ERV SESSION PROCEDURE REPORT. NICKNAME: OTHER A . SESSION NUMBER: 01, 02, 03. SOURCE IDENTIFIER: 101

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP96-00789R001900250002-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 23, 2002
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 2, 1986
Content Type: 
REQ
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP96-00789R001900250002-3.pdf70.43 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2002/11/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900250002-3 4 /NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY PROJECT SUN STREAK (U) ERV SESSION PROCEDURE REPORT WARNING NOTICE: INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED CONTROL NUMBER: NICKNAME: Other "A" DATE OF SESSION: REFERENCES: None 2-6 Jun 86 TARGET COUNTRY: Unknown g SESSION NUMBER: O1, 02, GS 03 DATE OF REPORT: 31 Jul 86 MISSION STATUS: Initial/complete TECHNIQUE UTILIZED: ERV SOURCE IDENTIFIER: 101 1. ( ) TASKING: Initially the interviewer was provided a 3x5 card on which the following tasking was typed: ures and purpose of the structures at (coordinate) In the two Subsequent sessions the interviewer was provided further verbal tasking and directions~,`i.e., " site is accurate but focus attention on tunnel and rocket device, additional emphasis on purpose of rocket device and relation to site." Throughout sessions the interviewer was never told the exact nature of the site, its key facilities nor its mission. In the initial session, the Source was simply given the coordinates of the site, (encrypted to preclude inadvertent geographic cueing as per Eytended Remote Viewing(ERV) protocols). In subsequent sessions, Source was again provided the coordinates and a general synopsis of previously reported data. No additional specific tasking emphasis or intentional cueing was provided to Source. 2. ( ) SESSION: During the initial session, Source took a "joyride" to an unspecified site whose descriptive. data did not coincide with the known data on the site. Source was retargeted, (coordinates repeated) and successfully acquired the site. In subsequent sessions Source was encourage to initially take a "joy ride" to a'site of his choosing, (later to be designated !'Sanctuary") and from that site, at the direction of the interviewer, he was to move to the target. This technique appeared to eliminate inadvertent reporting on non-related targets and was enjoyable to the Source, therefore, he use of "Sanctuary" targetting will continue on a trial basis to A ermine Lts affect on the Source's success rate. I p ( ) SUMMARY: The following is compilation of the raw and unevaluated data provided by Source during the total of three sessions conducted on this target. a. ( ) A fenced complex of buildings and facilities with a feeling of military involvement. There are numerous scientists and technicians working at the site. Some areas of the site are above ground, (buili jngs and related facilities), while other areas are undera ournd or at least partially under- ground. Mnay of the buildings appear to be abandoned completely including one building (next to a railroad track) which may have once been a depot. This building oriedtR )Re9 a d()Og 1/gei?MFA*Dpg 9FtWlg6M50U 8t of