BIBLIOGRAPHIC PROJECT REPORT (ATTACHED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00780R000200120057-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 20, 2002
Sequence Number: 
57
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 11, 1962
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00780R000200120057-7.pdf338.23 KB
Body: 
Ap Ap ?SENDER WILL CHECK CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTO ov 9Sq?pQ c rruwmf CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP TO NAME AND ADDRESS INITIALS DATE 1 DD/S, 7D18 Hdqtrs. 2 C/ADPS, 810 1016 16th St. 3 4 5 6 ACTION DIRECT, REPLY PREPARE REPLY APPROVAL DISPATCH RECOMMENDATION COMMENT FILE RETURN CONCURRENCE X INFORMATION SIGNATURE Remarks : Red - I think you'll be interested in this report; it is for your information. It reacts to OCR request (via Project CHIVE) for recommendations on how to mechanize the products of their soviet literature exploitation projects (funded at the Library of Congress). In my view it's a good EDP job. Even more important, however, is the fact that it surfaced the existence of several DD/I projects which overlap each other. I sent= a copy of the report and asked him to zero-in on the duplication. There are FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. DATE 814 1016 16th St. 2 Jan 63 rov4d W 6 9&E2OO 04/ 9 MA1RQM4JQOJ8RR 0 I1'PO FM N Replaces For I A R 55 237 which may b used (40) U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1955-0-342531 Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-0078OR000200120057-7 money savings possible here provided we use the right kind of gentle persuasion. =and I intend to pursue this within the DD/I. Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-0078OR000200120057-7 Approved For Release 2003/04/2 F.CEDP84-00780R000I 4'2b'v5 -7 61O 11 December 162 Assistant Director, OCR Bibliographic Project Report (Attached) 1. Attached is the study report on the BR Bibliographic Project. 2. The report : a. concludes that BR's bibliographic file is of rea). value and merits both continuation and improvement; b. outlines a possible IMP system to handle bibliographic data end proposes an interim system to move us to rds the proper ultiia,te system; c. defines the steps to be taken if the proposed interim system meets with approval. 3. After you have had an opportunity to study this report, I would propose a diocussion session at which: a. OCR's general cents on the peer and OCR'S general views of the problem would be presented; b. aspects of the report 'would be clarified, as may be required; c. alternative courses of action would be defined and reviewed, including what appears to be the minimum course of action; to wit : (1) that CIA and Air Force coordinate their LC con- tracting actions for next year; (2) that the bibliographic data required by CIA be captured in machine language henceforth at the source (w)# r"~ 6ROOP t ~~ Excluded from automatic doa;ngrading and Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000200120057-7 deciassl{czcion Approved For Release 2003/04/2SEC"P84-00780R000200120057-7 (3) that AID undertake to produce autos aticarlly for OCR 5 x 8 bibliog'aph1c cards from Project CROSS CIF p #r t a if duplicate coverage of the CIA and. Air ftree contracts is eliminated and yet sepaxate contracts continue. 25X1 Attachment CIA Automatic Data Processing Staff Bibliographic Project report ' 3 10 SS IIW .23 Approved For Release 2003/04/29SOMPP84-00780R000200120057-7 Approved For Release 2003/04/29. B P84-00780R000200120057-7 11 December 1962 MEWRANDUM FOR, Chief, Automatic Data Processing Staff SUBJECT t EDP Study of BR Bibliographic Project Purpose of Study Last April OCR asked us to undertake a study of its scientific literature exploitation program at the Library of Congress with a view to determining the desirability of providing machine support to this OCR project. More specifically, we agreed that the study would' a. Provide some evaluation of the worth of continuing this activity; b. Determine the advantages to be gained from attempting to coor- dinate the program with the Air force's Project Cross Check; c. Suggest a general design for an automated system if such appears merited; d. Recommend future action. V22Rd We. rriet Meadow of IBM and I have spent approximately twenty-five per cent of our time over the past six months examining operations at the Library of Congress and Biographic Register, consulting with the Air Force personnel at the Aerospace Information Division of the Library of Congress and Foreign Technology Division, WPAFB Ohio, and performing system analysis and design. of the Biographic Register/OCR has monitored our study throughout this period and participated in the interagency discussions and meetings per- taining thereto. The attached report is a compendium of our findings. Study Conclusions Some of the principal conclusions reached in the paper are as follows' a. Scientific literature continues to be a significant source of intelligence information on the closed societies of the Bloc countries. b. Neither "analyst files" nor commercial bibliographies, indexes, and other available research tools (including those issued by the Bloc itself) answer the intelligence officer's needs for a cumu- lated, many-faceted, multi-subject index to the literature of a Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-00780R0002001f20057-7 ,SECRET 25X1 25X1 1 Approved For Release 2003/0jMRDP84-00780R000200120057-7 given bloc country. OCR's Bibliographic Project, and the more subject-limited Cross Cheek Project and OSI contract operations at the Department of Agriculture and National Library of Medicine, are attempts to fill this gap. c. The Bibliographic Project, like most intelligence activities, is difficult to assess in terms of dollar value. The problem is exaggerated in the present instance by the absence of certain vital statistics on file queries and by imperfect understanding of users' requirements, especially as to scope of coverage (including country as well as specific publication), indexing depth and content, and priorities that should be applied thereto. While evidence exists that the Project files N.4 being used to support the intelligence analyst both directly and indirectly, more exact information is needed. d. If the Bibliographic Project is to continue its operations at the present level each longer, it must automate. Not only is the present system expensive in terms of space and personnel required to operate the system, its continued growth renders it increasingly leas responsive to the demands levied upon it. e. An interim rather than a fully automated system is recommended for the Project for the near term. Such a system would lessen some of the current record-handling problems and, at the same time, permit additional studies to be undertaken of problems peculiar to the final Bibliographic File design as well as to the place of such a file in any future DD/I information system. Is lementation Both the attached systems study, as well as this covering memorandum, are addressed primarily to the goal side of automating OCR's literature control file. Whether action can or should be taken now to implement any of those technical recommendations is a matter for ADDS and OCR to determine, preferably in concert, following suitable con- sideration of staffing and budgetary problems as well as other external factors. In any event, before even the interim system can become operational, the tanks summarized below must be planned and carried out. Of those listed, the first three can be performed more or less simul- taneously; the remainder should be undertaken in the order given. Usk I z Determine through a ctua_l men, twhat the t obable input cast -r r,,; tills will ,ig under an automat,, system. i This experiment should be performed at the Library of Congress. ADPS should design and administer the test, provide the tape-producing typewriter, and investigate the advantage of an optical scanner over potential punched paper Approved For Rele "oft 01/29 &TAIM"-086MDIIZ00'fZDO '-TonPr our mon 0 Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000200120057-7 uti,tUtina owe Bib] iggainhg File. s ADS should specify the figures to be collected. OCR should compile same over1a period of time not to exceed that required for completion of Mjak . &irsey OSI to determla specific user roc e manta as to title covers ,,. a content, and index. detail. gggNW& ADPS should collect this information in the course of its ongoing CHM survey of the HD/I= the 031 portion of which should be completed by January 1963. 7 n,; c de s g$ of interim a stem. including to be ed, .. . reap rd L2=1- and d seen. _.._ mUW to be usod for cemrer doc=gnts to 2 , 'E lanowro. ADPB should perform most of this system design. 8owev.r, OCR assistance should be given in some areas, principally that of develop- ing an organization (facility) index. The time required for completion of ,this stop should not exceed three months. Usk 5: Oondual gotiations with the Lib _..of nsress. and the Air,or_ ea reg&rjj&?a management of the =9" A fort. s Single management of the AP and CIA literature exploitation programs has been recommended by the study team and the Air Force has given signs of being amenable thereto. Nowever, the Library of Congress' attitude is unknown. OCR should represent CIA in these negotiations using ADPS for technical advice as required, Writs end d.txi outer nro rams required to carry 2U& the nogeagary a chine processing. Gomment: ADDS should write & debug the required Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-00780R000200120057-7 Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-0078OR000200120057-7 -4- computer programs. Four months is a rough estimate of the time needed to eomplete this task. 25X'1 ADT?S/Intel/ (Dec 12 62) Approved For Release 2003/04/29 : CIA-RDP84-0078OR000200120057-7