FITNESS REPORT - BARNARD, EDWARD T.

• Document Type: FOIA
• Keywords: PERSONNEL FILES
• Keywords: BARNARD EDWARD T
• Collection: FOIA Collection
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 0001459643
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: June 22, 2015
• Document Release Date: April 17, 2008
• Case Number: F-2007-01040
• Publication Date: June 17, 1960

SECJ
69,
(b) (1)
(b) (3)
fl~ (S)
EMPLOYEE SERIAL NUMBER
tTNESS REPORT
SECTION A GENERAL
1. NAME (Last) (First) (Middle)
2. DATE OF BIRTH
3. SEX 4
. GRADE
BARNARD Edward T.
1910
M
GS-14
5. SERVICE DESIGNATION
6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE
7. OFF/DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT
OC
1. 0. (Contact)
00/CD/New York
S. CAREER STAFF STATUS
S. TYPE OF REPORT
NOT ELIGIBLE
X
MEMBER
DEFERRED
INITIAL
REASSIGNMENT/SUPERVISOR
PENDING
DECLINED
DENIED
X
ANNUAL
REASSIGNMENT/EMPLOYEE
10. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.
I I. REPORTING PERIOD
T'
SPECIAL (Specify)
31 May 1960
From Mar 59 - Mar 60
SECTION B EVALUATION OF PERFORM
ANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES
List up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. insert rating number which best describes the
h
d
All
ff
,
f
f
l
emp
oyees
ectiveness in
per
ormance o
t
at
uty.
manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY e
with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).
1 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Barely adequate 3 - Acceptable
4 - Competent S - Excellent 6 - Superior 7 - Outstanding
SPECIFIC DUTY NO.
RATING
SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4 Prepares intelligence R
ATING
Represents the New York ce
NO.
information reports, memoranda, and
No.
.6
commie cations supporting his
6
o ration .
SPECIFIC DUTY NO.2Establishes and maintains
RATING
SPECIFIC DUTY NO.-5 Takes actionon cases R
ATING
domestic contact with non-governmental
NO.
requiring intelligence or operational
NO.
organizations and individuals to colle
t
support for other elements of the
6
intelligence i33formatl
n, ovide
6
a
o
oper
Agency.
SPECIFIC DUTY NO. Briefs, debriefs, and
RATING
SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6 R
A
TING
generally exploits for information
N
US domestic sources in response to
5
5
specific requests or sntaneousl .
SECTION C EVALUATION OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION
Take into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position - performance of specific
duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, particular limitations or talents. Based on
your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the rating number in the box corresponding to the
statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.
1 - Performance in many important respects fails to meet requirements.
RATING
2 Performance meets most requirements but is deficient in one or more important respects.
NO.
3,- Performance clearly meets basic requirements.
4- Performance clearly exceeds basic requirements.
5
5 - Performance in every important respect is superior.
6 - Performance in every respect is outstanding.
SECTION D DESCRIPTION OF THE EMPLOYEE
In the rating boxes below, check (X) the degree to which each charocteristic'opplies to the employee -
1 - Least possible degree 2 - Limited degree 3 - Normal degree 4 - Above average degree 5 -Outstanding degree
CHARA
T
S
NOT
P
-
NOT
O
RATING
C
ERI
TICS
AP
LI
CABLE
B-
SERVED
1
2
3.
4
5
GETS THINGS DONE
X
RESOURCEFUL
X
ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITIES
X
CAN MAKE DECISIONS-ON .HIS OWN WHEN NEED ARISES
X
DOES HIS JOB WITHOUT STRONG SUPPORT .. -. ..
~-
X
FACILITATES SMOOTH OPERATION OF HIS OFFICE
X
WRITES EFFECTIVELY
X
SECURITY CONSCIOUS
X
THINKS CLEARLY
DISCIPLINE IN ORIGINATING, MAINTAINING AND DISPOSING OF RECORDS
X
OTHER (Specify):
SEE SECTION 'E' ON REVERSE SIDE
FORM
6-58 45 OBSOLETE PREVIOUS EDITIONS.
APPROVED FOR RELEASE
DATE: FEB 2008
 SEC
SECTION E NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB P E
Stress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position. Indicate suggestion s ma e o ovement of his
work. Give recommendations for his training. Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assuming greater re-
sponsibilities. Amplify or explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the best basis for determining
future personnel actions.
ti
ng
This experienced individual is highly competent psen
the Agency and this office in his area. He performs his ies wi - enthusiasm
and dedication, and continues to demonstrate his skill as a*]anded contact
intelligence officer.
No observable weaknesses.
As reported previously, the interests of this individual as well as his capabilities
are strongly directed toward operational activities and responsibilities, which tends
to diminish his interest in administration. However, he has the potential for direct
ing the operations activities of others and should be given consideration for a
position of such responsibility. For the next 3-4+ years he would prefer to remain in
his present area of assignment, unless an urgent need arose for his services elsewhere.
Operational training is recommended.
SECTION, F CERTIFICATION AND.'COMMENTS
BY EMPLOYEE
1 certify that 1 have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.
?DA-T-E----' ... ~. .. ... ..,
.SIGNATURE OF-EMPLOYEE _?.--.
BY SUPERVISOR.
MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN.,..
UNDER MY SUPERVISION
IF ?THIS REPORT HA-SNOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION . ,.
Employee on military-leave Will be- shown to -him on his next
32
`
visit to New York, 7 July 1960..
...,.. .. .! .... ,? .. -.. IF.-REPORT IS NOT BEING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE REASON_
EMPLOYEE UNDER -MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN 90 DAYS REPORT MADE WIT,H.IN LAST.90.DAYS.
OTHER (Specify):
DATE
OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR
TYPED OR PRINTED
15 June 1960
CHIEF, NEW YORK OFFICE
3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL
I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE..ABOUT THE. SAME EVALUATION.
I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A HIGHER EVALUATION.
I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.
I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS. I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE.
COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL
DATE
OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL
TYPED OR PRINTED NAM,
17 June 1960
Chief, Contact Division