JAIL FOR NAMING CIA AGENTS?

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP91-00901R000100130001-5
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 155
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 27, 2001
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: December 1, 1978
• Content Type: NSPR

TprnuArLF
U,7rg
D1AR1tYN
JAIL FOR NAMING CIA AGENTS?
NOTE: This fall congressional com-
mittees considered, but did not vote on,
legislation that would make it a crime
for anyone, including a newspaper re-
Porter, to disclose the names of secret
American intelligence agents. The
proposal is likely to be reintroduced
this January. Floyd Abrams and Frank
Carlucci have markedly different views
about it. Their essays are adapted from
testimony before the Senate Judiciary
Committee.
BY FRANK C. CARLUCCI
There exists today a small and appar-
ently interrelated coterie of Americans
who have openly devoted themselves to
the destruction of certain of the Na-
tion's authorized institutions of govern-
ment, namely, the foreign intelligence
agencies. This group includes a small
number of renegade former CIA em-
ployees, such as Philip Agee, and a
larger group of Americans who have
capitalized on disclosures of classified
information made in the past by such
renegade former employees.
This group has engaged in a course
of action openly and avowedly under-
taken in order to destroy the Nation's
intelligence-gathering capability
through the medium of exposing as
many undercover intelligence officers
and agents as possible. The perpetrators
of these disclosures understand correct-
ly that secrecy is the lifeblood of an
intelligence organization and that dis-
closures of undercover identities can
disrupt. discredit and-they hope-
even ultimately destroy an agency such
as the CIA. The two principal organs of
such exposure have been a series of
books written and edited by these indi-
viduals and a publication, Covert Ac-
tion Information Bulletin, published
here in Washington, D.C. These have
disclosed cumulatively approximately
1,500 to 1,600 names, many correct
and many incorrect. In addition, per-
sons such as Agee and Louis Wolf, one
of the editors of Covert Action Informa-
tion Bulletin, have traveled to various
foreign countries. to carry on a cam-
paign dedicated to stirring up local an-
tagonism to U.S. officials through what
appears to me to be only thinly veiled
incitements to violence.
'I he tragic results of this activity are,
well known. Five years ago Richard
Welch was murdered in Athens,
Greece. Mr. Welch was first alleged to
be CIA Chief of Station, Lima, Peru, in
the 1974-75 winter edition of Counter-
spy. On November 25, 1975, the
Athens Daily News printed a letter to
the editor in which a number of U.S.
Government employees-including
Mr. Welch-were alleged to be CIA
officers. Included in that article were
Frank Carlucci is the deputy director of
Mr. Welch's Athens home address and
telephone number. Less than a month
after the article appeared in the Athens
Daily News, Mr. Welch was brutally
gunned down in front of his home. A
few weeks ago only luck intervened to
prevent the death of the young daughter
of a U.S. citizen employed by the U.S.
Embassy in Jamaica whose house was
shot up only days after Mr. Wolf ap-
peared in Jamaica and, at a highly
publicized news conference, gave the
names, addresses, telephone numbers,
and license plate numbers and descrip-
tions of the cars of U.S. government
employees whom he alleged to be CIA
officers.
I think it unnecessary to go into detail
about the adverse effects this behavior
is having on the work of the Nation's
intelligence agencies. Simply put, our
officers willingly have accepted the
risks necessarily inherent in their taxing
and dangerous occupation. They have
not accepted the risk of being stabbed in
the back by their fellow countrymen
and of being left unprotected by their
Nation's Government. The failure of
the Congress to act so far has had a
demoralizing effect. Refusal to enact
effective legislation in the face of most
recent developments would be incom-
prehensible to them. I stress the word
"effective." Everyone who has any
familiarity with this problem knows
full well that a criminal statute limited
only to disclosures made by employees
and former employees would not pro-
vide the kind of relief we need. Enact-
ment of such a statute would be little
more than a misrepresentation to the
public and a cruel disappointment to
our personnel.
Let me turn now to the policy
advisability and constitutional status of
the controversial portions of these bills.
As an introductory comment, I would
like to say that I have seen numberless
discussions of the constitutional rights
of Messrs. Agee and Wolf and compa-
ny, but almost nothing as to the consti-
tutional implications of what they are
trying to do. Their purpose is no less
than, by direct action, to destroy insti-
tutions of government that our constitu-
tional authorities, the President and the
Congress, have authorized to exist and
operate. They are taking the law into
their own hands. Nothing could be
more subversive of our constitutional
system of government than to permit a
disgruntled minority of citizens freely
to thwart the will of the majority. I
recognize the great importance of the
First Amendment, but I have never
understood that the First Amendment is
the entire Constitution of the United
States, and I suggest to the Senate Ju-
diciary Committee-as I understand
the Supreme Court's interpretation of
the First Amendment actually to be-
that First Amendment considerations
must be balanced against other compel-
ling constitutional requirements, in-
cluding the inherent constitutional right
of the people of this country to have an
effective defense against external ag-
gression, a defense that necessitates a
working intelligence system.
Now I would like to address a key
factual element in this situation that
seems to be widely misunderstood.
There is no unclassified document that
identifies undercover employees or
agents of the CIA. Neither the House
nor the Senate version of this legisla-
tion would purport to criminalize the
mere disclosure of an identity that had
been acknowledged by the U.S. Gov-
ernment in any such document. It is
Approved
claimed by some opponents of these
bills that the activity on which they
would impact consists merely of pick-
ing information out of certain unclassi-
fied publications in which the U.S.
Government, through carelessness, has
allowed the names of CIA officers to be
revealed. This is simply nonsense.
Some critics of this legislation have
suggested that it would open up to
prosecution any person who came
across a classified intelligence identity,
including a journalist who exposed
such an identity in the course of a legiti-
mate story on CIA activities or alleged
CIA wrongdoings. This simply is not
the case, as any careful reading of ei-
ther the Senate or the House version
would demonstrate. The version before
the Senate requires that the actor be en-
gaged in a pattern of activities intended
to identify and expose covert agents
and with reason to believe that such ac-
tivities would impair or impede intelli-
gence activities of the United States. In
short, the bill describes a very narrow
category of persons engaged in a cru-
sade whose commonly recognizable ef-
fect is to destroy intelligence activities
in general and who furthers that pur-
pose by doing much more than merely
restating that which is in the public do-
main.
A second canard about this legisla-
tion ghat I would like to lay to rest is that
it is unnecessary because anything that
a private citizen can uncover can also
be uncovered by the KGB. Even if true,
this observation is irrelevant. I question
its accuracy because, as Americans, the
publishers of Covert Action Informa-
tion Bulletin probably have easier ac-
cess to misguided or duped sources of
information within Government agen-
cies than would the KGB.
A third and increasingly important
consideration is to protect against ter-
rorist attacks such as that which caused
the death of Richard Welch and almost
caused the death of Richard Kinsman
and other U.S. Government employees
in Jamaica.
What the Congress can do is protect
us from the malicious and deliberate
acts of Americans who are bent on our
destruction, acts that exacerbate the
inherent difficulties present in our oper-
ating conditions overseas.
NO
BY FLOYD ABRAMS
The naming or listing of undercover
intelligence officers, agents, inform-
ants and sources by any of their col-
leagues is an outrage; those who engage
in such activities disgrace themselves
and disserve both their colleagues and
their country. Without covert intelli-
gence operations, we would lose much
Floyd Abrams is a partner at Cahill
Gordon & Reindel in New York who
specializes in First Amendment work.
1lLUSTRATION BY CHARLES WALLER
~AAnuo 102 17
 Approvo,
THE
AMERICAN LAWYER
IS NOW
AVAILABLE AT
THESE BOOKSTORES
AND
NEWSSTANDS IN
ILLINOIS
AND WISCONSIN.
UNIV. OF CHICAGO BOOKSTORE
5800 S. Ellis
CIRCLE CAMPUS NEWSSTAND
Univ. of Illinois
750 S. Halstead St.
KROCH'S AND BRENTANO'S
29 South Wabash
16 South LaSalle
B. DALTON BOOKSELLER
129 North Wabash
THE BOOKMARKET
6 East Cedar St.
BARBARA'S BOOKSTORE
2907 North Broadway
121 North Marion-Oak Park Mail
1434 North Wells
PARKWEST BOOKS
2430 North Lincoln
LOGOS BOOKSTORE
2423 North Clark
BOB'S IN NEWTON
Clark and Diversey Sts.
GUILD BOOKS & PERIODICALS
1118 West Armitage
FOLLETT'S BOOKNOOK
Northeastern Univ.
5500 North St. Louis
CHICAGO-MAIN NEWSSTAND
Chicago and Main Sts.
BOOKLOVERS
8 West Burlington
THEBOOKNOOK
4738 Main St.
SCHWARTZ BOOKSHOP
440 W. Wisconsin Ave.
DESFORGES
427 E. Wisconsin Ave.
BAY MUSIC CENTER
2625 N. Downer
UWM BOOKSTORE Apprw~e~d
2200 E. Kenwood Blvd.
Association does not define the ques-
tions upon which certiorari is granted. "
Ashton covered her main point in a
crisp, firm and knowing delivery that
no doubt did much to make up for the
turgid brief the state had filed. Aware
that the court has been increasingly
hostile to the Fifth Amendment self-in-
crimination clause, she simply dwelled
on the point that the Court should resist
any extension of the clause to limit
testimony on punishment after the ver-
dict is in.
When it was time for rebuttal, she
rose and swept smartly through her an-
swers to Berger. As matters stood then,
Ashton had saved more time than she
would need; Berger had not been at his
best. Ashton thus was about to wind up
early. She wanted to make one further
point: if defendant Ernest Benjamin
Smith, Jr., had been so troubled about
the psychiatrist's testimony that Smith
had shown no remorse when inter-
viewed, Smith "could have taken the
stand and said he was sorry he did it."
Blackmun, hunched over his papers,
looked up and asked, "Could the state
call Smith as a witness at that stage?"
"No, your honor, it could not,"
Ashton answered confidently.
"Given your answer," Blackmun
returned, "how does that apply to your
argument that the Fifth Amendment
does not apply to that phase?"
Ashton had an answer, but it did not
resuscitate her point. "The Fifth
Amendment," she said unconvincing-
ly, "should not be used to prohibit the
use of testimony that forms the basis for
an expert opinion."
Justice Thurgood Marshall, keenly
aware that Ashton had not gotten out of
Blackmun's trap and apparently wish-
ing to keep her there, asked: "What if
Texas had a statute that said that, at a
bifurcated trial, a psychiatrist could
determine the sentence? Would that
violate due process?"
Yes, she said, it would. "An expert
witness may not determine an issue of
fact that a jury must consider,"
Marshall's question had sounded be-
side the point, and her answer was
solid, but the exchange did not come
out in her favor. It did not alter the im-
pression that Ashton's rebuttal had got-
ten cleanly away from her.
Had she passed up rebuttal al-
together, her case would have been in
much better shape. Joel Berger had got-
ten into needless verbal combat with
the Court and had displayed too often
an unpleasant way of starting his an-
swers with "well . . . " in a tone sug-
gesting that questions were getting in
his way.
His brief was notably stronger. It
marshaled the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and
Fourteenth Amendments against psy-
chiatric testimony in capital cases.
Berger's brief made it seem plain that
capital case defendants would not know
of the hazards of talking to a doctor
about future criminal propensities.
For reasons that were in no way ob-
vious, Berger had come to the oral
argument determined to discredit the
particular psychiatrist involved in the
Smith case, Dr. James Grigson. He
wanted to be sure that the Court knew
the doctor was "prosecution oriented"
-a point that his brief had made, but
far more subtly.
"Aren't all expert witnesses oriented
to the side who calls th Relt u'
i-n ' ~ r QQr~ M~o~igh't kbp
complaint.
Berger agreed, but insisted that it
was "particularly relevant here" be-
cause in Texas, "prosecution-oriented
psychiatrists are going in to see these
defendants. "
He would not give up the point when
ridiculed sharply by Justice Byron
White for failing to prove his claim
about Grigson's supposed bias.
Justice Stevens offered Berger a
chance to get off that line, asking, "It
wouldn't make any difference, would
it, to the legal. question, whether the
psychiatrist was defense oriented?"
Berger said that was correct, thus
switching his ground to suggest that
"this case is not about Dr. Grigson."
Even after that exchange, however,
Berger returned to his theme and aban-
doned it only after the chief justice rath-
er bluntly forced him off it.
O 0 O
ESCHEWING POLITICS: Benjamin
Civilctti may be one of the most politi-
cal of U.S. attorneys general, and he
may have had one of the more interest-
ing political assignments in a waning
presidential campaign. But he handled
it like a lawyer.
Standing before the Court's lectern
for the first time as attorney general (he
was there once before as a private law-
yer in 1973), Civiletti showed none of
the political artlessness that last sum-
mer took him to the White House to talk
about not talking about Billy Carter's
legal troubles.
There were Jewish votes to win with
the case of Fedorenko v. U.S. and Civi-
lctti knew that-but he never let on.
The case is about the right to contin-
ued citizenship of Russian-born Feodor
Fedorenko, who lied on his visa appli-
cation in 1949 about his past as an
armed guard at the Nazi death camp in
Treblinka, Poland. The Justice Depart-
ment's move against him is part of the
continuing campaign to ferret out
"Nazi collaborators," perhaps to de-
port them. Fedorenko's case has
brought major Jewish groups to the
government's side in the Court, and its
political impact is well known at the de-
partment.
Outside the Court, Civiletti insisted
that politics had had nothing to do with
having the case assigned to him for
argument; there is always an election
going on, he remarked drily to the gag-
gle of press following him.
Inside the chamber, he was as good
as any of the subordinates the solicitor
general sends up. He.argued the case
with a bare lectern and did not drop a
syllable ora crucial fact. The absence of
props (he also had no apparent need for
assistant Andrew Frey, who sat close
enough to be of help) revealed a confi-
dence that turned out to be justified.
The attorney general is known as
anything but a rash man, and he exhib-
ited the utmost deliberation as he
spoke. Civiletti, collected, composed
and well-studied, was on top of his
case, even though its legal points are
complex and the attorney general had
not had much time to learn them. The
main points turn on the concepts of
'`materiality" of information withheld
by immigrants. The Court's past utter-
ances about those concepts are far from
helpful guides, but Civiletti gave them
new clarity. Handsomely tanned below
his deftly combed gray hair, the attor-
ney general was as much the sartorial
e
Kgw ~s1t~ib flq~c superior of
B
OD.
Fedorenko's lawyer, Brian Gildea of
New Haven's Celentano and Gildea, is
as dandy a looker as shows up at the
bar. lie has it face fit for a shirt ad and
exquisitely oiled hair. Gildea, too,
came prepared-but his preparations
were too visible, and he was too de-
pendent on them. He departed from his
notes only with difficulty and evident
strain. For more than 20 of his allotted
30 minutes, Gildea was obsessed with
the papers that lay before him.
He was nearly finished before his
side had achieved anything like oral
clarity, and it did so then only because
Justice William Brennan, Jr., gener-
ously talked him through it in simple
terms.
He treated his case as if it were en-
tirely fact bound, and thus left the legal
questions at stake entirely open to Civi-
letti's practiced exploration.
O 0 0
TICKLED WHITE: Justice White sel-
dom seems as tickled as when he has
put a question that an attorney had
never once pondered. He was positive-
ly gleeful when Kevin Forde came up
short on a jurisdictional idea floated by
White in the hearing on U.S. v. Will.
White may have had a special reason
for the particular puzzler he asked of
Forde. The Will case is a test of whether
all federal judges (including all nine
Supreme Court justices) have a consti-
tutional right to a cost-of-living raise
every year. The discomfort of facing
that issue was everywhere evident on
the bench and across the courtroom,
and White's question involved a possi-
ble way out.
Forde, incidentally, did little to case
the pangs. Repeatedly in the opening
minutes of his argument on behalf of
the 14 judges who sued for higher pay,
the Chicago solo practitioner made an
apology for the lawsuit.
He called it an "explanation we owe
the American people, if not this
Court. " It was simply a matter of duty
to bring such a case, he said at the start.
"What canon of ethics," Justice
Rehnquist asked archly, "requires
federal judges to file a lawsuit urging
other judges to raise their salaries?"
Forde relied upon the mandate that it
is a judge's responsibility "to preserve
the independence of the judiciary,"
and the thought that Congress's refusal
to assure an annual pay raise by law was
a threat to that independence.
Twice more, before turning to the
merits, the Chicago lawyer asked for
implied forgiveness for the lawsuit:
"There is nowhere else to go. "
White immediately wondered out
loud if that were really so. "Could you
have sued Mr. Foley in state court?"
(William Foley, director of the Admin-
istrative Office of U.S. Courts, pays
judges their salaries.)
Stumped at White's thought, which
is nowhere touched in his brief or the
Justice Department's brief on the other
side, Forde nevertheless was quick to
remember that the U.S. government
could not be sued in state court.
"I did not say the government. I said
Mr. Foley," White responded. "Could
he be sued in state court'? State courts
handle federal question cases all the
time. "
Rehnquist chimed in: "Couldn't the
Circuit Court of Cook County have
heard this suit?"
"No, no," replied Forde. With not a
hint that he had ever looked up the
question, he went on, "There is no
state court in which we could have pro-
 Approved ) For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R00010013000
29 December 1980
Old Spies and Cold Peas
ByJEFF STEIN
great power; it is evil unto itself. A corollary to this grand design is the
pattern of omnipotent IiGB and Eastern Bloc efforts to recruit Western journal- I
ists and plant false information in the press.
The issue is important. In recent months, the devil theory of international
relations has made a big comeback. The Soviet Union is said to be not merely
throwing its weight around and protecting its vital interests, like any other
year after five years of sour grapes. Membership has increased tenfold from an
original 250 to 2600 former CIA, FBI, and military intelligence agents and
officers, and this year, for the first time, corporate membership has been
solicited and enthusiastically received (S500 a year gets a company three free
memberships). Lockheed was first in line.
A marked departure from earlier years, when the more prominent brethren
were busy ducking subpoenas or television network crews, the mood at this
year's convention was both joyous and combative, apparently thanks to the
bracing Cold War tingle in the air and the solid prospects for new laws making
it a crime to disclose the name of a CIA officer learned from publicly available
sources.
This year's convention of spies found cause for joy in every comer. Key
"anti-CIA" liberals Frank Church, George McGovern, Birch Bayb, and John
Culver were in deep trouble in their reelection bids (and went on to lose). The
Supreme Court had grabbed Frank Snepp's "ill-gotten gains" from Decent
Interval back for the government. The Congress had repealed the Clark Amend-
ment prohibiting covert intervention in Africa on the side ofapartheid and had
retreated from its early promise to write a strong CIA and FBI charter. As former
CIA intelligence chief and present Reagan adviser Ray Cline crowed to the
assembled CIA, FBI, and military men, "We are on the upgrade at last."
Or are they' A few days of milling around at the conference, clipping into
panel discussions and chatting with a number of intelligence officers in the
lobby or bar, suggests that the U.S. intelligence community remains mired in
delusions about itselfand the world about it. Its chronic and crippling problem
remains its inability to distinguish between intervention and intelligence,
security and repression. In the real world, moreover, its solution to these
problems is not as harmless as hiring rabbits to pretest food for a convention
banquet-
A series of sharp exchanges at the conference is instructive. On Friday,
October 3, a panel on Soviet Bloc intelligence operations unveiled its star
performer, the former chief of "disinformation" for Czech intelligence, Ladis-
lav Bittman. Chaired by Ray Cline, the panel sought to draw out of Bittman a
Phillips (Cuba, 1960; Brazil, 1964; Chile, 1973), appears to be having a vintage
as the Association of Former Intelligence Officers sat down fora luncheon at its
fifth annual convention. It wouldn't do to have America's finest ex-spies
knocked of in one fell swoop by a KGI% chef
The association, founded in 1975 by senior CIA covert operator David
r October, pretesting samples of fried chicken, roast beef, and col
I-A
duty in the kitchen of the Holiday Inn in McLean, Virginia, in
Appro
apparently fashionable view that Russian "moles" have burrowed into the
loose fabric of American life, poking, climbing, and chewing their way into the
highest echelons of the U.S. press,and the intelligence community itself. Thus;
an editorialist's support for human rights cannot merely be a sensitive response
to much of the world's state-organized cruelty; it has to be "proof" ofsecluction
by Soviet intelligence's "false flag" technique ofwooing liberals to communist
V44 C{44{ V{ 2bi r
I ! n ffilkb
r s astern uropeanaccents, p ayed t o ro e assigne to him in
the
discussion. He titillated this special audience, producing chuckles when
HUTCH OF Rr1BBITS WAS MUSTERED FOR SECU
 Approved For Release 2001/ 7 7 ? I - D 0 0100130001-5
Washi ~gton
STATINTL
V lJ L1 Ll IJ `5 _~
Should Caspar Weinberger get his ',
way as Secretary of Defense, Frank
Carlucci, a career civil servant who is
now No. 2 man at the Central Intelli-
gence Agency; will become deputy to
Weinberger. Carlucci would be in
day-to-day_ charge at. the Pentagon,
permitting Weinberger to spend time
as a member of Reagan's "superca-
binet" on a broad range of issues.
A CIA. report circulating in the intel-
ligence community estimates it. would
cost the Soviet Union 10 billion dol-
lars,a year in economic aid and mili-
tary spending if it invaded Poland-a
sum big enough to constitute a deter-
rent, in the CIA view.
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 'ease 2001 /07/2p7HEQA PRt rJ P
Nick tli72mesch
Power ` is' heady'-stuff and can : make-
jackals out of people-*ho suddenly find
themselves wielding it.'This verity might
explainwhysome jackals on the far right
are out to.stopthe nomination of Frank
Carlucci, 50,'a=seasoned federal official,
as Caspar-Weinberger's deputy secretary
'of defense
Carlucci, now deputy. director of the'
CIA, served in the Nixon and Ford ad
ministrations' im?top:policymaking jobs.;
Much of his experience'was in working..
as right-hand man to..Weinberger when
he was director of the Office of Manage-
ment and- Budget" and. secretary ;`of
health, education and-welfare.,-
Indeed,- Woinb6iger and Carlucci were
a, team, known for-fixing gimlet eyes-bn
budgets - and team headed-; by
'William R. Van Cleave, who sees himself
as the sort of deputy Weinberger needs
-16i balance..
Most people who closely'-obse'rved'the
trials and tribulations of th -CIA-and I
include myself in.that group-feel that
Carlucci has helped preserve a,sense of
rationality . at the agency,. particularly
during the Carter years.. ; ' ,
It is ,absurd to charge.Carlucci with
taking: actions weakening " "bur "-'intelli-
genre capability,'and whatever work-he
did in carrying out a presidential direr--
tive on CIA conduct was in line. with fol-
lowing the law. The , charges. that he cov-
ered up for Billy Carter are rubbish, and
so is the claim that he was derelict *on -
Afghanistan:-74
--Carlucci is a professional public' ser-
vent;.the kind Republicans need to-run
th.e -goverrment::He served as a State
Department official in South Africa,-.the. '
Congo, Zanzibar nrtd:Brazil. As assistant
director of the Office. of Economic. _Op-
portunityunder PresicientNikon; he had
to fend- off holdoverDemocratic- liberals
and, at one-point, directed that all Xerox
machines be locked:up'in.the: basement
in' order;_,to prevent`-documents : from
being copied and leaked to congressional
Democrats:-,r ,s,k. > r,
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 A2, T:i C: - Aimee
0x7 PACE
or Release 2001107 Y-F-00901R000100130001-5
25 DECEMBER 1983 .~-
_ESSAY..
By William Safire
At Defense Cap Weinberger is a su-
perb choice. If defense budgets are to
be increased dramatically, who is bet-
ter at Defense than.an experienced
cost-cutter? Weinberger has both at
sense of proportion and a. sense of
humor, and nobody will be closer to
President Reagan. His infighting
skills were shown in Weinbeger'sfirst
bureaucratic test: he rejected hard-
liner William Van Cleave as De- putt'
Secretary in favor of deputy C.i.A. .
if Frank CarluccL to the dismay of
?t L "Madison Gmun." which are-
(erred cleavage.
- At State, Al Haig,is a question mark.,:
Seeking Democratic help.in his Senate
confirmation, ?Haig.,reached first for,.,
lawyer-Newton Minow,4.hen hired his'
Johnson Administration sponsor, Joe
Califano; seeking to please the Kissin-
ger faction and diplomatic, establish-:
ment,..,Haig abruptly. dismissed the I
right-wing transitionaries who :were-
worrying the striped-pants set. All his-
attention now is focused on the left, but.
his long-range battle will be with the
hawks. (For his deputy,. Haig seeks to
ciicudivent Richard Stone, Fred" Ikle
and Laurence Silberman with a dark-
horse Californian beholden only to
At .Treasury,. Donald Regan was
chosen. beause- he is' neither.Alan
Greenspan. (resented by the supply-.
side ,Simonizes) nor William Simon
-WASHINGTON, Dec. 24 - Twice in
recent weeks, a. group of people have
stumbled onstage at. transition head
quarters. = awkward.',' defensive,
blinldng;in the unaccustomed.lime
light' and lined up to face a flock of
witnesses and potential accusers..
I: half-expected one member of the
audience to leap.to his feet-and shout
atone man in the lineup:. "That's him!
There he is! :That's the one who prom-
ised me arose garden!"
The dreary, frayed-edge -introduc
tion of.the Reagan Cabinet="Hi; I'm,
ttte new Secretary of Whatever; and 1..
can't answer any questions yet'" = is
part'of the incoming Administration's:. post.-election slump:.
At: first;,"the Cabinet-in-formation
was presented the way a tie salesman
sells ties. "You Iike._this'one? How
about this instead?" The Washington
landscape was :littered.. wi--- : deflated
trialljalloons Later; the transcontinental distance
between the President-elect and the
men and -woman finally selected left..
the impression that Mr. Reagan was :
at the.receiving end of the.decision--.I
making process
.In the end,.when the lineup managed
to.lurch or tage, no rhyme or reason:
accompanied their introduction. Nei- 11
ther.the.foreign-defense group nor the
economic-issues group presented any
them atic" :?approach.'.As.. 'crowds of
transitioneers bumped into appointees,.
at thestationhouse the elected leader
seemed to"be off on sonae.distant?pa :.{
trol: Car 5.4, where are you?
At this rate, both Reagan's. '.'hun
died dns" and his honeymoon are in
danger of being over by Inauguration
Day, 'a modern, record. That's unfair, .
of course,.but.by.failing to act as mas.
ter of his own ceremonies. Mr. Reagan
invites others to search his selections
fox.ai sense of purpose:;,;;,:;;:.
(resisted ..by the traditional Green
His choices. .
spanics). He is-afine manager who, may not realize.that he is backing into
a philosophical- buzz saw. We will be
better. served by Reagan's Regan than..
Regan's-Reagan. :
At Justice, thechoice of Mr. Rea-..1
gan's personal lawyer was a mistake.
William French Smith would have
been: a. perfectly good White House
counsel, but -the Attorney General
should .. be.. neither the President's
brother nor his buddy nor his cam-
paign manager nor his former lawy er
Justice has been profoundly politicized"-`
in the past four years; we shall see if
thejob of chief of the Criminal Divi-
sion, goes_ to someone who combines -
.prosecutorial, zeal with judicial ter
perament,ortoRobertBlakey: -'.
To,, Commerce, - Malcolm Baldrige
brings the experience of running a
tight ship at ' Scovill Manufacturing;
his sister, Tish,, is editor of Amy Van
derbilt's "Book of Etiquette,". so we -
can expect the Reagan Cabinet to use
the right forks
As Ditector of Central InteiIigen:ce,
William Casey is a natural -- Worms
War II master spy international law-
I., refute advocate, ecoromnc
statesman" By treating this aooomt_
meat as of Cabinet rank, Reagan sends
a clear signal that the C.LA. can stco
feeEing guilty and start gettin?resulis.
Skipping over most of the others, as
Reagan probably will, we come to the
most inspired appointment: Jenne
Kirkpatrick as ambassador to the
United Nations. Intellectual, articu-
Iate,.forceful,=this.Jackson Democrat
will sweep away the guilt-ridden pre-
tensions of the Andy Youngs and bring
back memories of Pat Moynihan. With
Cabinet rank, she will have direct ac-
cess to the President if the Secretary-
of State wavers on policy. At the Coali-
tion for a Democratic Majority hers
was the Strongest voice for..support; of
Israel; America will not soon again
be embarrassed by the-spiteful anti-
Israel vote cast by Mr. Carter's man
last week.
A good bunch, by and. large, bol-
stered by Richard Allen and Martin
Anderson within the White House -
certainly a big improvement over the
crew sinking from view. The pity is
that the "team" has not been pre-
sented as a team; the fault for that lies
with the man who mayhave chosen his-
Cabinet, but failed to give meaning. to
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 ARi1ApprgvgU.g,,Release 2001/07/27 : C_ IA-RDP91-00901ROO010013000
/ >
25 December 19(80
105
As 6xpected.to be named deputy di-
rector'of the" Central Intelligence
Agency byPresident-elect" Ronald
Reagan, according to well-informed .-
:sources in.,the transition process..
=The 49-year-old naval officer has
been director of thesuper-secret Na-
?.tional.-Security Agency at Fort-
.j4eade, bid;_since.197T. Tr _nsition
.sources said Inman was at the top
of the list for taking over as deputy
.t::o. director-designate- William - J:
Casey because Inman's talents would
`complementthoseof the.67-year-old
director.
Casey,~is a respected political
strategist who took over as Reagan's
campaign manager on . the eve of
the New, Hampshire primary and had-.-
:i "saceessfnl" career as an OSS oper--
ator during World War IT_ But Casey
issaid,?even by his friends, to be
-'somewhat disorganized when it,
comes to details, occasionally forget-.:
_iuland out of touch with modern
intelligence techniques..
adclition;-the CIA!~trath on is';a
,that when the director of the agency
i.s,a civilian, the deputy's spot goes;.
to a military man Outgoing director
Stansfi4d Turner is a Navy admiral.
:and his 4eparting deputy, Frank Car--
}ucci, is civilian.-
_1 he. Reagan -talent hunters stave
been -looking for. someone "orga=
, sized, articulate and current in J
ni_
presentclay'intelligececraft`and technology to
install as Deputy CIA Director under Casey. While
.Inman's nomination-is not, final, several sources
cons der him to be a runaway leader for the post.
"Inman; native of Rhonesboro, Texas, entered'
the-Navy after graduation:. from. the Universityof Texas in 1950.-Although not a graduate ofthe
Naval Academy; he did' graduate from the presti-
giousNational War College here in the 1977 class.
Hebecame- an ensign. in 1952 and.advanced,
"through ail'the officer ranks until his promotion'
to v ice;Admiral in 1976:` In. his 'career, Inman
has servedas assistant naval attache in Stockholm,:
.:Sweden; a:key listening post for events in the
:Soviet Union: He also was assistant chief of staff
for intelligence under the commander of the Pa-`
civic Fleet- from:1973'and 1974:'
- For the following two years, Inman was director
_of the Office of Naval --Intelligence in Washington.
He was vice director of the Defense Intelligence
Agency `fram: i976 to 1977 when he was named.
head of'the NSA: == -r
The National Security Agency. has the task -of
listening'_in'electronically on'all worldcommu- !
nicationsand has the-inajor-role in U.S.efforts'l
to break other nations' codes
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901ROO0100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100130O
ON PAGi L./
THE WASHINGTON POST
21 December 1980
$ , y,:;ie+.v.$?-> ..+ ...:--r .S~,assaz.;~~. xr". .,~'. a ~.."", ~?' , _ . - - may:-- - - ?:.I
''` ~. ,.+.;i
' L y L~\s~J
- Ssuz !a O
l
H
am
.
i+G+
n
.- Y ~`~,DW.~TF-AT. Washington has begun .to grasp the
N shape shape of'the new Reagan Cabinet, it is time to begin'
thinking about'where most of the real power will reside
m the new administration.
--.-No, it will.not'be inan official or unofficial super,.'
cabinet,'Y:a-:notion of some closeaReagan.advisers,who:
would-liketo be super cabineteers.Nor, for that matter,
will it be,with the Cabinet as awho-le
ld
d
er Rona
`If experience-is any, guide, we will have un
Reagan what. we. have long had in Washing' on sub= `~
r i e~~ fnr
me
d
..,
ve s
A Cabil.tet ~
eign and domestic, most. power will rest with the legion of
sels
undersecretarces, assistantsecretarre9 *general coun
o n o
he
`!"_
ana anew Swtt w~.o ..
le are wise to have pre
eo
he Reag
p
an p
t
That is why. pare-d lists- of -prospective .subcabinet members for their
whowill have to choose from among them or
w b
ne
osses, else get- special, permission from the~White House` com-
. - ? - TT _._ .. I.... _.4 r.nnrfrn~-nQ'
possible over the suocawnet~ tb ILV OIL:, .w ti ~??
- success of any administration, regardless of whether ca- . J1
reer bureaucrats, the press or others sometimes portray it--
as a sinister scheme (iii Washington, of course, anything
Richard Nixon once tried to do is ipso facto "sinister"} {
Indeed, manyof the.butgoing_adminlstration s.prob-
lemssternmed from-the weakness of Carter's subcabinet
..which was.generally.chosen by;Cabinet. members,
themselves;-with little,White: House- consultation:-: The
-unpopularity of the CETA jobs program, to cite just one
example,.: is traceable ! directly.- to -the'administrative-;
weakness of Ernest Green, the assistant labor secretary
responsible for it. '~~^~'` "?- ? ~"` _`'~' Y
t The .White' House, and .Galiinet members, . after a
spend,.their time dealing almost exclusively.,witf~-issues'
that are on the. front pages. The subcabinet; meanwhile,
,controls what;most'oters .consider``the government'
They_manage.the federal' departments and their. myriad..
programs, develop- new policies, legislation; and ret ula
tions;..dicker with Capitol. Hill' and. the inescapable con-;.~
-sti.tuency:grous.'All this brings with.it'control-of per-
'haps the most.inipoiUnt resource in government - i
formation ??? .? . n.s :? ie, ?T,4 ? e}~: - , '. '
*Nobody betters understands the _74 74
irnp.rtancpyo ': he' 12urab r two nian.';i
in. Cabinet-level=agencies than:Frank
Carlucci, :the: deputy.1 diret.tor: of -the,I
;;CIA; '.wbo = may -become the ;F~liot
"Richardson of ;the subcabinet
s e.}was Casgar Weinberge'e;~un
cersecretary at HEWN-' in- thei early".
'19?Cs ands a. leading, albeit contro-1
:vernal, candidate to follow his former
boss to Defense as the -deputy secre '
:.tart'-. It is a nIDS t' that John- Marsh, a.1
former Ford aide mentioned'as a pos--
:siblesecretaryof the Army, caUs.`.`the
most important. job in.-the`subcabi-,
net." Traditionally, the defense see'
retary wornes about global strategic.
:policy and t'ae deputy secretary ban-
dies-thenuts-and-bolts-: of ,ru-nm;?
, the Pentagon
Carlucct's career, at the. CIA sug-'j
rgests=-that in-the foreign policyfna-I
wl"security. arena even the. numn l
to actually run:the-agency. Long, ago-,;
ruzi:ngj , arms ' expertwhowasa Reagan Aerate condition as .
campaign adviser and heads his defense : it changes govern-
meat- a condition not often reflected
-transition team; Dr. John Poster, former the last six weeks in the president-elecis
Pentagon :research chief and now a hunt-and-peck Cabinet making
president; J. Fed ~; .
politico-military chief. Outside the list, a
push has been made for Torn Reed, a
former secretary of the Air Force. .. -i
But Weinberger insists on fellow r.eo-- phyte Carlucci, showing as little intarest'1
in a knowledgeable deputy as-Reagan!
did in a knowledgeable: secretary. Nor
did he share: apprehension by defence=,
transition officials that as a senior intel
?liaence official of the Carter administer-d
Lion, Carlucci could not be totally sepa-,f
rated from its demolition of the CIA
dence of Carlucci's complicity but ciia:'
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 STATINTL
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100130001
'OFFICE OF CURRE
p_ ATU
-:1R:... -.-L
t o j'GCN
DISTRIBUTION If ?l i- -':-.tj}?E. TRYING ? _. ~.
F.t:.~I\ k'E 1.S R
NT OPERATIONS
NEWS SERVICE
_.fiir 1r-ilfl;t- ?? ..
. .. L?:.-il .. :mot }: .
S TO
IT ER
Li .r i t:L it- t r r -.. t-t}-._. i :r_? t t -. _E T ~t ? T k - THE :? ? i i~.t 3 E:
rt_ t.}i
t :.. RMRNCE UNDER i nESIOENi L.-i? ERS ARE TRYING TO DISSUADE -ii ?TLD
;ESGRM FROM APPOINTING DEPUTY Ss+.ri DIRECTOR FRANK C. S L::CC i TO T HIE
SECOND-? rc-s:. r'.RHMNG j OS a}emu ~ AT iH DEFENSE -- v-r-~o>-et- ~~S i.i SOURCES ..'t Et-ONDT E DEFENSE EPPRTMEN 3 _t~: SrrURCE_ 511Y.
-:F: iGR~ i. ~UM?NiST=?.TICN?=i
1' Rl..CCI. 501 .~- j 'Hit ALSO SERVED t: THE IN TH:.- i. .'s NI{{=... .i itk-.. _i....s t. _.
t.i i7 it U a. WHO
15 REPORTEDLY THE CHOICE OF DEFENSE FENrr" i?C-?r r "J-OES N_"'~".i?- ~.~ti's-.S7- :t i.i
OF s
Li~. t-
t i
TO n BE HIS DEPUTY,
:
SOME GO? sEnf=RTIVE REPUBLICAN_ HAVE F A}}NCH=:i - rr ? "a'i :: -?i r3= ._:}G_
CA ttPO = TO DENY ARLUC ? I THE _ N L JEN T ?.A 30E:s CHARGING THAT HE
CONTRIBUTED . O :tE :t ^. 4 ~t TO ? }tt7. t E~t>.t'-?i'i-.tS7.tt}tI2:U r OF r- U.S. INTELLIGENCE - :t~i- .-_?Y._-_ -. _i tR -. i--..^..i_.
CAMPAIGN [tom n WIN R ?: ~tATIF7 I:' _A1 THE .N ?i Or t ?:?HE .~.r.-.. ti? : 11 ~.?RER - _~ . . SOURCES rit
__ i.:
THE ;.r attesti . , WHO : It- ..... _.. NOT -'r:tr?;ti TO BE -- 1 .__ _ - J ?
.... J , i . SOURCES; - --?: .- S A I D }?i:rL.._ _ .-~r -] r IS COMING U.. :. t?tr7:isn:.rrt :?i?STi-i:nitt FOR fl a. HIS _,i? r.Lr.t EXPERIENCE!!
a te Z? siFr ^'t.?-BrER:??. ?-- LIMITED E- r.t :cN: c. _ Ma rtfT_ AR--I~iS:LR L} IN LIGHT OF H t r?~ER'.: A_NGR_':3 ?r - 4 iLI IFI._Y
MATTERS.
E:tIt_^ . l i
"R LOT . PEOPLE iJ DOESN'T tt NOTHING SV 5-F ~:t tri.rter:f t S tI'tYL :t tt?t;it?t2?'i _~? -'j^ S:'.T --:.F. .
it .
?t
51110 ONE SO R E S
1X Pt .Ot.. - n:1:ta Ttt7lC 7 SOURCE SAID .. Ei i .. .?.r' ... CE .:rAID I- t:. = i^t t- t rrt g tJ.jr'3 is--.tt-.y ! r - , _ -rt-T ?~j i.r. R 1 t_~t{ i= T
F. . } - 's ior-t'taa DO ENOUGH TO ._TOP THE PROSTITUTION 0-7 THE T:t_ELLiG_rt_t_ UpTT.i i
THAT H ; . -.Y THE r' RRi ER 1Yrr?t RLatt s ' 1 Rte}INT~.`-T1:.~TIOhN CITED . - - BOCK ITS ?= - - - ~?:?
TO BO" RE;A)VEL
OPTIMISTIC A'S?.t -i ?_:MT O #}r?}.-SOVIET iiLLTiteri E7PLti?CE.
i{3e :} }?i PEOPLE FEEL I1E. PRT:?).it..ii'tfyL IN FT GRAND tiE-.i=i } iUi+' tt iT7T '}
UFii3Eil::iT ir?:iiT 1 SOVIET C:}iti?BIL IT IFS AND 1!} i Z,} 1 1 :tiiilLf ?t etLiil_sa_i
HISRSSESSMENTS TO MISLEAD THE CONGRESS
EJT IN,ATE ' ' SAtO ANOTHER SOURCE.
}tits rt-1 - S.?vS O~}URCE C-~)Irr O THAT
a NE~?} ) l
STRE NG T H ~, T 1_Y NOULO
SOVIET
t. rt Tnn? FORCES,,
CONGRESS
IN THE i ..r. s~. "r):-.. .. 3i. ?~ NATION ~.? I NT` t 1It Et:'ff
IN THE
HAD BEEN CORRECTLY
MORE
i}t THE!'. 1 SOURCE t its ~..}Zi~i Lr5~ED THAT r.r,L;S tLr
}:F}ii r -rv-I-. I~1 ~ ? JTiiIL k
ON i TO, BEEF LIP
i >0 C i MRT i OM OF THE (COVERT) OPERATIONS SECTION
THE .. 1 _i i AS DEPUTY
U L
k t
TO i L?ER- DIRECTOR 3 RMS IELis I Ufli,T1) WHO CRITICS CONTEND HAS RELIED
MUCH t) n S. 311 ELECTRONIC INTELLIGENCE GATHERING +::~.sr Si 1 THE 2li- f- -?r:t12.575
Lill! 1night:. servQ~l~r
and 'the articles?tliati,result':generally
attributa_the: information:-,to 1."intelli'
~~ATl~R afl71T(`PP?~ic~1t S6-~awZ'ii ~_'a~byt }'lff'1':.
In the case- of the Saudi report, t.._
agency,. decided-to- brief-Roberta
Ilornig of- The Washington -Star and
Jane Whitmore of-Newsweek.,;
They apparently were told of the re-
port suggesting that 'the Saudi regime
ini.ght.collapse within two years.- As 1
one source quoted the report,, Crown
Prince ,-Fahd,. next,- -in Ilineirtog -the
throne, "would have to go."'The man
to watch was- Prince 1 Abdall ah 'the.
conservative' commander"of ,the
tional guard.
Official' sources, who do-not.wish to
be identified, say the two journalists
were briefed by a CIA analyst. The re-
porters say they, cannot discuss-CIA
briefings
The day after the briefing; Brzezin=
ski lunched-"with Newsweek editors.
He was to leave,. for Saudi Arabia
within- a few : days:"?
What.- happened- then ;remains, ob-
scure. Newsweek printed =a. paragraph
attributed ''to-- an administration - offi-
cial, who said 'that the White House
had -received..:numerous pessimistic
"alert" memos from Langley in recent
weeks.
The', official sarcastically ?' pointed
out that s with. so .':many predictions
"some of,'them are bound to be right'". 'l
and added: that "there are few` crises"
lately they:; haven't predicted one way
or another.'
Early on, t ,day after Brzezinski's
lunch with Newsweek editors,-the CIA
launched Its efforts to kill the story of
-its Sauffwarninsr. -71'
'? Both the Star and Newsweek report-
'ers were beseeched by the agency not
to-write the story. They-were 'threat-
ened>that:if they .did, they would not
get?any more briefings.,' References
.were made to-the "national interest"
'According , to intelligence 'sources,.
the CIA claimed to have suddenly re-
not :that L':it-was not supposed -to
brief`reporters '' on "countries' which
are. actively:. involved in U.S foreign
policy" L _ R
Did someone inBrzezinski's: office
point; out that his trip would not ex-
" .
A, 11
actly be helped by such stories'
No one is saying.,And the CIA's ef-
forts tosuppress -the story almost
worked-the Star did not run it.
And not until after Brzezinski's re-
turn did Newsweek print two guarded
lines on-.the subject;,in a- five-page-
analysis of - Saudi Arabia's. uncertain,
prospects;
"One secret U.S. report,:" the maga-
zine said, "warned recently that the
regime's survival could not be assured'
beyond the next two years-" ,
There was no reference to the CIA's
apparent flood of gloomy `.'alert" me
mos in the wake of-the Iran debacle.
But this glancing reference to Saudi
Arabia was .enough to -make senior
CIA people fear anew': about Saudi
blood pressure. =
After Khalid's illness in February,
reports quoting French intelligence
sources said the royal family could be
overthrown within the next. few years.-
On May 3, the Saudi minister of -in-
dustryand electricity, Dr._Ghazi Ago-
saibi, encapsulated Saudi complaints
'about the U.S. media when he told the
National 'Association of'Arab-Ameri-.
cans _that therfate- of the regime did
not depend' on "the -,pronouncements
of,' third-rate bureaucrats ,reading
fourth-rateiintelligence reports-from,
fifth-rate spies
Carlucci -apoligized. "He conveyed:
to us," said one, source, `'that it had
been an unfortunate-briefing, and `the
briefer had since been moved
The hapless Langley, analyst" is 'not
alone in, his thinking. Many Middle'
East experts expect traumatic changes
in Saudi Arabia within. five years."
One formerU.S._ diplomatwho :re
'turned from. Saudi `Arabia this- spring:
said that corruption,---internal - unrest
and strains.within the; ruling family
combine to make; the regime-,highly
- -
fragile.
``If_w e're talking aboutguarantees,"-
he said, "then.-- the-survival of the-
Sa-udi regime can't-be absolutely guarat .,
,teed for more than six'months."
2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130
 = I'i 1'! ?. .'J Z i l !.t .'" :.?r :. i.i:=J }: 7t ''_..:! .."1
i r:
1'4 U
1:. k .. :. ...5= :.., r. x'.?_"? 1 ::c ...?=i_,}:=. :.. Y: rt.^.
_. .. .! - . _ :i== a t i : t i t ~_-'~ i ?/, _=r r I. t_. 1 :1. 2n i .a. , _? ?t r,
Approved For Releas
001/07/27: CIA-RDP91-0 OQR00010fl 1-5 Y-- STATINTL
c!~k I c 0~1 (20 :, -D u )-,I - k I n) C---b
i'i ? a f % ! `a P. L. .: tt 1 _ . t-= :_= r, c Ti i .J... 3 _. a . _.
s i ix r r.
i ri'.:: :.} a t; c~i } .` ':. ?? ._ :.a i } ri H.
_:xrY __ _ _~_ i f rY
_ - L..
?x l r.r. r.r? r, r. - -- T::r -- ^ rr.T _
t 1 1. 1 1. 1. 1.
i7-1.7.
e r? .r i ?
13: ^. ri:i -i? }r:~. _.. .-r ...:?. C.i1 C: rY:....:I __- L.i i.:-; .'t `_.-.3_ :"1e a ,.:._. .._=T.Y. ....
--.a-. t: ?trtr -r r. i _?. t-r -? ?-??ir- -- -~r.:tr - r.-??-?a-_- _ _ _..._ _
- v :e -r r-: v rr?:: ~? r :: r _ -r-
.'?. I Y': c.yL '--.si t.,._ .. '- r-.
7 ?Y r . 1 ,' r.ri r*-??. P rs n ^ ~.t r.~s-f-. t: --
c : ? i k_= v ; 3 U. r r c. .T=. r"i': ' '".... _i = ` i =. 7? ! .. Yt. n
: f ~'_~. T ~ -'s `~ r. r.: 1-? r. "?t t- ~? ~' r ^' " _:r. t r.t4:~ r.Y.- ~ - tt y r Y - r. ;-.
:_nr?r i{Z.> Inc. P. =i_c ttr irx= ?0 5 =Ir',i ?--- . U! -I ::?_- _.. ;
r,'I'.7_a v r: - ,v r??7? r' t: s:a- 7???- -r. -r. r. - - - -"-r -r rr.rr ...?
x r:.. Y. ~_ ~.. _ ._ .r }=. , _ r. _i "?-_ :a . s - C r vr% 3 _ U1. .. L
- _. _.. ... a
_, ?a Iii l i .[' s ~ n i 77~ x=- _. i -^ 1
???? r, r. ?x r .: t-r t^r ?? r.T :! ^ t: r ^-? -r, r.?:"~ r - r. l:-:' 7- -:T r.:: _^ .. T r
:._ .731:_..!i? ..:?r =. i c._ a Mist: i i211S?.C'. } r: ... _ -!:?ri } _ r}_- i s i =
La r. r, r. r r_:t r f:: r?t?r. :c".t r=
_ir i'i1 r:r1r
i ` :'t r- ='t-:: ~'r. r, s.r i -crr r.-.-?.,??;.s r. r. v a.:- r _ st v -sL - -L;. ?? r- _ ~'- ~5
} rk E. I i E VI ?i !.= h, 7?; } 1 }"i .... L= r i G r{ r r. 1 's } } ti i ri n r ? r rk L Y i N t2 r r.. n _ E . .. ! 5
?'- r. r.:? r-7? -} + ;L i i T r.l r. :: :L-?f a", r. Y. tt r.t:'7 MS ~I ^ t t: r?:^. _ r?r ;t r-r. : f- r.:.::r r; rr.-r.
a~. ri s 7? s rI } sJ i"i 3 r-. 1 L; 7I Vi :._ r9 7. r 'a i .....: _ ?". :.= r :.t .:.?.._ r- T=. _ ,.. a'-i w P...._ _ .._ ~a :"i :? _^?. __ :` ..
_r_..- r? , ii
ih, ta;i}a
xi i r? r,1! rr. t^r. r.:1 ??t,Y r.r? - r.r, ? i'.'5 ?^? ? ^ i ? -L: r, r. r. Y-r. t_ ?ri r'r,-. r. r r.t t1: ~PYZ
L_ L . I7 Y% ; Li r ?.= i'I 7 r, t- Y , = i L , = ti } V t..x } H i'?i - : Z. }?i n r r r - , i . ' _ :! 1 1: } i ; F :? S _ i ' s .= t'i ...? l..
T 11T r.Y
A ?i ! nn }t'.r..ii ?i t_1}? tt. ?r t i Y :}?il: ?
r?s-r-?.r+r.5.:r- e i r.r-r r. 7.--r-, r.:: ??? -L_'.o os _?vz -
:? ^t r ii .?:, } f ^ i U!% ; CIit rI i'4 1 r7 t;
r,r.T t: y t: r r. v i s tier r. ?-r r."ttr,r r. r:t 'r-? 1^L: - r r.:-r-:: r.r? t: ' r. TY ?: -?.1.7.51 ^ :L-'r.Y.'Y r -
0i r r.iyk 3.1 t3 Ltl:ii L^ r "H } s.=Y'?.:.:-s Lr} : ^!.Y:.ca`i. ?_'sit.ti~l: L?."_.3'::~.: 9 1'ii". i i _n -rtir ::~}i!`. 1
r, t : r r. I:
_ 7 :: r. ?:- i to I. r. Y.r :: '?._?. r. t. -. r.r r.'. 8. r. 75. r. :: t: t r-r_L ? ? r r - 1'1r r.
i Ya, rY r. r,r T ? ]r
'l; -r . ?
{nLfie}} aiT:r}T;1J!si~:ii}`}iTiL:=a1 T}eii.' z-: Vi T. .:a TI I? i_~?:..! ? a i i 1 7-.
i xir? sir.::r- ??r?
V
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R00010013
o"d 1 AGE
CHFISTIA1~ CT'~''dC % , ,I 1'
T'
Tul-:r 1980
CIA plains to CBS
on covert-action report
New York
Frank C. Carlucci, deputy director of
US central intelligence, has formally
objected to a recent CBS Report titled
"Return of the CIA" which accused
the CIA of reviving the use of covert
actions.
In a letter addressed to the new
CI,S president, Thomas H..Wyman
(with a copy sent to The Christian Sci-,
ence Monitor), Mr. Carlucci accused,;,-
the documentary of "selectively com
bining 25-year-old facts and footage
withcurrent interviews and innuendo
to convince the audience that co-
vertaction is virtually our only activity.:;
"
[CBSf Correspondent [Ed] Bradley
says the return of covert action and
the return of the CIA are synonymous.
This,
s a distortion which
underestimates the intelligence of
your audience and does a disservice
to our many dedicated people who
wofk?in the collection and analysis
Monitor TV critic Arthur Unger
Points out, however, that Mr_ Carlucci
does not deny that the CIA is involved .
in covertactions.
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000
C d-y
ON F E E. CE
INTELLIGENCE
LEGISLATION
Standing Committee on Law
and
National Security
American Bar Association
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
June 26-28, 1980
 .ARTICtAJp#8
OK P n
elease 2001/0 !7 FA-I
5 JUNE 19
C.I.A. Seeks Jail Tarr,
For Dssolosure o.FAgents
WASHINGTON,' June 24 (Reuters)
] he. Central Intelligence Agency today
asked Congress to pass a law providing
`criminal punishment for unauthorized
`disclosure of the identities of its agents.
Hundreds of agents have been compro-
mised by the publication of their names
in books and magazines, the agency's
deputy director, Frank C. Carlucci, said.
"it: is imperative that the Congress
clearly and firmly declare that the unau-
thorized disclosure of the identities of our
intelligence officers; and those -allied in
our efforts will no longer be tolerated,"
he said.
Mr. Carlucci told the Senate Intelli-
gence Committee that the disclosure of
identities. of undercover agents and the i
C.I.A.'s foreign sources of information
had had a harmful effect on the United
States intelligence program.
"Our relations with foreign sources of
intelligence have been impaired," he
said. "Sources have evinced increased
concern for their own safety. Some active
sources,. and individuals contemplating
cooperation with the United States, have
terminated or reduced their contact with
us."
Mr Carlucci, who advocated prison
terms and fines for offenders, was speak-
ing at the first of a series of public hear
ings by the committee..
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
i1R T i CLE t1F'x ;.'u J
o 1r7-
THE WASHINGTON POST
25 June 1980
Sen.";Tohr1. Chafee (R?Il I) told Stockwell hie stat
a
11ent3, %-,-t-llt rather. to gain an important weapon
TA- 40-K.
ma
:`.He said thogencv'i aim t4 as 1ri .a,
'
lished without the Freedom of Information
'Act which, as Macy and Kaplan say, "is
responsible for much of what we now know;
tional security apparatus."
Also in Documents is a draft of the.
anonymous (actually, FBI) letter-to:
Martini Luther King, Jr., in 1964 urging
that he commit suicide to forfend the
release of tapes made from bugs planted
by the FBI.in his hotel rooms: "There is
but one way out-for:you..You better take
it before your filthy, abnormal fraudulent
self is bared to the .nation."
CIA Directox"Stansfield Turner:
Only the Shadow knows.
That's an. FBI document,. but the CIA
also spied on King. Not only overseas, but
here. As George Lardner, Jr., has pointed
out in the Washington Post, not a trace of
the CIA's surveillance of :King appeared
"in - the' extensive. congressional or ex-
ecutive branch investigations of the agen-
cy conducted in recent years.".BuL-when
Harold Weisberg, a writer from Frederick;
Maryland, filed a Freedom of Information.
Act lawsuit to get the CIA documents on
King, they finally made their way--much.
to -the. discomfiture of the :Agency into
the light. . .
.There is a long list of , crucially mstruc .
tive books that could not have been writ-'
ten without the FOIA. One is William l
Shaweross's Sideshow. Another is John.I
Marks's The Search for the `.Nfanchurian
Candidate'--.The; CIAand'll-find Control,
just reissued in a McGraw-Hill paperback.
In:1975, .Marks noticed two sentences: in
the Rockefeller Commission report on the
CIA. They had to do with a "CIA program
to study' possible means -for controlling
human behavior" and said that some of
the studies had "explored the effects of~II
radiation, electric-shock, psychology, pay-
chiatry, sociology, and harassment sub t
stances."
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100130001-5
 STATINTL
A r1q c Fgr ,,,d a 2001/07/2TH WARW `fi 09Ot1RJ 00100130001-5
e,-, PAG. _2'_ 15 March 1980
By George Lardnet .Tr
washiztxtor, Fost 5ta;E Writer
f lie:strange case of Phillp Agee has
beeome,one of the:,;Central,:;intelli-:.
gerlae'l A ency's prime exhibits in' its
canipanr against the 1 reedoin of, Ip .
formation-'Act-
A.farrn r, CI'r ;officer:"who resigned
fr om'th a; ency tn'' 1968, Agee, 45, -
nows.on,_ of its .most outspoken ene,
mies:;Siice he resigned. he has made-
a careerrof exposing the names. of CIA
persorirrjel and-attacking the agency's;
mettrpdef:He:also.is entitlec1 like-any
one ;Q1Se ?ta ask for CIA documents
t nclet the Freedom of Information.-,
Act~':
,1t #s. ,frankly' disgraceful that - we-
ar e'regttired to assist him: in his en-o
deavprs."CIA Deputy Director Frank'
Carlucci` told a House subcommittee:.
r eceYgtly`?in> pleading for a change in
thaaeg~slation
r Uodlfication of the Freedom bf In ,'
fornialit rr Act makes sense;" Sens. Mal-
coin`'" wallop (R-Wyo.):;asserted in; co-,',
spliiring a CIA bill that would;- put-,
ino pf`the agencq's operat.ional'and'
teGliriical,records?beyond the- reach of
"Congress,"' Wallop. declared,
"Never intended that the American
taxpayers should pay to provide..
Philip Agee with' four 'full-time re
search assistants within the.-CIA
that.;is'.exactly.what happened under
the law in 1978"
The aImplication is thasuch
quests no 'longer would be permitted-
if- Congress-would 'give the Girl; the
extraordinary. exemption it'is;seeking.
.But the, bill would do nothing'of: the
sort: Instead;' it would block freedom:
. of.infoihation: requests from newspa='
,..,pees;" historians; civil libertarians
-and .just'about everyone. and anyone-:
except individuals such as 'Philip
Agee. ? w , r;
i s 'Under tht' Cl'A.`proposal,'thp agen=
cy's. operational and technical files.
,would .be immune from disclosure,'e'
cept to Americans seeking records
.about themselves. TheCIAstillwould
have to 'entertain those requests ;And
that'is all that Agee, an American.citta:;
zen, has asked fox, 'records about him
self
Approved
tle`useta the , recipient."' : ?;.~
"We do not seek a total .exemption.",
Carlucci said in his House testimony
Be said the CIA bad constructed "our
amendment in such a manner as to
keep. all ,of 'our, files accessible to
:American citizens and permanent resi-:
dent aiiens'requesting information on
themselves,;-.subject to existing FOIA,
exemptions.;'=+
So far, Agee has gotten very little.
On Nov. 9, 1977, he 'asked the= CIA,
ninon other agencies,for copies of
+? "all files and' records ..that per-
tained to, referred toorhr;any way re
.lated to himself." -Last:.November,'
more; than two years ?Iater,'She filed
suit1 n :-Federal court here. under the
Freeclan.:of''Information :;'Act; " saYing
that he had-yet to get a. single piece of
paper. from.the CIA beyond a letter
acknowledging receipt of his request.
Now, according t to, court records;
Agee :wants of-drop the lawsuit.' From
its.'rlietoiic Oh..the issue, it.' appears
year; letter-'to; the Office of
has found it useful inmore ways than
ManQement and.' Budget. ;that the in-. onA.
that the CIA would be only too happy
to accommodate. him But the. govern-
ment is expected to try to keep the
case alive in. order. to press, . a.,counter-
claim it filed against Agee last in nth
for his anti-CIA,y~ritings , _ .,..
? CIA officials refused to discuss
Agee's suit, but according to?the agen-'1
cy's_annual report to Congress lastl
year, the CIA had. 'already expended
four man-years"-the. equivalent of-':.
four men working a year-on. Agree's recyuest'and might spend as_much as
"nine man years of labor" boy the time
it wag finished
-'..'Thus,"' `C1A Deputy Director for
Administration Dori" I.Wortman re-
ported on April 2, 1979,:"The reques-
ter is not only succeeding: in
tying-up the-time, of ?agency'-expertS,
but,.:in addition, can. be expected to
use ..whatever information is ulti
' mately released in his`-.efforts `t'a 'dis`
.credit the agency and destroy its oper:'
ations "
The sugaestion.tiatthe`freedom. o
information law: enables Agee to' pi Y _
damaging?secret.s from the' IA ivilly-r.
nilly' is not" supported' by _. tile record:':'
The : law already . allowsr the, CIA. tod,
,withhold .documents that`'would dis =
Eclo'se sources-and' methods or, endanr
der national security ,And: CIA `?Dep-
? .uty..Director Carlucci. a sserted'.'last.
reT '' 001
For Release 2001/07/' t elafo94o' tetthag no o
o
hw s 'mo
In addition,' Agee, who-currently,
lives in West Germany is the subject.
of "an intensive counterinteIlizence
investigation," court records show. The l
Freedom of Information Act permits
withholding investigatory records on
-
var ious .grounds.
Accoring to one of Agee's lawyers,
Melvin Wulf of New York, the CIA
has given them nothing beyond a two-
inch-thick personnel: ' file that was
turned over two weeks ago. _
""They told us at a status conference
[on the: lawsuit] that that .. . . was'
about 10 percent of what they had-
which means they might be coming up
with about 20 inches of documents,"
Wulf recalls.: "That doesn't sound
like nine man-years to me.... They've
been working the Agee angle In order
to_destroy" the Freedom of Informa-
tion'Act .. ..
Justice. .Department lawyers who
are defending .'.the CIA and other
agencies--in the 'Agee case filed a
counterclaim against him Feb. 5 in an
effort to confiscate the profits of two
controversial, books he helped ' write
that exposed the names of -CIA agents
'-in Western Europe and Africa.
~ k_ it
Encouraged by a Supreme Court de-
cision expanding the CIA's censorship
powers, government attorneys also
are seeking an injunction' that would
-require'Agee to submit all his future.,
writings to the CIA,for review
The' government says it needs the
-freedom of information suit as a ?vehi
-cie to make its case.,
"Plaintiff [AgeeT'has resided aboad`
since the Iate 1960s and he has not :
been subject to the jurisdiction of any'
United States court," the Justice. Dr-
partment said. in a memo filed . with.
:'U.S. District Court Judge Gerhard` A:;:,
Gesell. "Now,: through .' his, own 'ac
tions, this court has jurisdiction over
.the: plaintiff.. Thus, for-tile first. time
in nearly 11 year's,. the United States
may assert claim., against Philip. Agee.
The Lrner~catt Civil'Liberties IJIiion.
has joined in- the- liti;ation,"arAuina4
that-Agee has the right to drop'his,
own lawsuit. A hearing has been set
for March 27.
The outcome is`uneertain, but it is:.
-clear that the government is more in-:
tterested in keeping Agee's widely." de-.'
plored . Freedom.. of; Information.. Act 7
 ARTICLE .A,YPXARZD
01 Xlip. ove,~!-. .Belease 2001/07/27 : CIA-R~ ~~
b ~a 4
estifying February 20 before the House Subcorn-
mittee.on - Information and Individual Rights,
Deputy-.. Director of Central Intelligence, Frank
Carlucci repeated the Agency's oft-stated plea to
be largely exempted from the Freedom of Information Act
(F.O.I.A.). Admitting, as he has in the past, that sufficient
"national security exemptions do exist" in the F.O.I.A. to
protect vital secrets, and that the act itself had not caused
leaks. Carlucci nonetheless argued. that would-be spies,. in
formers and accomplices `have an entirely different perceptt
tinThey: refuse to sell us information be cause the-act hasW
assumed "a larger-than-life role as a symbol". of the Agen-
cy's inability-to keep secrets. Although Carlucci insisted that'
this perception was not correct, he nevertheless` wanted the
' >A gency freed from the act's disclosure. provisions because,
as he explained,`"It is "unimportant whether they areright or-,.
not--.' in our` business perception is reality:"
'Setting aside our questions about the value, ethics and
corruptive quality of -the C.I.A.'s intelligence-by-bribery`
policies;= we- find Car'lu'cci's argument intriguing. By= ?the,`':
same logic how.long will it be before some creative prose_:
cutor takes up the-'cry .to repeal the Fourth Amendment on'?
the ground that, tliougli itmay-not actually cause criminals to'go free, some policemen and crooks think'it-does? A.nd if
_
a marginally more efficient C:I.A: justifies removing it from :
public accountability; ;then why would not marginally -safer
streets justify removing such inefficient prohibitions as",
,.those against unreasonable searches-and -seizures? = a.
Carlucci also testified that the F.O.I.A. was no =longer
needed as an oversight device because Congress now has its
own oversight committees, and he affirmed that those com.-
mittees were being supplied with "whatever information
they need" to prevent abuses. The very next day, however,
C.I.A. Director Stansfield Turner informed a Senate intelli-
gence committee that sensitive information had-been and
would continue to be withheld from the committees, despite
his assurances to the contrary in his confirmation hearings.
The Senate,- to its credit, does seem to be concerned about
this deception, but Turner's revelation should .serve as a
timely reminder 'that in -the past Congress has done- more
overlooking than overseeing. The Freedom, of Information
Act provides an independent check; no wonder -the..intelli=
..gene agencies and their friends want. to get rid -of 'it.
? Carlucci's testimony was also revealing. in other-respects.
Liven his confession- that the C.I.A:.depends on sources -
Who are unable to'~recognize the difference between symbol
and reality ? and. the-Agency's' inability, to explain the dif-
ference.to them;=it:is not surprising that.the?quality-of the iri-
telligence it provides has been so disappointing.-How can aan-
agency that. cannot abide the public accountability our:sys='
tem requires and that cannot explain , thatsystein'.to=its own'
accomplices represent our interests abroad?.
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA=RDP91-009011 000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
ANTIC-LE .APP ''D
ON PAG'"s
U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT
10 March 1980
Intelligence officials say Carter, in an
effort to. boost CIA morale, is likely
to stick within the agency for a suc-
cessor to Adm. Stansfield Turner if.
the present director leaves.. Reported
on the inside track: Frank Carlucci,
the current No.2 man.
Asian intelligence sources report that
sizable quantities of Soviet-supplied
chemical-warfare material, including
poison gas, have been put in place
along Vietnam's tense border with
China for use in case of another war.
Refugees from Laos, in fact, say the
Vietnamese already have used poison
gas against tribal insurgents there.
The White House is getting this
word from top CIA officials about
leaks of agency secrets: Look to the
State Department, not just the CIA it/ i
self or Congress, for the source.
STATINTL
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 IA?TICI APT"I,AiZED STATINTL
P'- ti ;1-JApp Fed For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100130001-5
THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE
9 March 1980
By Jarnes Coates
and John Maclean
Chic' ' Tribune Pros Service
11', '1IItiGT l^I -the United States' in-!
'teliigence community has seized on a
i chanced pational?" mood to press from
the removal of restrictions on their
agenci.es. I
Moving on several fronts. under leadd
ers of the Central. Intelligence Agency,
administration officials are seeking to
ease demands on discloou a of agency(
files under the. Freedom of Information
Act and to decrease requirements of
informing Congress of covert schemes in
advance. The restrictions were imposed
in the 1970s after agency abuses of civil
rights were brought to light.
Perhaps most importantly, the agen-
cies have won-support for the idea that
new charters should be.written for the
Federal,Bureau of Investigation and the]
CIA in a fashion to increase their pow-
ers in-some areas while restricting their,
methods in others. .
The' moves, are in 'sharp contrast tol
the past when, for example, then-CIA
Director William Colby sat meekly at a
hearing table while former Rep. Bella
Abzug [D., N,Y.1 ridiculed him for hav-
ing her mail opened. . -
INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS, obvi
ously pleased, contrast Colby's humilia-
tion to the forceful some have said
arrpgant - presentations recently made
by-.CIA Director Stansfield Turner on
Capitol. Ilill,
At a.'sesslpn of the Senate Intelligence
Committee; Turner stunned Sen.? Steven-
son [D., 111.1 by- disclosing that he has
broken, a promise to advise the thtelli
gence panel.. in advance of all covert
CIA activities.
Turner insisted that when he 'said un
der oath in 1977 that he,would have 'no
difficulty";'in reporting all covert plans
to Stevenson, he only meant he would
"try"' to pass on data. Besides, Turner
told Stevenson's Senate Select Commit-
tee on Intelligence, there is no law fore-
ing-himto inform that committee:. '
Later,, Turner aides. disclosed one sto-
ry that the' CIA had. withheld from the
Senate - the agency's knowledge that
the Canadian diplomatic mission to Teh-
ran was hiding six American embassy
\ workers.. r . . ,. i.. ,.4 . ,.
WITHIN Till-.' so-called intelligence
community, recent events in Iran and
Afghanistan are credited with winning
support, rather than condemnation, for
the various spy agencies after nearly a
decade of concern over civil liberties,
domestic spying against U.S. citizens,
and even efforts to kill U.S. dissenters.
A newsletter circulated among the ia-1
telligence and defense communities re-
cently summed up -the new climate by-
saying: "Out of the gathering clouds of 1
the Iranian and Afghanistan crises there
may. be a silver lining.
Because of the lack of good in-
formation about Iran [before the Shah's
downfall and since] there is growing
sentiment on Capitol Hill to revamp the
laws' governing the intelligence agencies
in such a way as to restore a clalulestine
capability."
The letter was endorsed by several
hardliners, including Adm. William
Moorer, former chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff.
Many hardliners argue that clandestine
operations are limited severely by the
1974 Hughes-Ryan' Amendment to the
Foreign Assistance Act, which requires
the House and Senate Foreign Affairs
committees be informed of ' plans for
covert operations.
SPEAKING-ABOUT Hughes-Ryan and
the Freedom of Information Act) at a,
recent Ilou ye hearing,. Frank. Carlucci,
deputy CIA_director, said that numerous
foreign intelligence networks have re-
fused:flatly to work with the,CIA or.
other U.S. intelligence , operations be-
cause they fear leaks on Capitol, Nil.
Just as Turner had .surprised the Sen- I
ate, committee with his strong position,
Carlucci startled the House Government
Operations Committee when he argued "
that he personally believes the CIA can
guarantee that no information will leak.
But foreign spies -just don't believe that,
Carlucci argued.
"Foreigen agents - some vary. impor-
t ont-hav either refused t o ' accept. or
have terminated a relationship on- the
grounds that, in ? t~ ?.ir minds---and it is
unimportant whet; ,.: they are right or
not-but in their minds the CIA is no
longer able, to absolutely guarantee that
the information which they provide the .
U.S government is sacrosanct '
.. v.,, ..... ,Y . ..~.. ._.. .. .L.r ova w. ..
Following Carlucci and Turner, FBI
Director William Webster and Bob In-
man, director of the super-secret Na-
tional Security Agency, along with rep-
resentatives of the Defense Intelligence
Agent' made congressional appearances
to argue that their agencies need some
of the same relief from past reforms.. .
At the White- House, an official told
reporters that President Carter endorses
"relief across the board"' for intehi..
Bence officers who 'have complained
about the Freedom of Information Act.
That prompted Sen. Daniel P. .Moyni-
han [D., N.Y.] to? wonder aloud. about
the changes in national mood. '
Moynihan said that in the fall of 1978
Vice 'President Mondale, who- led the
-drive for CIA refort s as a senator; clis-
played a change of-heart at a rneeting{
with lawyers for the CIA, National' Secu-
rity Agency, defense intelligence, and
the FBI. .,STATINTL
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 CIA-RDP91-00901 R0001 00130001-5
 Now
it-
L -D
ON. P u p r 0d~For Release 2001/07/27 CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
THE LOS ANGELES TIMES
9 March 1980
it;alLrriattr Qt1 1A40 a'Z:YFC d 0fWt. Q9Q 41f~ON0l>p'i+~Q 1t$e.veteran Armed Forces Movement
ent,:which; favored,' nonalignment arid' development of : members I interviewed, he was afraid to let his name be pub
""`' ?~ ~ ?? ~`? dished '.That would mean an end?t 'hi s 'care
er;_ar even jait.
man aged:to-continue in the militaryrunder the new. regime
_
,f:tugal's conservative North, SA Carneiro has proposed ac- have-beer' moved from command posis to desk-jobs or have
s:r celerating ttie r'eturnto private hands of land in?the Alentelo been passed over for promotion..'.;- ~::
 STATINTL
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
ARTICLE A_?Jel.:.:.lu';D
ON PAG32} r-_L
By.-Ronald Kessler
SVeiahtngton Post Statt Writar
A '$1,200 bottle of wine given to
Henry Kissinger, a $1,600. diamond
and mother-of-pearl watch given to
C ctor_ tans ie Turner and
a $1,700 gold dagger given 0 Secre
tary of State . Cyrus Vance are,
among the gifts from foreign coun-
tries sitting in government vaults.
because the General Services Ad-
ministration so far has failed to.sell-.
them as required by law,
The federal governntent has' 9184
such gifts; valued conservatively at
more than $100,000. The gifts date
back i to. 1966, when government
officials were first required to. turn,. over presents they had received..,
.from foreign officials" or govern-:
meats.
The law. allowed officials to ac-
cept gifts - if they are donated to
museums or turned over to the gov-
ernment to.be sold. If a gift does not
go to a museum, GSA, the federal
housekeeping.agency, is supposed to
handle its.sale, once the secretary
of state has- determined that...,-it ..
would not harm relations with other
countries.
Since 1966, only- seven gifts have
(,been sold--for' about $25,000. An-
other 1,400, valued at about $452,000,.
have'been transferred to museums,
according to GSA. records. The gifts
now in storage have been turned
down by-.museums. '
Gifts to presidents are'covered by
the same .-regulations. But some ?'
presidents have been able to keep j
their gifts by displaying- them in
THE WASHINGTON POST
7 March 1980
their libraries, considered to be GSA
storage areas.
Most of the unsold gifts of watches,
exotic furniture. eleohant tusks. neck-
laces, carpets and inlaid boxes are
kept in a living-room-sized. GSA vault
on the first floor of the Forrestal
Building on independence Avenue
price, with potential buyers or take
compe'.iti''e bids. The government of
finials who received ,he gifts on??
nally are allowed to buy them back ak
any time, he sa?.d.
Ducla said the GSA's estimates ef?
the value of items are generally made.
without obtaining formal a.ppraisals._
He said ri
le real values rnav he moeh<
SW. Four persons know the combina-
tion, and the vault is prot~cte~t by hjclter because of recent dramatic in-
creases in the prices of .-old and other-,
alarm devices that detect movement precious materials.
inside.
"
went at uublic auction, advertised in
the newspapers. in 1974, according to
when we sell them,
he said.
Among-the=.rifts turned in by gbv-~4
Stan M.. Duda who is in char,---:- of the j errment officials are ;c
INTENDS TO GET HELP FROM i a~. :?? i PORTUGUESE EMIGRES IN THE iE . UNITED ~ }3=Y...,,.
ND VENEZUELA TO FINANCE HIS ELECTION CRMPAIGN% AS NOTED BY
i' ?^-1-.
THE WEST GERMAN DIE N iEE1i 'THE ii'.:N't i? iii"iER U.S. i..i AMBASSADOR i i ?wit. i.'T..Sii.:?:..
l
-y'si~]ez ~ ;? ~ ESTABLISHED CONTACT .3 i.ii?}
..
FRANK CARI.i,iCi HAS
- r
LLw?
USSR:
i. A t i.?CL~.?? c i LS WRITERS IN i^.i{ r' 3?.i ii it 1
il?l~.i??i ; - -?- _ ^ _ Off,
I%?1-r... 4 i'i
}} 3
g:::isi jii'i'?'
i'RRER?': ?y'.i ? Oit CIA DEPUTY DIRECTOR CARL ^i r. i
s
MOSCOW TOSS
?. N ? NG .. i- H ?? 4 2 4 GMT 30 ' i i,
(TEXT) NOVEMBER ~ :'iii i ~ti,.. i..;H :^ ? i[ii?r;i _::" WEEKLY WRITE":.`
MOSCOW; '~13 .Ei ~i [ ? c i., i'[ `.:. . ! ?
ieNEDEi is HAS N ARTICLE Br V A.i.~r MI i::'-iit1.Rliii4 CONTAINING SOME
iii ii y.i a is' HAS AN
xiW -I?r!? -r:.?t;: ii~'i?ii^i . - FRANK i~ ?'~iiJi ii?~i??..i U _ iFYq._i CAREER; IN i'?it ABOUT
?ii lieici?l1'I^ON :: iAL~iiT.i.:.iLRRi
U T C ..... i . .. ., L . TM TUC ?..i i [ _ 2^'?. ... L ML L ..:_ i..': [?: "? D TM 14 i . - . ....? . .?i t_ D- U C
WAS EXPOSED B i L i i . H La THE LOCAL PRESS ` ? S A ~: CIA AGENT:
II.. t l::L =.:T %:i .13.. Li'iFYdiq i.'t'. _? _ i., t u 1. :2'i'i 'rU..? I WHO ti" i. i.,i::..i N 4.'? :.... i i .
`i it .~i i t i i.:.:: ?.
._?:w : :L CLANDESTINE i?5i! ~. ..,
PRESIDENT [ ?? sS.i PORTUGAL; B E .: i [ '.i .. HIS .. s i:? i i i :^i ? 'i
.POST
Approved For Release 2001/07/27: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100130001-5
_ i --a i `1 sT~, 3
_ii ,-.l.'' P. ji- i.i::2.:,-ii. w._ .._^~~!? ~? (!?:
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 `Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100130001-5
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-,
THE CORNELL DAILY SUN
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
-in the woods of Langley, Va.
s~ cnn~sa.....
Washington, D.C. - Flanked by an American
flag and a banner bearing the C.I.A. emblem,. the
agency's Deputy Director Frank C.. Carlucci
urged a gathering of Cornell and. Princeton
alumni last week to have more faith in. the
intelligence community.
"Only our failures come to light;." although
"there have been a number of. .substantial...
successes," Carlucci told 480 members- of the
Cornell and Princeton Clubs of Washington, D.C .:
The intelligence chief said he.wasnotat libertv.-
to? discuss the successes, because he would have
to betray his C.I.A..,sources,`thus preventin
future successes.
He was reluctant to say anything about the
current crisis in Iran,_a situation the C.I.A. has
drawn a lot of heat for.`
"'Intelligence. failure is too categorical, a
term" to describe-,past U.S:actions._there,, he
said.
"As a result of the Iranian`espetrience, `we've`
taken a fresh look at social movements in the
Third World as opposed to narrow reporting of ;
political movements.'' .,t
INTELLIGENCE HEADQUARTERS: The Central intelligence Agency headquarters lies obscured
By MARCIE PENN
F
The. Prineetori alumnus had
taken a break from the Iranian
crisis to address Cornell and
Princeton alumni on 'The State of
-'American Intelligence' Today."
During his talk he focused on the
nature of and need. for covert
action in any successful intelli-
gence program.
Carlucci explained how the
C.I.A. is dependent on accurate
information. complimented by
"superior analysis."
"People think of us as a spy
factory. It's more like a university."
The C.I.A. does "pure analytical
`work" using information which
originates. largely from open
sources and, in part, from. secret
ones, he explained.
Haman Collection
' Carlucci .said technology, while
"impressive," has "distinct Iirni-
tations" in information collection..
"Human collection will continue
to be fundamental," he This aspect - of . intelligence
gathering is especially problematic
for the CI.A., he said, in part
because of the "unique"'eircum
stances involved in the clandestine
relationship at the "heart of intelli-
;.' genre collection."*
Because the CI.A must seek.
out individuals who would other
wise not be in contact with the
agency, its sources are often moti-
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 Cmf,~~afer~iabJj1a-~0.(l
~reason- t ==v....~-?x
19 November 1979
Pay frequently takes the form of
an insurance policy to protect the
person or. his family in case he
must leave his country, said
,.Carlucci..
Although a C.I.A. contact
4` frequently... will violate laws of
his [own] country," Carlucci said,
"6n no occasion" does he violate
United States law.
Can't Keep a. Secret
The C.I.A. is faced with the
problem that the United States
government is developing a repu-
tation as "a government that can't
keep a secret," Carlucci said.
A contact who believes his.
. information-will reach the press
and be traced back to him is not
likely to offer that information, he
explained- ,
Yet, "we live in a climate where
we glorify the whistle-blower, the
investigative reporter.... N ational
security.. [hasi become a dl
dited terms' he saidW
In response to a. question on the
role of the media, Carlucci said he
is not in-, favor ? of "abridging
freedom of the press," but would
argue, with. those who give out
information . "for their own,
purposes."
Media representatives are much
less likely today- than they were
years ago to check with the C.I.A.
,on the sensitivity of with. particular`:
piece of information, he said.. -
)01=5 Carlucci described "distribution"
Las a contributing factor in ? the
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
ARTICLE d-.PPLAh D
ON PAGE 2m-
THE WASHINGTON POST
18 November 1979
%~Jr4niral Intelligence Agency-.._. Al-~
though the CIA is.exempt;.from)rnostj
?civil.service rules and procedures-it
has adopted --.and adapted - the'
concept of the Senior Executive Serv-
ric'e. CIA's. version is. called the,SIS,
or Senior Intelligence Service..Li.ke
its. civil service counterpart, the SIS
includes top-paid. career,. employes .in
,the $47,829 to_ 550,112:50 pay range.)
Outstanding SIS? membeis will be:eli?
gible for special ranks which carry.ex-
t'a" pay, and- bonuses worth -up : to 20
percent of salary. -CIA's deputy direc
?tor'Trank -Carlucci, ? a -veteran of ? the
State Department, HEW and Office of
Management and Budget is largely re.
sponsible for setting up.the SIS:. ,.
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
ARTICLE APP:1 .R
ON PAGE
WASHINGTON STAR (GRERi LIFE)
14 NOVEL 1979
..: i.. .+a !.i{34~ as,:'3..ir:V? /~.7Y+,1.'G a 'ui" bxE+; cr..r XF : K.Y J ze.~.-i../7 t.,s.~ 'C' ~' ..z+' J~d'.,i .,.;~~,,~.5:a-t.x. r::,i
h
4~
.
J.
e
Bey e- 1e~
i
Evert w th-Ted .KennKdy announcing-and!"
all those?stories about' Chap paquiddick, and,
sistani and IVirs. Frank.ivioore, were already Murphy, author of the popula-r `tThe Win,
i
sashayingto.relie~e,the,week's tension No:-isorStory._,Fgrmer Ambassador and,Mr,
wonder this is the:dancingest town around Jwillliam Sullivan was there, as was Gen. F
!Black from Honolulu, President John SiLb,
Things got even, more serious at the Ken 'ol' Boston University, and Geri.'Richard Sti'.
Giddens' supper Saturday: night that was well. She was particularly touched that Ge
hilt 'i av"An Evening with ClareLuce_`arid. Iand Mrs: L.auris Norstad came
even.with Ronald: Reagan announcing,j!O put on by'Ernest?Letever, director of.tnG
the sole story consuming.Washingtoiz-at'.Ethics and Public Policy.Center:'He likes.to
th around an'ncknowl--..
r
'..1
""'
t is rhat.: to"d about the' tL 1
v
ce
eve
y soc
n
e
en
a
o
hostages-in irau.~r..
At a dinner, party the other'night, discus
sionsraged in varying degrees._of:polite
.vehemence:al:evecy.table. and,tbeopin.
ions at one.were fascinating
Seated together were House;Foriegn Af .
:fairs Chairman Clement Zablocki who com-
posed the - dbngressional Ietter to'4 the.
Ayatollah Khomeini; Deputy Director'of the
CIA Frank Carlucci w1~ o was carefg~ly limit
king-his comments lest something be read `
into them; Middle,East- expert and former
Undersecretary of State.'Joe.Sisca,who?as
resident of. American University had.some
:'thing: to say about Iranian-students, a beau-
'tious young Iranian- women'?with1bigniew:,
_Brzezinski-staffer, bearded'Bob Hunter,''.
Shirley Metzenbaum who was the best-lis
tener and C arl Rowan, who did the most
`talking:.,:; . -:tzk nsr~
Most rejected the idea that we=shiiuld-
:ave conducted a'tit-for,tat:' operation' here
the'rninute our,mbassy.over.therewas in-,
yadco. The Persian girl,:iwho has family in
Iran,. said.Khom inL.is-an absolute-madinan.
`'who might then'have ordered thii Ameri,
.cans killed:
Sisco said'thea"e-.are'definite?signs on:his
campus that some Iraniaii.studen. is are shift
,edged brain,-?a'cross . section o1-optnions
.from public, officials to press, pose, a,ques-'
< ~tos~s t
4~r Harri
'M At sought,
For Release 2001/07/27: CIA-RDP91-00901 R00010013000,
eo to tt a past, bath
ue = cerssidrte '.caber ' ola
 w6at4d,EpCr ielea,cm~l-201~aVTEI xlQ1A R~B~11 Q99 ~R60M flO
M..,._..,,r 21 June 1979
1-N& e _400
a Ma 'y- un for loo `s Seat
CIA
WILKES-BARRE, Pa. (AP) streamlined the tangled bureauc Georgetown University HospitaL
Republican officials seeking a racy involved in-:the.. past storm ' in Washington. Flood's term in the
I980 :.._
strong candidate to run for Daniel cleanup operation, House ends in
J. Flood's congressional seat are The Times-Leader newspaper, However, because of uncertain.:,'
interested in supporting Frank `J. -said it has learned a representa- ty about the -congressman's -fu- -
Carlucci III. tive of the national Republican ture, GOP officials on the locals
Carlucci is a former Wyoming = congressional committee was. state and national levels are mak-
valley resident who now serves as. `-here last week testing the reaction. ing contingency plans in the event-
deputy director of the Central . to a Carlucci cacdidacy. "a a special election is called.
Intelligence Agency. He became a The representative; G March In' addition.-to his health prob-'
household word. in,. fhe Wilkes Miller II . field'_director for he lems. Flood _is. under indictment
Barre area in.the summer of 197Z NRCC,-said Wednesdaythis.visit to- for bribery, conspiracy and per-'-
while servings as .then-President ; -the -area. showed.. a - positive re- jury fvr. alleged influence ped-
Richard.' . M o,pixcin's personal .. sponse to the idea of t arlucc~run ding
emissary in the aftermath of tropi ninj for Flood's seat Carlucci "is a. veteran foreign
3 .. ,, The 75cal stormAgnes. -year-old Flood is serving service officer who,-prior to jour,.
In that ,capacity. Carlucci hisp 16th term. in: the' use of in the CIA;. served as Ambassa
.:.- .,. ; Re resentatives Heis'a patienta't- dorto-Fortugal
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R00010013000
1~ . = d'E J j'RIC
18 JUNE 19TIME'S
79
C?., .~ Aide Says News Leaks in U. S. Worry Allies
T services" to be more cautious in sharingcress would not be compromised by the
By DAVID BINDER secrets with the United States. r information law,
cial to The New York Times Recent leaks disclosed classified infor- There was also a disturbing Incident,
wWAS:iI:NGT0N, June 17 -- The prob- macion about American relations with Administration officials said, in which a
1_.-n of -eats of sensitive information to South Korea and. Japan, new weapons covert operative of an American intelli..
too press is inherent in the Americanl systems and the identities of covert? Bence service was identified ta~rougcs
r1..ical system, but Frank C. Carlucci, ( operatives of the C.I.A., he said, adding Freedom of Information disclosures. "Ile
the Dep~irf Director of Central intelli-i that some of the revelations had come o. got a knock on the door and his cover was
gerrce, says he believes leaks now are the about inadvertently through accidental! blown," an official said.
Worst ne has seen in 23 years of Govern- releases under the Freedom of Informa-
ment service. 1 tion Act. Mr. Carlucci noted that some foreign
But Mr. Carlucci, a career Foreign intelligence services were so jumpy
In an interview last week, he said a; Service officer who was appointed to his about the American disclosure practices
spate of leaks during the last year by for. C.I.A. post in 1977, said he was much that they had sharply curbed secret-shar-
r:er C.I A. officers, current Pentagon of-,, more concerned about the "erosion of thei ing, even on matters where the C.I.A.
f'ciais and current members of the Na-; environment" for protecting national-se- knew they had certain valuable inforrna.?
tonal Security Council and Congress had curity. information. He said the erosion tion.
prompted "friendly foreign intelligence l was caused by "leaks for policy-reasons"
1 by officials wishing to influence a course They dont say, We area t going to`
give you X
Y
Z
"' he said
1 of actio
"That is not
,.
,
,
.
n..
He said he was firmly opposed to "run- the way intelligence services work. But
e
_
"
we do know of information in the posser
nin? o
to
n
a
othe
which has usually been futi gi"'entoUS
le Instead, he ."
said,. the solution was.to reinstitute "a(ill Mr. Carlucci said he and his aides, as.I
deliberate leaks and accidental. disclo- "I am mildly optimistic that we can do
sures had prompted virtually every-intel- something about the Freedom of Infor-
w ith the C.I.A. to voice concern -during we can protectsecrets, he said:-
01e last eight months "about our abilityto' He said that he approved of the princi-
protect the information they give us.,- - pies embodied in the 1974 law making- it
possible to obtain Government docu-
"It isn't all one-sided," he said of the ments not protected by the-security ex-
foreign complaints, explaining that Brit- emptions. But he said the C.I.A. had to
ain, West-Germany and Australia-were commit 80to90employees tothepvocess-
developing ? freedom-of-information laws ing of such requests and received no
and were "trying to profit by our expert-l rextra funds for the purpose.
er:ce." -
But he went on to say that the gravity of i STAT I N T L
the disclosure problem, underlined byi
C.I.A. compliance with, about - 4,000 ? re-
quests a year under the information law,
could be. illustrated by a foreign intelli-
gence chief "who- told` me -he couldn't
cooperate as much as he'd. like, because
r 1 of the disclosure practice:'>;;:};
Covert Operative Identified
A visiting British intelligence-delega-
tion recently told American... authorities
they needed new assurances that their se-
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA=RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 rpro`bed For Release 2001/P7 ,,, QI I DP91-00901 R00.0100130001-5
ESSAY
The New-Boy Network
By William Safire wheeling intellectual and unthinkable-
thought man.
WASHINGTON, June 6 - Eighteen To add Congressional and press
months from now, a newly-elected savvy to the Special Coordinating
..President will be going over recom- Committee of Forty, we'll make Sena-
mendations to appoint a group of for- tor Jackson's aide, Richard Perle,
eign and defense policy professionals Deputy National Security Adviser,
who operate just below the top, who with Congressional staffer William
have grown up reading and criticizing Schneider and U.S.C.'s William Van
and helping each other, and who frame Cleave to be the SALT-shakers.
most of the far-reaching decisions That N.S.C. staff, which should once
made by the men in the limelight. = again become an exciting place to be,
The "new-boy network" will write would include Prof..Scott Thompson.-Of
tomorrow's option papers, turn the Tuft's Fletcher School; Kenneth Adel-
spigot for tomorrow's leaks,. deter- man of Stanford; Michael Ledeen of
mine the parameters for the top lead- the Georgetown Center, to handle Eu-
er's decisions- Like cartridges in a rope; Sven Kraemer, a Senate staffer,
clip,, when the order comes frorir the on global issues; RAND's Richard ("A
electorate to "lock and. load," these. Revolution is not ;a Dinner Party")
men will naturally be inserted into our." Solomon toughening our China policy,
national security system. in tandem with Penn 96ta. Prof. Par-
They know who they are; the ones ris Chang. Senator Sam Nunn's advis
chosen first will bring in the others. er, Jeff Record, would add Congress-
One network would be called to arms sional know-how and William Odom
by a soft-lining Kennedy Presidency; could be the holdover from the Brie-
a different set would be put in place by zinski era, as the new man's military
a Reagan, a Connally, or a Moynihan. aide. Richard Whalen would take over
Since they could determine our des for Jerrold Schecter as strategic om-
tiny, let's take a preliminary look at budsman.
them. Outside the White House"in a hard-
In a Kennedy White House (halde. line era, Cabinet officials like Don
manned by David Burke), many soft- Rumsfeld, Paul Nitie, Laurence Sil-
line. apparatchiks- would remain: berman, Robert Ellsworth and Thom-
David Aaron, Tony Lake, Richard Hol mas Reed, would look below to find
brooke, David McGiffert, Richard Martin Hoffman and Prof. Bing West
Moose (there goes Africa again) and . at key posts in Defense, with Seymour
Lynn Davis of PRM-10 fame. The Na- Weiss--an old Kissinger adversary -
tional Security Adviser. could be as Deputy Secretary of State. Jphn
.'Thomas Hughes of the Carnegie Foun- Connally's issues director, Sam Hos-
dation, John Steinbruner of Brookings, kinson, would be a likely choice for
Graham Allison of Harvard, or the Deputy Director. of Central Intelli-
present N.S.C.'s former Kennedy gence under C.I.A. chief William 3.
.staffer, Robert Hunter. Jan Kalicki,:.. Casey orwiry'Al Haig. -,
who now heads foreign policy for the 'But what if a dark horse flashes by
Kennedy shadow government, would the finish line first? If -it's Jerry
be placed near, but not at, the top.. Brown, the N.S.C. job could go to Jane
This soft-line network.would want ' Fonda, unless he opts for newly hard
an amenable hawk to be Deputy Secre-? line Joan Baez.
tarry of`Defense -'perhaps the Navy's,' ` ? If the ship of state corns ' in for
James Woolsey,. or non-Irish Philip.!- George Bush: or Howard Baker, the
Odeen. Jan Lodal would be a likely ac- Kissingerian network - stands a
tivist for the arras control agency, and chance: Hal Sonnenfeldt is adamant ? `
Toni Chayes is destined to be the first .' about remaining in private life, but
Democratic woman service chief, as Winston Lord would be a natural for a
Secretary of the Air Force. key post at State in a centrist network,
If the next President is a hard-liner .. and Brent. Scowcroft is available for
attuned to the Soviet global threat, the N.S.C.call.-William Hyland, who
five names spring to mind as potential knows where the bodies are buried, :.-
National Security Advisers: Harvard would be useful in any administration,
Prof. Richard Pipes, Deputy C.I.A. Di- and help mop up the memoirs later.
rector Frank Carlucti, and-three -.Is the existence of these "new-boy:
heavyweight strategists -John Leh- networks" -sinister? Quite the con...
roan, Edward Luttwak and Richard trary: after we decide on our Presi-
Allen. dent next year, there will be no long,,
Let's put Pipes in that slot, with Car- indecisive groping about for a way to
lucci as DEPSECDEF, Lehman as make and carry out policy. All that is
Navy Secretary (to save the nuclear needed is an articulated point of view,
carriers), Allen at the N.S.C. 'to re- a definite mental set, and a trumpet
vamp our intelligence and African that is not uncertain. With that long-
Appthe er'getownx center)~X t' Cthe osen -up teams 1 b44~0*30W -5
liant Luttwak as the. N.S.C.'s freed ground running.
.;..< ..,.. ;.. _ .:I
 04 FAGS 27 May-1979--
Can the American intelligence William, Ka
was: 'subse
tly
.
quen
network effectively monitor the Soviet convicted of treason and sentenced to 40
Union to, ensure' compliancewith years imprisonment.
strategic arms limitations agreements? "I'm unhappy that thej KH 11 manual
frank C. Carlucci, deputy director of. was furnished to the Soviet Union;"
the Central Intelligence Agency, Carlucci said, "and while it isserious. I
declined . to - provide that assurance ,wouldn't describe it as crippling." ,
during a news conference Saturday at-, The deputy director, made a similar
the Lake of the Ozarks.
,~ observation concerning the loss of the
I think the Senate will be impressed Iranian base. "Our;. monitoring
with the monitoring capability we capability is essentially. a network and
have,"'. said with reference to the loss of any one part reduces our.
the upcoming Senate hearings on the, confidence level," Carlucci said. "Whiled
Carter administration's proposed SALT it is a concern, it is not crippling." 11 treaty with the Soviet Union.
? Carlucci described',, strategic arms.
Carlucci, however, declined to discuss:. limitations agreements~ as "a process
any specifics, of: that monitoring _ leading to mutual restraints" and he
capability or its effectiveness. ~. The added, "all of us are, in..favor of limiting
deputy director- Was . visiting Mid ^' strategic arms."
Missouri:- during the Memorial Days Carlucci later' declined to- give an
weekend to speak before members of the opinion specifically, regarding the
Central Missouri Press Association proposed SALT' II accord. "Our people
"All we can do is tell the Senate in do not take a position," hesaid, "we're
closed sessions: how. we can monitor the not a policy:making part of the executive
Soviets and" how- we can detect branch.' %
cheating,''' Carlucci said. He added "it Asked his opinion of what would
would be inappropriate for someone in happen-to a CIA official who publicly
my position to express a personal point "opposed SALT II, Carlucci said, "if
of view. someone wanted to, express a personal
The deputy director said two recent view, he would have an obligation to
developments- the loss of. the CIA
monitoring base in Iran and the leak to re" hen a person goes- to work for the
the Soviet Union of a ton-secret manual CIA he accepts a certain : amount of
explaining the-, KH-11 U.S..' satellite discipline," Carlucci said' "A CIA-
system -'have "reduced the"confidence, without. discipline cannot be effective.."
level" of the monitoring network. Carlucci added, "this is not to say that
The KH-11 manual was stolen by a there is no ? dissent. within the
junior CIA employee and turned over to. organization." When questioned `about
the Soviet Union. The CIA employee, the frequency or nature of dissenting
opinions regarding SALT II, he said, "I
don't think it would be appropriate for
Carlucci also felt it inapproprigt:e to
comment on a number of other questions
put to him Saturday. He declined to
comment on the recent trade of captured
Soviet spies for Soviet dissidents and he
declined to discuss his view of retired
-~'miiitary officials who have publicly
opposed SALT Ih: ;
A native of Scranton, Pa., and a
former U.S. ambassador to Portugal,
Carlucci took office as deputy director of
the CIA in February of 1978.
He is z 1952 graduate of Princeton
University and he served as a lieutenant
junior grade in. the U.S. Navy before
'attending : Harvard Graduate School of
Business Administration.
Carlucci :has previously served- as
-under, secretary. of the federal
Department of Health, Education and
Welfare, deputy director of the Office of
Management and Budget, and assistant
director for operations, Office of
Economic Opportunity.
}
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
Intelligence tired.
Frank C. Carlucci, deputy director of
the Central Intelligence Agency,
responds to a question during a
Saturday news conference held at the
Lake- of the Ozarks: Carlucci, who
visited Mid-MissourV -during the
Memorial Day weekend to speak to
members of the Central Missouri
Press Association, discussed the role
of the intelligence network in
monitoring strategic arms limitations
agreements with the Soviet Union:
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 Approved-For elease 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-
0`i
27 .ay 1979
Betty Beale
It was the kind of diplomatic dinner
that embassy hostesses strive for. It
was awash with figures that give
Washington soirees a certain eclat. It
abounded with political observations
and recollections as every proper
Capital dinner should.
It was Moroccan Ambassador and
Mrs. Bengelloun's party for Washing-
ton Star Editor and Mrs. Murray Gart
and it drew,-among others, the chief
justice of the United States and the
Senate's most powerful member (at
least next to the majority leader) Rus-
sell Long.- two-men who rarely sally
forth for mid-week, black-tie socializ-
ing. Another rarity on the party circuit- -
was the CIA's deputy director Frank
Carlucci and his wife. Frank admitted
he knows where the Shah of Iran is .
going to live but wouldn't sav.
STRATI NTL
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 Approved For ReleaTcHN0 N W): M *C&91-00901 R0001 00130001-5
(CENTRAL MISSOURI PRESS ASSOCIATION)
25 May 1979
Deputy CIA Director
To Give Keynote Talk
Frank C. Car-
lucci, deputy di-
rector of the
United States
Central Intelli-
gence Agency,
will be the key-
note speaker at
the 54th annual
convention of the
Central Missouri
Press Association
Saturday evening, May 26, at
Kirkwood Lodge on the Lake of the
Ozarks.
Carlucci's address is scheduled for 8
p.m. Saturday in the Kirkwood Lodge
Terrace Room.
Carlucci was sworn in as deputy
director of the CIA on Feb. 10, 1978.
A native of Scranton, Penn.,
Carlucci graduated from Princeton
University in 1952. He served as a
lieutenant (junior grade) in the U.S.
Navy from 1952 and 1954 and
following his military service attended'
the Harvard Graduate School ofi
Businesses Administration (1954-55).
He joined. the U.S. Foreign Service
in 1958
From 1969 to 1970, Carlucci served
as assistant director for operat;,,-h
Office of Economic Opportunity, anti
from January to September 1971 as
director of OEO. In 1971, he was
appointed associate director of the
Office of Management and Budget,
followed by his appointment as deputy
director. From 1972 to 1974, he served
as under -secretary of the Department
of Health, Education and Welfare.
Carlucci was appointed United
States ambassador to Portugal in
December, 1974, and. served in that
position for three years. He is a career
minister in the U.S. Foreign Service.
Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000100130001-5
 Approved For Release 2001/07/27 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R0001 00
WILMINGTON SUNDAY NEWS
Article appeared 20 May 1979
on page A-1, 8
By JOE TRENTO . $18D-a-day Consulthf . jnb for the
and RICHARD SANDZA &agency;
.,, , . ernard ' Fensterwaid,Srs.
Two life insurance companies ,.-paisley's, attorney, ..said tie . Ac' refusing to pay John A. Pais- I }''counting job "just doesn't add'tip
ley's widow $200,000 in death bene- J;He couldn't even balance his own
fits because they, are not con- _~!checkbook."
vinced the former top CIA official '-Said,Vyscocilof Mutual of.New
is dead.-.::' York, "It is not clear who he was
.A body , pulled from the Cliesa-, , working for when he came under
peake Bay last Oct. 1 was our coverage." An Investigator for
Identified as Paisley by the Mary the company went further, "We
.land state medical examiner, with have a hunch Paisley is not only
the help of-the FBI. Both ithtuai alive but being held ...Nothing
Life Insurance Co. of New York adds up here.
(MONY) and Mutual of Omaha Said Tondell of Mutual of
think otherwise: ::u? Omaha, "It is an unusual case, to
"There is no evidence Mr. Pais. put .it mildly. Our investigators
ley is dead,''.:said Jerry. VY scocl, are working on it."
an assistance vice, president of United Mutual of Omaha, the
group claims at INiONY ? division that handled the Paiseiy
.",'There is- no convincing evf claim, has sent its investigators to
de" nce Mr. Paisley is dead,'. eeho=: review police reports and has been
ed Len Tondell,- a.spokesrnan for: in contact with the Senate Intelli-'
Mutual of Omaha,, 'We consider'
onsider ~gence. Committee, according to a
this a false death claim.` :.: .:(' , ~?; { source in the company,
Each company holds a $100,004;
policy in Paisley's name, with his! The Senate committee also is not
widow; Mary Anil, a? the benefici-I convinced it knows all the facts
ary.Mrs. Paisley;-from whom he about either Paisley's role with
was .estranged,. Was. herself. not the agency or his disappearance.
convinced that the body in the bay The committee is continuing its,
was her husband's and hired:,an own probe after expressing dissat-E
attorney. and?a private.nVestiga- isfaction with ? a Justice
tar to determine the facts Department probe.
Paisley, 55;* had begin servring as A -body, weighted with divan,
de uty-.director. of strateggic.;~re.; weights, and with a billet wound
'search for the Central Intelligence behind the left ear, was fished
Agency,.when die officially, retired from the bay in October. It was
fn 1974. {.. identified by Dr. Russell K. Fish-
er, the Maryland state medical
After hisempty' boat was found examiner, from fingerprints sup-
in the bay, and after the body later plied ? by the FBI and from an
'ideniihed s hiswas found ti.week~ upper dental plate.
later, the CIA.claimed he had been-]
retired. fronyfalow-bevel analyst's'; The prints, the News-Journal
job, for'selret?al'.years rand :was later learned, had been mailed in
.working; for; Coopers &!-Lybrand, nearly 40 years earlier to the FBI;
the world'>-,~.largest :-`accounting office in Phoenix, Ariz., by al
firm "Jack Paisley." No later prints i
Paisley; was~,cove'red'; under;. were allegedly found. And the den-
MONY grouph?hinsurance - polic fist who identified the teeth said;
Maryland State Police listed the,
cause of death as of "unknown
determination" but decided Pais-,ley had probably committed sui-
cide.
0 `
In the June 11 issue of L ok maga
zinc, Betty Myers, a woman who
.said she had had a "liaison" with;
Paisley for more thati'a year be-i
fore his death, said she had.tapes
made by Paisley aboard his sloop)
,Brilling in which he discussed his
unhappiness with life.:. t. _..i
Paisley's job with Coopers, & Ly-~
brand is being investigated by: the
insurance companies and by thei
intelligence committee. The;
News-Journal has 'learned that;
Paisley was assessing for the CIA'
the impact of the United States"
loss of satellite secrets to the Sovi-
et Union while he was supposedly
working for the accounting firm.
.The Senate committee is looking:
at the apparent close links be-!
tween Coopers & Lybrand and the
Central Intelligence Agency. Pais-,
ley's immediate boss,.K. Wayne;
Smith, once had the resppoonsibility {
of concealing CIA spending in the'
Defense Department budget, -ac-i
cording to department sources.
Philip A. Odeen, , partner iii!
charge of the accounting firm, I
was a staff official of the National. !
Security Council during the Nixon
administration: Marcia: Carlucci,
wife of the present deputy director
of the CIA, is manager of the spe-
cial projects division of Coopers &
Lybrand's Washington office. ~,.
A spokesman for Coopers & Ly-
brand In New York said, "ou,r of-.
flees are run on an individual
basis. We are not aware of any ar-
rangement" with the CIA. Smith,
wlth; Coo rs.