
'No X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the lig
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
of
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP831300823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION Of AETTIT.J.=! ?(dOi-RDPg3E30082BROOIROPPL36--. Pspons ible
Approved For Keiease zutar/09p3
or 'providing Agency personnel .with initial
advice and guidance on a wide range of
problems'concerning'bot'h security and non
, security matters.
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b),
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
ivision
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3);
25X1A Federal Pro Administration Services Act of 1949 as amended;
Is (aeJ tne reteren'(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
,
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION UF _UTIVITY: The Office of..Security component responsible
Approved For Release 2001)109/z02cptAADE1813130082131R000706620036f0
information, inquiries and complaints from
Agency and nonAgency personnel, both
telephonically and in:person:
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), 3 CONPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical,Security
Division/HSB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3); Federal
Property & Administration Servites Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (arirlitinlices) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
25X1A
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Do you fe.1 that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued wit out
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDEN ity_Tcomponent that
F TAPPIdF?1(1*611.6i".2?mbri9nt/Wifs.cdPS-110#113eiiiiaGA21 aR00010002oonts of
all activities and events concerning the
Headqu4TtPT? 4ding and sub-building
complexes.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
III, A, ?(b), 10 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical,SecuritY
-DiVinTirilESS
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)? -
National Sec. Act.of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3); Federal
25X1A Property& Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) Still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still X
necessary? Yes No
X
Do (es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes : No -
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another ?component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant _effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by. OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes - No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03: CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: sipmip seivalivisswIponsible
e ice o ecuri-fY radio
Approved For Release 2000/Gi9jp3ilf"AIA-Ap
net which also serves .senior Agency officials
including the DCI, DDCI, and DDA. (This
activity includes operation and control
of the Office of Security Paging system.)
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
III, A, (b),
11 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
DIV-n-TUriinss
DATE:
is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3); Federal
Prorerty F Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes XNo
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so how?
X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No x
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and'why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued wit out
significant effect on overall- Agency security? - Yes . No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pur
important than this one? Yes No
d by OS that you feel is more
If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office Of Security component responsible
Approved For Release 2000/69/03e:f0tAIRDP93-130E013231ROGO1100420016V-rs of
safekeeping equipment.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, 0.), 12
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/B-5B
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3); Federal
25X1A Property& Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended:
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force?
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
X
Yes No
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes -X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feerthat responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued wit4out
significant effect on overall' Agency security? Yes No A
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP831300823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF AT
Approved For Reiease zu00/06/bs AfICARDP$38008213ROOOMOOMEL-Bat
serves as the alter-hours weather watch
for the.Office of Security and initiates
prescribed and ad hod emergency actions,
including timely notification of appropriate
officials responsible for action in such
emergencies.? .
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical,Security
ivision/HSB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is Care) our reference(s) for this activity? Date.(s.)?
National Sec. Act of 19'47, as amended, sect. 10 ,z(6) Yederal
25X1A Property & Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X.
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENT1 VetTiciA-TA(RI FWr IkaJdsTero00/Gftcymengwai
with the various local fire and police
authorities who have concurrent jurisdiction
over Agency property-,and officials..
oritemMuT040
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b),
ib le
14 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
EVALUATION:
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? DateLs)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended Sect. 102(3); Federal
25X1A Property& Administration Services Aet of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole.
?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes XNo
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced...in scope/size or discontinued w.ithout.
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so-, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible for.
providing_ uidanc
and direc alliR ,Fgderal
Approved For Release 2000/00/91e0A- opkaa ".
J... Y RAI4e .
protective cognizance overall Agency occupied
buildings in the Metropolitan area..
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 56
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
DiTri-MTIVITSS
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3), Federal
25X1A Pro ert Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are t e reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency, as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes XNo
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yc---Tg?X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be traRsferred,
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued wit4out
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No A
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office 'of gecutity component' responsible
for maintaining continual liaison-with GSA
Approved For Release 200010.91013arplik-RETWIE600823R000700020036-0.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III A ?(b) 57
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
'vision
EVALUATION:
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. .02(3), Federal
PropertyAdministration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force?
-
Yes XNo'
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
,
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes )e No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel tha;t. responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the, activity more.efficiently1 Less costly?
More properly? Yes ? No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light
Watergate? Yes No X If so what? .
?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No N
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you, feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?-
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office oi Security component responSible
for serving as coordinator and overseer on all
Approved For Release 200MA/113.:IGIAteREIFI83B00823111000730002003621:Ortime,
staffing and manpower matters.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
III, A, (b), 58
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
DiVrnoTitfrn
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3), Federal
25X1A Prooerty Administration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another 08component'or to another Office? Yes No x
If so, where and why?
?Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less Costly? -
More properly? Yes .No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03: CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of security component responsible for
conducting periodic pedestrian traffic- flow Counts..
Approved For Release 2000/09/0344kAeRIMM0118213zR0.00e002Miteive
Officer posts.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 59
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical.Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3), Federal
25X1A PropertyAdministration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
.Agency as 4 whole
A
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
.X
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary?, Yes
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
No
No X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another 05'component'or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less Costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why.?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No A If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS. that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Se urit- comngnent resDonsible
Approved For Release 200049i/06-RigiN aRXRUPWACIWPg the
various intrusion and fire alarms and closed-
circuit TV systems.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 6
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
DM-S-1-61-ITHSS
EVALUATION: DATE:
What
25X1A
is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(sr_
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3), Federal
A-1ministration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary?
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
YesX No
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No N
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does. the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agencysecurity? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes NO x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000/0
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
pfiGi_cierlibitlie.tcivicoionoge02043ffityponsible
i&ITTAIninTWa-atel airectories including
names, room numbers and telephone extensions
of areas which are normally visited in
Agency buildings.
?
?
III, A, (b), 23 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
plvision/HSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3), Federal
25X1A Pro ert ration Services Act of 1949, as amended;
Is (a e erence s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes I No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less'costly?
More properly? Yes No, X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include a
Watergate? Yes No
thing questionable in the light of
If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIWiciii061.4kCe:gg4jao
ACTIVITY CODE:
afft.* f Security component responsible
nt-4311411 8241300823R60070002003teGret
Service and local police departments as
appropriate concerning' arrests, demonstrations
threats on life Of President, ect.
.-.:,
III, A, (b), 8
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
EVALUATION:
DiArisV5WITTS13
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
?Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? 1.es X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component OT to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what? .
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? :Yes No x
If so,. how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03: CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATIO.N OE. ACTIViao/
Approved For Kelease
25X1A
III, A, (b), 4
ACTIVITY CODE:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
EVALUATION:
livision
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No x
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes x and No x
If so, where and why?
This activity more or less belongs to Central- Cover but they do
not have the means or capability to perform the duty so it probably
should remain as is.
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the li,
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
?If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
0/09V4
The_ Office ?cliA#0094504?020.1c1fponsible
Approved For Release 200. '6C-AiRP Mment of
large sums of money and bulk classified
materials between varibus facilities, both
inter and intra Agency. (Maintains radio
contact with the SDO-and sounds the alert on
any provocations.) .
34 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
ivision/Hsb
EVALUATION: DATE:
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b),
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Sec. Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3);
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
25X1A
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No x
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and Why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agencysecurity? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000 oggg.
ilwoRciedm resRonsible
Yon of th
transcriptions of the various proceedings
taken when Agency officials attend closed
hearings on Capitol Hill.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
III, A, (b), 35 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical.Security
Division/H-5B .
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Security Act of 1947, as amended, Sect-102(3);
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No x
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVIZY:
Approved For Release zu00/0 bs :ctfai-RDPS38008213R0017010-201X3Eresponsibie
or conducting 'after-hour security checks
of senior offices including the D/OS and
DCI suites.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, ?(
), 15 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical,Security
ivision
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our refer n e(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? YesX and NoX
If so, where and why?
This activity is a drain on the time of
the SDO but there is no other component to which the
responsibility can be transferred.
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes x No If so, which component and why?
The office reponsible could do this function more
efficiently but because of the high levels involved believe their
Does PfictaCTI1R-10 irtnrun RWADAvques lona e t. bl In the light of
Watergate? Yes NoX If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes ' Nox
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes NoX If so, what? ?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component that is
Approved For Release 2000/AWNecCIAARAMB09802410341-9 FPO
and conducts preliminary inquiries and
reports on the violation.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 5
EVALUATION:
What is
are
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical,Security
ffivision/HSB
DATE:
our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes
Who is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
No
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X- No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes - No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000/0 or donauc g i 30U0AiS8?e0ogiSR0Dtpmeg20-036eoponsible
ng atter-nours security, safety
and guard past inspections in Agency
buildings in: the metropolitan area.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, ?()), 16 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
DiTict511
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity .should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so; what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
IDENTJ PATICIATAKsritgaa.000TOC*A.04k6 com onent which
244:100rOs
and replacement of parts on safekeeping.
equipment in.Agency facilities in the
MetroDolitan area, including overt and
III,. A, (b), 25 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/PhysicaLSecurity
Division/HSB
DATE:
25X1A
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
What is are our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
No
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
-Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why? /
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
Approved For Release 2000/ppR; gAm Ag P
ThP Of7irP nf000400rpo5Ronsble
uYaTeMeeping
equipment should be surplused.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
What is
III, A, (b), 26 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: No. zonsible
The_Dff.a..ce aL?Saglaxirlt_a...Quant
Approved For Release 2000i{.1.4iih.thoirclangspps 1.1yuygoAkeeping
equipment and electrical and mechanical
door locks in the Metropolitan area.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
What is
are
III, A, ?(b), 27 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical,Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
25X1A
our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
t.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
No
No X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall' Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
ihe office Of Security component responsible
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
kiDR8iB00829R000000219D36Q0s t ruc ted
Approved For Release 2000/ 9103-tICIA1
secure areas.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
What is
are
III? (b), 28 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Diviston/HSB
DATE:
our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No.
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Agency as 4 whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes Nox
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION DF LCTIVITY: -e-itett
Approved For Release 2 0 0 War0 ellAeREPEP3BOOgnROOMINI26013FOT ides
advisory opinions to the security violations
Officer whenever there- is a possibility of
a safe cabinet having been defective rather
than improperly secured.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 2q COMPONENT:
OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?'
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY.
Approved For Release 2600
ACTIVITY CODE:
00.*r_lk. NM IVY MP IA e
? ? ? Is: 1
major
Bibl
safe problems which cannot be handled by the-
SDO.
,o
III, A, (b), 30
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
EVALUATION:
ivis ion
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
. Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ?X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
Significant effect on overall Agency? security? Yes ? No X
?If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes_ No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
Approved For Release 2000S91013f.oGIAARDP133M1823tR01,11.00112q0afeacs
when theJceys,,have been lost or forgotten.
ACTIVITY CODE:
,EVALUATION:
III, A, ?(b), 31 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Agnecy as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X- No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the aictivity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No A If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall- Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of security component responsible foi
Approved For Release 200070wain_valivii08:3Ath Off
R0007008204:014riate
ice of Logistics
modifications are made bn'inoperable safe cabinets
prior to their 'being returned to service.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
What is
are
III, A, (b), 32 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
prirnTravTins
DATE:
our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes __X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be trztnsferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No A
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less. Costly? -
More properly? Yes No X If so, which Component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVII/.
Approved For Reiease zuC10/01A3S :0C fA4RDP8.313048123(1300019492QUEtA p onsible
or maintaining liaison with safe equipment
manufacturer!s representatives in the area
in order to keep abreast of the latest
trouble-shooting and ,repair techniques on
equipment and to ensure a reliable flOw of
spare parts.?
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), 33 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical,Security
Division/HS-13
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency as a whole
-
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x . If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Officeof Security component .responsibie for.
Approved For. Release 2000/conal 4APtiiiikulacile5?/??711*Yrt' Vat
tflon
time of their entrance On
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), 44 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
DiVin-UVMSB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? D
Natinn1 Sirnrity Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 102(3);
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X
Who is (are) the bene?ficiary(ies) of this activity?
No ?
25X1A
?
X
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? les -)C No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently?- Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
.important than this one? Yes No -)( If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component resPonsible-for
finger rintsing all Categories of-personnel
Approved For Release 200Q/03/ Division to to the FBI for appropriate checks.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
III, A, (b), 45
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Security Act of 1947, as amended, Sect. 102(3);
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No"
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
25X1A
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
?X
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
? pc) you feel that .responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No x
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less Costly? -
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued witiut
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component resp-onsible for
operating a photographic console to take badges
Approved For Release 2000/09/412edeetAaRDR94B00823R000700020036-0
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
III, A, (b), 46 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Oivision/HSB
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Da ? . ?
National Security Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 102(3.).; 25X1 A
25X1 A ,
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary?
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still
Can the activity be done more efficiently or
If so, how?
Yes X No .X
necessary? Yes
No
less costly? Yes No X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
v,
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes - No X
If so, where and why?
Can another Component do the activity more.efficiently? Less. Costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what? .
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes
If so, how?
No X
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
The Office of Security component responsible for
Approved For Release 20001 10 tIR1501177666M626
of all types o badges
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), 47 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
DiViSTUTIPISS
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Security Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 102(3);
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
25X1A
Do you fepl that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to anther 0Scomponentsor to another Office? Yes - No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less Costly? -
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include apything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No A If so, what? -
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now beirlig pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
The Office of Security component responsible for
Approved For Release 200039*
3inei"Dp831300,8230000.700,0200.0610mergency
TDY and PCS cases. "
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), 48 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our referencels) for this activity? D
y Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 1D2(3);
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X
Who is (are) the benefaciary(ies) of this activity?
No-
25X1A
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes "x ' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nox
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light
Watergate? Yes No If so, what?
X
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security co4onent respontasble
m-dS
Approved For Release 2000
..WRIFMIXTER10820bWaoteessr-btY
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b), 49
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? D 2
NationalAct of 1947, as amended, Sect 102(3)
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the bene"ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ')( No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or .to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? .Yes .No X If so, which component and why? ?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No A If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is aore
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of 'Security component- responsible for
maintaining a record'of all bad ? tial
Approved For Release 2000/13914adtaktRIDF183130821313 42r7b.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III A 0)
50 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
'vision
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Da ? 25X1A
National Security Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 102(3).
.25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you f&el thai, responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS'-tomponent or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component ? do the activity more.efficiently? Less Costly?
More properly? Yes ? No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you fee
important thaii. this one? Yes NoX If so, what?
s more
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
? IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible f?r
maintaining. daily liaison wi_th 01,NIS Da al] matters
Approved For Release 2000:1(19iNnicglAs3B00823R000700ozOu36-u
ACTIVITY CODE: III A (b) 51 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
'vision
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is
our reference(s) for this activity? Det 25X1A
' Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 102(3);
?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? y..s X
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
No
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes XNo
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
'Do you fOel that , responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS-component or to another Office? -Yes No
X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes .No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes - No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes . No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursied by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No A If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component- responsible for
establishing requirementsjsz ugslAj,z,CiagAR reports
Approved For Release 2000/09/2sialAfIRDMBSUAZWPWAYW-sutilloinVnagement:
planning. and programming.'
ACTIVITY CODE:
-
?
III, A, ?(b),52 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Drm-ruffins-h
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
National Security Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 102();
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes -X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
No
Nox
Do you feel th,at responsibility for the activity should be trapferred
to another 08 component or to another Office? Yes NO
If so, where and Why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component r'esponsible for
retrieving badges and credentials-of 'persons who
Approved For Release 200010814)3e.relAaRDRO3B0082111ROCW004120030110
changing records to reflect xeceipt of these items.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 53
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Division/HSB
DATE:
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Dat
National Security Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 1132 (3);
(2) (d) 25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes XNo'
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
25X1A
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes s No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes y(
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how? ?
Do you fepl that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can -another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less Costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light
Watergate? Yes. No If so, what? .-
X
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDF'83B00823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible for
controling and issu7permanent and temporary
Approved For Release 2000/09Y013mtetA-ROMBC0823R000700020036-0
ACTIVITY CODE: III, A, (b),54
COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
Dim-ruffInss
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Security Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 102(5);
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No.
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? 17-&?X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes ? No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes .No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security 'component responsible for
maintaining liaison with component security and
Approved For Release 20001019/03qtestAiRDP838e082atit0007000000064 for
the purpose of coordinating activities regarding
Agency documentation.
ACTIVITY CODE:
III, A, (b), 55 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical Security
EVALUATION:
ii iv is ion! H13
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
National Security Act of 1947, as amended, Sect 102(3):,
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X Na-
no is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
25X1A
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes "X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be. transferred
'4
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes. - No X
If so,- where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x ? If so, which component and why? ?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what? .
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes - No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: "Chp_ nf-uc
Approved For Release 2oow9pfni,-.gtk
*40040' q00#9SErsible
? p
6 90 'king
contractor and char force personnel. working -
throughout Agency facilities, On a 24-hour,
7-day a week basis.
ACTIVITY CODE:
EVALUATION:
III, A, (b), 36 COMPONENT: OS/PTOS/Physical,Security
urvinwitnss
DATE:
What is are our reference(s) for this activity? Date s ?
National SecurityAct of 1947, as amended, Sect 102(3);
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
25X1A
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be tr4nsferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes - No A
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020036-0