WEEKLY REVIEW

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
26
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 10, 2010
Sequence Number: 
36
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 20, 1974
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1.pdf1.84 MB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Weekly Review 25X1 25X1 Copy N2 649 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 nil IIyI II 1i`IIUII' t!) I:1y;::' ',ic;nli iI_,Itli .~~ ~.~:. `.il:f's ymrJ establish a "correcting mechanism" that would determine each member's share of the community.,.,. budget. 1S lA~' ' :v The left wing of the Labor Party, the chief repository of anti-market sentiment in Britain, has been slow to react to the conference outcome and seems uncertain of the line it should pursue. Anti-marketeers are unlikely to be dissuaded, however, and relent in their campaign against continued British membership.' Privately, however, British officials are Wilson has charted a strategy of trying to pleased with the summit. The press has also re- reassure Britain's partners in Europe and the sup- acted optimistically and has suggested that, al- porters of the EC at home without arousing left- though minor obstacles still exist, renegotiation is wing Laborite A week before the summit, he no longer a major problem. endorsed continued membership if renegotiations are successful. He forced the leftists into a defen- sive position by claiming that his conditional en- Reaction from the left wing of the Labor dorsement was consistent with official party doc- Party, temporarily outmaneuvered by Wilson's trine. To support his case, Wilson cited the rene- tactics, has been subdued. The parliamentary de- gotiation statement in Labor's election manifes- bate on the summit was low key, highlighted by to-listing the terms necessary to ensure Britain's Wilson's statement implying that the government continued membe?.-ship-even though it was origi- would not be bound by any decision from a nally drafted as an anti-market measure. special Labor Party conference on the EC issue. If for no other reason than to keep the issue alive Wilson has nevertheless struggled to avoid until the referendum is held, the anti-marketeers alienating EC opponents within the Labor Party. are likely to insist that Wilson's conditional en- At the EC summit meeting last week, he made a dorsement of membership misrepresents party well-publicized show of toughness-especially to- policy. Even if the EC partners meet most of ward the French-which was probably designed to Britain's terms for renegotiation, anti-marketeers contradict claims that he has been too , rnpliant are still likely to try to, exploit the fears of many toward the other EC governments. In a; apparent Britons that the government will surrender much effort to keep anti-market skeptics in 1's.,e, govern- of its sovereignty to the European Communities, ment leaders have played down the concessions despite specific government reservations about ;-ained at the summit. In their public statements, the political role of the EC. Opponents of the EC both Wilson and Foreign Secretary Callaghan are may be counting on this issue to swing the refer- taking the line that some progress has been made, endum vote aoa*n-;t cnntinij 0_r,__7 ember- but that renegotiation has a long way to go. ship. 25X1 25X1 Page 13 WEEKLY REVIEW Dec 20, 74 LM Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 MWMMM~ Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 The deteriorating economic situation in many NATO countries was very much on the mind of the ministers. Although they took note of a number of scheduled improvements in mili- tary equipment as well as a 4 percent real increase in West European defense budgets in 1974, they recognized that inflation and escalating costs could seriously weaken Western defense programs in the future. The ministers heard reports from several countries in which this has already begun to occur, notably Britain, Italy, and the Nether- lands. Britain's defense cutbacks came in for very little specific criticism, however, since most of the other allies seem relieved that the cuts leave London's NATO commitment largely intact. The allies are nevertheless uneasy that some of the announced British moves may adversely affect the security of NATO's northern and southern flanks. In searching for ways to deal with the prob- lem of rising defense costs, virtually all of the ministers supported increased standardization of weapons and specialization of military tasks in NATO. Few, however, were inclined to go much beyond the studies NATO is already condu-ting of areas in which this "rationalization" might be beneficial. The defense ministers endorsed the US pro- posal that NATO force plannir,g be oriented to a "long-range defense concept." Several of the min- isters insisted, however, that all three elements of the NATO strat-gy of flexible response-strategic, tactical nuclear, and conventional-be given equal emphasis in the long-range concept. They had felt that an earlier US draft put too much emphasis on conventional forces. The ministers spent much of their time on East-West issues. The discussion of the Vienna force reduction negotiations revealed the frustra- tions of many West European governments caught between domestic pressures for reducing defense spending and the lack of progress at the talks. The Most of the force reductions discussion focused on a possible offer by the West to reduce tactical nuclear weapons in the context of the ienna talks. Several foreign ministers agreed with Secretary Kissinger that perhaps it would not be a good idea to introduce such a nuclear element so soon after the Vladivostok agreement on SALT principles, but some thought that NATO should begin studying the matter so as to be ready when the time seemed right. When the ministers discussed the European security conference, the French came in for some thinly veiled criticism. Although Paris has been claiming that the Brezhnev-Giscard communique only gave conditional approval to concluding the conference at summit level, many other NATO members feel that Paris has gone further toward putting its stamp of approval on a summit than most of them are prepared to go. Several min- isters made the case that allied unity was large;y responsible for whatever progress had been made so far and that the French should not jeopardize chances of obtaining future Soviet concessions. Greece's future relationship with NATO was not addressed directly, although this question will have to be dealt with now that the Greeks have formally requested discussions regarding the with- drawal of the Greek armed forces from the al- liance's integrated military structure. There was a good deal of talk about the need for a settlement in Cyprus, however, and for stabilization in the Middle East generally. Several ministers pointed with concern to the growing Soviet naval strength in the Mediterranean. ,)tiy1 25X1 Few blueprints for action emerged last week from NATO's ministerial discussions in Brussels, but many of the defense and foreign ministers were pleased by the depth and `rankness of the exchanges and the wide range of subjects covered. Belgian, Dutch, and Canadian foreign ministers favored re-examining the Western negotiating position. The Belgian foreign minister said that his government was firding it difficult to reject out of hand the recent Soviet proposal to freeze forces in central Europe for the duration of the negotiations. Brussels does not think such a freeze would have an adverse impact on agreements to Le reached later in Vienna. Dec 20, 74 Page 14 WEEKLY REVIEW Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 I I Turkey is now entering its fourth month with only a caretaker government at the helm, and there are no immediate prospects for a break in the political stalemate. Amid signs of growing dissatisfaction within the military over the bicker- ing among civilian political leaders, Justice Party leader Demirel has renewed his efforts to form a center-right coalition. Armed forces leaders are reluctant to become embroiled in strictly political matters, but if the Demirel effort falls short and no other alternative is immediately available, prospects for some ty!:)e of military involvement will rapidly increase. The caretaker Irmak government has coordi- nated its Cyprus policy with the major political parties. Despite the general consensus, there is widespread doubt that a caretake,' government can take any new initiatives to help move the Cyprus problem toward a settlement. Now that Turkey has been given a reprieve until February 5 on the cut-off of US military assistance, there is likely to be increased pressure on civilian politi?' cians to form a government that can make sub- stantial progress on Cyprt!s and avoid the halt in aid. There is a growing sentiment in the armed forces, particularly among junior officers, that the military will have to force a solution on the politicians. This sentiment does not favor a direct military take-over, but rather the installation of former prime minister Ecevit at the head of a minority or coalition government to lead the na- tion into new elections. Ecevit's performance through the Cyprus conflict reportedly has con- vinced the military that he is the politician most capable of dealing with Turkey's pressing prob- lems. The armed forces could, however, accept Justice Party leader Demirel if his current efforts to form a center-right coalition are successful. So far, Demirel has been pledged 218 votes in the national assembly, only six short of an absolute 25X1 majority. He will have difficulty picking up the remainder, however, as the Democratic Party has already rejected his offer to join in an "anti-left coalition" that would exclude Ecevit's Republi- can People's Party. Democratic leader Bozbeyli has charged that Demirel is now trying to split the Democrats in order to obtain a majority. If Demirel's effort has not succeeded by the time the Turkish holiday period begins on Decem- ber 23, he may well give it up, claiming that at least he has made a serious effort. Ecevit has come out of the Republican People's Party con- gress with a strengthened hand and might make yet another efforrt to form a government after the holiday period ends in early January. F_ Page 15 WEEKLY REVIEW Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 I I FRANCE: CHIRAC'S POWER PLAY French Prime Minister Jacques Chirac's abrupt take-o-nr of the Gaullist Party last week, end was a power play that has brought simmering divisions within the party to a boil. In the long run, however, it could strengthen the ailing move- mer, i. The party bosses or "barons," who domi- nated the movement under De Gaulle and Pom- pidou, were caught off balance by the speed of Chirac's move. Most of them vehemently opposed his election and, unless he can win their support, the party may split at the national congress sched- uled for late February. Chirac has been considered an opportunist and a traitor by orthodox Gaullists since he de- serted the party candidate, Chaban-Delmas, for Giscard prior to the first round of the presidential election last May. Chirac has gradually consoli- dated his position in the party and el. idently feels he is now strong enough to make his move. During the next two months, the baron: will have to decide if they should swallow their pride and work with Chirac to restore the party's lost prestige and influence. Their alternative is to try to bring about his removal from the government- if they could undermine his support within the party, his usefulness to President Giscard would be limited-but they would risk splintering the Gaullist movement in the process. Acceptance by the barons of Chirac's leader- ship would put the party firmly under the prime minister's thumb. Even it the barons oppose him, however, Chirac will probably emerge in control of a leaner, more' unified party. Chirac has the support of an erit'iusiastic majority of the Gaullist National Council-they gave him a standing ova- tion last Sunday-and as prime minister he con- trols important financial resources. Gaullist funds have been drying up since Giscard's election cut off the flow of government money into party coffers. Chirac reportedly used the prospect of partial restoration of financial support to ensure his election as secretary general last weekend. Moreover, by assuming the le;~rlership, Chirac has apparently isolated the barons from the party apparatus. His chances of consolidating his con- trol over the Gaullists appear good, and the day of the barons may be over. 'Giscard's attitude to the coup is unknown, but he was consulted by Chirac and presumably gave him the green light. Giscard, who has re- cently been leaning over backward to placate the Gaullists, may feel that he will be in a stronger position to implement his policies with the Gaullists firmly under Chirac's control. There is some speculation that Chirac's take-over rep- resents an interim step toward "Giscardizat on" of the Gaullist Party, but the move also serves Chirac's own personal ambitions. Stronger representation in the cabinet could increase Gaullist influence on Giscard's policy, at the same time it could give the President more latitude to cooperate with the US. Although the Gaullists do not trust Giscard-the barons call him "Giscariot" because he turned against De Gaulle in the crucial 1969 referendum-and are espe- cially wary of his reputed "Atlanticism," they might oe more flexible if they felt they had some control over his policies. Chirac's act;on last weekend may have been triggered by efforts to undermine his position in the party. Recently, disaffected Gaullists have been wooed by former foreign minister Michel Jobert. Jober has never been a member of the movement, but his appeal to nationalism closely mirrors that of De Gaulle. He has organized a movement of his own -,,0ich is gaining support from many Gaullists. Prior to Chirac's power play, there were per- sistent rumors of a comeback by the Gaullist barons-Chaban-Delmas, Maurice Couve de Murville, Michel Debre, and Olivier Guichard. Guichard in particular was touted as the man who could lead the Gauliists out of the wilderness. Unless the barons can unseat Chirac in the next two or three months, which is unlikely, Guichard is probably the only one with a political future. If he can reach an accommodation with Chirac. he Page 16 WEEKLY REVIEW Dec 20, 74 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 VENEZUELA: AN EMERGING POWER Benefiting from massive oil revenues and under the ambitious leadership of President Carlos Andres Perez, Venezuela is extending its economic and political influence in regional af- fairs and has arrogated to itself a role as leader of the less-developed countries. One of the major goals of the Perez adminis- tration is a summit meeting in Caracas of all Latin American chiefs of state-including Fidel Castro-in mid-1975. Within the past two weeks, Perez has garnered significant backing, including support from the seven nations officially re- presented at the Ayacucho anniversary celebra- tions in Lima and from the Central American chiefs of state who met with him last weekend. A meeting of Caribbean leaders tentatively sched- uled for January in Caracas is expected to lend additional support for Pe' :;z' proposal. An agenda has not yet been circulated, but official Venezuelan statements indicate that Perez intends to focus on at least three main areas of interest to Latin Americans: ? restructuring the OAS; ? establishing a permanent forum where Latin leaders meet and discuss Latin Amer- ican problems; ? arranging for Latin raw material produc- ers to be guaranteed a fair price for their experts and access to foreign technology. Perez disclaims any personal intention to assume a role of leadership in Latin America, but Leaders of Venezuela and Central America Venezuelan leaders privately are pleased with the new-found source -if power and influence that their massive oil revenues are bringing. To further strengthen Perez' position, Venezuela is expand- ing its political and economic influence in the 'Caribbean littoral with investments, loans, and a multimillion-dollar aid fund for Central America. Further, Caracas has indicated that similar oil-aid programs could be extended to larger Latin coun- tries. Perez has also pledged Venezuelan financial assistance for the less-developed Caribbean islands that are vital to Venezuela's security and attrac- tive in terms of economic potential. Last May, Venezuela announced its intention to set up a $25-million trust fund within the Caribbean Development Bank to be used specifically for "regional integration." In August, Perez gave an interest-free loan of $15.7 million to Guyana for budget stabilization. He recently offered the Associated States and Grenada $10-million to buy and operate the bankrupt Leeward Islands Air Transport System, the vital, short-haul inter-island carrier. Perez probably knows that neither this nor the loan to Guyana is likely to be repaid. Other pending deals are a possible loan to the Dominican Republic so that it could purchase the, country's one oil refinery, and a joint merchant-fleet venture with Trinidad.' Cuba has not been overlooked in all this activity. Perez believes his country is no longer bound by OAS economic and political sanctions directed against the island, and he has indicated Page 17 WEEKLY REVIEW Dec 20, 7Q Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 I I he will resume diplornatic relations "when it is convenient." In a startling reversal of position, the governing Democratic Action Party and its elder statesman, former president Romulo Betan- court, have given their approval to Perez' efforts to re-esteiblish relations with Cuba. In Lima, Perez personally invited Fidel Castro to his summit meeting next year; press reports claim Raul Roa, on Castro's behalf, invited Perez to visit Cuba in January to coincide with his proposed trips to Mexico arid Central America. The local press has covered Perez' activities to th-i virtual exclusion of the opposition political parties, which are still in considerable disarray more than a year after the elections. Support for Perez cuts across party lines and reflects the gen- eral public enthusiasm for his flamboyant style and his policies. For 1975, Perez is carefully pre- paring a full round of activities that will keep him in the limelinht. These include several projected trips outside the country. The emergence of the Venezuelan President as a major leader in Latin America will not be viewed indifferently by othe ' ?afi:-i powers. They already see Venezuela's new? ::i,d wealth and ambitious leadership as a challe, a to their tradi- tional spheres of influence. Neva heless, more is likely to follow, as Perez will probably use the traditional New Year's Day address to the nation to provide further details of the foreign policy objectives of his government during the rominn BOLIVIA: ACCESS TO THE SEA President Banzer is claiming that he scored a major diplomatic triumph at the meeting of Latin American leaders in Lima iast week when he got Chile and Peru to focus on Bolivia's land-locked status. Government propaganda has taken up his line, calling a paragraph in the "Declaration of Ayacucho" on Bolivia's lack of an outlrt to the sea 'a major fo: aign policy achievement. The "Declaration" only recognizes Bolivia's right to pursue the issue, however, and does not commit either Chile or Peru to support Banzer's goal of regaining the outlet to the sea his country lost during the War of the Pacifli- in 1881. Bolivia is allowed to use the ports of Arica in Chile arid Materani in Peru, but Banzer finds this arrange- ment unsatisfactory because of Chilean and Peruvian tariff charges on Bolivian imports. Traffic congestion in the Peruvian port is also a problem. Banzer's chances of obtaining a major con- cession on an outlet to the sea at this time are slight because, in spite of the "Declaration," tensions between Chile and Peru prevent either country from making a special deal with Bolivia. The issue is an emotional one in Bolivia, however, and may temporarily bolster his sagging popular- ity. Although Banzer has recently strengthened his dictatorial control over the country, and still retains military backing for his policies, his sup- ing the past year. Page 18 WEEKLY REVIEW Dec 20, 74 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 I I LATIN AMERICA: TIES WITH EC The EC is seeking to expand its formal ties with Latin America, now limited to trade pacts with Argentina, Uruguay, and Brazil. The Latin Americans themselves have been pressing for years for more attention from the EC, which only recently ha; begun to look beyond its African associates to other underdeveloped areas. The EC Commission has begun negotiations with Mexico on a new type of non-preferential agreement intended to serve as model for other Latin American countries. Mexico had requested an agreement with the EC covering commercial, financial, investment, industrial, and technical co- operation. Lacking the legal standing and com- petence to negotiate such a broad agreement, the commission has proposed a commercial agr. e- ment that establishes a mixed committee whose jurisdiction over trade matters would gradually be extended as the EC achieves unified policies in other areas. The community has meanwhile ex- tended its existing bilateral trade agreement with Argentina for one year in order to allow time to negotiate a broader arrangement along the lines of the Mexican model. Relations with Latin America have been hurt by serious community restrictions on Latin American exports. Last June, the EC unilaterally imposed a ban on meat imports that has resulted in a loss of more than $100 million for Latin America. Community Larriers to imports of wheat, coffee, and bananas have also led to Latin American demands for a more stable trade rela- tionship as well as guaranteed access for some exports. The Latin Americans have always been wor- ried by the trading preferences granted by the EC to its associates in Africa. Expansion of such preferences to other African, Mediterranean, and Commonwealth countries has reinforced Latin American fears of exclusion from EC markets. If the Latin Americans do not gain equal access to community markets, their export opportunities will be restricted to the Western Hemisphere, resulting in continued trade dependence on the US. The EC now acknov ledges that there is little it can c'o to ease the beef problem for the Latin Americans or to give them equality-in community markets with other developing countries that now enjoy associate status. As a result, the EC has been concentrating on trade promotion measures to increase Latin American sales in Europe. Sev- eral new promotional activities were discussed in Brussels at the latest semi-annual meeting of Latin American ambassadors and the permanent EC representatives of the Nine. The EC also pledged at the ambassadorial meeting to continue its de- velopment cooperation activities, to provide im- proved trade opportunities through the corn- munity's system of generalized irade preferences, and to su American regional integra- .- tio 25X1 25X1 Page 19 WEEKLY REVIEW Dec 20, 74 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 CHILE: COURTING THE CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATS A decree was issued on December 17 elevating General Pinochet from the presidency of the military junta to the constitutional presidency of the nation. The move is not only the culmina- tion of his growing personal power, but may also be an effort to de-emphasize military rule in an appeal to the Christian Democratic Party. Since taking power in September 1973, the military government has tried repeatedly to coax Christian Democrats to join the administration, because this would do more than anything else to enhance the government's legitimacy. Much of the Christian Democrats' distaste for the regime and some of its policies have been lost on Pinochet, who apparently views the ,.?-oblem as one of form more than substance. By assuming a more con- stitutional posture, Pinochet may hope to give the Christian Democrats a face-saving entry into the government if his effort to win their acceptance proves successful. The timing of Pinochet's nod to constitu. tionality is interesting, as the Christian Democrats appear to have emerged unscathed from their most recent clash with the government. Last week, just days after left-wing party leader Renan Fuentealba was expelled from the country for engaging in political activity, Interior Minister Benavides met with party president Patricio Aylwin and vice president Osvaldo Olguin. Benavides reportedly expressed the government"s concern over its poor relations with the party and asked how the situation, could be improved. .Aylwin and Olguin suggested that an improve- ment in relations could begin only after Fuen- tealba is allowed to return and Claudio Huepe, another left-wing party leader, is released from detention. They also pointed to an anti - Christian Democratic campaign within the government's right wing as a major source of friction.' Un- ruffled, Benavides asked the Christian Democrats to prepare a memorandum outlining their differ- ences, and went on to request once again the party's help in improving the government's image abroad. There can be no question that Pinochet would prize the effect, both domestically and internationally, of Christian Democratic partici- pation in the government. It also appears evident that he is prepared to make some concessions to win them over-as well as to accomplish as much image polishing as possible without them. It remains doubtful, however, that Pinuchet ap- preciates the full extent of the Christian Dem- ocrats' estrangement. The human rights issue, which is probably the party's underlying basic concern, is obviously v'ewed with much less urgency by the government. On economic policy, a considerable liberalization of government programs would be required to meet the Christian Democrats even half-way. Pinochet would probably find that the easiest concession to make would be to mute anti-party polemics within the government and military hierarchies. Having become president, he could also quite easily suggest the possibility of elections, perhaps at the local level. Whether such a modified approach would suffice to draw the Christian Democrats closer is an open question, but their decision at such a juncture could only be made after intra-party soul-searching, possibly resulting in the alienation of wing. 25X1 Page 20 WEEKLY REVIEW Dec 20, 74 J Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 OPEC: HIGHER REVENUES OPEC oil ministers concluded their meeting on December 13 with a communique that was deliberately vague. The meeting's only apparent substantive result was the adoption of a new pricing system. Under this system, the govern- ment take will be $10.12 per barrel for the light Saudi crude that serves as a benchmark for all OPEC oil prices. This take represents an increase of 38 cents or 3.9 percent above the level estab- Iishad by OPEC for the fourth quarter of 1974. The revenue levels are effective for nine months beginning January 1. If all members apply this measure uniformly, the consumers' oil import bill for that period will increase by about $3 billion. Some non - Persian Gulf OPEC members may not hike their revenues by the full 38 cents. The African members, who already receive over $11 per barrel, are encountering heavy consumer resistance. Faced with declining production, the African producers may use the elimination of the posted-price system to establish more competitive prices. Venezuela, on the other hand, is likely to demand an increase of more than 38 cents per barrel. Iranian Minister of Interior Amouzegar says that the benchmark price for sales of govern- ment-owned oil to third parties will be $10.46 per barrel. Competition presumably would force the producing companies to adopt the same price. According to Amouzegar's figures, company prof- its would amount to 22 cents a barrel after sub- tracting government revenues ($10.12) and pro- duction costs (12 cents). The companies maintain that production costs will be close to 23 cents a barrel in 1975, reducing profits to a meager 11 cent-, a barrel. Amouzegar's arithmetic-which apparently applies to Iran plus other countries that obtain 100 percent ownership of their in- dustries next year-has not been confirmed by OPEC officials or by other oil minister3. The important issues of production cuts and the linking of oil prices to inflation in the indus- trial countries have been put aside for future discussion. These issues, as well as consumer reac- tion to the new prices, are likely to be discussed at a meeting of oil and foreign ministers to be held in Algiers on January 24. In administrative matters, the OPEC minis- ters appointed Chief M. O. Feyide of Nigeria as secretary general effective January 1. Chief Fey., ide will replace Dr. Abderrahman Khene of Alge- ria, who held the office for two years. The next ordinary meeting of OPEC is 9 1975 in Libreville Gabon. Page 21 WEEKLY REVIEW Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 RHODESIA: HARD BARGAINING AHEAD Prime Minister Smith has taken the first step toward implementing his truce agreement with Rhodesian insurgents by allowing long-imprisoned rebel leaders to resume political activity in Rhodesia. The first round of public statements by both sides, however, shows that Smith and the insurgents are not yet ready to compromise on the c1tical issue of how a transition to majority rule '.an be accomplished. In fact, no agreement has even been reached on when settlement talks can begin or where they will be held. Late last week, Joshua Nkomo, head of the Zimbabwe African Peoples Union, and Ndaba- ningi Sithole, head of the Zimbabwe African Na- ti anal Union, appeared together in Salisbury after returning from Lusaka, Zambia. They had made the trip to meet with exiled Rhodesian insurgents and try to formulate a common bargaining posi- tion for dealing with Smith. The public appear- ance of the two leaders, their first in a decade, followed Smith's announcement that he was releasing all black nationalists under detention in Rhodesia in return for a cease-fire agreement. Nkomo and Sithole were accompanied by Bishop Muzorewa, head of the pion-insurgent African National Council, the only nationalist group Smith has allowed to function openly in Rhodesia. In a joint statement, the three leaders confirmed that Nkomo and Sit`iole had agreed to merge their organizations wit'i the African Na- tional Council under Muzorewa's chairmanship, and that they would implemei t a cease-fire as soon as Smith agreed to a date for a constitu- tional conference. Muzorewa subsequently implied tha` guerrilla operations were already being suspended in anticipation of an early release of all political detainees, numberino about 400. Early this week, Rhodesian government officials said that some 200 detainees were being released immediately. It is not yet clear, however, whether the cease-fire will be hor;ored by the exiled nation. alists who have been directing guerrilla operations inside Rhodesia since late 1972 fron, bases in Zambia. During the Lusaka talks, Herbert Chitepo, head of the Zimbabwe African National Union's guerrilla base in Zambia, opposed accept- ing a cease-fire until Smith had guaranteed an early transition to majority rule. Chitepo argued against giving up the tactical advantages gained by his group-wh;ch has fielded most of the guerril- las-and stated that the insurgency was the key factor in forcing Smith to make concessions. Although Sithole, Nkomo, and Muzorewa appear more open to compromise than Chitepo, their joint statement [as' week asserted that a constitutional settlement must provide for an early transition to majority rule. Smith said in a subsequent radio interview, however, that he was opposed to any franchise that might result in majority rule within five years. Smith is probably asserting a hard-line posi- tion in order to convince white Rhodesians that any concessions he makes in the course of a constitutional conference will be unavoidable. Smith is fearful that allowing the long-imprisoned nationalist leaders to resume public appeals for early majority rule may arouse such expectations among black Rhodesians that a prolonged impasse in settlement negotiations could bring about popular demonstrations and possibly provoke civil disorders. Smith's security forces depend on a limited pool of white reservists. Without substantial external support, they could have difficulty coping with extensive rioting or a resumption of guerrilla activity. South African Prime Minister Vorster announced last week that the 1,400 South African police who have been serving in Rhodesia will be withdrawn as soon as terrorism actually ceases. Vorster apparently is warning the white Rhodesians that South Africa will not back them in any die-hard resistanc aiority rule. 25X1 Page 22 WEEKLY REVIEW Dec 20, 74 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1 LIBYA SEEKS NUCLEAR CAPABILITY Libya is receiving help from a number of countries in the development of a nuclear pro- gram. Although the facilities Tripoli is seeking can be used for peaceful purposes, their acquisition would be a small first step toward President Qadhafi's ultimate goal of achieving a nuclear warfare capability. Tripoli has turned to France and Sweden for assistance in setting up a nuclear research center. A French firm reportedly has accepted a $30- million contract for work on the center that may include construction of a research reactor with enriched uranium fuel and associated research facilities. Two government-controlled Swedish companies have also expressed willingness to help with the center and to provide training to Libyan nationals. Tripoli has awarded a West German firm a contract for a heavy water production plant that is presumably intended to supply heavy water for use in a natural uranium reactor. US officials have attempted to learn the details of the contract from the West German ambassador, but he claims to know nothing about the transaction. These arrangements do not take Libya much beyond the planning and research stages, and Libya's bureaucratic confusion and lack of indigenous talent will retard its efforts to develop a nuclear capability. Nevertheless, Qadhafi is det:rmiried and has the financial means to buy further advances. Page 23 WEEKLY REVIEW Dec 20, 74 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/06/21: CIA-RDP85T00875R001000070036-1